I have now found 1070 verified accounts from media organizations in the #Fediverse, but only on #Mastodon, #Flipboard, #Threads, #Bluesky, #Ghost and #Peertube. Just one is on #Sharkey (đŸ‘‹đŸ»
from mho@social.heise.de to fediverse@lemmy.world on 09 Jul 08:08
https://social.heise.de/users/mho/statuses/114822250856705055

I have now found 1070 verified accounts from media organizations in the #Fediverse, but only on #Mastodon, #Flipboard, #Threads, #Bluesky, #Ghost and #Peertube.

Just one is on #Sharkey (đŸ‘‹đŸ» @heiseBotti) and none on #Pixelfed, #Lemmy, #Piefed, #Misskey & Co. Are there really none there, or did I miss some?

Source:
https://fingolas.eu/fediverse/overview.html

@fediverse

#bluesky #fediverse #flipboard #ghost #lemmy #mastodon #misskey #peertube #piefed #pixelfed #sharkey #threads

threaded - newest

gon@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 09 Jul 08:26 next collapse

What do you mean by verified? I’m not sure there’s such a thing as “verification” on Lemmy, at least.

Successful_Try543@feddit.org on 09 Jul 08:33 next collapse

Probably verification by the associated domain. At least this works on Mastodon and Friendica.

https://stefanbohacek.com/blog/verification-in-the-fediverse/

souperk@reddthat.com on 09 Jul 09:47 collapse

Also, if the organisation shares their fediverse profile on their official website, you can consider them verified

schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de on 09 Jul 08:30 next collapse

Media organizations typically don’t want to post (only) to discussion groups, they want to provide a way to follow them as organizations.

That being said, @heiseonline@social.heise.de does sometimes mention threadiverse communities in its posts so they appear in those communities.

mho@social.heise.de on 09 Jul 09:19 collapse

@schnurrito

I know about @heiseonline 😊 That's us.

schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de on 09 Jul 09:20 collapse

yeah, I saw your instance only after posting the above comment :D

Still, some other people reading this thread might not know this; I think the way you guys are doing it is a good way to get your articles more widely spread, I think it would be good if other media organizations did the same.

Flax_vert@feddit.uk on 09 Jul 08:35 next collapse

Bluesky doesn’t count.

I don’t see why a media organisation would use lemmy. Unless if it’s via the wordpress or another integration.

jill@mastodon.de on 09 Jul 08:37 next collapse

@mho Since when is Threads part of the Fediverse?

@heiseBotti @fediverse

mho@social.heise.de on 09 Jul 09:18 collapse

@jill @heiseBotti @fediverse

More than one year now.

https://www.heise.de/en/news/Meta-Platforms-integrates-threads-more-strongly-into-the-Fediverse-9778132.html

jill@mastodon.de on 09 Jul 10:04 collapse

@mho So it's possible for Thread users to follow people in the Fediverse now? And they actual moderate their servers, respect data privacy and copyrights?

@heiseBotti @fediverse

mho@social.heise.de on 09 Jul 10:53 collapse

@jill @heiseBotti @fediverse

No, it isn't. But that doesn't make something part of the #Fediverse, does it? Try following someone with a Peertube-account for example. I dind't find a way, yet it's still a part of the #Fediverse..

I'd say: Fediverse = "connected via ActivityPub"

jill@mastodon.de on 09 Jul 11:21 collapse

@mho Disagree.

Because it does. And I am already following people on PeerTube, works just fine!

I've to say, reducing the Fediverse, its development, its history and many supporting different software and diverse communities to a protocol, is, to be frank, just ignorant for an editor of an on tech focused online magazine. You should know better in 2025.

@heiseBotti @fediverse

mho@social.heise.de on 09 Jul 12:13 next collapse

@jill @heiseBotti @fediverse

No, I mean following an account from #Peertube.

mho@social.heise.de on 09 Jul 12:19 collapse

@jill @heiseBotti @fediverse

And if it's not "just" about the protocol: Who gets to decide about the definition? The people on #Mastodon? The ones on #Misskey? Or Lemmy? And why not the ones on #Threads, which could be soon the biggest part of it (the protocol, I mean)?

jill@mastodon.de on 09 Jul 13:03 collapse

@mho We are getting off track. I'd say, don't call it "Fediverse" in your original post, but e.g. "software using activity pub", if that is what you are referring to and if you don't want to be misunderstood.

Regarding the Fediverse and what it stand for as its self-conception built over the years by so many individuals and communities which widely agree upon, my above mentioned remarks still apply.

@heiseBotti @fediverse

Skiluros@sh.itjust.works on 09 Jul 08:42 next collapse

In a perfect world, all media organIationa would have their own instances (tied to their domains) for each network type (threadiverse, micro logging, video, short form video) and these instances would be used for both content distribution (official NYT mastadon feed) and for validation of journalists.

