Canonical's Steam Snap is Causing Headaches for Valve (www.omgubuntu.co.uk)
from pnutzh4x0r@lemmy.ndlug.org to linux@lemmy.ml on 18 Jan 2024 00:04
https://lemmy.ndlug.org/post/603138

Timothée Besset, a software engineer who works on the Steam client for Valve, took to Mastodon this week to reveal: “Valve is seeing an increasing number of bug reports for issues caused by Canonical’s repackaging of the Steam client through snap”.

“We are not involved with the snap repackaging. It has a lot of issues”, Besset adds, noting that “the best way to install Steam on Debian and derivative operating systems is to […] use the official .deb”.

Those who don’t want to use the official Deb package are instead asked to ‘consider the Flatpak version’ — though like Canonical’s Steam snap the Steam Flatpak is also unofficial, and no directly supported by Valve.

#linux

threaded - newest

TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social on 18 Jan 2024 00:20 next collapse

I’m sure Canonical’s neverending death march towards Snap, along with the OS running outdated packages, is why Valve no longer uses Ubuntu for SteamOS development. The greatest April Fools was Ubuntu dropping Snaps because so many people were saying how they could go back to using Ubuntu again…then they noticed it was a joke and the sadness set in.

Hominine@lemmy.world on 18 Jan 2024 02:16 next collapse

I was certain you had to be joking in this post, holy shit.

ThermoToaster@exng.meme on 18 Jan 2024 07:07 next collapse

news.itsfoss.com/ubuntu-ditch-snap/

[deleted] on 18 Jan 2024 12:13 collapse

.

chrishazfun@lemmy.world on 18 Jan 2024 16:52 next collapse

That’s gotta be the funniest backfire for an April Fools’ joke I’ve seen in a while lmao

TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social on 19 Jan 2024 17:17 collapse

And still is, as Google still has it on the first page of results for “Ubuntu without snaps”.

QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world on 18 Jan 2024 21:27 collapse

Why do people hate snap over flatpak? I feel like I’ve read a thread or two about it, but I haven’t seen an answer that was particularly satisfying (almost definitely for a lack of trying on my part, to be clear).

TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world on 18 Jan 2024 22:01 next collapse

  • Proprietary on the server/distribution end

  • Controlled 100% by Canonical

  • Worse performance, particularly in terms of app startup times

  • Snaps are mounted as separate filesystems, so it can make things look cluttered in your file explorer or when you’re listing stuff with lsblk

  • Canonical often forces users to use Snaps even when users have explicitly tried to install with apt. e.g. you run sudo apt install firefox and it installs a Snap

  • It hasn’t gained traction with other distros like Flatpak has, and Canonical’s insistence on backing the “wrong” standard means Linux will continue to be more fragmented than it would be if they also went along with what has become the de facto standard

There are however benefits of snaps. It works for better for terminal programs, and Canonical can even package system stuff like the kernel as a snap - as you can imagine, this might be a very powerful tool when it comes to an immutable version of Ubuntu.

QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world on 18 Jan 2024 22:58 next collapse

Proprietary on the server/distribution end

Zoinks!

umbrella@lemmy.ml on 19 Jan 2024 00:57 next collapse

Snap startup times are awful, tens of seconds to open a simple text editor, even on an nvme ssd…

edit: Also it doesnt bother following XDG specifications, further cluttering our home folders.

Thwompthwomp@lemmy.world on 19 Jan 2024 01:16 collapse

Snaps just act strange. They update in weird ways, it’s always automatic and it’s confusing how to keep something in a version that won’t auto update. It’s been a bad experience for me.

zyratoxx@lemm.ee on 18 Jan 2024 22:16 collapse

  • Flatpak is open source, Snap isn’t
  • Flatpak allows other repositories besides the official one, therefore having the ability to be decentralised, Snap doesn’t
  • Canonical (the company behind Snap and Ubuntu) is hated for some past decisions they made with Ubuntu
  • and more

(The only thing I really prefer Snap over Flatpak is that you need the whole package name in Flatpak (like com.valvesoftware.Steam for Steam) whilst you can simply use “steam” in snap but that’s due to decentralisation vs centralisation I guess and overall a minor problem for me)

narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee on 18 Jan 2024 00:26 next collapse

I don’t even want to hate on Snap, I just think Flatpak is probably superior in almost every way and it’s probably not great that there are three competing formats for “applications with dependencies included”. It was supposed to be “package your app to this format, dear developer, so everyone can use it no matter the distro they use”, now it’s a bit more complicated. Frustrating, as this means developers without that many resources will only offer some formats and whichever you (or your distro) prefers might not be available.

I know that you can get every format to work on every distro (AppImages are just single binaries you can execute), but each has their own first class citizen.

By the way, the unofficial Steam Flatpak has been working well for me under Fedora 39 KDE Spin, but an official one would be great to have.

harsh3466@lemmy.world on 18 Jan 2024 01:27 next collapse

Obligatory xkcd

<img alt="" src="https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/0ea3317a-569e-41dd-b2df-209721b6b20e.png">

joojmachine@lemmy.ml on 18 Jan 2024 01:43 collapse

obligatory reply to obligatory xkcd

<img alt="" src="https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/2c3a02be-64cf-4ace-aabc-60c0ca9c7324.png">

harsh3466@lemmy.world on 18 Jan 2024 01:53 next collapse

Nice. I haven’t seen that one before!

grue@lemmy.world on 18 Jan 2024 03:17 next collapse

Yeah but Snap isn’t an improvement.

joojmachine@lemmy.ml on 18 Jan 2024 04:21 collapse

I know, I’m on the Flatpak side, just appreciate the intention behind snaps (although I quite frankly hate the execution).

bouh@lemmy.world on 18 Jan 2024 12:19 collapse

Creating standards to trap users is not improving technology.

