A Fediverse Alternative to TikTok
from anthony@lemmy.cif.su to fediverse@lemmy.world on 12 Jan 12:38
https://lemmy.cif.su/post/206838

In the last few months i really gotten into the whole Fediverse thing, but i noticed that, despite it being the most popular Social Media Platform, there isn’t a TikTok alternative. I know there is Loops, but it’s not open source or federated yet, so it’s not really an option. Why is that?

#fediverse

threaded - newest

[deleted] on 12 Jan 12:46 next collapse

.

fxomt@lemm.ee on 12 Jan 13:22 next collapse

Fixed link: Loops

huginn@feddit.it on 12 Jan 14:03 collapse

I know there is Loops, but it’s not open source or federated yet, so it’s not really an option.

astro_ray@piefed.social on 12 Jan 12:51 next collapse

It's still in the early days of development and you will probably have to wait a bit for full AP implementation.

originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com on 12 Jan 13:29 next collapse

because the team building it are better at marketing what they want it to do rather than what it actually does.

doesnt federate. doesnt embed. requires their app or view only in their walled garden. so far its just yet-another-short-form-video-site

anthony@lemmy.cif.su on 13 Jan 11:49 collapse

That’s exactly what I’m worried about.

Agrivar@lemmy.world on 12 Jan 13:31 next collapse

[TikTok is] the most popular Social Media Platform

I’m not calling you a liar, but this is news to me. Do you have any data to back up that assertion?

JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world on 12 Jan 13:36 next collapse

Correct. Seems more like 5th.

catloaf@lemm.ee on 12 Jan 13:40 next collapse

YouTube is a social network?

Agrivar@lemmy.world on 12 Jan 13:46 next collapse

I’m often surprised by how active and “engaged” the comment section can get, especially on live videos.

nokturne213@sopuli.xyz on 12 Jan 16:10 collapse

I am often surprised how toxic yt comments are.

Agrivar@lemmy.world on 12 Jan 17:49 collapse

Perhaps I spend too much time reading them, but I’m more surprised when the comment section is NOT toxic!

Kichae@lemmy.ca on 12 Jan 23:40 collapse

No. But it is a social media site, and people have been conflating the two for twenty years now.

Agrivar@lemmy.world on 12 Jan 13:46 next collapse

Thank you.

bdonvr@thelemmy.club on 12 Jan 14:12 collapse

I’d say third. YouTube isn’t really a social media platform, nor WeChat.

Carighan@lemmy.world on 12 Jan 17:02 collapse

If tiktok is sa social media platform, then so is youtube/

Ulrich@feddit.org on 12 Jan 13:36 next collapse

It’s not true. Not even close.

[deleted] on 12 Jan 14:12 next collapse

.

WhatSay@slrpnk.net on 12 Jan 14:29 next collapse

It could vary by age group, so not most popular overall, but it’s relative.

anthony@lemmy.cif.su on 13 Jan 11:56 collapse

I’ve gone of the google play charts.

OhYeah@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 12 Jan 14:06 next collapse

Loops is new and still in beta. The dev has said that he wants to wait to open source it until he feels it’s current state is ready to be on other people’s servers (once it reaches 1.0). I can’t say I agree with the thought process but at least with pixelfed he did the same process and actually followed through on federation and open sourcing

breakfastmtn@lemmy.ca on 12 Jan 14:46 collapse

The grant he’s receiving to develop it requires it to be open source.

noodlejetski@lemm.ee on 12 Jan 15:04 next collapse

vidzy.codeberg.page

queermunist@lemmy.ml on 12 Jan 16:48 next collapse

Video content is really computationally expensive to play and store. Seems like it requires centralization to make the service fast and responsive with enough storage.

I suppose I could imagine some kind of ephemeral TikTok that deletes videos from storage after a set amount of time. Or a lowfi TikTok that only allows uploads in 240p. Otherwise I just can’t see it.

Zementid@feddit.nl on 12 Jan 17:03 next collapse

Lowfi TicToc would be perfect. Just upload the thousands of loops from Z0R or POWN.IT and wait.

BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world on 12 Jan 19:12 next collapse

7 second clips

Xanthobilly@lemmy.world on 14 Jan 12:54 collapse

So, Vine?

anthony@lemmy.cif.su on 13 Jan 11:44 collapse

A peertube approach would be a great way of saving bandwidth

gencha@lemm.ee on 12 Jan 17:15 next collapse

Nobody pays for that much bandwidth without the ability to manipulate you through profiling and impressions. You are the product. The product is not sharing videos. There is no fediverse platform that makes you its whore. If you were to make a video sharing platform, it would never work, because that is not the product, it’s only a feature of what makes up the dopamine machine.

