YouTuber Faces Possible Jail Time for Reviewing Gaming Handhelds (www.androidauthority.com)
from Fluffy_Ruffs@lemmy.world to games@lemmy.world on 16 Jul 15:57
https://lemmy.world/post/33053776

#games

threaded - newest

DrSoap@lemmy.world on 16 Jul 16:03 next collapse

That’s really an unnecessary escalation

riskable@programming.dev on 16 Jul 19:22 collapse

An unnecessary emulation too! Of fascists.

simple@piefed.social on 16 Jul 16:04 next collapse

Retro gaming YouTuber Once Were Nerd has been sued and raided by the Italian government.

That's insane. I know many of these handhelds come with pirated roms but taking it out on a youtube reviewer is outrageous. Why don't they just ban them from being shipped to italy?

st3ph3n@midwest.social on 16 Jul 16:25 next collapse

Easier to stomp on one individual than to crack down on the businesses importing this stuff. They’re probably also collecting some kind of import duty on them too.

fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com on 17 Jul 10:48 collapse

My guess is it’s because reviewing is advertisement, as he’s making money off the review if he monetized the video.

NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip on 16 Jul 16:08 next collapse

Seen this going around.

Is anyone familiar with the channel itself? Because based on the article, it sounds like mostly (presumably he) is getting made an example of for reviewing hardware that comes with ROMs on an SD Card? But… a LOT of these “retro consoles” do and outlets just ignore it in favor of their totally legit collection that they don’t talk about.

Did OWN actually show what is on the SD Card and emphasize that these units came with it?

Evil_Shrubbery@lemmy.zip on 16 Jul 19:04 collapse

He uploaded an English dubbed explanation: youtube/zSEB4if2pJQ#.

He seems super unsavvy when it comes to legal/formal proceedings or authority in general (I don’t mean that as a bad thing, we are all different, just that it can def affect how things go and escalate).
For one he got the notice in mid April & just continued to review (among other things?) such consoles this whole time (which makes me think now a trial is even more likely) & didn’t prepare for anything (his channels, personal things, SD cards with all them ROMs, etc).
The panic & the whole ‘why is this happening to me’ anger makes more sense in view of this (not that is isn’t warranted, from what I’ve seen it’s def stupid anyone is doing anything about this guy in general).

But other shit-showy things happened too - they took his phone to make a copy & didn’t return it for two months (it’s unclear if they had a warrant for it or if he volunteered it - or indeed if Italian law recognises what a “personal device” is as EU has yet to compile a delegated act that will unify definitions & personal rights for such modern necessities for all members).
(If a cop takes my phone & doesn’t promptly return it still locked I’m marring their mom & make them call me daddy before the trial starts. Then submit my phone in evidence with saucy newlywed pics. I would be angy too if they took my phone, not to mention some poor data retrieval specialist getting a lifetime dose of ptsd.)

An Italian youtuber with some legal experience explains a bit more (in Italian): youtube./zSEB4if2pJQ#.

What I was thinking is that the complaint had to be specific, ie some lawyer (for a Japanese megacorp?) found an exact thing to complain about (eg in this exact second of this specific vid he admits this personal gain and shows that illegal thing, etc). Not just something vague.
They are looking at all his communication, finances, and content on his channels (but might be focusing only on one YT channel - this and the fact they mention an Anbernic device makes me think it’s a very specific complaint).
I don’t know that much about Italian law enforcement but I agree that is a bit sus they went after him at all - there might be more to the story that he either isn’t saying or thinks (in your average “law ignorance” way) irrelevant but is very relevant. Idk.

Killer_Tree@sh.itjust.works on 17 Jul 01:59 collapse

Thank you for the additional context and links!

Ulrich@feddit.org on 16 Jul 16:25 next collapse

YouTuber Faces Possible Jail Time for Reviewing Gaming Handhelds

I’m so tired of these titles “Person arrested for perfectly legal thing”. He wasn’t arrested for reviewing gaming handhelds, he was arrested for copyright infringement.

wizblizz@lemmy.world on 16 Jul 16:43 next collapse

The most pedantic comment I’ve read all week. Title is fine

ThatGirlKylie@lemmy.world on 16 Jul 17:04 next collapse

Exactly. Copyright infringement? He was reviewing handheld that came with ROMs which is the copyright infringement apparently?

