Shortly After Xbox Game Pass Prices Spiked, the Page to Cancel Game Pass Subscriptions Was Overwhelmed (wccftech.com)
from SalamenceFury@lemmy.world to games@lemmy.world on 01 Oct 19:17
https://lemmy.world/post/36746566

I cancelled too! I really wanna see what excuse Microsoft will pull out to walk back the changes.

Hit 'em where it hurts, people.

#games

threaded - newest

wetbeardhairs@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 01 Oct 19:26 next collapse

Now is probably not the best time to sell my xbox… I bet the market is flooding

jordanlund@lemmy.world on 01 Oct 19:42 next collapse

You might even be able to sell it for what you paid for it…

Tollana1234567@lemmy.today on 02 Oct 04:27 collapse

if costco stop selling xbox(a series) its a bad sign.

etchinghillside@reddthat.com on 01 Oct 19:49 next collapse

Internet is being shitty on link. What is the price increasing to/from? When was the last increase?

SalamenceFury@lemmy.world on 01 Oct 19:53 next collapse

It varies by location. But for me on brazil at least every single subscription doubled in price. PC Game Pass was 36 BRL, it is now 70. Ultimate was 60 BRL, now it’s 120. I cannot justify this shit.

Nelots@piefed.zip on 02 Oct 00:24 collapse

This link has a pretty good comparison between the new and old gamepass features/prices. The cheapest tier is actually better than it used to be, but it looks like the more expensive ones are getting bundled with shit most people won’t want just so they can justify increasing the price.

There are four tiers to the gamepass: Core, Standard, PC, and Ultimate. The first two were exclusive to Xbox, the PC version was obviously exclusive to PCs, and Ultimate was available for both. All tiers aside from the PC gamepass are now being bundled with xbox’s cloud gaming, with higher tiers having shorter wait times and better quality.

This is all US pricing, so take it with a grain of salt considering the OP said their prices doubled:

  1. Core, now called Essential, is a $10 tier that will now have double the games (from 25+ to 50+) and is newly available on PC as well with no price increase.
  2. The $15 Standard tier, now called Premium, is likewise not seeing a price increase and will now be available on PC. However, it looks like Call of Duty will no longer be included in this tier, which I imagine is one of the biggest sellers of gamepass.
  3. The previously $12 PC tier is increasing in price to $16.50. Looks like the only new “benefit” is it will come with Ubisoft+ classic (40+ games) now. Still exclusive to PC.
  4. Then there’s the previously $20 Ultimate tier. It’s price is increasing to $30 a month, and it’s the one everyone’s upset about. The only new benefits are cloud gaming, Ubisoft+ classic, and a Fortnite subscription.
wesker@lemmy.sdf.org on 01 Oct 19:51 next collapse

EA also further buried the ability to cancel EA accounts, after the announcement they had been sold to the Saudis and Kushner.

other_cat@lemmy.zip on 01 Oct 22:15 next collapse

Between that, this, and Disney+ cancellation page “accidentally” going down during that fiasco, this is exactly why I’ve switched to using only virtual cards for subscriptions. Pause/Cancel the virtual card, voila, no more subscription.

hydrashok@sh.itjust.works on 01 Oct 22:49 next collapse

Good thing I never signed up for one.

Any Steam game that requires an EA, Ubisoft, Blizzard, whatever account is a total non-starter for me. I’ve looked at some of the newer Battlefields when they’re on sale for like $2 and I still can’t be convinced. Likely never will.

Ok with me, there’s lots of other publishers out there, both independents and studios, that I’d much rather give my $2 to.

RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world on 02 Oct 01:53 next collapse

To be fair, those kinds of changes do not usually happen so rapidly after a purchase, and was likely already planned for implementation and started before the sale.

In other words, it is likely EA was already planning to make that change regardless of if the sale went through or not.

Tollana1234567@lemmy.today on 02 Oct 04:28 collapse

they dont want SA or kushner to hold an EMPTY bag, but i suspect they will get alot of cancellations in the future. wish they seperate westwood so a proper CNC can be revived.

SlartyBartFast@sh.itjust.works on 02 Oct 11:05 next collapse

And Kyrandia!

ICastFist@programming.dev on 02 Oct 15:57 collapse

Westwood, my beloved 😢

Would be good if Maxis also got out of their throes, though that’s extremely unlikely, given The Sims

doctortofu@piefed.social on 01 Oct 19:51 next collapse

The price increase is absurd. I cancelled too, because while I do play quite a bit, this level of corporate greed is completely unjustifiable to me. If rather watch playthroughs of new games on Twitch or YouTube and then buy them a year later on sale than pay this bloody much, eff that.

whereyaaat@lemmings.world on 02 Oct 03:09 next collapse

Just so you know, they only thought you were stupid enough to pay more because you were stupid to enough to pay at all.

Use your brain before your wallet. Start torrenting.

Stop being average.

CosmoNova@lemmy.world on 02 Oct 06:48 next collapse

To be fair it‘s as absurd as it was inevitable. Gamepass was always meant as this temporary thing you can try out to play some new games until everyone jumps ship because of increased prices. It has been preached for years. No one could‘ve seriously thought this was a long term alternative to buying games or at least buying licenses to games on Steam. All online subscriptions are scams in the process.

