Use 'Bridgy Fed' to connect Mastodon and Bluesky (lifehacker.com)
from Emperor@feddit.uk to fediverse@lemmy.world on 16 Nov 20:36
https://feddit.uk/post/20035367

The Great Twitter Exodus of 2022 is still happening. It’s just a little…fractured. A lot of X power users migrated to Bluesky early on, which paved the way for a flood of folks to join that service in 2024. Meanwhile, a lot of technically inclined individuals are still hanging out on Mastodon (at least, that’s where I hang out).

Bluesky and Mastodon are both decentralized services, in theory, but users of one service can’t really talk to users on the other—or it wasn’t possible before Bridgy Fed, anyway. It’s a beta service that makes it possible for Bluesky and Fediverse-compatible applications, such as Mastodon, to interact.

This is where Bridgy Fed comes in. With this service, individual users of either service can opt in to “bridging” their accounts. I tested this out with my friend and Lifehacker alumni Eric Ravenscraft, who hangs out on Bluesky more than me. It worked well—we can now see each other’s posts, like each other’s posts, and even talk to each other, cross-network.

While this solution works well, there are a few hangups. Chiefly, it only functions if both people bridge their accounts. This means I can’t see any comments from Bluesky users unless they also are bridged, and vice versa: During our little test, a few other Mastodon users responded to my conversation with Eric, but Eric could not see those replies. This make sense if you know how the system works—only comments from bridged users are bridged—but it’s hardly ideal, and can lead to asymmetrical conversations. Unfortunately, the opt-in nature of the bridging service makes this inevitable.

If you are already using Bridgy Fed, how is it working out for you?

#fediverse

threaded - newest

JoYo@lemmy.ml on 16 Nov 21:14 next collapse

please don’t

cabbage@piefed.social on 16 Nov 21:24 collapse

Thanks, very insightful!

Maybe elaborate?

JoYo@lemmy.ml on 16 Nov 22:58 collapse

do not bridge the fedi to bluesky, please.

Wistful@discuss.tchncs.de on 16 Nov 21:27 next collapse

<img alt="" src="https://discuss.tchncs.de/pictrs/image/38467764-7356-448d-800f-c7bb25fe1164.png">

So you can’t interact at all, or see bluesky comments or anything. It’s basically as if you subscribed to an RSS feed. Pretty useless no?

Never really understood the appeal of twitter-like platforms anyway.

flamingos@feddit.uk on 16 Nov 22:54 collapse

You can, it’s just that individual accounts need to opt into the bridge.

<img alt="Mastodon reply from a briged Bluesky user replying to the official Bluesky account, also bridged" src="https://feddit.uk/pictrs/image/4fee9265-a837-4611-8a7f-013a606b5ce9.webp">

Wistful@discuss.tchncs.de on 16 Nov 23:21 collapse

So all 3 people on the whole bluesky who even know they can do that or give any fuck about mastodon.

mosiacmango@lemm.ee on 16 Nov 23:48 collapse

So y’all just pissing in cherrios today?

This is a brand new, opt in interoperability tool between 2 small-ish social networks. No shit its not heavily used yet. People who are using it can ask their friends to bridge, which will bring growth over time, just like any social networking experience.

What exactly are you complaining about? That someone else did something cool you don’t care about? That other people may enjoy something you don’t?

Wistful@discuss.tchncs.de on 17 Nov 00:06 collapse

Well I don’t use either of those platforms, I was just curious. I just shared what I observed, I guess it does sound like a complaint.
Mostly disappointed that there even is a need for such a thing.

muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee on 16 Nov 22:27 next collapse

I really dont think we should be bending over backwards to accommodate blueskys clearly inferior protocal when activpub is objectivly better

cabbage@piefed.social on 16 Nov 23:18 next collapse

I post on mastodon and bridge to bluesky. That way I can reach anyone there interested in following me, but I personally don't have to bother with the site at all.

As someone trying to reach an audience, it's pretty much perfect. Each to their own obviously.

mosiacmango@lemm.ee on 16 Nov 23:45 collapse

Interoperability removes power from closed gardens. It makes the platform itself way less relevant.

“Bending over backwards” is how you undermine bluesky in favor of mastadon. We should 100% be doing it as much as possible.

Chozo@fedia.io on 16 Nov 22:30 next collapse

Bluesky is not decentralized, stop calling it that.

mesamunefire@lemmy.world on 17 Nov 00:38 collapse

I’ve been seeing people migrate in mass lately. The biggest issue with the above is that it’s not at all intuitive. If Blue sky wants to be fediverse comparable, I think they need to make the process easier OR implement activity hub and link. As it is, all I see is people not opting in and a huge migration without activity hub users.

I’ve opted in on my fedi/mastodon account. But no one knows on the blue sky side to opt in so when I try to follow, no one shows up. It’s easier to just follow on RSS.

Oh well we can still have fun on our side of the Internet.