I agree the title is fine because the whole reason why he was arrested because he was reviewing the handheld that had the games on them. That is making an argument out of nothing

Ulrich@feddit.org on 16 Jul 17:09 collapse

the whole reason why he was arrested because he was reviewing the handheld that had the games on them.

I’d love to see you point to an Italian law that states that reviewing handhelds on YouTube is illegal.

Evil_Shrubbery@lemmy.zip on 16 Jul 17:49 next collapse

Epstein arrested for flying on planes

People will seriously argue such title would be fine.

ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml on 16 Jul 19:32 collapse

I understand your concern, potential employer, but I was never arrested for Chicago Sunroofing the Popemobile. There aren’t even any laws that say it’s illegal, I don’t know why people keep calling me that

Ulrich@feddit.org on 16 Jul 17:10 collapse

It’s not pedantic. The title not only intentionally misrepresents the situation but it explains absolutely nothing. Reviewing hardware on YouTube is not a crime in any country to my knowledge, so how could he be arrested for it?

Evil_Shrubbery@lemmy.zip on 16 Jul 17:41 next collapse

I agree, the title is literally false, just to get more engagement.

(If it was literal than any ads about such handhelds would be in the same category, not to mention YouTube as it allows this en masse.)

And this isn’t a comment abut the arrest (megacorps are always scumbags), just how “journalism” works nowdays.

It’s just a fact that the title could have easily explained why was he arrested - and it’s a fact that was omitted on purpose so that you have to click on it to see what the actual reason was (what potentially isn’t in accordance with the law).
(You don’t get the key info of the whole story until you pay for that info by clicking on the article so they get engagement monies.)

NotForYourStereo@lemmy.world on 16 Jul 18:34 collapse

Is he reviewing the device, or is he reviewing the pirated games?

Dumbfuck.

Ulrich@feddit.org on 16 Jul 19:16 collapse

I don’t understand the question. Which one of those is illegal?

NotForYourStereo@lemmy.world on 17 Jul 05:44 collapse

I don’t understand

Yeah that’s abundantly clear.

[deleted] on 17 Jul 06:55 collapse

.

grue@lemmy.world on 16 Jul 18:36 collapse

He couldn’t have been arrested for copyright infringement; that offense was perpetrated by the entity that sold the thing to him, not himself.

Evil_Shrubbery@lemmy.zip on 16 Jul 18:54 next collapse

That is literally the charge/what they are investigating.

Afaik the difference will come down to if he was ever paid for a review (which would be the difference between a regular consumer buying a thing legally & showing what he bought vs him being part of the promo campaigns by the manufacturer … you know, like Google is).

And if there is no newer specific law (the old one ofc doesn’t explain shit since it’s from pre-computer era), it might come down to him receiving free consoles to review, and maybe having a bunch of SD cards full of ROMs in his apartment.
(Meaning that if they say free review merch is a form of payment, they go to trial. As I understand he didn’t/it’s not common practice to return stuff like this after review, tho some reviewers do it and some manufacturers demand it.)

Ulrich@feddit.org on 16 Jul 19:17 collapse

He can be arrested for anything. If you want to argue that it wasn’t copyright infringement, you’ll have to take it up with the author. That’s what they said.

Evil_Shrubbery@lemmy.zip on 16 Jul 20:34 collapse

No, copyright infringement is a criminal offence in this case* - there won’t be any Nintendo/Sony lawyers in any part of the investigation or trial. They might have just reported a crime.

Nobody is getting sued by Nintendo (like would be the usual business in USA).

*it has it’s own jail sentence & a 15k€ fine, tho again not clear if per case or whatever bcs the law infrastructure just isn’t up to date (never was?)