M137@lemmy.world on 02 Oct 09:16 next collapse

Why watch playthroughs at all? Just wait till the games are on sale. And only a year isn’t that long, wait more and get better deals with more complete games. There’s nothing saying you need to hurry in any way, and several things saying it’s a good idea to wait. There are more than enough games available for anyone to not have to constantly claw at the newest releases in any way.

Scotty_Trees@lemmy.world on 02 Oct 15:46 collapse

“watch playthroughs of new games on Twitch of YouTube”

welcome to my life for the last couple of many years lol. Not that I’ve been boycotting per se, but I haven’t bought a new game in years cuz my laptop is over a decade old so the best I can play is minecraft, or just use my xbox one for battlefield 4. the corporate greed from the last decade has caused me to never buy this crap again. I love videogames so much, thank god for emulators.

I don’t need any trash EsaudiaA dishes out. People need to go play old/vintage games, get back to the roots, before games were nothing but meaningless cash grabs.

bblkargonaut@lemmy.world on 01 Oct 20:00 next collapse

It’s nice they pulled this nonsense during a steam sale. Cancelled and picked up halo mcc and silksong.

copd@lemmy.world on 02 Oct 03:45 collapse

silksong isn’t on sale.

bblkargonaut@lemmy.world on 02 Oct 04:08 next collapse

Impulse purchase

JollyBrancher@sh.itjust.works on 02 Oct 05:48 next collapse

A game, where depending on opinion, $20 is only $20.

caseofthematts@lemmy.world on 02 Oct 10:35 collapse

It’s a pretty low price already, and I personally think the devs deserve it. Hope you enjoy!

samus12345@sh.itjust.works on 02 Oct 16:28 collapse

Coming for the sale and leaving having bought a game not on sale is part of why sales exist!

mrfriki@lemmy.world on 01 Oct 20:07 next collapse

It was nice to have Xbox a month or two a year to play new releases. Guess that it’s over now, no problem, still a patient gamer.

SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 01 Oct 20:28 next collapse

The thing about this shit is…

Microsoft, like Google, is now a user-data driven company and they have already made loss/profit ratio analysis on this long before they released the price increase. They’re absolutely banking on people cancelling but making up the difference and then some from the people who stay.

For a thought experiment let’s consider how many subscribers they were reported to have in Feburary: 34 million. Let’s assume that everyone is paying for the highest tier to make the math easier. So current income would be 34 million user x $20 a month and thats $680 million a month. New income of 34 million users x $30 a month is $1.02 billion. The difference is $340 million a month. Let’s divide that by $30 a month. That gets us about 11,333,333 users. So they can hemorrhage over 11 million users and still break even. To make sure, let’s subtract 11 million users. That gives us 23 million users. 23 million users x $30 a month is $690 million a month, a cool $10 million a month above current profits.

For final context, 11 million users is roughly 32% of their entire subscriber count. They can afford to lose a third of the people subscribing and still make money.

The math doesn’t bode well for us who vote with our wallets.

Rentlar@lemmy.ca on 01 Oct 20:57 next collapse

One could imagine that conveniently, Microsoft’s online support pages and the amount of support staff were designed to only handle hundreds of thousands of cancelations at a time.

quackerjo@lemmy.wtf on 02 Oct 01:17 next collapse

I’m not a licensed math surgeon, but I think your math is wildly optimistic in favor of Microsoft due to how the subscription totals are actually distributed per price tier.

I don’t doubt that they did a lot of math to figure out an acceptable level of churn for this change, I just don’t think it’s nearly as generous and wide as you’re calculating.

There probably is a very real churn limit that they’re trying to avoid, and my hunch is that there exists a breaking point that could be hit with an aggressive and sustained boycott / cancellation spree, but again, I’m not a math surgeon so I could be wrong. That’s just my gut feeling.

ramble81@lemmy.zip on 02 Oct 01:54 next collapse

And it gets even better. Instead of up to 33% leaving, say 50% of that group convert to Premium instead of Ultimate. That isn’t any lost revenue since the price is going up to what Ultimate used to be. So that cushions their numbers even more.

ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de on 02 Oct 05:05 next collapse

Now factor in the cost savings from a lower server load and less staff to run the back end, and possibly the smaller licensing\use costs for the games available to play since less people would be accessing those games.

hitmyspot@aussie.zone on 02 Oct 10:33 collapse

But also less new users and still the usual churn of existing users. It could be a downward spiral.

greybeard@feddit.online on 02 Oct 18:12 collapse

That’s the next CEOs problem.

hitmyspot@aussie.zone on 02 Oct 21:40 collapse

Yes, but still something they will look at. It means when it becomes unviable with the squeeze already on, those that chose to pay the higher fees lose access to everything as they shut it down. I’m sure they will thank their loyal subscribers, so there is that.

My guess is they realise that xbox users in general is likely on a downward trajectory and now is the time to milk them.

Jakule17@lemmy.world on 02 Oct 17:28 collapse

Okay, but wouldn’t a higher price also discourage new people from subscribing in the first place? Or are companies that shortsighted?

Minnels@lemmy.zip on 02 Oct 17:36 next collapse

Most of them are. Just make profit NOW!!

