Bots increase online user engagement but stifle meaningful discussion, study shows (www.techexplorist.com)
from huppakee@lemm.ee to fediverse@lemmy.world on 10 Apr 07:33
https://lemm.ee/post/60907172

cross-posted from: lemmy.world/post/28012519

#fediverse

threaded - newest

Novamdomum@fedia.io on 10 Apr 08:09 next collapse

75% AI generated article score on Scribbr lol

LemUrun@pawb.social on 10 Apr 08:46 next collapse

shattered glass sound Oh… The irony…

0laura@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 10 Apr 08:55 next collapse

those sites don’t work. not saying it’s not ai, but those tests are worthless.

catloaf@lemm.ee on 10 Apr 15:08 collapse

Yeah the articles on this site don’t sound like they were written by a human.

sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al on 10 Apr 08:55 next collapse

This is something that a few instances here had to learn the hard way and are very open and honest about it.

Letsdothisok@lemmy.world on 10 Apr 18:02 collapse

These bots are sounding like real people. They can talk about a lot of s*** That sounds good, but is ultimately pointless. Are bots politicians?

So bots are getting better at engaging people about meaningless bullcrap? Yeah, AI sounds like it’s heading in a great direction.

huppakee@lemm.ee on 10 Apr 18:52 collapse

No offense but I don’t think you’ve read the article.