(Afaik)

Canconda@lemmy.ca on 16 Jul 16:34 next collapse

Didn’t Italy elect a far right neo-fascist government?

Hopefully gamers take notes.

Dojan@pawb.social on 16 Jul 16:38 next collapse

They did! I’m curious about the overlap between retro-gaming enthusiasts and fascists though. Do fascists really care about art and its preservation?

st3ph3n@midwest.social on 16 Jul 16:44 next collapse

They’re notorious book burners, so I imagine not.

NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip on 16 Jul 17:23 collapse

Fascists care about setting precedent and “purchased vaguely illegal content” is some great precedent.

This just also is a smart attack because the usual crowd is going to come out to insist that it is OWN’s fault for playing Nintendo games and piracy is the greatest problem facing the world and that Nintendo Switch Online™ is a great service.

Its the same as when the christofacists attacked Pornhub via Visa et al in the US. Everyone hates revenge porn and child porn (well, except for certain heads of state…) so nobody is going to complain but it made it very clear the path to destroy content that goes against the fascists’ interests.

paranoid@lemmy.world on 16 Jul 17:04 collapse

Italy has always been a bit odd - I remember a group of scientists were convicted of manslaughter because they didn’t predict an earthquake that killed a few hundred people.

TachyonTele@piefed.social on 16 Jul 17:18 next collapse

Dude. That happened way back in ...2009!
Whatthefuck is wrong with people? At least it got overturned.

themadcodger@kbin.earth on 16 Jul 17:32 collapse

I remember that! But yeah, it didn't make any sense back then either.

bss03@infosec.pub on 16 Jul 18:16 collapse

The USGS still claims, as it did in 2009, that earthquakes are unpredictable. At best they’ve been able to communicate when/where seismic events happen slightly faster than they propagate through the earth.

HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world on 17 Jul 06:45 collapse

most of the time i get the “you’re having an earthquake” text a few seconds after the shaking stops, but a few times it’s come before it started so hey

[deleted] on 16 Jul 20:41 next collapse

.

CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works on 17 Jul 18:31 collapse

What about that American college girl whose roommate died and they accused her of murdering her in a satanic ritual which all turned out to be made up by the Italian prosecution?

finitebanjo@lemmy.world on 16 Jul 16:50 next collapse

According to the video, officials are not required to disclose what exactly the charges are or who has brought them until the initial investigation is complete under Italian law. At that point, the case is either dismissed or goes to trial. The complaint specifically mentions reproduction of copyrighted material from Nintendo and Sony, but the case may originate from the agency itself.

So for now we don’t actually know the charges or if the trial will procede, but yeah definitely not fair.

Evil_Shrubbery@lemmy.zip on 16 Jul 18:48 collapse

Yeah, he only showed what the police gave him (they are investigating him for promoting copyright infringement).

vane@lemmy.world on 16 Jul 17:56 next collapse

He could say that he is doing AI research and AI training and reviews are just part of his scientific documentation.

ZeroHora@lemmy.ml on 16 Jul 17:59 next collapse

Shipping the handheld with a SD card loaded with pirated ROMs is asking for trouble, why target the youtuber though?

ViatorOmnium@piefed.social on 16 Jul 18:41 next collapse

Because the manufacturer and seller are in China and they want to make an example out of someone?

ZeroHora@lemmy.ml on 16 Jul 18:54 collapse

They made a example, and how that impact the sales of the handhelds? They’ll probably sell more now.

ViatorOmnium@piefed.social on 16 Jul 18:56 next collapse

They are hoping people are going to be afraid of being caught with one. (yeah, idiots)

Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 17 Jul 09:19 collapse

Alternativelly, some higher-up got pressure via some politician after talking to some lobbyist or golf-buddy, to “do something”, and some lower-down who got the hot potato covered their ass by finding something they could do, all of which quite independently of any strategical considerations.

If one doesn’t assume the Justice System aims be Just, a lot of things become easilly explained without the needed to find some kind of Master Strategy Beyond Our Comprehension to explain them.

ayyy@sh.itjust.works on 17 Jul 05:17 collapse

Nobody ever accused capitalist goons of being smart.

