8 ancient Roman shoes of 'exceptional size' discovered at Roman fort near Hadrian's Wall (www.livescience.com)
from throws_lemy@lemmy.nz to archaeology@mander.xyz on 03 Jul 02:37
https://lemmy.nz/post/25040226

Archaeologists excavating a Roman-era fort in northern England have unearthed several enormous ancient leather soles that measure more than 11.8 inches (30 centimeters) long.

The finds add to the archaeologists’ growing collection of supersized ancient footwear found at the ancient fort, known as Magna. The researchers now have eight of these extra-extra-large shoes — a quarter of the total found at the site.

The shoes were discovered at Magna — also known as Carvoran — a fort along Hadrian’s Wall, which was built around A.D. 122 to demarcate the northern extent of the Roman Empire. Magna is situated about 7 miles (11 kilometers) west of Vindolanda, the large Roman auxiliary fort that’s well known for the remarkable preservation of writing tablets, military medals and leather shoes.

#archaeology

threaded - newest

Whirling_Ashandarei@lemmy.world on 03 Jul 02:57 next collapse

Giants were real, there is NO POSSIBLE OTHER EXPLANATION!!!1!

fucking /s bc internet

ogmios@sh.itjust.works on 03 Jul 04:17 next collapse

Or, if you wanted to be more inquisitive rather than sarcastic, you might consider the origins of the word.

bear@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 03 Jul 06:26 collapse

The article says they are basketball player sized.

Maybe they were sending really big soldiers to the front. This is near the peak of the Roman empire, which spanned multiple continents and had over 100 million people.

Zos_Kia@lemmynsfw.com on 03 Jul 11:37 collapse

Romans were (justifiably) terrified of Picts and Caledonians who were tall, strong, and very barbaric in appearance. It makes sense that they’d send their beefcakes up there to sort of even out the odds.

Redfox8@mander.xyz on 03 Jul 21:17 collapse

‘Barbaric’. A Roman word, possibly from the Romans saying about foreigners, along the lines of, “they were all like, “ba ba ba ba ba”, I couldn’t understand a thing they were saying”. “They’re ba ba barians! What do you expect”.

So being a ‘Barbarian’ is not about vicious behaviour, rather simply being a foreigner to Romans casts a person as being called that. It’s essentially rascism.

Source: Terry Jones’ Barbarians

I even found link to the whole book! archive.org/details/terryjonesbarbar00jone

And yes, they were terrified of them, in large part because Rome was well and truly sacked! (Can’t remember who by now). An act that ironically spurred the creation of the famous Roman empire.

wetbeardhairs@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 03 Jul 03:03 next collapse

You know what they say about Romans with big feet…

Gorram_Reavers@lemmy.world on 03 Jul 03:07 next collapse

Big shoes

boydster@sh.itjust.works on 03 Jul 03:30 collapse

To Romans, roads were but narrow foot trails.

otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 03 Jul 12:14 collapse

Peens like grapes?

AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world on 03 Jul 03:16 next collapse

Ancestors of Maximinus Thrax?

red_bull_of_juarez@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 03 Jul 03:25 collapse

Biggus Footus?

Vince@lemmy.world on 03 Jul 03:25 next collapse

Biggus Dickus?

Hello_there@fedia.io on 03 Jul 03:40 next collapse

This must be just a setup to a historic big dick joke.
https://www.livescience.com/roman-penis-graffiti-stone-uk

Redfox8@mander.xyz on 03 Jul 20:56 collapse

What are you all laughing about?? Stop it at once!!!

Rocketpoweredgorilla@lemmy.ca on 03 Jul 03:28 next collapse

I wonder if they were some form of “outerwear” that you would wear over your normal footwear in the cold.

Davel23@fedia.io on 03 Jul 04:00 next collapse

RSOESes? I don't think they exist.

shalafi@lemmy.world on 03 Jul 04:07 next collapse

How is this a big (heh) deal? I wear an 8.5 shoe and my feet are 10". If I measured my boots, they would be close enough to having 12" soles.

Cypher@lemmy.world on 03 Jul 04:12 collapse

Nutrition was harder to come by and people were generally shorter, these are notable for being very large shoes for the time period.

Pilferjinx@lemmy.world on 03 Jul 08:39 collapse

That’s a great point. Was there an elite royal guard situation around that time they bred and fed well?

idiomaddict@lemmy.world on 03 Jul 06:21 next collapse

11.8 inches. Damn, that’s almost a foot!

Treczoks@lemmy.world on 03 Jul 09:40 next collapse

OK, 11.8 inches, that is 29.972cm or 45.41 Paris Stiches, i.e. European size 45. That’s big, yes, but is it really that extraordinary?

Given that overall size and shoe size are roughly correlated, maybe they just had a kind of “elite group” of large warriers to intimidate the Picts? Or maybe one large guy, high enough in the ranks to be able to afford more than a single pair of Caligae?

otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 03 Jul 12:15 next collapse

And here I thought one Caligula was too many.

m0darn@lemmy.ca on 05 Jul 14:57 collapse

My guess is that they were sized to fit over extra thick foot wraps.

Treczoks@lemmy.world on 05 Jul 16:18 collapse

That, too. I mean, in the end they are caligae, sandals. Not exactly the stuff you’ll usually wear up at Hadrians Wall, especially during the winter. So wrapping a lambs fur around the feet will take the shoe European size 45 down to feet European size 40 to 42.

Commiejones@lemmygrad.ml on 03 Jul 09:51 next collapse

Romans had a troop of clowns at Hadrian’s wall.

dunz@feddit.nu on 03 Jul 10:39 next collapse

It’s not that big? My shoes are one EU size larger, and just small enough that I don’t have to order specialty shoes. That starts at 47 and above. 46 are usually made for most models

teolan@lemmy.world on 03 Jul 12:45 collapse

Possibly very big at the time. Over the course of the last century we have grown a lot and the average height is much higher because we’re eating much more. I suppose feet size have also increased.

SteposVenzny@beehaw.org on 03 Jul 11:12 next collapse

Why these feet were nearly a foot long!

otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 03 Jul 12:13 collapse

Oh, poor chivalrous giant, ηΩδΩρ. Always the gentleman, getting the door since way back.