Social Web Foundation is Betting Big on Client-to-Server API
(wedistribute.org)
from deadsuperhero@lemmy.world to fediverse@lemmy.world on 30 Aug 01:08
https://lemmy.world/post/35187482
from deadsuperhero@lemmy.world to fediverse@lemmy.world on 30 Aug 01:08
https://lemmy.world/post/35187482
The Social Web Foundation has been experimenting with the lesser-known other half of the ActivityPub protocol. Here’s what they’re up to.
threaded - newest
tf is this title
I blame all the similar sounding terms and organizations in the fediverse space. It’s actually pretty cool
What SWF is:
From this article:
<img alt="" src="https://i0.wp.com/wedistribute.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Board1.png">
It then has some other examples of how this protocol is being used
that’s pretty interesting I guess, having standard activitypub servers would be pretty good for reducing connectivity complexity as well I assume
Yeah, it’s not great. Unfortunately, there’s not a great way to describe this stuff without either leaning into abstract terms, or using oversimplifications.
The short of it is: only half of the ActivityPub protocol really got adopted by most of the Fediverse: the stuff that lets servers talk to each other. The other half would allow for a lot of cool things to be built, with not everything being its own Fediverse server.
Surely they could’ve just included some reference to activitypub, e.g. “Social Web Foundation is Betting Big on ActivityPub Client-to-Server API”. that’s so much clearer