Lemmy will also never outgrow commercial platforms, because the commercial platforms also never were about content.

anthony@lemmy.cif.su on 13 Jan 11:43 collapse

Nobody pays for that much bandwidth without the ability to manipulate you through profiling and impressions. You are the product. The product is not sharing videos. There is no fediverse platform that makes you its whore. If you were to make a video sharing platform, it would never work, because that is not the product, it’s only a feature of what makes up the dopamine machine.

I mean, video streaming platforms already exist as part of the fediverse (Peertube) so i would disagree on you with you on that one.

gencha@lemm.ee on 15 Jan 00:27 collapse

That’s a good point, and I don’t really have enough insights to properly respond to that. I did think about Peertube, and I believe that a site like TikTok is different, because it relies on the ability to broadcast a large number of short videos, specifically with lots of skips.

Streaming one video for several minutes, and skipping between numerous videos every couple of seconds, is orders of magnitude more expensive. Video compression works on the idea that you store entire pictures rarely, and then just encode the difference between each frame. When you constantly need the start of videos, you constantly need the full picture of the first frame. This induces a much higher bandwidth requirement than with video that streams for several minutes continuously. Also consider the response time that is required to make the TikTok experience work. Then also consider that you need to attract enough content contributors to make this work. You can’t just upload some ancient archive of 45 minute videos. You need to drive the machine.

So, to produce a TikTok experience, you also need to design for an attractive ingress of free content.

This is just not replicable in a free environment.

anthony@lemmy.cif.su on 15 Jan 13:06 collapse

Streaming one video for several minutes, and skipping between numerous videos every couple of seconds, is orders of magnitude more expensive. Video compression works on the idea that you store entire pictures rarely, and then just encode the difference between each frame. When you constantly need the start of videos, you constantly need the full picture of the first frame. This induces a much higher bandwidth requirement than with video that streams for several minutes continuously. Also consider the response time that is required to make the TikTok experience work.

Yeah, it would probably have to load the next 5-10 Videos in advance, and probably even continue sharing the last 5-10 to make the torrenting work properly. And the bandwidth use would be even higher this way… It would be possible to use even more advanced compression algorithms than TikTok, but that would require more performance on the clients end, and therefore lock out a lot of old and cheap devices.

poVoq@slrpnk.net on 13 Jan 00:01 next collapse

Most of the content on TikTok is created by people because they want to earn money with it. But most of it isn’t content which would make it possible to build up a supporter base through Patreon, OnlyFans etc. So where is the money going to come from to attract such content creators to a potential Fediverse TikTok alternative?

anthony@lemmy.cif.su on 13 Jan 11:53 next collapse

I mean independent sponsorships still exist, and for most creators, that’s the biggest source of income anyway.

poVoq@slrpnk.net on 13 Jan 13:09 collapse

On TikTok? I doubt that. Do you have any examples?

Ziggurat@fedia.io on 14 Jan 11:55 collapse

I really doubt that average TikTok (or instagram, or youtube) aims at monetizing video. It's a way to share photo and video more than a way to make money. but I may be wrong.

poVoq@slrpnk.net on 14 Jan 13:02 collapse

I am not a Tiktok user, but everytime someone shares a video with me it is clearly made by someone that did it because they want to build a following and monetize their channel. I mean, why else spend a lot of effort to make such short form videos?

Ziggurat@fedia.io on 14 Jan 13:38 collapse

Not sure whether the video that get share out of TikTok are the ones average user make. For many it's just fun filters, big music library and a way to share video with friends. I doubt teenager randomly dancing on a music, or sharing pics of their horse-riding lessons try to make money on-it.

poVoq@slrpnk.net on 14 Jan 14:03 collapse

Not sure why you would need a seperate platform for such kind of videos though. You can use Mastodon etc. perfectly fine for this kind of stuff.

But I think that is not why the majority use TikTok. Tiktok is more like those TV channels that show an endless number of funny bloopers and cooking shows, and those need semi-professional makers and curators that want to be paid for their work.

underscores@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 13 Jan 02:48 next collapse

Vidzy and the loops server code are available under AGPL. The loops app isn’t open source yet, but has to be eventually as part of the NLnet grant agreement.

Kichae@lemmy.ca on 13 Jan 13:15 collapse

I’m fascinated by this idea that the fediverse is open source by definition, when I don’t think that’s implied anywhere. It’s notpart of the ActivityPub license, is it? I would have assumed thatw as public domain.