Recommendation for a Wireguard Mesh network
from tetris11@lemmy.ml to linux@lemmy.ml on 14 Nov 00:13
https://lemmy.ml/post/22474540

#linux

threaded - newest

Max_P@lemmy.max-p.me on 14 Nov 01:17 next collapse

WireGuard works great for that.

this_is_tio@lemmy.ml on 14 Nov 02:26 next collapse

I use NetBird ist easy, free and powerfull

sic_semper_tyrannis@lemmy.today on 14 Nov 04:00 next collapse

GL.iNet has a mesh router based on OpenWRT and supports WireGuard.

www.gl-inet.com/products/gl-b1300/

I have the Flint 2 and like it quite a lot but don’t have experience with this other router.

tiny@midwest.social on 14 Nov 04:25 next collapse

Tailscale is the best with netbird in a close second if you want to self host, headscale works great.

0x0@programming.dev on 14 Nov 09:26 collapse

With Headscale being an open source, self-hosted implementation of the Tailscale control server.

utopiah@lemmy.ml on 15 Nov 06:41 collapse

Very cool, does it have an iOS client? Or can the official iOS client use that control server?

Edit: yes, wonderful! headscale.net/usage/connect/apple/#configuring-th…

redxef@feddit.org on 14 Nov 10:40 next collapse

I just use ansible to generate all wireguard configs and deploy them. Works great, but then, all my devices have static ips.

corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca on 14 Nov 14:28 collapse

Oh God. Please, use anything but Ansible.

ninekeysdown@lemmy.world on 14 Nov 16:17 collapse

Why? And what would be a replacement for it?

wasabi@feddit.org on 14 Nov 21:09 collapse

Probably a terribly written shell script that relies on misusing bash footguns and falls apart when you try to fix linter warnings.

Fijxu@programming.dev on 14 Nov 12:31 next collapse

NetMaker is like Tailscale. It uses Kernel wireguard unlike Tailslace which uses user space wireguard.

The only downside is that you need to pay for it or you can host your own server (but is kinda tricky to do)

Fijxu@programming.dev on 14 Nov 12:38 next collapse

I didn’t know NetBird existed. I may switch to it because it seems to be literally the same as NetMaker

krolden@lemmy.ml on 14 Nov 14:37 collapse

The only advantage netmaker had over any other mesh vpn was the ability to add regular wireguard clients to access the network without a specific client.

Tbh I miss this feature it would be nice to see it in netbird.

krolden@lemmy.ml on 14 Nov 13:43 collapse

Fuck netmaker. They removed features from the free self hosted community version and made them enterprise only. They made the self hosted version nearly useless

Took me forever to finally get off of it and switch to OG wireguard

dino@discuss.tchncs.de on 14 Nov 14:18 next collapse

I don’t understand people compaing a mesh network to simple wireguard. It is not the same.

tetris11@lemmy.ml on 14 Nov 16:03 next collapse

It really isn’t. I do agree that for most purposes a static network with some central public nodes is the answer, but I want something more dynamic

ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org on 15 Nov 00:18 collapse

to simple wireguard? there are wireguard based mesh network solutions out there

dino@discuss.tchncs.de on 15 Nov 09:49 collapse

Most of them are, thats not the point.

ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org on 15 Nov 14:17 collapse

in my understanding OP was not comparing it to simple wireguard

DieserTypMatthias@lemmy.ml on 15 Nov 08:45 collapse

Tailscale.