LodeMike@lemmy.today on 18 Jan 2024 01:51 next collapse

Snap isn’t a standard actually. It’s closed off.

bjorney@lemmy.ca on 18 Jan 2024 02:17 next collapse

Every line of snap code that touches your computer is open source, so “closed off” is absolute hyperbole when you are discussing the format

pastermil@sh.itjust.works on 18 Jan 2024 02:23 next collapse

The server is proprietary.

bjorney@lemmy.ca on 18 Jan 2024 03:02 collapse

Which is why I phrased my above comment in the very precise and deliberate way I did.

You don’t need to interface with canonical’s server to use snaps, you only need to do so if you want snaps that have been approved by and signed by canonical. Anyone can create a snap and privately distribute and install it, and every part of that process is open source.

grue@lemmy.world on 18 Jan 2024 03:18 next collapse

Yeah, but nobody cares about your technical “gotcha.”

bjorney@lemmy.ca on 18 Jan 2024 03:40 collapse

APK isn’t a closed source format just because Google operates the main store.

If there was community effort someone could spin up their own snap store, this person did it forum.snapcraft.io/t/…/27109 - problem is, it would serve no benefit because you would have to create your own signing authority and patch snapd to use those assertions instead - and then you are still relying on a central authority to vet and sign releases and frankly I would rather have my software signed by canonical than someone random guy operating their own snap store

grue@lemmy.world on 18 Jan 2024 03:48 collapse

Again: nobody cares because practically speaking, the only people using snaps are getting them from Ubuntu, and Ubuntu pushing snaps as the default is the only reason they aren’t using flatpaks intead.

PrimalHero@kbin.social on 18 Jan 2024 12:22 collapse

I care. It is interesting.

bamboo@lemm.ee on 18 Jan 2024 08:19 collapse

Interestingly though unless it has changed recently, you can’t add a third party snap repository. Canonical’s is hard coded, and when people requested alternate repo support, the issue was closed with a response that users seeking third party repos could just edit the string and recompile. Not the most useful solution

zephr_c@lemm.ee on 18 Jan 2024 02:58 collapse

Canonical specifically went out of their way to create a closed ecosystem with snaps, and you think that’s not “closed off” because they only allow you to download the open source parts of the snap software?

narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee on 18 Jan 2024 06:24 collapse

Hence I picked the word “format”.

firecat@kbin.social on 18 Jan 2024 02:08 next collapse

Just tell the billion dollar company to allow people to download the games on their browser. The Client only exists as a means to DRM and analytics, there’s no actual reason for games not to become standalone.

MajorHavoc@programming.dev on 18 Jan 2024 04:49 collapse

That’s pretty unfair. Before Valve’s efforts, the first thing we PC gamers asked eachother about a new game was always “could you get it running?”

Three bad old days were quite bad, and they started getting better in lock step with Valve’s improvements to Steam.

Correlation/causation and all that. But for a lot of us Valve earned a lot of goodwill simply by allowing “request a refund” on games that run poorly. (Edit: which was apparently forced on Valve by a government. Valve got lucky there!)

AlteredStateBlob@kbin.social on 18 Jan 2024 06:03 next collapse

Their refund policy is due to getting slapped around in EU courts, not because valve is benevolent or anything. I do like steam a lot, but it is a near monopoly which acts as DRM to a degree. They did and would abuse that power unless regulated.

Owljfien@iusearchlinux.fyi on 18 Jan 2024 06:45 collapse

I believe their refund policy is actually from ACCC in Australia, rather than European rulings

AlteredStateBlob@kbin.social on 18 Jan 2024 14:49 collapse

You're correct, Australia played a big role in it, and the EU was passing regulation around 2015 on that issue as well. So they got slapped around in Australia and changed it up before getting slapped around in the EU.

AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world on 18 Jan 2024 21:09 next collapse

A lot of people these days have no idea what has happened outside of the few years they’ve been in contact with the industry. Computing might as well have started in 2005 when you listen to them.

firecat@kbin.social on 18 Jan 2024 21:19 collapse

As someone who was during those times, your Zgen knowledge is very incorrect. The games did work, including Crisis (original). As to why the myth you hear from fellow Zgen gamers; it’s because graphics cards were invented. Brand new, no one knew what they were doing with them. The companys Renzen and Nvidia started sponsoring games, it’s how they became popular, their logos were part of the game, Metal Gear Solid revengeance is proof of this.

Steam had no part in gaming history, they were not the first online platform. Dell made wild target before Valve Corporation was founded. Lootbox was invented before Steam launched it, Yahoo games (anyone remember them) in japan had the concept down to almost todays standards. Valve had nothing to do with gaming history, they are just known for their lawsuits and anti competitive behavior.

MajorHavoc@programming.dev on 18 Jan 2024 21:26 next collapse

I’m incorrect that my PC games didn’t work on my PC?!

Shit. Thanks for clearing that up.

Your points about Vavle part of the same bullshit are worth raising, though.