MrFinnbean@lemmy.world on 03 Oct 17:06 collapse

The same math is there too. They can afford to loose one third of new subscribers to get the same amount of money.

But their new customer acquisition cost wont get higher at the same pace and they get more valuable customers whose payback period will be shorter.

Also i dont think its relevant here, but less customers means less operating costs, so they will most likelly save some money on customer service and behind the scenes things like server upkeeps etc., but i dont think these make real difference here.

Also if for some reason things start to go bad they still have option to create “a budget version” for the people who see the normal subscrition as too expencive.

verdi@feddit.org on 01 Oct 20:38 next collapse

For years I’ve been warning whoever would listen that XboxGP, much like any other content subscription service owned by a public company would inevitably lead to a massive consumer squeeze. Fortunately it happened before MS managed to metastasise into a monopoly in gaming too. Good riddance.

SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world on 01 Oct 20:47 next collapse

Getting users to pay extra for features that should already be included with their overpriced consoles is such a scam.

Passerby6497@lemmy.world on 01 Oct 21:04 next collapse

It’s the Microsoft way. They hide security features that should be standard behind higher subscription tiers. It’s entirely bullshit.

whereyaaat@lemmings.world on 02 Oct 03:10 collapse

It’s all a scam.

It’s been a scam since the first Xbox where they charged people to play online.

The thing is, once they see dumbasses are willing to be scammed, they see no reason to stop there.

The only winning move is not to pay.

Gerudo@lemmy.zip on 01 Oct 20:59 next collapse

Turned off my recurring billing. I’ll have about 3 months then it’s bye bye. I have been a customer since 360, but now will probably sign up for Playstation Network for the first time.

Prox@lemmy.world on 02 Oct 00:30 next collapse

Ehh… PSN isn’t really any better. Their Game Pass competitor is a hot mess. Better to just buy games outright, especially during sales.

[deleted] on 02 Oct 03:12 next collapse

.

Gerudo@lemmy.zip on 02 Oct 04:55 collapse

I know it’s not better, but it has a bunch of the catalog from Game Pass as well as a bunch of PS titles I’ve missed while being on Xbox.

Prox@lemmy.world on 02 Oct 15:12 collapse

That’s a good callout - treating these game rental services more like we do with streaming video services by subbing to one for just a few months, then dropping it for another.

Gerudo@lemmy.zip on 02 Oct 15:38 collapse

Yeah I was shocked at the overlap of titles between the 2. If I had noticed that the last price hike, I might have switched sooner.

whereyaaat@lemmings.world on 02 Oct 03:11 collapse

but now will probably sign up for Playstation Network for the first time.

Fucking hell… some people legitimately never learn.

They are destined to be suckers for life.

Gerudo@lemmy.zip on 02 Oct 04:47 collapse

Oh I’m sorry, did Playstation start charging 30 bucks for their service? Oh, it’s actually CHEAPER than Xbox even was? Oh and it’s a massive back catalog of PS games I haven’t played due to being on Xbox? Fuck me right?

dubyakay@lemmy.ca on 03 Oct 12:26 collapse

If you have a backlog of games that you have bought, why do you need an online subscription for them? Or am I misunderstanding something?

Gerudo@lemmy.zip on 03 Oct 15:27 collapse

I don’t have a backlog of PS games due to mainly playing Xbox for the last 20 something years. That’s why subscription services can make sense, you play through games you’ve missed out on. Kind of like sub hopping for tv streaming, you build up a back log, sub for a few months then move to the next.

[deleted] on 01 Oct 21:50 next collapse

.

Aviandelight@mander.xyz on 01 Oct 22:05 next collapse

Jfc I just downgraded back to Premium. We were paying for Ultimate but never used it. What a great way to force users to look at their subbed to. It’s pretty fucking awful to pull this shit with no real announcement.

sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 01 Oct 22:42 next collapse

… and here is yet another opportunity I have to post the same comment as I have been doing for the past 6+ months:

People still use Microsoft products?!

null@lemmy.nullspace.lol on 01 Oct 23:36 next collapse

Nope. Nobody uses them.

sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 02 Oct 00:05 collapse

I literally cannot imagine why they would, and I used to work for them.

null@lemmy.nullspace.lol on 02 Oct 01:40 collapse

Hardly anyone does

psx_crab@lemmy.zip on 02 Oct 01:09 next collapse

Your comment really just shout “i’m living under a rock!”

sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 02 Oct 01:31 next collapse

Yep, me with my years of working for MSFT, playing their games, configuring their software and using it at large businesses… and then realizing its all fucking overpriced broken garbage from first hand experience, and then replacing it all with open sourcr shit both at home and at work…

Yep, I really am sound like live under rock.

psx_crab@lemmy.zip on 02 Oct 01:35 collapse

Nobody care about your credentials though, your “people still use microsoft product” comment is the one that sounds like you’re living under a rock.

whereyaaat@lemmings.world on 02 Oct 03:13 collapse

I think he’s just not an idiot like most of the people who are finally cancelling their subscriptions.

I know, it’s rare to find someone who isn’t eager to be ripped off.

dukemirage@lemmy.world on 02 Oct 10:54 collapse

Unfortunately the only music software I’m somewhat productive in runs only on Windows or Mac, and I really can’t afford Apple’s hardware prices. So it’s either using WIndows, or being very limited at a very dear creative outlet.

sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 02 Oct 11:22 collapse

You can run most Windows programs on linux.

