The nation’s best hackers found vulnerabilities in voting machines — but no time to fix them
(www.politico.com)
from BrikoX@lemmy.zip to cybersecurity@sh.itjust.works on 14 Aug 2024 13:21
https://lemmy.zip/post/20901347
from BrikoX@lemmy.zip to cybersecurity@sh.itjust.works on 14 Aug 2024 13:21
https://lemmy.zip/post/20901347
Organizers and participants at the DEF CON Voting Village found cyber vulnerabilities in everything from voting machines to e-poll books, but there is no time before the November elections to fully implement their findings.
threaded - newest
Electronic voting will never be safe. A combination of electronic and physical systems might be the best. Like putting in your vote on a screen but also have a punched card that can be physically verified by the voter before submitting the card as well. Thus there is an easy electronic count and a physical card that cannot be easily hacked if there is a need for a recount.
But there are many ways to skin a cat, and even physical votes like in Venezuela can still be overturned if you have the corrupt men and men with weapons if you argue.
Are there countries that have e-voting on a national level apart from Estonia? They had it since 2005 without any major issues.
35 million people spread out in the second biggest country globally and our voting is done in a day with folding tables, paper, pens and volunteers counting.
I hope we don’t get the machines. They seem slow and inaccurate. :-p
The issue with electronic voting is changeability of electronic data. You‘d need to employ the bad word (blockchain) to make sure you can backtrace every single vote to the booth it was taken from. Someone with more experience in blockchain or voting might disagree but you do get a real ledger which is a good start.
You mean, like, mail ballots? You mark a card, then they scan it in for a digital count. It’s a pretty good system, and I like not having to wait in line at a voting booth.
A piece of paper isn’t exactly perfectly secure either. Most hacking ends up being manipulating people rather than machines.
Well manipulation of people is my example with Venezuela with guns and corruption. but it is a small country. What about a 150 million or more country, what would be easier, manipulation of paper votes across the country involving a lot, and I mean a lot, of people using ballot stuffing and count rigging or getting a small hacking group years in advance to plan and execute a voting machine manipulation without anyone noticing
This is actually incredibly difficult. Finding vulnerabilities isn’t easy, and exploiting them often isn’t easy either. Sometimes a vulnerability requires the user of the device to do something specific, and sometimes it requires direct access to the device. This comes back to social engineering, as a hacker may have to trick a poll worker into triggering the vulnerability. Also some vulnerabilities might be less impactful than others, e.g. leaking some information rather than allowing a hacker to manipulate votes. Finally, vulnerabilities are discovered and patched all the time. The problems discovered at this year’s DefCon, maybe not all of them will be patched before the election. But planning an attack years in advance? That’s not happening.
So here’s a list of actual vote manipulation techniques that are commonly used in this country:
Here’s a list of vote manipulation techniques that were attempted but failed:
I really, deeply think that some unspecified electronic vulnerabilities are the least of our concerns for this upcoming election.
.