Will all these multiplayer games being released without support for LAN or hosting our own servers no longer be multiplayer when the company shuts down the servers?
from gradual@lemmings.world to games@lemmy.world on 09 May 12:45
https://lemmings.world/post/25849564

Seems like there’s going to be a point where people are noticing the games they spent money on don’t work as they should anymore because the servers get shut down.

How would you feel if most of the multiplayer games you spent money on suddenly stopped being multiplayer because the business decided it’s not worthwhile for them to keep the servers running?

#games

threaded - newest

slazer2au@lemmy.world on 09 May 12:47 next collapse

Isn’t the stop killing games movement bringing this to light?

RandomStickman@fedia.io on 09 May 13:43 collapse

This whole movement really highlights how hard it is to get the word out for me. Fediverse isn't a huge place as it is, relative to other online spaces. But every time SKG related topics surfaces there are always people who have never heard about it and people talking about misconceptions that Ross has addressed many times.

Anyway for everyone else, especially if you're in the EU, please check out https://www.stopkillinggames.com/

11111one11111@lemmy.world on 09 May 12:49 next collapse

Thought that was just stat quo since call of duty or madden started pumping out annual games. I never checked but I assume I can’t boot up Madden 2011 and still find servers to play on.

ampersandrew@lemmy.world on 09 May 12:53 next collapse

They’ve been putting out annual releases for a long time, and Call of Duty used to still have LAN. It doesn’t look like Madden ever had LAN, from a quick search of the old covers, which would list the features the game supported, but it was pretty common even in console games back then.

themeatbridge@lemmy.world on 09 May 12:58 collapse

Can confirm, I remember when Madden introduced online multiplayer, and there was a small kerfuffle because there was no way to bypass their servers. I remember having the conversation with my buddies that it didn’t matter, because we would all prefer to play together on the couch in the same room, and playing strangers on the internet didn’t sound appealing.

jqubed@lemmy.world on 09 May 14:07 collapse

Yeah, I’ve never played Madden online. That’s very much a couch game to me still. Not that I’ve played it much in years. I picked up my first copy in over a decade a couple years ago when it was on sale at the end of the season.

gradual@lemmings.world on 09 May 12:53 collapse

Which is a shame.

I’ll always be able to play World at War multiplayer because it supports LAN and player-hosted servers.

I don’t know if the newer ones support LAN or hosting our own servers, but if they don’t then it would mean we’re essentially renting access to the game’s multiplayer features.

It really means we’re going backwards just to make businesses richer than us even richer at our expense.

ampersandrew@lemmy.world on 09 May 12:50 next collapse

Yes, precisely. These days, when I consider buying a game, if it doesn’t have LAN, private servers, or direct connections, I treat the multiplayer as though it doesn’t exist, because one day it won’t.

MyDarkestTimeline01@ani.social on 09 May 14:08 next collapse

That is. Because you stopped owning your games a while back. What you’re actually buying is a limited access license to the software.

Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe on 09 May 14:22 next collapse

This all started 15+ years ago.

I vaguely recall this transition with a Call of Duty game, when you could no longer host your own, for a game where that really wasn’t necessary, unlike MMORPG.

And today with the high bandwidth home connections, hardware capability, or even just using a VPS, you could still host with appropriate performance.

Brosplosion@lemm.ee on 09 May 15:41 collapse

You never owned your games, what are you talking about

iii@mander.xyz on 09 May 14:27 next collapse

Well yes. That’s why you buy other games.

B0NK3RS@lemmy.world on 09 May 15:26 next collapse

Community servers were/are some of the best times I have in gaming.

yggstyle@lemmy.world on 09 May 18:18 collapse

Meanwhile StarCraft, one of the most pervasive rts for its time and in the PC gaming sphere in general … let you have multiple people play multiplayer on a single disk. Offline. It’s kinda like it advertised itself and people went out to buy it… which influenced more people… who bought it… gasp.

Mindblowing.

Yermaw@lemm.ee on 09 May 22:26 next collapse

Legend has it the original Worms was similar. The DRM was a notepad readme that basically said “share me with your friends but buy a copy if you really like it please”

yggstyle@lemmy.world on 09 May 23:21 collapse

mmmm banana bombs, holy hand grenades, and those cursed shopping levels * shudder *

very_well_lost@lemmy.world on 10 May 17:50 collapse

And it still has a thriving competitive scene more than 25 years later.

In fact, ASL (the biggest SC tournament) is going on right now!

yggstyle@lemmy.world on 10 May 18:08 collapse

Funny how that works. ;)