WINE/Proton.

dukemirage@lemmy.world on 02 Oct 11:45 collapse

I know, but DAWs are notoriously difficult to run and there are problems with most plugins.

sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 02 Oct 16:02 collapse

Thats a fair point, DAWs are nightmares.

Hrm. I would offer a linux alternative, but I also know how people learn a DAW like an instrument and changing to a new would actually be quite an undertaking, and yeah, lots of various effects and such that… really only work that one specific way on your specific setup.

doingthestuff@lemy.lol on 01 Oct 23:00 next collapse

Between the cost of housing and the cost of food, and the fact wages aren’t that much better than they were 15 years ago - you’d think they would realize they are asking for the scraps people have left.

I’ve always just bought games when they’re on a good sale, I’ve never had a game pass type thing. But maybe they just want to squeeze a bit more out of their most loyal customers and they’re accepting that it is a dying model.

Prox@lemmy.world on 02 Oct 00:27 collapse

Once upon a time, the idea with subscriptions like this was to have customers set it and forget it. Charge them a small/reasonable amount and they’ll keep giving you money forever. Giving people a reason to think about - or worse, evaluate the merits of - the monthly deposit they’re giving you used to be a sin for companies.

But here we are, seeing the difference between “companies” and “corpos”.

AppleTea@lemmy.zip on 02 Oct 04:10 collapse

…is the difference being publicly traded on the stock exchange? The only company I can think of that doesn’t fall under “corpo” is Valve, and it seems to mostly be because they don’t have to answer to shareholders.

Prox@lemmy.world on 02 Oct 16:51 collapse

I mean “corpos” in the Cyberpunk sense - mega-huge companies that put profits far and above all else, discarding any notion of ethics, morality, or care about others in the process.

They’re the companies that buy up emerging tech solely so they can kill it (their competition). They don’t give a shit about long-term sustainability - if it raises the bottom line today, they do it. They disregard laws and consumer protections because the only consequences are paltry (for them) fines, which they see as the cost of doing business.

LavaPlanet@sh.itjust.works on 01 Oct 23:13 next collapse

I already canceled because of the atrocities Microsoft does / is / supports.

PKscope@lemmy.world on 02 Oct 01:11 collapse

Not that the harm hasn’t already been done, but I did just see this: thisweekinvideogames.com/…/microsoft-pulls-azure-…

LavaPlanet@sh.itjust.works on 02 Oct 04:26 collapse

Thanks for sharing! Small wins!!

ano_ba_to@sopuli.xyz on 02 Oct 15:46 collapse

Know also that they did not really pull out completely. They are still there, but made sure to let everyone know they did something.

LavaPlanet@sh.itjust.works on 02 Oct 20:15 collapse

Oh, so it’s kinda for show.

RunJun@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 01 Oct 23:19 next collapse

Just canceled my 4 year old subscription. Can’t wait to hear the complaints from my kid but Netflix is likely next.

thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works on 01 Oct 23:51 next collapse

The missus and I sat down about a year ago and tabulated up how much all of the various streaming subscriptions were costing us per year (it was close to $1,000 when including YouTube Premium).

We cancelled every single one, and put that money towards building a home NAS and filling that up with downloaded media. No more ads, stupidly low bitrates, or TV shows & movies disappearing because a license expired.

The server has more than paid for itself at this point, and every additional spare dollar is being put aside for our kids’ tuition.

ETA: Consider doing the same, your kid’ll likely thank you in the long run!

PS: Never too late to introduce them to all of your favourite classic games, either - though that one may be a bit harder to get them onboard 🤣

RunJun@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 01 Oct 23:56 next collapse

I have a 16TB server and an extensive steam collection. I already explained it to him and he was fine about it.

thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works on 02 Oct 00:08 collapse

Even better! What are you running on your server?

Ours is just an old QNAP I dug out of storage with 4x8TB drives in RAID5 - but am eager to try out HexOS on a proper system once I have some spare time.

RunJun@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 02 Oct 00:59 next collapse

It’s running windows out of convenience but I’ll be swapping to Linux soon.

AlfredoJohn@sh.itjust.works on 02 Oct 14:34 collapse

Out of curiosity, what’s the electricity cost per month with your server running 24/7 now? Or do you schedule down time when its not in use. With all the datacenters poping up, electricity rates have gone through the roof, so looking at that, do you end up saving more still through this route?

thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works on 02 Oct 22:13 collapse

I haven’t used a killawatt on it to check, but according to the specs it uses ~30W while in operation (plus whatever additional draw for the four drives). It’s pretty negligible, overall as far as I can tell.

ICastFist@programming.dev on 02 Oct 15:54 collapse

Never too late to introduce them to all of your favourite classic games, either

Easier if you start with Bomberman Party on the PS1 or the arcade Neo Bomberman. I think those play much better than anything Bomberman released after 2004

If the kid enjoys strategy, starting out with Age of Empires should be easy. Or just leave them messing around with Settlers 2

[deleted] on 02 Oct 03:07 collapse

.

calliope@retrolemmy.com on 02 Oct 00:59 next collapse

I really appreciate this, you just saved me at least $20.

