Dying Light continues celebrating its 10th anniversary with a big graphical facelift, but don't you dare call it a remaster (www.pcgamer.com)
from ninelife@lemmy.ca to games@lemmy.world on 29 Jun 10:11
https://lemmy.ca/post/47048766

#games

threaded - newest

Deathray5@lemmynsfw.com on 29 Jun 10:27 next collapse

Damm it’s kinda bad that there is a logical justification for calling it a retouch instead of remaster and that this argument shits on so many large game companies

Meruten@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 29 Jun 10:48 next collapse

Are they going to patch the ps4 version to not run at 1080p 30fps with thick motion blur on the ps5?

It doesn’t look it like, but they’re still charging £25 for over on PSN.

[deleted] on 29 Jun 11:59 collapse

.

moncharleskey@lemmy.zip on 29 Jun 12:32 next collapse

Personally I wouldn’t say the 2nd was terrible. The first was a better game, but it was helped significantly by free post release updates, which DL2 has gotten a lot of a well. I was pretty impressed with the depth of the city and I like the slow infection aspect. I really miss having a vehicle, but if I remember correctly, there wasn’t a vehicle in the first one at launch and it was added later. Just my 2 cents.

GreyCat@lemmy.world on 29 Jun 17:01 collapse

It wasn’t utter shit, or even bad. It just doesn’t hook you like the first one does.

Pandasdontfly@slrpnk.net on 30 Jun 12:14 collapse

I’ve played hundreds of hours of both games. Dl2 has a lot going for it and is an amazing game… On the other hand the story is awful past the first chapter.