You don't need testify/assert (Golang) (antonz.org)
from cm0002@lemmy.world to golang@programming.dev on 16 Jul 23:38
https://lemmy.world/post/33069683

#golang

threaded - newest

MrTrono@lemmy.world on 16 Jul 23:53 collapse

We don’t need testify… proceeds to write testify

sxan@midwest.social on 17 Jul 11:01 collapse

For many cases, writing assert is both trivial and effective, and prevents importing yet another fairly large dependency.

A little copying is better than a little dependency.

  • Rob Pike
MrTrono@lemmy.world on 18 Jul 05:06 collapse

  1. it is a test dependency
  2. wouldn’t go tree shaking make any size concern moot.

I’m not agreeing that you do or don’t need testify, but find the argument against testify that is presented here incredibly weak. Ultimately if you’re wasting any time thinking about an asset library you’re doing it wrong.

sxan@midwest.social on 18 Jul 08:04 collapse

It’s not a dependency, though. I mean, it could be, but you can just ssd easily rewrite or copy/paste; his repos is basically a single for with a half dozen functions. It’s a hundred LOC, or something. Copy the file, change the package. A little copying.

I usually just re-implement the asserts as I need them, but copying this one for over into your project introduces no dependencies. If you import testify, you now have dependencies on

  • testify
  • github.com/davecgh/go-spew
  • github.com/pmezard/go-difflib
  • github.com/stretchr/objx
  • gopkg.in/yaml.v3

because that’s what testify imports.

It’s not the same, at all.