Microsoft’s user experience is awful at every step in a browser. I wanted to like XBox but it’s clear why they’re losing.

W3dd1e@lemmy.zip on 02 Oct 01:54 next collapse

I canceled. I don’t want the features they added. I don’t even use all the features they charge me for now. I just want to be able to try out so new games every so often. I’ll take the $30 I save and buy those same games, probably with some money leftover

whereyaaat@lemmings.world on 02 Oct 03:05 collapse

You should start using your brain instead of your wallet and begin torrenting.

For all the money you’ve wasted renting games with gamepass, you could’ve been owning them with a fraction of the cost of a VPN.

W3dd1e@lemmy.zip on 02 Oct 03:16 collapse

I understand, but I do want to support devs, especially indie devs, when u can. That’s why I have no qualms about canceling an expensive service and putting that money directly in their hands when it’s possible

Glide@lemmy.ca on 02 Oct 03:54 next collapse

You know, fundamentally, I don’t hate Gamepass as a concept. “Netflix, but for videogames” is an idea I can get behind, as it widens the audience for something I love by lowering the bar of entry. There are plenty of people out there that benefit from being able to play a few games here and there without needing to commit hundreds of hours to $100 purchases.

But Netflix has overstepped with price hikes and ads, and I’ve cancelled my service with them. That Microsoft thinks it can charge some ~$40CAD a month is pure hubris. I hope they learn quickly that, at that price point, the enthusiast market will happily cancel and just buy their games outright, and the casual market will decide it’s an expense they don’t need.

kepix@lemmy.world on 02 Oct 05:02 next collapse

no numbers were shown that day

Macaroni_ninja@lemmy.world on 02 Oct 05:56 next collapse

Pro financial tip: Be a patient gamer. Get the games you are interested in during sales. Fuck FOMO, subscription models and pre-orders.

Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world on 02 Oct 06:18 next collapse

Yeah, I’ve got so many more games than I have time to play them that there’s never a need to play full price for anything. I wishlist em and pick them up when they’re on sale less than £10

Macaroni_ninja@lemmy.world on 02 Oct 11:16 collapse

Exactly. My limit is also under 10 eur for most games on my wishlist, or 20 eur for games Im interested the most.

Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world on 02 Oct 12:10 collapse

Yeah. I might break my rule for phantom liberty, it’s reduced to £17 at the mo. I’m enjoying cyberpunk so much I might make an exception here! But I’ve still got plenty in my backlog.

LucidNightmare@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 02 Oct 15:17 collapse

While I wouldn’t say it is crucial by any means, it is a fun piece of DLC. I put over 400 hours into Cyberpunk before I got the DLC though, so that may have been why I was okay with purchasing it! Either way, it does make me happy to see someone enjoying the game! :-]

Guitarfun@lemmy.world on 02 Oct 06:37 next collapse

Lately, I’ve only been buying indie games. I can’t justify dropping $70-$80 on one game and even when those games go on sale they’re usually $40-$50.

If you read reviews and do a little research you’ll find that there are actually a lot of really cool indie games and you can get multiple games for just a fraction of the cost of double or triple A games.

[deleted] on 02 Oct 10:45 collapse

.

ibot@feddit.org on 02 Oct 12:22 next collapse

I agree. But if you are on a console and want to play online, you already need a subscription.

I want a subscription free Console that supports online play.

ltxrtquq@lemmy.ml on 02 Oct 14:26 next collapse

That’s just a computer. If you’ve heard about the steam deck, you can set up a pc to be basically the same but more powerful and permanently hooked up to a tv.

ibot@feddit.org on 02 Oct 18:45 collapse

Yeah, I know that this is just a computer. From a skill point of view I have no problem to assemble it and set it up. The thing is I work in IT and spend the whole day on the computer. I do not want to administrate any system in my free time. That’s something I love about consoles. I’m aware they limit the possibilties, but they also low maintenance. I never actively installed system updates on my Xbox Series X, it is just done in the background. I turn it on and play. In worst case I need to install a game update. I have a store interface where I can buy and install games with pressing a few buttons. Inside the game, I do not need to play around with the graphic settings to find what runs best. If at all, I need to decide between graphics and performance mode. That’s what I love about consoles and do not want to have a gaming PC.

Consoles have obvious limitations, but they make it much easier if all you want to do is play.

ltxrtquq@lemmy.ml on 02 Oct 19:07 collapse

I do not want to administrate any system in my free time.

Do you have a computer you use at home? How much time exactly do you think it takes to manage a personal computer?

I have a store interface where I can buy and install games with pressing a few buttons.

Seriously, look into a steam deck. The interface is very console-like and you can have it on a normal desktop if you want. Or don’t, you already seem pretty convinced that you only want a console.

Guitarfun@lemmy.world on 03 Oct 02:08 collapse

I second this. The Steam Deck is the best console and a really cheap gaming PC at the same time. You can emulate and use it for other programs without needing to mod it like you would a console and even though it’s linux, it’s so easy to use. You don’t really need to use the desktop mode for much if you don’t want to, but it’s not bad at all. I’ve switched to Bazzite as my only OS for my main computer because of how much SteamOS has impressed me.