But a unified store with reviews, a refund policy, , and installers that actually fucking worked was a really big deal, especially to those of us without bleeding edge hardware - which was most of us.

Edit: and don’t start talking about gaming history to me, I was there for all of it. Pong didn’t come with an installer, it came with the hardware. Turn those paddle knobs folks. Pong is still better than a lot of the shit you kids are playing.

firecat@kbin.social on 19 Jan 2024 21:07 collapse

You fake, everyone in the older days knows how the controls work. All except you younger people, you didn’t turn it, you slide it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FvT8jG1OVdI&t

What you describe was the Arcade version, not the popular console versions.

Valve is in a lawsuit: https://news.bloomberglaw.com/antitrust/valve-loses-bid-to-end-antitrust-case-over-steam-gaming-platform

Dell did make wild target: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ibz8kpsRHdk

PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks on 19 Jan 2024 21:07 next collapse

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://www.piped.video/watch?v=FvT8jG1OVdI&t

https://m.piped.video/watch?v=ibz8kpsRHdk

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I’m open-source; check me out at GitHub.

DmMacniel@feddit.de on 22 Jan 2024 16:12 collapse

you didn’t turn it, you slide it.

Like the cx30 on the popular 8 bit home console Atari 2600 which was a knob you turn?

TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world on 19 Jan 2024 09:55 collapse

Steam had no part in gaming history, they were not the first online platform.

Lmao. This is like saying the iPhone or iPad had no part in smartphone/tablet history, because neither were first to the market. It’s a ludicrous take.

Valve had nothing to do with gaming history

Lol

they are just known for their lawsuits and anti competitive behavior.

I’m willing to bet this isn’t true lol. Valve is only known for anti-competitive behaviour? Come off it.

firecat@kbin.social on 19 Jan 2024 20:41 collapse

The Iphone wasn’t part of touchscreen technology either. They were just the first to try heating sensors. It’s still being used in android devices too. The ability to use physical sensors is gone. Apple killed it off.

Valve is in a lawsuit, do your research next time: https://news.bloomberglaw.com/antitrust/valve-loses-bid-to-end-antitrust-case-over-steam-gaming-platform

TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world on 20 Jan 2024 08:12 collapse

Lmao

Ephera@lemmy.ml on 18 Jan 2024 06:00 next collapse

Personally, I don’t get why devs would elect to package for Snap, in favor of Flatpak or AppImage. I guess, if your toolchain offers Snap packaging out of the box, then might as well. But aside from that, do you not just reach fewer users…?

narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee on 18 Jan 2024 06:26 collapse

Yes and no. Last time I checked, Ubuntu was the most used desktop Linux OS, and it obviously uses Snap (and has Flatpak disabled by default).

iopq@lemmy.world on 18 Jan 2024 07:05 next collapse

How do you figure? For example, Arch Linux community on r*ddit is bigger than the Ubuntu one

Where did you get the numbers?

Ephera@lemmy.ml on 18 Jan 2024 07:19 next collapse

If you’re on Ubuntu, you can just ask your question in the normal Linux community or in a search engine. You don’t need to go to a special Ubuntu community.

That’s at least, how it makes sense to me. In general, I’ve seen many niche distros have very active communities, because everyone just ruts together and helps each other out.

…which is to say, I don’t think there are accurate marketshare statistics, because no telemetry, but my impression is also that Ubuntu is still popular out in the wild.

narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee on 18 Jan 2024 07:33 next collapse

Hard to find raw numbers backed by good sources.

If you filter the Steam Hardware Survey for December 2023 by Linux, you can see Arch has a market share of 7.85% (excluding SteamOS on the Deck, which is technically based on Arch and has 40.53%) while Ubuntu 22.04.3 LTS - a specific Ubuntu version - already has 7.04% on its own.

But that’s also just Steam users. Ubuntu is one of the few Linux distributions that OEMs ship preinstalled and officially support on some of their devices (Dell for example). Another example is Fedora iirc, which Lenovo ships or at least used to ship as an option on some of their ThinkPad notebooks.

I’d assume the Arch community on Reddit is bigger than the Ubuntu community as it’s geared towards tech-savvy people. Going by Reddit community size wouldn’t make much sense though. Even if you add up the member count of the r/windows, r/windows10 and r/windows11 community (which doesn’t make a lot of sense as most users are probably not unique), it’s only like 3-4x the members of r/archlinux, which doesn’t translate to market share whatsoever.

I don’t really have hard numbers, sorry. Should’ve checked first. I guess I just assumed because of the OEM support and being relatively easy to install and maintain for the average guy (in comparison) that it was the leading Linux desktop distro in terms of marketshare. I’m still assuming this is the case for the reasons stated, but can’t tell you with 100% certainty.

grue@lemmy.world on 18 Jan 2024 10:11 next collapse

I don’t really have hard numbers, sorry.

It’s impossible to measure since sharing copyleft stuff can’t be tracked like sales of proprietary software can. There’s no need to apologize about not doing the impossible.

iopq@lemmy.world on 18 Jan 2024 10:57 collapse

Well, most of windows users don’t even know they are using it, they think they are using a “PC” as opposed to Mac

Any Linux desktop user is already very tech savvy, I doubt there are any Ubuntu users that don’t know they are using Ubuntu so the windows commission is not apt

TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world on 19 Jan 2024 00:48 collapse

So? The AMD subreddit is larger than either Nvidia’s or Intel’s (in the case of Intel, by a lot). Both of them have a greater market share than AMD in their respective markets.

