An evidence-based and critical analysis of the Fediverse decentralization promises (arxiv.org)
from morrowind@lemmy.ml to fediverse@lemmy.world on 12 Sep 2024 23:12
https://lemmy.ml/post/20234577

Lemmy mentioned\( °□° )/

#fediverse

threaded - newest

morrowind@lemmy.ml on 12 Sep 2024 23:36 next collapse

pretty brief paper though ngl, it doesn’t do much

RagingHungryPanda@lemm.ee on 12 Sep 2024 23:49 next collapse

Tl;dr - fediverse probably won’t do too much, and it does have discoverability issues, along with migration issues

foggy@lemmy.world on 13 Sep 2024 00:20 collapse

Discoverability issues as per yesterdays search giants methods of crawling the web.

It’s quite clear that companies like Google and Microsoft are vulnerable in the search game right now.

I mean in the end you’re probably right, but if there were ever a time for a well-funded group to take aim at the suddenly low barriered entry, I think this is probably Custer’s last stand.

schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business on 13 Sep 2024 01:59 next collapse

Another paper that equates not changing the world with being a complete failure.

A valid viewpoint, I suppose, but some Fedi-things have certainly improved my life, which really, is how these things work: you improve people’s lives incrementally, and not by the hundreds of millions at once.

Of course, that means this is a complete failure because we won’t accept anything other than massive global success as success anymore because… reasons?

andyburke@fedia.io on 13 Sep 2024 04:40 collapse

Not only that but ... here we are. 🤷‍♂️

cabbage@piefed.social on 13 Sep 2024 11:48 next collapse

They define decentralisation as an even distribution of users? Or did I get that wrong skimming the paper?

This seems arbitrary. Mastodon is a decentralised network, no matter how big Mastodon.social is. Lemmy is equally decentralised, even though there's a dominant actor.

The other hubs in the network don't revolve around mastodon.social/lemmy.world. they connect to each other bilaterally - if the central hubs disappeared over night it wouldn't affect them all that much.

I think the notion that decentralised networks can't have hubs of varying sizes is plain wrong, and a fundamental misunderstanding of what decentralized means.

Fizz@lemmy.nz on 15 Sep 2024 01:55 collapse

I don’t care if 99% of users are on once instance as long as people have the option to create their own instances and build on tech software and content created by the community.