ICastFist@programming.dev on 02 Oct 15:47 collapse

I want a subscription free Console that supports online play.

Sorry, best we can do is a PC or phone

zanyllama52@infosec.pub on 02 Oct 16:40 next collapse

Word. Just give me a completed game that is mostly bug free and has all features that are alleged to be part of the game on release.

Landless2029@lemmy.world on 02 Oct 17:40 next collapse

I always preferred waiting a year for AAA games. Patches, mods, guides and sales.

Even better when GOTY editions or bundles with all the DLC on sale.

sadfitzy@ttrpg.network on 03 Oct 19:05 collapse

Be a smart consumer. Don’t pay for things you could be getting for free just so the business can have a nicer campus.

If it’s a major release, wait until the game is finished and then torrent it.

_AutumnMoon_@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 02 Oct 06:25 next collapse

I have never had gamepass, it just seemed like a waste honestly

caseofthematts@lemmy.world on 02 Oct 10:30 next collapse

I get the inherent value people attach to it, but after having it several times (I’d have it for a month or two and then drop it for like, a year), I would never go back to it even if it still seemed like a good deal.

For an app developed by Microsoft and working on a PC, it has some awful pathing, and I lost saves and had issues launching games on multiple occasions. Tried many fixes and it never worked out. Some games would work for me, others wouldn’t. So for me, since it felt like a toss up to get a game to work, it was pointless.

rozodru@piefed.social on 02 Oct 11:46 collapse

it WAS a good deal early on. Also when they introduced their partnership with RIOT and it would allow you to unlock all the characters in LoL that was a very good deal if you were a League player.

but the price increases and what have you…meh. it was good to get access to some games and not have to pay full retail for them. I’m thankful I didn’t pay full price for Starfield and just played it on gamepass but there would be months on end where there was nothing on there worth playing.

chrislowles@lemmy.zip on 02 Oct 09:07 next collapse

I wasn’t one of the unsubscribers here but I still can’t believe I stuck out on GP for so long back when I did unsub

vladmech@lemmy.world on 02 Oct 09:22 next collapse

I’m doing my part!

OddMinus1@sh.itjust.works on 02 Oct 10:50 next collapse

Just cancelled mine. I have barely been doing ~2 games per year, and the cost was low enough for me to not really care about the months I didn’t play at all.

But a price increase is the straw.

Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world on 02 Oct 10:59 next collapse

Oh, they got rid of the 12 month core plan completely and renamed core to essential (isn’t essential the basic playstation plan?).

I guess I won’t buy more than 1 month at a time for multiplayer. That’s going to save me a lot of money, since I don’t play xbox online very often.

moakley@lemmy.world on 02 Oct 11:58 next collapse

I’m usually fine with paying more for things I enjoy that are worth it. Like $70 games are just not a big deal to me.

I’m also too lazy to cancel most things. I’ve ignored Game Pass price hikes before and justified them by thinking of all the games I played without buying.

But this one is just ridiculous. There’s no value here, no way for me to justify it. I was enjoying Silksong on Xbox because I didn’t have to buy it, but now that I do have to buy it I guess I’ll do that on my Switch instead. Replaying it is going to be rough, especially without my Elite controller.

I hope Microsoft gets their shit together, because Xbox has been my favorite game platform for years.

zanyllama52@infosec.pub on 02 Oct 12:07 next collapse

Never would I ever subscribe to a game service. That’s just me.

altima_neo@lemmy.zip on 02 Oct 14:05 next collapse

I justified it as a games rental. I mean I easily paid $5 to rent a game for the weekend in the 90s. Paying 12 bucks to rent games all month long wasn’t bad (for PC).

But the price they’re charging now, I may as well buy the games I do play, rather than paying for the subscription. The problem for Microsoft is that money is gonna be going to steam instead of them.

sadfitzy@ttrpg.network on 03 Oct 19:07 collapse

Your justification is exemplary of how useful idiots operate.

mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca on 02 Oct 16:16 next collapse

you wouldn’t? not if the cost and convenience was right? just out of principle, regardless of value?

I could see doing it if I had more time to game

zanyllama52@infosec.pub on 02 Oct 16:37 collapse

I don’t feel good about not having the ability to do what I want with my games; the idea of games being “mine” goes away if I cannot buy, sell, resell, loan, copy, backup, modify or destroy it.

I’m not sure how a digital gaming subscription service can compete with that no matter how cheap or how good the library is or how long the service is proposed to exist.

TommySalami@lemmy.world on 02 Oct 17:44 collapse

I definitely see this. I think, at least the way I’ve used it, it’s replaced rentals for me (I miss video stores). I’ve picked it up 2-3 times, each time to play a specific game and cancelled at the end of the month. I’ve absolutely saved money that way, and didn’t really care about owning the content I was getting it for.

Don’t take this as an endorsement though. I don’t think that’s the intended use, and I doubt it would last if everyone did the same. Besides the price hike takes it out of that reasonable territory for the rental idea, at least for me.

killerscene@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 02 Oct 17:21 collapse

same boat. as soon as that service was announced it never made sense to me.

i play a lot of games, but its never at a consistent pace, just makes more sense to buy.

same goes for shit like netflix. im not constantly watching something, so why wouldn’t i just buy the movie when i have a movie night.

ibot@feddit.org on 02 Oct 12:18 next collapse

I just bought 12 month of Ultimate on eBay. I always did this in the past, because it’s cheaper than buying directly from Microsoft. So far, I made good experience with it.