Evil_Shrubbery@lemmy.zip on 16 Jul 18:44 next collapse

Yeah, it’s weird bcs as I understand that copyright law from 1941 is for the actual distribution, and if he never got paid by anyone in the distribution chain (tho as understand he did get some free consoles to review), then he wasn’t part of it - just filming himself saying what can be bought on the market.

MolochAlter@lemmy.world on 17 Jul 04:55 next collapse

The exact specifics change country by country, in Italy there are a lot of horseshit rules around it because one of the most powerful unions lobbies (our equivalent of the RIAA) for more exclusive control over media at every chance they get, to the point that you’re not allowed to distribute even your own media through physical sales without paying a cut.

Evil_Shrubbery@lemmy.zip on 17 Jul 06:55 collapse

I would have your mafia people (RIAA) meet their mafia people (Nintendo) & let them fight.

/s

MolochAlter@lemmy.world on 17 Jul 09:24 collapse

Nintendo products have their union sale sticker on so I think they met and our guys won.

HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world on 17 Jul 06:47 collapse

a decent accountant could persuasively argue those free consoles were payment.

Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 17 Jul 09:13 next collapse

Almost certainly there was some kind of pressure by somebody well connected on some higher up in the Italian Justice or Political Authorities of the

“Something Must Be Done!”

kind.

Followed by whomever was the last link in the shit chain coming from above, following the mental process of:

“This is Something we can do”

“We shall do This!”

It’s pretty standard in the stuff which isn’t their daily bread and butter that Justice Systems are driven by cronyism at the higher level and cover-my-ass at the lower level, especially in countries which have a culture of Cronyism.

(People are people, and even in Justice Systems they’re no more impeccably honest and fair than elsewhere - in fact positions with power tend to attract people who are less honest and fair than average, IMHO).

Often this shit gets overturned when it gets to court or on at least appeal (generally the system gets less crooked as you go up, though I know of cases in other similar countries in Europe were only when it got the European Court Of Human Rights was the injustice corrected) and once the Press’ (and the higher up’s) attention has moved on, but that is a mentally and economically very costly fight for individuals to fight, which is why poor people almost invariably get shafted in such a system when they cross the wrong person or “don’t know their place”.

x00z@lemmy.world on 17 Jul 14:52 collapse

why target the youtuber though?

It’s the same taking the fight against drug dealers to the drug users. They don’t care about the lives they ruin as long as they can punish people.

absquatulate@lemmy.world on 16 Jul 19:25 next collapse

Aah, the Guardia di Finanza, the one police organ all italians actually respect and fear ( or so I hear ).

The charges don’t make sense though. Maybe by reviewing “pirate” material he was indirectly bypassing paying the italian state its due and thus they jumped him?

Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 16 Jul 21:30 next collapse

the Italian Copyright Law. This law, which was originally written in 1941

Draconian copyright laws, government overreach, and fascism. Name a more iconic trio.

missingno@fedia.io on 16 Jul 22:17 next collapse

I'm surprised they've gotten away with shipping preloaded SD cards for so long. That was a risk waiting to blow up in someone's face, though it obviously isn't fair to be going after some guy rather than the distributors.

FinalRemix@lemmy.world on 17 Jul 00:45 collapse

To be fair, they (anbernic at least) sidestep the obvious minefields. No Mario, Pokemon, etc. A bunch of really sketchy and somewhat janky MAME ROMs, and a bunch of NES and others, on my 35xxV and 406h.

Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world on 17 Jul 01:59 next collapse

Remember when Retro Game Corps almost had his youtube channel shut down by Nintendo for showing Nintendo footage on these handhelds?

Yeah…he’s probably thinking to himself “Welp. Time to retire.”

ayyy@sh.itjust.works on 17 Jul 05:15 next collapse

Fuck fascists. I can’t believe the literal Mussolini’s are making a comeback. Remember, the only good fascist is a dead fascist.

Cocopanda@lemmy.world on 17 Jul 07:07 collapse

CIA killed all the leftists in Italy to keep Italy out of the USSR. Don’t forget that.

