Bluesky opens to public registration (bsky.social)
from canpolat@programming.dev to fediverse@lemmy.ml on 06 Feb 2024 21:10
https://programming.dev/post/9648453

#fediverse

threaded - newest

KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 06 Feb 2024 22:32 next collapse

No thank you.

yokonzo@lemmy.world on 06 Feb 2024 23:53 collapse

Why? What’s so bad about blue sky that you don’t like?

victron@programming.dev on 06 Feb 2024 23:59 next collapse

Probably because it’s not linux, foss or any of that shit

southsamurai@sh.itjust.works on 07 Feb 2024 04:34 next collapse

lemmy.ml/comment/8050937

That comment covers it

BrikoX@lemmy.zip on 07 Feb 2024 19:46 collapse

It’s algorithmic and run by venture capital. 2 things that made social media the toxic mess it is today.

timconspicuous@lemmy.ml on 08 Feb 2024 12:42 collapse

The algorithms/feeds are easily the best part about Bluesky because they can be custom-made. If you don’t like the feeds provided by Bluesky, you can just make one of your own that displays what you want to see. I use many such feeds.

BrikoX@lemmy.zip on 08 Feb 2024 12:56 next collapse

If that’s what you like, use it. Nobody is telling you can’t. Those that prefer non-algorithmic vs algorithmic social media will always be in disagreement, since they are fundamentally opposite of each other.

timconspicuous@lemmy.ml on 08 Feb 2024 17:28 next collapse

If you want your timeline to be just a chronological timeline, you can also subscribe to that feed and delete all others. Bluesky isn’t Threads, no one is forcing any algorithm on you that you don’t want, this is part of the decentralized nature of Bluesky.

Also, I don’t think there is a clear line between “algorithmic” and “non-algorithmic” social media. If you use Mastodon with the Mammoth app and its “For You” feed, is it algorithmic or non-algorithmic? If I sort my Lemmy timeline by “hot”, do I not use an algorithm?

spaduf@slrpnk.net on 09 Feb 2024 20:53 collapse

This is a particularly silly opinion because Lemmy is an algorithmic social media platform. It’s just an algorithm that you happen to have access to documentation for. Almost certainly, any fediverse algorithm would have to work on the same principles as Lemmy (open and based on public interactions). Likes and upvotes are king. User similarity ranking is wildly inefficient on the fediverse due to its distributed nature and keyword systems are easily gamed (although some hybrid is possible).

BrikoX@lemmy.zip on 09 Feb 2024 21:43 collapse

Sure, Lemmy has algorithms, but it’s not the same as being algorithmic. We can continue to argue on the semantics of technical definition, but my point on the issue with toxic mess was clear a few messages above. Intent of the implementation really is the factor that defines the different between platform being algorithmic and using algorithms.

If a user has a chronological feed, and it reaches the top (or bottom) of the content, the user is likely to close the app/page and do something else, but an endless feed will keep the same user longer.

And using user input to sort content is not the same as prioritizing content based on past interactions to achieve a predefined goal.

E.g. Twitter API allowed to pull content in chronological order of only people you followed, but the official app used For You feed as default and even if you changed it manually to chronological in the settings it would reset on app restart. Contrast that with being able to set any sorting method as default on Lemmy or having no algorithm on Mastodon (yet the API allows anyone to create one if they wish) and the difference of intent is clear.

owen@lemmy.ca on 08 Feb 2024 13:22 next collapse

I have a custom bluesky feed right now: absolutely nothing. It’s awesome

timconspicuous@lemmy.ml on 08 Feb 2024 17:57 collapse

Nice! I’ve been enjoying the “Quiet Posters” feed, which shows only posts by people I follow that don’t regularly post, so I might miss the rare times that they do! :)

spaduf@slrpnk.net on 09 Feb 2024 20:50 collapse

This has always been the killer feature of the fediverse. Open non-exploitative content algorithms. So weird to see people against it for no reason.

algernon@lemmy.ml on 06 Feb 2024 23:39 next collapse

Nevertheless, as Bluesky grows, there are likely to be multiple professionally-run indexers for various purposes. For example, a company that performs sentiment analysis on social media activity about brands could easily create a whole-network index that provides insights to their clients.

(source)

Is that supposed to be a selling point? Because I’d like to stay far, far away from that, thank you very much.

vamp07@lemm.ee on 08 Feb 2024 09:14 next collapse

When I see people criticize something they have clearly not used I get motivated to try it.

Hanrahan@lemmy.world on 07 Mar 2024 07:43 collapse

Good for you, I’ve never tried punching myself in the balls and I don’t like the idea of it, let me know what’s its like please.

It’s run by a shit stained billionare venture capatilist to make money. It can’t be anything but a toxic shit show, the proof ?, they ball are, so doing the same thing and expecting a different result is insane.

vamp07@lemm.ee on 30 Mar 2024 14:57 collapse

It’s not worth getting this upset about this stuff. That’s my 2 cents.

candle_lighter@lemmy.ml on 08 Feb 2024 14:38 collapse

I hope someone makes a way to bridge activity pub and @protocol

canpolat@programming.dev on 08 Feb 2024 15:31 collapse