Porsche has over double the subs of Toyota, yet Toyota sells 33x the amount of cars.

Subs means zero.

iopq@lemmy.world on 19 Jan 2024 06:55 collapse

Again, my mom is not on the Intel subreddit because she doesn’t know she has an Intel processor. In fact, she used to work for Intel, and she still doesn’t care

Ubuntu is nowhere near popular enough to be a default. I’m just wondering how to count the market share accurately

Ephera@lemmy.ml on 18 Jan 2024 07:10 collapse

Ah, I hadn’t realized Canonical was so awful as to disable the format everyone else agreed on, but seems you’re right: www.omgubuntu.co.uk/…/ubuntu-flavors-no-flatpak

Vincent@feddit.nl on 18 Jan 2024 11:14 next collapse

Ubuntu itself never natively came with Flatpak though. Some flavours might have, but their marketshare is also a lot smaller.

Of course, if Ubuntu ever decided to ship with Flatpak natively, that would instantly become the obvious choice.

bjorney@lemmy.ca on 18 Jan 2024 11:53 collapse

They didn’t “disable the format”

From your own link:

Do keep in mind that “not installed by default” is not the same as “not available to install at all”. To this end, Flatpak continues to be available in the Ubuntu repos, and users of Ubuntu flavors are free to install Flatpak

Ephera@lemmy.ml on 18 Jan 2024 14:07 collapse

Well, yeah, you can enable it. But if it’s not active in their GUI software store by default, then many users will not find / look for it. It’s rather important for a package format that you don’t have to separately install it.

bjorney@lemmy.ca on 18 Jan 2024 14:51 collapse

Why do you need to have two package formats that do the same thing installed by default? If you could install snaps and flatpaks both from the same store you could have 2 (or 3 if you also installed the .deb) copies of the same app, like steam etc installed, and user sessions and games set up on one wouldn’t be launchable from the other because they all store their state and config in different locations - the only way to know what config your program is launching with would be to inspect and rename the launcher scripts. If you are intending to support naive users this is the absolute worst case scenario. It would be like debian including pacman by default as well alongside apt for maximum user accessibility confusion.

Ephera@lemmy.ml on 18 Jan 2024 16:32 collapse

Because many apps will (or would prefer to) only be bundled as Flatpak. I agree that the deduplication is not a trivial problem to solve, even if they might have already solved it for DEBs (I don’t know).

But your entire comment could just as well be a rant why Canonical shouldn’t have introduced Snaps in the first place. It might be good for their bank account, if they can somehow monetize part of the cake, but splitting the cake even further, after it’s already split into DEB, RPM, AppImage, Flatpak, Docker, APK etc., that’s maximum user confusion.

bjorney@lemmy.ca on 18 Jan 2024 17:41 collapse

Because many apps will (or would prefer to) only be bundled as Flatpak.

This reads like speculation to me and is directly contrary to the file counts on flathub and snapcraft. What about CLI apps and server software? How are they supposed to distribute their software if not via snap? (Flatpak doesn’t support this well)

could just as well be a rant why Canonical shouldn’t have introduced Snaps in the first place

You are acting like Ubuntu core (and snaps) came after flatpak? Snaps were announced almost a decade ago

Like, I get you don’t like snaps, but your argument is basically “every Linux distribution should ship the same default software, and it should be the software I choose”

Ephera@lemmy.ml on 18 Jan 2024 18:38 collapse

I don’t know why you’re trying to interpret all kinds of things into my comment. I did not say any of that. This isn’t some competition to show who’s technically more correct.

Lichtblitz@discuss.tchncs.de on 18 Jan 2024 07:09 next collapse

Flatpak with Fedora 39 must have come a long way. Almost every tutorial with workarounds or discussion of broken features you can find online is now obsolete. It just works out of the box, especially under KDE. Mostly. That makes searching for actual issues extremely hard because I find myself chasing down paths of issues that have long been resolved.

joyjoy@lemm.ee on 18 Jan 2024 18:23 collapse

Agreed. the only “workarounds” I’ve needed to do (on arch) is install gtk-desktop-portal-{gtk,kde} because it’s not included with kde-plasma5 for some reason.

hangukdise@lemmy.ml on 18 Jan 2024 07:19 next collapse

I thought that valve distributed statically compiled files

haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com on 18 Jan 2024 07:50 next collapse

I didnt want to hate snap either, until I found out its proprietary technology… on a foss OS… since then I‘m pretty over it - and ubuntu for that matter. I‘ll probably switch to debian once ubuntu 23.10 runs out of support.

RuikkaaPrus@lemmy.ml on 18 Jan 2024 19:39 collapse

Well… Flatpak ships Propietary Software too. And at this point Propietary Software is almost avoidable (unless you have a LibreBoot. I want one too). But it’s reasonable to be frustrated that an operating system as influential as Ubuntu has ended up falling so down in its technology, and that it has the support of a company like Chanonical.

Edit: Thank you for the comments. I didn’t noticed Snap itself is propietary.

arthur@lemmy.zip on 18 Jan 2024 21:05 next collapse

I think they meant that the Snap itself (or part of it) is proprietary. But I’m not sure.

haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com on 18 Jan 2024 21:13 next collapse

Not sure if I understand you correctly. Flatpak itself is not proprietary afaik and while people might make flatpaks of proprietary software, the problem with snap is that the snap system itself is proprietary afaik.

