New report suggests third-party Switch 2 game sales are "below estimates" (www.gamesindustry.biz)
from tonytins@pawb.social to games@lemmy.world on 19 Jun 20:29
https://pawb.social/post/26681407

#games

threaded - newest

ampersandrew@lemmy.world on 19 Jun 20:52 next collapse

It’s really too early to extract much of anything out of this.

[deleted] on 19 Jun 21:03 next collapse

.

[deleted] on 19 Jun 21:04 collapse

.

ampersandrew@lemmy.world on 19 Jun 21:20 next collapse

It will be valuable information when we have more data points to compare it against later. The console’s high initial sales may very well have little to do with anything except how many Nintendo had available, for instance. It could do Wii U numbers (unlikely), or it could be a mega success, or anything in between. The third party sales might be reflective of the fact that the games are all older and available on other platforms, or it could be that customers are strapped for cash after a higher console purchase price, or any of a number of other reasons. I would just encourage people not to make a narrative out of this yet.

[deleted] on 19 Jun 22:05 collapse

.

Ashtear@lemmy.zip on 20 Jun 00:48 collapse

It’s too early to draw any conclusions. Take it from Mat Piscatella, who’s forgotten more about video game market research than I ever learned myself.

Hardware launches are not like game releases, anyway. It’s the establishment of a new product market, and early game releases on consoles have an ebb and flow to them that later blockbusters do not. It’s about building growth, not first-week sales.

[deleted] on 20 Jun 01:08 collapse

.

Ashtear@lemmy.zip on 20 Jun 07:11 collapse

conventional wisdom does not apply

All the more reason why it’s far too early to draw any conclusions.

[deleted] on 20 Jun 12:09 collapse

.

KoboldCoterie@pawb.social on 19 Jun 21:09 next collapse

Looking at this list of 3rd party games, I wonder if the reason for this is that most of these games have been available on other platforms already for quite some time. If you were interested in e.g. Hades 2, unless you just didn’t have a PC available, you probably weren’t waiting for an at-the-time unannounced Switch 2 to play it on. Heck, Cyberpunk is 5 years old at this point. Street Fighter 6 is 2 years old and was on a lot of other platforms.

I expect we might see different results when we see more 3rd party games getting simultaneous launch on Switch 2 and other platforms.

Vipsu@lemmy.world on 19 Jun 21:43 collapse

A lot of players and local venues prefer PS4, PS5 and PC for fighting games. If you have licensed PS4/PS5 arcade stick it should work on all three of these platforms. Unlicensed ones might not work with PS5 games. Switch is mostly just for melee.

That being said game key-cards seem largely inferior to physical versions on other platforms even if you likely have to patch most games these days anyways.

tonytins@pawb.social on 19 Jun 21:54 collapse

Game cards seem like a tone-deaf attempt to appeal to those who just want a physical copy.

bdonvr@thelemmy.club on 19 Jun 22:08 collapse

I mean - they’re better than the codes they used to slap in boxes. At least you can lend these or sell them (for the lifespan of the console, or whatever server it uses…)

Phelpssan@lemmy.world on 19 Jun 22:49 next collapse

Are they? If you didn’t buy the game with the intent of lending/reselling later I feel they’re even worse than code-in-a-box.

bdonvr@thelemmy.club on 20 Jun 00:01 collapse

Yeah, they’re not tied to accounts or consoles. Any console with the card in will be able to play the game after downloading it. You can trade or sell them.

Codes and boxes are just digital purchases with plastic waste attached and no further benefit.

They’re shittier than real physical games, but they still do have that one advantage over digital games, just with the drawback that you still have a physical cartridge you have to switch out and carry around. It’s a mixed bag.

VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world on 20 Jun 06:38 collapse

In other words, they’re exactly the same as a lot of the games on disc for Xbox and PlayStation.

Goretantath@lemmy.world on 20 Jun 01:21 collapse

Theyre the exact same, the only reason to buy physical is to have the gane when the conpany decides to try and screw you over.

bdonvr@thelemmy.club on 20 Jun 02:00 collapse

I mean they’re clearly not. Codes are one time use and forever bound to you, these can be sold/traded.