The non-profit foundations that manage these networks could provide managed services to raise more money for development (beyond donations).

4am@lemmy.zip on 09 Jul 15:34 collapse

This is the part of the internet that we have forgotten. Everyone is supposed to be their own little island but they all connect. If I want news I shouldn’t have to go to Facebook, I should have to go to the news org.

This is why the Fediverse has been thriving by imitating monolithic platforms like Reddit or Twitter but doing so in a way that domains (aka “sites” are still all their own.

I shouldn’t have to go to Reddit to get to CNN, I should have to go to CNN to get CNN. CNN should not join Lemmy, CNN should host a Lemmy instance and have communities for topics and programs, and its users should only be people who work there. And that should all be federated out for the rest of us to interact with.

(CNN was the quickest news org name to type and I wasn’t about to use Fox as an example)

Skiluros@sh.itjust.works on 09 Jul 16:04 collapse

It’s funny how Americans technology oligarchs love propaganda copytext that includes terms like innovation, change and disruption, yet they are all vapid and lacking any imagination.

vowe@social.heise.de on 09 Jul 08:48 next collapse

@mho Das ist DER Fehler im Fediverse. Warum muss man fĂŒr jeden Service einen eigenen Account haben?

hamiller_friendica@anonsys.net on 09 Jul 09:37 next collapse

@vowe Wenn du nicht selbst eigene Photos bei Pixelfed veröffentlichen willst, ist ein eigener Account nicht nötig. Deinem Lieblingsfotografen kannst du von Mastodon aus folgen und auch kommentieren.

Genau so mit den anderen Projekten, mehr wurde nie versprochen.

/cc @mho

mho@social.heise.de on 09 Jul 09:16 collapse

@vowe

Muss man ĂŒberhaupt nicht, das ist tatsĂ€chlich der große Vorteil. Trotzdem gibt es Argumente dafĂŒr, zum Beispiel, weil verschiedene Dienste unterschiedliches ermöglichen: Zum Beispiel die hĂŒpfenden Emojis von @heiseBotti

https://federation.network/notes/a9z6q2eifb0g09ql

vowe@social.heise.de on 09 Jul 09:35 collapse

@mho komisch. Wieso fragst du dann nach Accounts von Medien auf anderen Services? Das mĂŒsste dann doch der gleiche sein. Kann ich mit @vowe einfach Peertube-Videos posten oder muss ich dazu einen neuen Account einrichten?

mho@social.heise.de on 09 Jul 10:48 collapse

@vowe

Nein, das sind unterschiedliche Dinge. Du kannst von deinem Mastodon-Account kein Peertube-Video veröffentlichen, dazu brauchst du den Account. Aber du kannst damit interagieren (linken, in der Timeline gucken, per P2P teilen etc.) und das ist der Vorteil.
Wer vorwiegend Bilder postet, sollte dafĂŒr keinen Mastodon-Account nutzen, bei Kurznachrichten dagegen schon. Das Tolle ist, dass alle trotzdem verknĂŒpft sind. Die Softwares sind aber untereinander nicht austauschbar.

vowe@social.heise.de on 09 Jul 10:56 collapse

@mho wir reden aneinander vorbei. Der Geburtsfehler ist, dass Identity nicht funktioniert. Anstatt eine eindeutige ID zu haben, hast du auf jeder Instanz eine andere. Und deshalb suchst du dir einen Wolf nach Medien im Fediverse. In atproto ist meine ID did:plc:k5ybhnnyl4zwq7ey3q3fogzt und sie kann beliebige Namen haben. Egal welcher Service, diese ID bleibt gleich.

hamiller_friendica@anonsys.net on 09 Jul 11:07 collapse

@vowe Die Grundidee damals war meines Wissens auch eine andere. NĂ€mlich eine eigene Instanz fĂŒr eine Community. Community meinte in dem Fall eher die eigene Familie, der lokale Sportverein usw. Diese Communities können sich dann untereinander verbinden.

@mho

LorenzoAncora@ieji.de on 09 Jul 09:56 next collapse

@mho the image preview looks like great advertising for Flipboard.

@heiseBotti @fediverse

FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 09 Jul 11:37 next collapse

@ProtonPrivacy@lemmy.world is quite likely the official org

Kirk@startrek.website on 09 Jul 12:20 collapse

Hilarious that that account’s made a single comment pushing back on classic lemmy hysteria/paranoia and then apparently left the platform.

tad@fedi.sndr.uk on 09 Jul 12:21 collapse

@mho @heiseBotti @fediverse you can add â€Ș@novaramedia.com‬ on Bluesky (also bridged to Mastodon) - it’s an independent left wing media organisation from the UK