So every open source software packaged in snap gets this proprietary stain added to it. Thats what actually bothers me.

TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world on 19 Jan 2024 00:41 collapse

There’s a misunderstanding here. What we mean is that the Snap system itself is proprietary. The server side is proprietary and there’s no way to add repos other than Canonical’s.

Flatpak is open, and anybody can create/add a remote.

Both can be used to package and distribute proprietary software. But the same could be said of .deb or .rpm

NekkoDroid@programming.dev on 18 Jan 2024 10:02 next collapse

The thing with AppImages is: it requires FUSE2 which doesn’t really get packaged/included by default anymore in a lot of places and the recommendation is “build on the most old and crusty distro you want to support” which just sounds like a nightmare in multiple ways :)

And with snaps the sandboxing only really works on Ubuntu and nowhere else last time I looked into it (then there is also the entire problem if you want to host your own repository/“storefront”).

So really the only universal sandboxing method that effectivly makes sense is Flatpak.

MonkderZweite@feddit.ch on 18 Jan 2024 12:40 next collapse

and it’s probably not great that there are three competing formats for “applications with dependencies included”.

Ok in snap/flatpak but i tink that’s a bit unfair in appimage. First two are runtimes, second is a file format that does stuff with fuse. That’s like saying there should only be one I/O scheduler.

now it’s a bit more complicated

Do native for system/environment stuff and simple projects, flatpak for frontend molochs with lots of dependencies, no?

narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee on 18 Jan 2024 14:42 collapse

I don’t think AppImage is a bad technology, but with the comparatively minuscule marketshare Linux desktop has barely any developer/software company can invest the resources to test and maintain packages in all these formats. It’s often not worth it for commercial software to offer packages in every possible format (yeah, yeah, open source is great, I know; still, commercial software is real and many people (need to) rely on it).

I’ve been using Fedora for a couple of weeks (one of my New Year’s Resolutions is to completely ditch Windows, so my main computer is now on Fedora :D) and most of the software I use is either available in the official repositories, as an rpm or a Flatpak. But there’s the odd piece of software where I can only find AppImage or Snap versions, and often if a Flatpak is available, it’s non-official (Steam for example).

So, you potentially have packages from the package manager (mostly deb- or rpm-based, and whatever format Arch uses), then you have AppImage, Snap and Flatpak and some applications are simply an archive with an executable binary. That’s a far cry from installing everything from one or two places, which I feel like used for be one of the selling points for Linux (years ago).

Nothing most users can’t handle, but it could certainly be more streamlined. Now before I install software, I check the website, then I check whether they offer an official flatpak or an rpm package if it’s not in the official Fedora repositories, and if they don’t, I check if there’s an unofficial one on Flathub, which sometimes has implications. If there’s no Flatpak whatsoever, I fall back to standalone binaries/archives when available. It’s probably easier to install software on Windows now: download the installer from the official website, install it and done. Most software auto-updates itself.

Having options is great and one of the great things about OSS, but I feel like when it comes to “standards” like these, more collaboration instead of reinventing the wheel over and over again would be better.

drndramrndra@lemmygrad.ml on 18 Jan 2024 20:20 collapse

That’s a far cry from installing everything from one or two places, which I feel like used for be one of the selling points for Linux (years ago).

That’s because years ago you had a choice between using the repo or compiling the package yourself.

Now before I install software, I check the website, then I check whether they offer an official flatpak or an rpm package if it’s not in the official Fedora repositories, and if they don’t, I check if there’s an unofficial one on Flathub, which sometimes has implications.

Imagine if Fedora came with software specifically made to install and update software from all of those different sources through a simple and unified gui. That would really streamline that whole ordeal. It could even include a snap backend for masochists.

PS

Wait till you learn about nix and guix

Having options is great and one of the great things about OSS, but I feel like when it comes to “standards” like these, more collaboration instead of reinventing the wheel over and over again would be better.

obligatory xkcd

narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee on 18 Jan 2024 23:46 collapse

The “Discover” app from KDE and the “Software” app from GNOME actually support backend plugins, but it’s far from ideal. I had an issue where a Flatpak (Tor Launcher) showed up in Discover with an update available, but when trying to update it would fail silently and show up as an update again. Updating via CLI revealed that the package was deprecated in favor of another one and it asked whether I wanted to replace it.

Even if it’d work great, it wouldn’t really solve the issue that developers have to try and package their app in many different formats because not all distributions support all formats (out of the box). There isn’t a clear “release in this format” for developers. And as I said, unofficial packages aren’t ideal.

drndramrndra@lemmygrad.ml on 19 Jan 2024 09:18 collapse

Refer to the xkcd. There’s never going to be a single universal standard to unite them all and in light bind them. The best you’re going to get is improved support and integration.

dandroid@dandroid.app on 18 Jan 2024 18:20 next collapse

My only complaint about flatpak is that updating them fails like 50% of the time for seemingly no reason, and I just have to run the update command over and over until they are all updated.

PlexSheep@feddit.de on 18 Jan 2024 20:11 collapse

I’ve never had an update fail with flatpaks?

dandroid@dandroid.app on 18 Jan 2024 20:40 collapse

It happens constantly both on my laptop (suse) and my Steam Deck (arch). Same exact behavior. I gave up trying to debug it, and I just keep retrying the update command until the list is empty.

