A judge just blew up Apple’s control of the App Store (www.theverge.com)
from cm0002@lemmy.world to apple_enthusiast@lemmy.world on 01 May 02:12
https://lemmy.world/post/28935673

#apple_enthusiast

threaded - newest

neon_nova@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 01 May 04:23 next collapse

I’m pretty anti-Apple, so my question is just to have a better understanding of what this means.

So does this mean, we will see a bunch of free apps that direct you to purchase a subscription or license on their website to unlock the app?

cm0002@lemmy.world on 01 May 05:05 collapse

Essentially now app devs/companies can have a pop-up for in-app purchases that directs a user to their own payment processors/portals where they don’t have to pay the “Apple tax” and they’ll be able to inform their users as such and even offer their payment method cheaper and/or you get more

Before this ruling, a previous ruling against Apple forbade them from forbidding third-party payment processing in the apps at all as they had since the App stores inception. So Apple followed the exact letter of the order and still “collected” the “Apple Tax” and set rules on the message the pop-up could have.

Now this ruling nixed their “work around”, and I’d say the judge is rather pissed, hence the “effective immediately”

flop_leash_973@lemmy.world on 03 May 20:47 collapse

Personally, I don’t want multiple app stores specifically. I just want to be able to install IPA’s from Github or where ever like I can on Android.