Assassin's Creed Shadows delayed again to March 20 (www.eurogamer.net)
from simple@lemm.ee to games@lemmy.world on 09 Jan 17:26
https://lemm.ee/post/52151262

It was previously releasing Feb 14. Does not look good for Ubisoft.

#games

threaded - newest

erin@social.sidh.bzh on 09 Jan 17:42 next collapse

that's the problem:

"the company had appointed advisors to review and pursue various transformational strategic and capitalistic options to extract the best value for stakeholders".

Companies should focus on extracting the best value for consumers not stakeholders... when it was created the stoke market was supposed to be disconnected from real economy to prevent that situation where companies tries to give priority to the stakeholders (who don't produce anything and don't increase GDP) over consumers. When that rule started being ignored in the beginning of the XX century and provocked the 1929 krack they should have take it at a warning and stop doing that instead of continuing that heresy.

ampersandrew@lemmy.world on 09 Jan 17:58 next collapse

Ubisoft will likely be a private company soon, and I doubt the situation will change much in the aftermath.

EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world on 09 Jan 18:08 collapse

Yeah the difference between being public and private disappears when the “private” part just means a private equity firm.

ampersandrew@lemmy.world on 09 Jan 18:12 collapse

The private equity that would control it after it goes private, in all likelihood, would be the same family who controls it today and always has controlled it. They’re not interested in stripping it for parts, but they’re also not interested in scaling their operations down and learning some hard lessons to make a sustainable video game company.

Katana314@lemmy.world on 09 Jan 21:39 next collapse

Giving some Weird Al vibes with that mission…

Pregnenolone@lemmy.world on 09 Jan 23:42 collapse

Are you thinking of shareholders?

Stakeholders and shareholders are different. Consumers are stakeholders in this case.

erin@social.sidh.bzh on 09 Jan 23:51 collapse

hum yes, English is not my main language, sorry ><

warmaster@lemmy.world on 09 Jan 20:01 next collapse

lol, this game’s fucked beyond salvation.

chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world on 09 Jan 21:19 collapse

It’s a Ubisoft game. It was doomed to begin with.

TastyWheat@lemmy.world on 09 Jan 22:27 next collapse

When does it ever look good for Ubisoft?

hal_5700X@sh.itjust.works on 09 Jan 22:36 next collapse

Whomp Whomp

LovingHippieCat@lemmy.world on 10 Jan 01:48 next collapse

They’re not saying it but I think it’s likely this is because of all the big games coming out in February. Civ 7, Avowed, and Monster Hunter Wilds are the three big ones and those take up a lot of time. Shadows would get lost in the weeds. Meanwhile there isn’t really a big game coming out in March. So perfect time.

pycorax@lemmy.world on 10 Jan 03:33 next collapse

Are delays not good? It’s preferable to being broken on launch, not to say that it couldn’t be, but it’s likely that it would be more broken if not delayed.

glitches_brew@lemmy.world on 10 Jan 03:57 next collapse

Takes extra time to get that fourth A.

Also, never give Ubisoft money.

UprisingVoltage@feddit.it on 10 Jan 05:33 collapse

When a game gets delayed it’s not a good sign in general. It means “the game is broken and we can’t release it as it is”.

Of course a delayed game will be better than a game that needed to be delayed and released anyways instead, but realistically speaking you can’t fix a broken AAA sized game in one or two months.

Add this to the fact that Ubisoft (rightfully so) earned a bad reputation among players as time went on, and that devs can’t work at their best when they are crunching and they fear to be laid off, and you’ll understand why non-casual gamers don’t have faith in the game.

vane@lemmy.world on 10 Jan 04:20 next collapse

KCD2 effect

mbinn@fedia.io on 10 Jan 03:06 next collapse

They are welcome to delay it again and again :)

john89@lemmy.ca on 11 Jan 04:00 next collapse

Assassin’s creed died with 2 when they fired the creator and decided to milk it as much as possible.

So sad what this series has become, considering its counter-culture influences.

Squizzy@lemmy.world on 14 Jan 08:41 collapse

Would have loved to see the original vision through

john89@lemmy.ca on 14 Jan 08:51 collapse

Me too.

Personally, I thought the series would’ve ended with getting to play as Desmond for most of the game, actually being an assassin in the modern day.

Squizzy@lemmy.world on 14 Jan 11:08 collapse

It could have gone anywhere, the rumour was modern day third to close out the story.

It could have gone to settlements in space, templar industry types creating advanced cities to escape a doomed earth allowing for a cryogenically frozen Desmond to believeably do some of the stunt in space conditions.

Instead they picked random times and shoehorned in a rethread story barely expanding on the lore by walking all over it.

MidsizedSedan@lemmy.world on 11 Jan 05:08 collapse

I feel more sorry for the Assasins Creed fans. Started by being a stealth parkour game, and its now just trying to be The Witcher