UnsavoryMollusk@lemmy.world on 19 Jan 2024 01:11 next collapse

I am honestly surprised, my arch desktop and my steam deck got no problems of those types. If you find what makes it happens on your systems then maybe it will help improve the tech!

dandroid@dandroid.app on 19 Jan 2024 01:48 collapse

If no one else has this issue, it could very well be something unique to my internet connection!

PlexSheep@feddit.de on 19 Jan 2024 07:33 collapse

I’ve never had anything like this when I used to run arch (with Archivstall). Also not on fedora for months and now back on LMDE.

dandroid@dandroid.app on 19 Jan 2024 14:26 collapse

How are you closing the program? I don’t mean with the X button on the desktop environment. I mean command line programs.

PlexSheep@feddit.de on 20 Jan 2024 01:39 collapse

What program? I just let flatpak update run through until it returns me to my shell.

dandroid@dandroid.app on 20 Jan 2024 05:12 collapse

I’m sorry, I must have responded to the wrong comment. That comment was supposed to be in an entirely different conversation.

Edit: Oh, I just reviewed my inbox. I thought you replied to a different comment of mine. I’m so dumb. Carry on.

PlexSheep@feddit.de on 20 Jan 2024 22:10 collapse

Everything alright. We all have some days where just nothing seems to be working right and we make stupid mistakes.

Just this Monday was one for me, even reported an issue to the Ubuntu trackers and upstream, turned out I just had a typo in both my code and minimal working examples.

No biggie at the end of the day.

morriscox@lemmy.world on 20 Jan 2024 18:40 collapse

Welcome to Linux.

narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee on 20 Jan 2024 20:21 collapse

Thanks buddy

krellor@kbin.social on 18 Jan 2024 01:53 next collapse

The article says that steam showing a notice on snap installs that it isn't an official package and to report errors to snap would be extreme. But that seems pretty reasonable to me, especially since the small package doesn't include that in its own description. Is there any reason why that would be considered extreme, in the face of higher than normal error rates with the package, and lack of appropriate package description?

Kushia@lemmy.ml on 18 Jan 2024 03:08 next collapse

It’s not extreme. This is an opinion piece posted on OMGUbuntu, so I’ll let you figure out where their biases lie.

teawrecks@sopuli.xyz on 18 Jan 2024 05:54 next collapse

Honestly, that seems like the nicest way to solve the problem. Afaik Valve would be fully within their rights to C&D them from unofficially rehosting their binaries. In any other situation, that would be a blatant security risk.

ook_the_librarian@lemmy.world on 18 Jan 2024 13:48 collapse

Was an unextreme solution mentioned? I don’t see one. It seems very reasonable.

What would more extreme, but not inappropriate, is for Valve to send a cease and desist to stop Canonical from using the Steam logo on a package Valve does not maintain. I don’t think that’s warranted. But calling a little text clarification “extreme” is nonsense.

But Canonical using that logo is pretty misleading. I notice the thumbnail adds some Canonical-flare to the logo, but it’s not there on snapcraft.

Auzy@beehaw.org on 18 Jan 2024 06:22 next collapse

Just to play devils advocate, why don’t they simply officially support the Snap store?

cadekat@pawb.social on 18 Jan 2024 06:46 next collapse

Snaps just aren’t ready yet.

sebsch@discuss.tchncs.de on 18 Jan 2024 06:54 next collapse

Bc/ they’re already packaging an deb-package. Why should the do that snap thingy?

Mubelotix@jlai.lu on 18 Jan 2024 07:20 next collapse

  • Nobody needs it
  • It’s a lot of work
skilltheamps@feddit.de on 18 Jan 2024 07:30 collapse

Because it’s the same story as with Mir or Upstart: it will die, because its half assed and tailored to Ubuntu, this time with dubious non-free parts even

haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com on 18 Jan 2024 07:46 collapse

The proprietary parts is what bothers me. Why would you make a foss OS/fork and put proprietary shit in? Its like taking something good and pure and instead of making it better or just different, make it worse.

Holzkohlen@feddit.de on 18 Jan 2024 07:20 next collapse

Canonical is a joke

Secret300@sh.itjust.works on 18 Jan 2024 14:44 next collapse

At this point, a bad joke

abbenm@lemmy.ml on 18 Jan 2024 16:06 collapse

It’s too bad. I feel like they’re a versions of Ubuntu from 2006 to, say, 2012 or so, that were beautiful and perfect and were accessible to me as a college student. It set a new standard. It seems like half the battle is having people with good vision making important decisions so things don’t go off the rails.

fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works on 19 Jan 2024 00:00 collapse

Yeah Ubuntu really used to be the go-to distro for me, now they’re really my distro of last resort (of the top options).

OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml on 19 Jan 2024 00:36 collapse

Canonical does a heck of a lot more for the Linux ecosystem than snap. For instance they have an entire (growing) team dedicated to fixing reported bugs in various upstream packages.

mariusafa@lemmy.sdf.org on 18 Jan 2024 11:55 next collapse

I feel the same. My entry distro was ubuntu, and every time I updated major version the whole installation exploded and i had to reinstall it from scratch.

Luckly for me now i use Debian and updating major release is smooth af. Already went through 3 major updates and 0 problems.