I’m not saying they’re good. Just that there is an advantage (and disadvantages)

Vipsu@lemmy.world on 19 Jun 21:34 next collapse

Switch 2 had a wider selection, with 13 physical games available at launch.

Many gamers do not count game key-cards as physical games. Just another version of code in a box. Cyberpunk is probably only actual physical 3rd party release on switch.

tonytins@pawb.social on 19 Jun 21:39 next collapse

Most of the third-party titles are yesterday’s games, as already mentioned, and the newer ones are still in development. Meaning, Nintendo’s games are pretty much doing all the heavy lifting. And given the price versus buying power ratio for some games, the launch comes off as a bit mid, to say the least.

Hopefully things will improve in the future.

caseofthematts@lemmy.world on 20 Jun 10:46 collapse

Wonder how it’d be if they didn’t include a cheaper Mario Kart bundle, as well. I had many people arguing with me that the price of MKW wasn’t $80 because of the bundle.

Phelpssan@lemmy.world on 19 Jun 22:30 next collapse

Not surprising considering that most 3rd party games are:

  1. Ports of old games so anyone who has a PS5/Xbox/PC can get them for cheaper.
  2. Overpriced ports as well, and in a system that is already rather expensive.
  3. Game Key Cards which won’t appeal to collectors who could still buy them despite #1 and #2.
Ulrich@feddit.org on 22 Jun 00:45 collapse

They should have accounted for old games in their estimates though.

jordanlund@lemmy.world on 19 Jun 22:56 next collapse

There are 3rd party Switch 2 games? 🤔 I thought it was all 3rd party ports of Switch 1 games…

De_Narm@lemmy.world on 20 Jun 06:07 next collapse

Wouldn’t have expected anything else. The two types of people I’ve mostly seen buying the Switch 2 are those who are really into Mario Kart and those who are into Pokemon, for the extra frame rate.

Neither of these groups is known for buying 3rd party games - at least not the ones I know.

Vipsu@lemmy.world on 20 Jun 06:22 next collapse

those who are into Pokemon, for the extra frame rate

Not just Pokemon, I am sure there are many who where hoping for Switch Pro before Nintendo crushed their hopes and dreams with Switch OLED. People have been testing Switch 1 games on Switch 2 and most of them seem to run on very stable frame-rate on Switch even without an upgrade pack.

This will lead to stronger console sales but not necessarily to game sales at least not in the short run.

Squizzy@lemmy.world on 20 Jun 10:34 next collapse

I have mario games and that is it for switch. Ill wait until the piracy is strong to jump in on swotch two games.

dustyData@lemmy.world on 20 Jun 11:37 next collapse

There’s a high proportion of those two groups that plays third party on PC or even a steam deck. The Switch is just the current Nintendo machine.

victorz@lemmy.world on 20 Jun 16:15 collapse

Yup! 🙋‍♂️ I’m only here (having a Switch 2) for the frame rate bump (which I thought I’d get from buying the Switch 2019, or the Switch OLED), as well as the GameCube games and future Mario and Zelda games. Nothing else.

Starayo@lemm.ee on 20 Jun 06:09 next collapse

I mean, main reason I got mine was to play the games I couldn’t stomach at switch 1 performance. Until duskbloods comes out, anyway.

Also, since I had a first gen switch 1, I was finally able to hack it without worrying about losing online functionality, so now it’s a nice emulation handheld.

ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world on 20 Jun 15:22 next collapse

“Am I charging too much? No, it’s the customers who are wrong!”

StargazingDog@lemmy.world on 20 Jun 18:17 collapse

I went to my local shop’s website. The first game listed is Split Fiction for $70. The game doesn’t even have a cartridge. It’s literally a download code in the box. The PS5/Xbox versions are $65 and are on physical disc.

Who in their right mind is buying this? $70 for a Hogwart’s Legacy game key card? PS5 is $50 new. PS4 is $30.

Ulrich@feddit.org on 22 Jun 00:41 collapse

Who in their right mind is buying this?

People who don’t want to spend $500 on a PS5 to save $20 on a game.

skozzii@lemmy.ca on 20 Jun 18:51 collapse

Give me OLED or give me death.