Nobody is saying it’s going to run well on the entire range of hardware but in terms of performance GPUs in Pro and Max versions of their SoCs are closer to a discrete GPU than something integrated.
Benchmarks I’m seeing has it at about 1/2 what a 4060 can do… (at least according to 3dmark, which is a pretty good indication of game performance.) And a 4060 can barely run cp2077 at 60fps at 1080p.
M3 gfx is still way better than intel integrated, but I don’t think it’ll drive CP2077 at 60 fps. it’s pretty close to the AMD integrated stuff, though… and I get 30-40 fps on my AMD lappy. So maybe the m3 can do about the same. I wouldn’t call it unplayable, but it does kinda feel like a size 12 foot in a size 8 shoe.
threaded - newest
Sweet, always great to have more games on Mac.
I love seeing more hardware competition!
why not vision pro?
How? I thought mac GPU was just an integrated… a GOOD integrated, sure, but not enough to push CP2077 at 60fps.
Nobody is saying it’s going to run well on the entire range of hardware but in terms of performance GPUs in Pro and Max versions of their SoCs are closer to a discrete GPU than something integrated.
The m3 pro 18 core GPU is comparable with an 4060 laptop gpu. To be honest, I don’t know how much cyberpunk needs.
Benchmarks I’m seeing has it at about 1/2 what a 4060 can do… (at least according to 3dmark, which is a pretty good indication of game performance.) And a 4060 can barely run cp2077 at 60fps at 1080p.
M3 gfx is still way better than intel integrated, but I don’t think it’ll drive CP2077 at 60 fps. it’s pretty close to the AMD integrated stuff, though… and I get 30-40 fps on my AMD lappy. So maybe the m3 can do about the same. I wouldn’t call it unplayable, but it does kinda feel like a size 12 foot in a size 8 shoe.