Valmond@lemmy.world on 17 Jul 07:30 collapse

Common grandpa, take your pills now.

Cocopanda@lemmy.world on 17 Jul 07:32 next collapse

I mean. Are you trying to say that things that have been reported on and unclassified. Didn’t happen? Come on now young one.

Saledovil@sh.itjust.works on 17 Jul 11:06 next collapse

Source?

Cocopanda@lemmy.world on 17 Jul 18:30 collapse

Here

Saledovil@sh.itjust.works on 18 Jul 04:27 collapse

Reading through the article it appears that the group that carried out the most assassination was the Brigado Rosso, or Red Brigades. Interestingly, they also killed a prominent politician of the Christian Democrats, Aldo Moro, who was actively looking into working with the communist party, and his assassination killed his party’s plans to work with the Communist Party.

The CIA appears to have been involved only marginally, being mentioned only only at one point where fascists ask them if the USA would theoretically support a coup. (Technically they’re also mentioned in the list of parties involved in the conflict, as alleged supporters of the fascists). While this doesn’t prove that they weren’t involved, I did expect there to be more proven CIA meddling based on your earlier claims.

It appears that the CIA wasn’t to blame for the leftist’s. In fact, it seems like the Marxist-Leninist Red Brigades killed people until they had no allies left, thus being unable to sustain their campaign of assassinations. So, yeah, basically your source completely undermines your position.

Cocopanda@lemmy.world on 18 Jul 05:22 collapse

I want you to know. That handlers might not pull the bullets. But they control the messaging from Langley. Just like Che’s death. It wasn’t an American killing them. But they were in the room when they were killed.

Saledovil@sh.itjust.works on 18 Jul 06:06 collapse

So, do you have any actual evidence that the CIA got involved in the years of lead? Or are you seriously trying to tell me that the Red Brigades were CIA puppets?

Cocopanda@lemmy.world on 18 Jul 06:55 collapse

Simple answer. Is there are books detailing this. But there is no direct smoking gun to say the CIA directly participated in assassinations. It’s just known that they financed and supplied radical groups on the right to do their dirty deeds.

Saledovil@sh.itjust.works on 18 Jul 07:19 collapse

Then why did you cite a source that doesn’t claim that the CIA was supporting the right wingers?

Valmond@lemmy.world on 17 Jul 17:41 collapse

No but that there are no leftists in Italy because of it. Or do you believe the CIA is killing all the leftist in Italy right now?

Revan343@lemmy.ca on 17 Jul 18:05 collapse

As opposed to a rare grandpa?

CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works on 17 Jul 18:28 collapse

An S-tier grandpa

buttnugget@lemmy.world on 17 Jul 07:02 next collapse

When I’m dictator, any country that does something like this will be carpet bombed.

WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today on 18 Jul 07:48 collapse

I will vote for you!

susurrus0@lemmy.zip on 17 Jul 07:05 next collapse

Sounds like a massive overreaction and abuse of century-old laws.

If those devices are so bad, why not forbid selling them in Italy, instead of punishing people who buy them completely legally. Imagine going through all of this because you bought a laptop and posted a review online.

Aielman15@lemmy.world on 17 Jul 07:09 next collapse

Italy is a joke. Our politicians call us lazy, the rich go on TV crying because they can’t find people willing to work for minimal (or below) wage, and then a young person manages to carve themselves a path outside of the ‘norm’, our state immediately shows up and curb stomps them.

I was talking with a colleague of mine the other day. They work two jobs to make a living. The state taxed them so much, they are paying more for the second job that they are gaining, basically working for free. Tax the poor, let the rich off the hook.

Fuck Italy.

Nikls94@lemmy.world on 17 Jul 07:40 next collapse

Up to 20k per year you pay 23%, from 20k to 32k you pay 25% and from 32k to 50k per year you pay 35% income tax. If my research is correct, the main job emplayer keeps the tax. So the second employer should keep those 23% as well. As long as your colleague earns less than 50k from both of his jobs, he only has to pay 12% of the second job‘s yearly income as taxes out of his own pocket.