The way it usually works is, that you get a few codes you need to redeem. I got three codes for 36 month of EA Play and then one code for Ultimate that is supposed to transform the EA Play subscription to 12 month Ultimate. But due to the the price hike, the subscription transformation changed as well and I did not get the 12 month.

I’m now in contact with the seller and he tries to find a solution. I want to have my 12 month Ultimate that he offered for the price. But it also sucks for the seller. Seems like we both didn’t know. He basically sold it to cheap. I paid 150€ for 12 month Ultimate and he just now increased the price to 200€.

The new prices are insane! 150€ a year is already my upper limit. I’m not gonna pay 200€ or even more a year. I think, if my new subscription is over, I will not extend it. I like the idea of Game Pass, but that’s to much money.

The thing is I really like Game Consoles. I want to play in front of my TV. I wish, Steam would make another Steam Machine with Steam OS. I do want an all in one solution. The last thing I want is a gaming PC. I hope, alternatives to Xbox Consoles and Playstation come up.

I know, I could also use the XBox without GamePass, but I do play online something and it would be nice to get away from subscriptions completly.

ArsonButCute@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 02 Oct 14:17 next collapse

I wish, Steam would make another steam machine with steamOS

The last thing I want is a gaming PC

The steam machine program was where OEMs could partner with Valve to make a gaming PC that shipped with a steam controller and Steam OS. That’s it.

You stated you wanted a steam machine, but also say you don’t want a gaming PC, but… That’s what a steam machine is

vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works on 02 Oct 15:44 next collapse

Yeah I think some folks get confused and think Steam machines were a Steam based console, but the closest to that is the Steam Deck which admittedly is pretty solid. Though I do think Valve has experimented with making a Steam Console in the past but I don’t think it went anywhere, though it also couldve been absorbed into the Steam Deck team.

ibot@feddit.org on 02 Oct 18:50 collapse

Thanks for clarifying! You are right, I thought they sold complete systems with just Steam OS, like the Steam Deck, but as a console. Seems like I was wrong around it.

Just to make sure: I’m aware one can also use the desktop mode on SteamOS, but it’s not really necessary.

ICastFist@programming.dev on 02 Oct 15:45 next collapse

I mean, you can set up a gaming pc or laptop to mostly work with a controller and have a general interface akin to that of consoles. Retro stuff like Lakka or RetroPie already do it super well. The “set up” part is where you’ll likely spend several hours, though

ibot@feddit.org on 02 Oct 18:29 collapse

Yeah, but what I love about consoles is the nearly zero maintenance. Updates are installed completly in the background. I work the whole day on IT stuff. I do not want to administrate any system in my free time.

And I like to play some more graphic intensiv games, not only retro stuff.

From this points of view Xbox and Playstation are great. I’m just getting less and less happy with the business model behind it. I’m totally fine with paying for stuff. But I never liked the subscription and the higher the monthly prices get the less attractive it is for me.

samus12345@sh.itjust.works on 02 Oct 16:04 collapse

I wish Steam would make another Steam Machine with Steam OS.

It’s rumored they’re working on one codenamed Fremont.

zanyllama52@infosec.pub on 02 Oct 16:39 collapse

It’s also rumored they’re working on Half-Life 3. Let’s see what happens first. 😉

samus12345@sh.itjust.works on 02 Oct 17:50 collapse

I’d say the console is the more plausible rumor, but maybe someday we’ll see!

voytrekk@sopuli.xyz on 02 Oct 12:23 next collapse

I haven’t subbed to gamepads for years because I knew this would eventually happen. Gamepass was designed to get people used to not purchasing games and instead letting them come to them. Subscribers now have to chose between paying even more each month or losing access to the library of games available to them.

SippyCup@lemmy.ml on 02 Oct 13:45 next collapse

I learned after a few months of game pass that most of the games that looked interesting actually weren’t. It’s no big loss, and it’s cheaper to just buy the few games I actually want anymore. Doubly true now.

thoro@lemmy.ml on 02 Oct 14:57 collapse

Gamepass only ever made sense to people who had time to play or dabble in a sufficiently large amount of games per year and felt the need to play some new titles soon or immediately instead of waiting. Otherwise, eventually your total subscription costs would outpace the total cost to purchase what you played, especially if purchased on sale at a later date. And the value gets worse if you ever replayed a game (s).

I’ll never really understand the excitement about this service. It was always a Trojan horse.

TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world on 02 Oct 15:46 next collapse

Gamepass only ever made sense to people who had time to play or dabble in a sufficiently large amount of games per year

Exactly. I only played two games before unsubscribing. You have to have so many free time to make the gamepass worth your while and money.

sadfitzy@ttrpg.network on 03 Oct 19:04 collapse

Gamepass only made sense if you’re an idiot.

Everyone who isn’t stupid knew that they were renting access to something they could be getting for free. The business can raise fees whenever it wants, and you’re stuck either paying the higher rates or cutting your losses and having nothing to show for the money you wasted.

