Asynchronous Device Shutdown Doesn't Make It For Linux 6.12 (www.phoronix.com)
from petsoi@discuss.tchncs.de to linux@lemmy.ml on 27 Sep 2024 14:37
https://discuss.tchncs.de/post/22715104

#linux

threaded - newest

terminhell@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 27 Sep 2024 14:50 next collapse

11 minutes to 55 seconds in their example is interesting. I’d wager this won’t do much for the consumer side, but enterprise…could save tons of time.

drwho@beehaw.org on 27 Sep 2024 15:51 next collapse

Yinz shut your boxen down?

dragonfly4933@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 28 Sep 2024 01:05 next collapse

What I’m thinking. If it took that long for my server to shut down, I would just sync and force reset. Although tbh, most things are VMs now, and those reboot pretty fast and would likely not be affected much by these improvements.

lnxtx@feddit.nl on 28 Sep 2024 19:21 collapse

You guys heard about vulnerabilities?

possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip on 29 Sep 2024 08:43 collapse

You guys?

lnxtx@feddit.nl on 29 Sep 2024 08:47 collapse

*You persons

drwho@beehaw.org on 30 Sep 2024 16:30 collapse

“Gentlebeings?”

ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org on 28 Sep 2024 19:45 collapse

I thought the delayed shutdown was intentional to not let the vibration of the disks increase too much

possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip on 29 Sep 2024 08:42 collapse

I don’t think that applies to SSDs

ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org on 29 Sep 2024 11:38 collapse

well of course. however not everyone uses only SSDs, especially before SSDs became popular, but even today.