So mathematically it should not be possible to pay to be able to work.

Unless he’s "self employed“ but then he’s allowed that employer to fist him lubeless.

Aielman15@lemmy.world on 17 Jul 08:21 next collapse

It’s a bit of a complicated situation and I wouldn’t go into much detail, but basically, they live in Italy, but one of their job is (work from home) in another country. They are taxed by the other country, then taxed by Italy as well.

After that, Italy fined them on some bullshit grounds and forced them to pay a ridiculous sum of money. Needless to say, they never attempted to skirt or evade taxes or anything. They worked their ass off and the country said “fuck you in particular” because Italy.

I specifically remember them telling me that, despite being half Italian, they wanted to live in Italy because they love the country and have friends and family here, but now they don’t know what to do. It’s heartbreaking seeing how our country treats its citizens, then our politicians going on TV and lamenting the fact that young people choose to go live elsewhere. Italy as a country doesn’t see you as a citizen to protect, it just wants to squeeze you dry and leave you for dead.

bassomitron@lemmy.world on 17 Jul 09:27 next collapse

That really sucks, man. I fully empathize with getting fucked by a greedy government that protects the wealthy while abusing the working class. The world needs to unite against the elites destroying it.

Nikls94@lemmy.world on 17 Jul 10:01 next collapse

They might Google some double taxation agreement between Italy and this other country. Usually, if there isn’t any, there should be a law to create a specific situation for them to avoid double taxation.

Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de on 17 Jul 13:30 collapse

So it’s not taxes, it’s some unspecified fines

mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works on 17 Jul 16:33 collapse

That’s still not how progressive tax systems work. In your example, it’s the first 20k is taxed 23%, then the next 32k is taxed 25%, then the next 50k is taxed 35%.

So if you made 52k in a year, the first 20k yields 4.6k in taxes, then the remaining 32k yields 8k in taxes. Leading to a total of 12.6k in taxes, or an effective rate of ~24.2%

TroublesomeTalker@feddit.uk on 18 Jul 06:34 collapse

When the scores are settled sure, doesn’t mean there’s not mechanisms in any particular country that make this harder. Work two Jobs in the UK without carefully sorting PAYE and one of those will be collected at 40% emergency rates. You get it back eventually, but if you are paying transport, meals and other expenses to attend the second job I can see how it could get close to nothing. You get most of it back later, but that doesn’t help marginalized people trying to earn extra right now.

rimjob_rainer@discuss.tchncs.de on 17 Jul 09:34 next collapse

Our politicians call us lazy, the rich go on TV crying because they can’t find people willing to work for minimal (or below) wage

This sounds like Germany. I think it’s the norm in many countries by now. We already entered late stage capitalism, at this point it will only become worse.

prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 17 Jul 12:00 collapse

The state taxed them so much, they are paying more for the second job that they are gaining, basically working for free

Perhaps I’m misreading, but I don’t think this is mathematically possible.

Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de on 17 Jul 13:28 collapse

The amount of people who don’t understand how taxes work is just ridiculous.

FanciestPants@lemmy.world on 17 Jul 14:16 collapse

Speaking from US perspective, our tax code is a few thousand pages. I don’t think it’s meant for most people to understand.

That said, yeah the effective tax rate being a larger percent of one’s income than the income from a second job is probably something that would be understood by most if stated differently.

Edit: i read some further responses and realized it’s a different situation than a simple effective tax rate issue. I also didn’t really understand the foreign and domestic tax issues at hand and resulting tax penalties though, so I’m in the ridiculous group.

Cocopanda@lemmy.world on 17 Jul 07:31 next collapse

But Gamergate said that Fascist conservatives would be our friends? What? Did the Russian disinfo targets get manipulated again?

bluesheep@sh.itjust.works on 17 Jul 09:32 next collapse

The creator, assuming he didn’t do anything wrong, complied with demands, providing full transcripts of his conversations and chats with gaming handheld manufacturers. The officers also took his phone, promising to return it in a few days. It was returned two months later, on June 15.