Renting is a scam and only morons think otherwise. Hopefully some of them grow up after seeing this, but I doubt it.

VerilyFemme@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 02 Oct 12:30 next collapse

Buying isn’t owning, but it has to be better than this…

unhrpetby@sh.itjust.works on 02 Oct 17:12 collapse

It can be if you buy from stores, such as GOG and Itch, that provide DRM-free downloads of games. Even Steam, depending on the game.

rumba@lemmy.zip on 02 Oct 16:04 next collapse

Knowing Microsoft, I’d like to thing that it went down like this:

Pardon me, your department isn’t achieving the expected 20% annual revenue increase.

But we’re just selling subscriptions to games that cost us nearly nothing. It’s free money.

And you need to make more money from it, increase your subscriber count or your costs, or we’ll cut your staff.

Randomgal@lemmy.ca on 02 Oct 17:44 collapse

Then they cut staff anyways, because why leave free money on the table?

garretble@lemmy.world on 02 Oct 16:22 next collapse

Honestly, I’ve kinda gone back to buying physical media.

I bought DK Bananza on cart, and guess what? After I finished it, I gave it to my brother. Imagine that! Sharing a game you own? Madness.

I’m eager to pick up Ghost of Yotei from the store this afternoon, as well.

zanyllama52@infosec.pub on 02 Oct 16:38 next collapse

I’ve never gone away from buying physical media, but I could understand exactly why you would want to return to it.

garretble@lemmy.world on 02 Oct 16:43 collapse

For me, when the Switch 1 came out it was just nice to have everything on the device and you never had to do the most heinous thing of taking a moment to put a cart into the device.

But more and more I buy one to two games a time and focus on those, so that issue is largely not a thing any more.

ilinamorato@lemmy.world on 02 Oct 17:49 collapse

For me, with the Switch 1, I was worried about wanting to play a game but oh no it’s back at home. Happened a bunch of times with my 3DS.

But then I bought a case that had card slots in it, and that concern wasn’t much of a concern anymore. Then the pandemic happened, and I never really left home anyway, which meant it mattered even less. So now I have a few digital games that are super annoying to share.

Wispy2891@lemmy.world on 03 Oct 11:54 next collapse

For PC games that’s impossible, at most you can find a disc-shaped steam redeem code

garretble@lemmy.world on 03 Oct 12:21 next collapse

That’s why I don’t really use Steam to buy games anymore, too.

At least maybe use GoG if possible to get a DRM free version.

syreus@lemmy.world on 03 Oct 15:35 collapse

Family Share works really well in my experience. It worked better when I could change the users more frequently but this model is still works pretty well.

prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works on 03 Oct 15:47 collapse

Is there a way to share a single game and use your library still?

I share my library with my son and when he’s using a game my whole library is unavailable to me, unless something has changed (or I’m old and ignorant … also likely)

Wispy2891@lemmy.world on 03 Oct 16:09 next collapse

And the huge drawback that if the kid finds some “easy trick to win matches” on YouTube and gets vac banned, the parent also gets vac banned

prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works on 03 Oct 16:13 collapse

That would be grounds for a 64th trimester abortion IMO

syreus@lemmy.world on 03 Oct 16:24 next collapse

That part changed. You only share what game is in use now.

mellow@lemmy.wtf on 03 Oct 16:44 collapse

Yeah they (if we’re talking about Steam here) changed their whole family stuff. You can keep playing, as long it’s not the same title.

store.steampowered.com/promotion/familysharing/

sadfitzy@ttrpg.network on 03 Oct 19:02 collapse

You never needed physical media in order to share games with others.

You still don’t, and you can share with more people digitally.

mintiefresh@piefed.ca on 02 Oct 17:01 next collapse

It’s honestly cheaper to just buy games than pay this subscription per year.

Plus, you get to keep the games.

sadfitzy@ttrpg.network on 03 Oct 19:02 collapse

It’s even cheaper to torrent them.

And you actually get to keep them.

Siegehammer85@lemmy.world on 02 Oct 18:38 next collapse

I work in the IT software licensing industry, it’s a fucking cancer I can’t wait to fail so bad that when we have the first extended internet outage failure so bad that it shows the world that subscriptions are a liability that shouldn’t exist

Arcane2077@sh.itjust.works on 03 Oct 11:49 collapse

Netflix Spotify Disney and Amazon proved that price hikes are effective at increasing profits even despite the loss of subscribers. Capitalism baby.

I think the only time collective cancellations actually hurt one of these companies was that time Jimmy Kimmel made fun of the president and it took an estimated 1.7M ex-Disney Plus subscribers.

cmhe@lemmy.world on 03 Oct 16:02 collapse

Maybe, but in the Kimmel case there could have been other reasons too. Like Hollywood people not wanting to make business with a company that would just cancel contacts when they have opinions on public. Disney needs those people, arguable more than subscribers.

IMO, consumer boycotts don’t really work in general, here it might have worked, but it is also possible it worked for other reasons.

Arcane2077@sh.itjust.works on 03 Oct 16:37 collapse

Consumer boycotts are pretty much the only strategy guaranteed to work, the only exceptions being Facebook and Google, as they’re the only businesses I can think of that are both primarily B2B, and can operate on speculative liquidity