You can now bridge Fediverse and Bluesky Accounts! (wedistribute.org)
from deadsuperhero@lemmy.world to fediverse@lemmy.world on 13 May 2024 18:26
https://lemmy.world/post/15367245

Bridgy Fed’s Bluesky integration is now in beta, and makes it possible to connect your account from the Fediverse to Bluesky, and vice versa.

There’s still some quirks, and every bridged account has to opt in to it, but it’s a promising moment for people that want to communicate across networks.

#fediverse

threaded - newest

A_A@lemmy.world on 13 May 2024 18:33 next collapse

This seems very dangerous : just look at the photograph !

DaseinPickle@leminal.space on 13 May 2024 18:58 next collapse

I still dont understand why we need bluesky.

deadsuperhero@lemmy.world on 13 May 2024 19:10 next collapse

It’s a different approach with different ideas. It uses open protocols, focuses on data and account portability, and incorporates peer-to-peer concepts in its architecture. The vision behind Bluesky is to build a global square with these concepts.

I definitely wish they would’ve extended ActivityPub and collaborated on the wider network, but I kind of understand wanting to start from scratch and not get involved with the cultural debt Mastodon brought to the network.

sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al on 13 May 2024 19:44 next collapse

Come now Sean, you know that everything open about BlueSky is smoke and mirrors, considering that everything stops and starts with the indexer.

deadsuperhero@lemmy.world on 13 May 2024 20:23 next collapse

I can’t tell whether this is serious or sarcastic 😅

As far as the “global square” part of the equation is concerned: yeah, you’re right! A firehose of public statuses requires indexing to work, as a basic foundational premise.

However, there’s nothing preventing someone from standing up a PDS, opting out of the firehose / big graph service, and instead leaning on federation between individual PDSes. I’m not saying it would necessarily be a common use-case, but it’s definitely not impossible.

ericjmorey@discuss.online on 13 May 2024 22:55 collapse

Isn’t that the same issue with ActivityPub and the instances that host accounts and messages?

sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al on 14 May 2024 05:07 collapse

No. With ActivityPub, it’s totally decentralized. There’s no central authority whatsoever. What there is however, is an instance that’s bigger than the rest. So if we talk about Lemmy. I can access it and post and my ISP can block Lemmy World and I’d never know.

With BlueSky, it pretends to be similar, but the reality is that everything needs to go through their central server in order to be displayed on a timeline. BlueSky is designed in such a way so that everyone does the heavy lifting, but to be seen, you need to have approval from their central server, where they can modify, insert adverts, do whatever. It’s a centralised service that cosplays as decentralised. I don’t understand why people keep pushing it when it’s literally the same shit we all escaped from but with a new paint job.

ericjmorey@discuss.online on 14 May 2024 15:42 next collapse

With BlueSky, it pretends to be similar, but the reality is that everything needs to go through their central server in order to be displayed on a timeline.

They have been saying that this is an implementation detail that will change when they open up that part of their implementation. Which is nice, but until that happens I’m only lukewarm in my optimism for Bluesky and the AT protocol.

On the other hand, every federated network has converged on a central host for the vast majority of accounts and data. That host has outsized influence over the standard used on the network and unencrypted acess to the majority of data. So I’m not sure what really matters to what extent.

Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world on 04 Jun 01:34 collapse

I’ll tell you why I signed up. Because I’m a non-techie, and didn’t KNOW any of that.

abrahambelch@programming.dev on 13 May 2024 20:45 collapse

I don’t see any need for BlueSky at all when there already is a great network in the form of Mastodon. I mean all (most) of the ideas you mentioned apply one-to-one to Mastodon as well. To me they have very similar ideas.

ericjmorey@discuss.online on 13 May 2024 21:52 next collapse

Mastodon’s moderation model is very different than BlueSky. BlueSky’s seems to be much better for targeted individuals and groups. But things aren’t entirely hashed out on either protocol or their implementations. We’ll see how it goes.

clgoh@lemmy.ca on 13 May 2024 22:53 collapse

Unlike ActivityPub, account migration with the AT protocol should allow to move content.

magnetosphere@fedia.io on 13 May 2024 20:55 next collapse

Out of context, “I still dont understand why we need bluesky” sounds like something an oil executive would say. In context, I completely agree.

maxenmajs@lemmy.world on 13 May 2024 22:20 collapse

It’s not ideal but it is in place to accept the normie Twitter refugees as Twitter turns into an alt-right propaganda platform run by a shitty AI that promotes false stories.

aniki@lemm.ee on 13 May 2024 22:47 next collapse

gross

capital@lemmy.world on 15 May 2024 22:10 collapse

Idk I’m a fan of open standards.

nutsack@lemmy.world on 14 May 2024 12:37 collapse

I don’t understand what this means but I’ve been over there and it’s weird