Oof. A reminder to not talk to cops, kids.

bestboyfriendintheworld@sh.itjust.works on 17 Jul 14:25 collapse

Never give them evidence against you. They should do the work themselves.

SpiceDealer@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 17 Jul 11:07 next collapse

Emulators. Are. Legal.

This was settled with the Sony/Bleem debacle. Bleem only provided the software by which one could emulate PSX games but never the ISO files themselves. Those files could only be provided by the end user regardless of how they obtained them. Sony, of course, couldn’t give less of a shit and sued them anyways. Judges, however, took Bleem’s side on the basis that no copyright infringement had been committed on their behalf. Although Bleem would ultimately win ever lawsuit brought against them, the sheer size of the legal costs led to their closure which makes you wonder if that was Sony’s endgame the whole time.

Here’s a video by Nerrel about the legality of emulation. It’s from 2020 but it is still relevant.

[deleted] on 17 Jul 11:59 next collapse

.

SomethingBurger@jlai.lu on 17 Jul 15:34 next collapse

This specific case is in Italy, though.

thermal_shock@lemmy.world on 17 Jul 16:42 next collapse

And I’m my moral code. Make the games available or stfu, we’re going to emulate it.

ILikeTraaaains@lemmy.world on 17 Jul 18:24 collapse

And it is not about the emulation by itself but that some of the consoles came with roms.

fatalicus@lemmy.world on 18 Jul 05:32 next collapse

That is a lot of text for something that has no relevance in this case, since it is from Italy and not the US.

Different countries have different laws, and court cases in the US has no effect on Italian law.

WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today on 18 Jul 07:42 next collapse

Don’t the losers of the lawsuit pay all legal fees?

oyo@lemmy.zip on 18 Jul 13:40 collapse

Not typically–which is a major driver of frivolous lawsuits.

Gaylactus@lemmy.world on 18 Jul 14:31 collapse

The legality of ANYTHING, is subject to local jurisdiction, in this case it will be in EU/Italy. Also, while emulators may not be illegal, copying ROMs that are copyrighted to Nintendo of whichever may be the company that published said ROM, are.

Scavenger8294@feddit.org on 17 Jul 12:57 next collapse

so what was the best handheld

lepinkainen@lemmy.world on 17 Jul 15:45 next collapse

It all depends really, Steam Deck is the best all rounder but for specific niches (tiny and portable, retro form factor) there are better ones 😀

GreenKnight23@lemmy.world on 17 Jul 18:41 collapse

retroid pocket 5 is pretty sweet. I just wish it had handles for by big hands.

thermal_shock@lemmy.world on 17 Jul 16:44 collapse

The one you’ll use, that’s fits your hand and playstyle. There is no “best”, they’re all pretty damn capable for retro gaming.

ivanafterall@lemmy.world on 17 Jul 18:00 collapse

The one you’ll use, that’s fits your hand and playstyle.

It was right there in front of me all along…

thermal_shock@lemmy.world on 17 Jul 18:37 collapse

Lol

“I play hard”

Kolanaki@pawb.social on 18 Jul 08:12 collapse

Master of my joystick.

x00z@lemmy.world on 17 Jul 14:51 next collapse

The officials have access to the devices, they consumed the illegal content and then documented their findings. This is considered a review and the officials should be charged under the copyright law.

thermal_shock@lemmy.world on 17 Jul 16:41 collapse

Almost like illegally obtaining evidence

barnaclebutt@lemmy.world on 18 Jul 07:23 next collapse

Man using a computer gets arrested for using a computer on YouTube. Amazon, seller of disgusting emulation game stealing piracy devices, is completely innocent.

Timbo303@lemmy.ml on 18 Jul 14:48 next collapse

Nintendo really gets on my nerves. It’s like they want folks to hate Nintendo. They could had gone after Amazon but instead chose to go after the little guy.

BurgerBaron@piefed.social on 22 Jul 20:42 collapse

In his honor I shall replay Grezzo Due 2.