Bizarre armor from Mycenaean Greece turns out to have been effective (arstechnica.com)
from fossilesque@mander.xyz to archaeology@mander.xyz on 01 Jun 2024 12:06
https://mander.xyz/post/13682709

#archaeology

threaded - newest

autotldr@lemmings.world on 01 Jun 2024 12:10 next collapse

This is the best summary I could come up with:


It took over a decade of research, elaborate numerical models, and 13 Greek marines fighting in it from dawn till dusk to prove it was surprisingly good at its job, despite its odd appearance.

“This made the Mycenaean warriors some of the best equipped in the Eastern Mediterranean in the Late Bronze Age,” says professor Andreas Flouris, a researcher at the University of Thessaly, who led the study.

This wasn’t just the product of hunches or bias; warriors were prominently featured in the Mycenaean art with numerous depictions showing their helmets, swords, spears, bows, and arrows in great detail.

“The doubts about the Dendra armor’s purpose—whether it was battle-worthy or purely ceremonial—rose from a combination of its physical characteristics, the context in which it was found, and interpretations of historical texts,” says Wardle.

Among all the embellishments added to boost The Illiad’s epicness, it describes things like the daily activities and maneuvers of the Greek army, and those seem to be in line with realities of late Bronze Age warfare, according to Flouris’ team.

Still, using Homer’s works as a source of knowledge about military operations was a bit like reconstructing modern warfare’s practicalities based on Rambo movies.


The original article contains 700 words, the summary contains 198 words. Saved 72%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

Reverendender@sh.itjust.works on 01 Jun 2024 12:21 next collapse

I mean, it’s silly, but it looks pretty effective

givesomefucks@lemmy.world on 01 Jun 2024 12:41 collapse

It doesn’t even look that silly.

I immediately pictured Nandor the Relentless…

But like, we know from writings they had plate armor, we know from paintings this is what it looked like, it’s just archeologists insisted it wasn’t used because most soldiers weren’t buried with functional sets.

It’s like 5,000 years from now people saying we didn’t have tanks because no soldiers were buried with a tank.

A fighter in this armor at this time, was essentially that. A fucking tank.

And most military members don’t own their own personal tank.

This example, is because for whatever reason, one did back then. Probably more likely to be some incredibly rich ruler who would attend battle sites while in the best possible armor, but wasn’t ever going to swing a sword while wearing it.

If a normal soldier died wearing this, the government would repair the armor and issue it to a new soldier.

ChicoSuave@lemmy.world on 01 Jun 2024 15:11 next collapse

That one guy buried with a tank was the Mycenean Prighozhin. Richer than sense.

PainInTheAES@lemmy.world on 01 Jun 2024 15:47 collapse

Burry me with my ERA

AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world on 01 Jun 2024 16:29 collapse

we know from paintings this is what it looked like

Do we, though? The article says “warriors were prominently featured in the Mycenaean art with numerous depictions showing their helmets, swords, spears, bows, and arrows in great detail. Armors, however, were mysteriously absent.”

Flyberius@hexbear.net on 01 Jun 2024 12:39 next collapse

The armour looks super cool

maculata@aussie.zone on 01 Jun 2024 15:52 next collapse

The stripey hat confused the attackers who thought it was a giant bee, and got scared.

D61@hexbear.net on 01 Jun 2024 19:52 next collapse

When the gnome asked for “Full Plate Armor” and we made do with what we had…

Bookmeat@lemmy.world on 01 Jun 2024 16:14 next collapse

Bizarmour!

Stamau123@lemmy.world on 01 Jun 2024 17:04 collapse

It pretty much looks like extended riot armor, of course it would work well