Just swap to Debian, Valve. And snap is engineered to waste your time, imo.

DumbAceDragon@sh.itjust.works on 18 Jan 2024 14:06 next collapse

It’s canonical that maintains the snap.

conciselyverbose@kbin.social on 18 Jan 2024 14:22 next collapse

Valve is on arch.

This isn't steamOS, just customers using Ubuntu.

DrJenkem@lemmy.blugatch.tube on 18 Jan 2024 18:25 collapse

Isn’t SteamOS based on Debian, not Arch?

EDIT: nvm, it used to be Debian, but the newer versions for steamdeck are based on Arch.

ZcaT@lemmy.world on 18 Jan 2024 18:29 collapse

SteamOS 3 is based on Arch

DrJenkem@lemmy.blugatch.tube on 18 Jan 2024 18:31 collapse

Yeah I just saw that, forgot/didn’t realize they switched. Thanks.

DrJenkem@lemmy.blugatch.tube on 18 Jan 2024 18:26 next collapse

As far as I know, SteamOS is already based on Debian. The dev is complaining about users trying to install steam on their own Ubuntu installs, not SteamOS.

EDIT: nvm, it used to be Debian, but the newer versions for steamdeck are based on Arch. Apparently they wanted rolling updates so that it would be easier to push out changes more frequently.

Pwnmode@lemmy.world on 18 Jan 2024 22:49 next collapse

This is not an issue of what Distro Valve chose to use (SteamOS used Debian now it uses Arch) but is on Canonical for how they package it. I have just been dipping my toes into Linux lately and have been using Manjaro and Nobara and they have been working great for gaming and every day use… Until I play a game like Finals and have to swap to windows.

ike@lemmy.world on 19 Jan 2024 01:35 collapse

wait, doesn’t steam os use an arch-ish base?

maness300@lemmy.world on 18 Jan 2024 12:11 next collapse

That’s the problem with doing everything yourself.

You also have to maintain everything, yourself.

Fuck snaps 🖕

Snapz@lemmy.world on 18 Jan 2024 15:53 next collapse

Yeah. Hey wait? Fuck you!

Dud@lemmy.world on 18 Jan 2024 17:01 collapse

I’m sorry but Linux Council has already decided your fate.

inverted_deflector@startrek.website on 18 Jan 2024 21:29 next collapse

Are you threatening me master jedi?

SapphironZA@lemmings.world on 18 Jan 2024 22:51 next collapse

I thought it was the GNU wizards circle that decides these things.

Are you telling me I have been going to the wrong meetings?!

I swear this Linux fragmentation will be the death of it.

WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world on 18 Jan 2024 23:40 collapse

I am the Linux Council!

ICastFist@programming.dev on 19 Jan 2024 01:41 collapse

Oh yeah? Then I’ll make my own Linux Council! With blackjack and hookers!

joyjoy@lemm.ee on 18 Jan 2024 18:02 collapse

🫰Fuck 🫰Snaps 🫰

octopus_ink@lemmy.ml on 18 Jan 2024 12:25 next collapse

I know the “Arch BTW” meme exists for a reason, but one of the reasons I haven’t been able to drag myself away from Arch-based distros in recent years is that it allows me to always have current versions of my software while also just not having to care about all this appimage/flatpak/snap brouhaha.

I guess it’s somewhat of a “pick your poison” kind of situation, but I find dealing with the typical complaints about Arch based distros to be both less of a problem than detractors would have you believe, and less of a headache than having to pick one of three competing alternative packaging approaches, or worse, to use a mix of them all. Standing on the sidelines of the topic it seems like a small number of people really like that these options exist, and I’m happy for those people. But mostly I’m grateful that I don’t have to care about this kind of thing.

Edited to add: Seeing how this thread has developed in the past 5 hours convinces me anew that “on the sidelines” is where I want to stay on this topic. 😁

Johanno@feddit.de on 18 Jan 2024 13:06 next collapse

Debian-trixie is pretty up to date and flatpak fills the holes perfectly.

ScottE@lemm.ee on 18 Jan 2024 13:40 next collapse

100% all this. Canonical has been pushing snaps for awhile, and I wonder if the 12 year LTS for Ubuntu is part of that strategy - want something newer? It’s in the snap store. snap is terrible, worse than flakpak and appimage - but just as you say, as an arch user I don’t have to care. Whatever I want is probably in the AUR if not the main repos. Rolling distros, done right (arch), are an amazing experience.

TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social on 18 Jan 2024 14:47 next collapse

I think if we could drag users (at least gamers) away from these Debian/Ubuntu based distros we could have developers just shipping packages that wouldn’t need to be compatible with some ancient LTS library release, and maybe we wouldn’t need appimage/flatpak/snap at all anymore (or at least only in rare cases).

Telodzrum@lemmy.world on 18 Jan 2024 16:07 next collapse

Debian catching strays over Ubuntu’s ubullshit.

alci@jlai.lu on 18 Jan 2024 18:28 next collapse

Well, the only thing holding me from switching to Debian is the absence of up to date KDE packages…

Telodzrum@lemmy.world on 18 Jan 2024 19:18 collapse

What about in unstable or testing? I moved to Arch from Debian because I wanted faster releases and it just made sense to move to rolling instead of testing Debian install.

TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social on 19 Jan 2024 17:23 collapse

I think Debian has a place in the Desktop market, it’s just not gamers or anyone wanting anything new (unless they of course go the flatpak route). Not a perfect analogy, but it’s kinda like gaming on Windows 7 these days because it “just works” for you. Sure you can, but you’re not getting the best of anything that way and all the underlying libraries are outdated and some things just aren’t going to work at all.

Theharpyeagle@lemmy.world on 19 Jan 2024 09:26 collapse

From my perspective as someone who is both getting into gaming on Linux and also not much of a power user, Arch would have to make the installation and maintenance process a lot simpler to attract more people, and I’m not sure that’s something they actually want to do.

Looking at the official Arch installation guide, the average gamer may be overwhelmed by the process here, especially if they’re not comfortable with the terminal. Something like Linux Mint, on the other hand, has a built-in GUI installer with reasonable partitioning defaults, and it comes packaged with stuff like an app manger and update manager, something that will feel much more familiar to someone coming from windows.

TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social on 19 Jan 2024 17:14 collapse

If you want, or are interested in looking at an easier to manage Arch install I would suggest CachyOS, EndeavorOS, or Garuda Linux.

tigerjerusalem@lemmy.world on 18 Jan 2024 16:51 next collapse

As someone who knows nothing about Arch, what do you do if your app exists only as a .deb file? Can you install it?

CalicoJack@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 18 Jan 2024 17:05 next collapse

It isn’t recommended, but dpkg will install it if you really want to. You just need to handle dependencies manually.

But it’s a pretty rare issue. If something isn’t available in the official repo, AUR probably has it.

octopus_ink@lemmy.ml on 18 Jan 2024 17:29 next collapse

I know you already got another answer, but - it’s very rare that any software for Linux exists that is both 1) not present in the official Arch repos, and also 2) not packaged by a user for the AUR.

Probably 99% of what a typical user (I know we all define that differently) will want doesn’t even require AUR access - it will be in the official Arch repositories and will be up to date to within a few weeks of release.

There are some potentially substantial downsides to the AUR (it’s the Arch USER Repository - so these are not official arch packages) but IME the real world problems are minimal. I would suggest anyone who is new to the Arch way of distributing software should hit up the relevant page on the Arch wiki and make up their own mind before using the AUR - but it’s about being aware of what you are doing more than it is a real warning, if that makes sense. I suspect few Arch or Arch-based users don’t have at least a smidgen of AUR packages on their system. (Edit: That page is very thorough. I think it makes installing from the AUR sound much harder than it needs to be. For most people the command is just “yay -S packagename.” There are gui options that handle all packages including AUR, and yay is not the only cli option, either.)

Interestingly, there are some AUR packages that work by pulling down the deb and deconstructing it for installation on your system - AFAIK it can be that, RPM, a true “compile from source” situation, or I’m guessing some AUR packages are deconstructing snaps\flatpaks\appimages during the install. Whatever the origin of the files, they include a pkgbuild file that tells your system how to either compile or deconstruct and install the software.

dev_null@lemmy.ml on 19 Jan 2024 10:52 collapse

I know I ran into this years ago. I think it was some collection manager app for a trading card game that someone had on GitHub and only had .deb releases. Eventually you will want to install something niche.

leopold@lemmy.kde.social on 18 Jan 2024 18:45 collapse

I have found no such instances. Software which is only officially packaged as deb will usually be unofficially repackaged on the AUR regardless.

dev_null@lemmy.ml on 19 Jan 2024 10:48 collapse

I distribute an app I made for Linux, macOS and Windows. The Linux version I only have available as a .deb. Released recently and has about 200 users so far, but definitely exists. No Arch user contacted me yet.

octopus_ink@lemmy.ml on 19 Jan 2024 14:29 next collapse

When folks start wanting it, someone will package it for the AUR, or if it becomes even somewhat mainstream it will end up in the main repos eventually.

dev_null@lemmy.ml on 19 Jan 2024 15:27 collapse

Possibly, though I wonder how updates would work then. Currently I have a Debian repository that contains a single package, and installing the .deb from my website also installs the repository so you get updates as with any other package.

If someone repackages it on AUR, I guess they will also need to update it every time I update the .deb, so it’s always behind? Of course it would be better if I provided a first party package for AUR, but I can spend time on that when there is actual interest. Most of my users are on Windows anyway.

octopus_ink@lemmy.ml on 19 Jan 2024 15:36 collapse

Usually what you describe is what they do. Someone “owns” the AUR package (and it’s not quite literally any random user IIRC - you have to be accepted as an AUR maintainer I think) and they then take on the responsibility to repackage it whenever the author (you) releases a new version. There is also a mechanism for users to flag the AUR package as out of date in case that maintainer misses a release, and if they abandon it (or even if folks just don’t like how they package it) someone else can package it, assuming someone else wants to.

Sometimes the AUR maintainer is the dev themselves. I can’t think of a good example currently, but I know I’ve seen it before.

I don’t know the process for how things end up in the official repos, but I would guess it’s similar to however any other distros identify software they want to officially package.

sloppy_diffuser@sh.itjust.works on 19 Jan 2024 14:40 collapse

They may not have to. For example, Plex on nixos just unpacks the deb and installs the files the “nix” way.

github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/…/raw.nix

Grain9325@lemmy.ml on 18 Jan 2024 17:40 next collapse

Yup, the AUR is a godsend. I barely touch the other methods and only use AppImages when I’m too lazy.

OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml on 19 Jan 2024 00:34 collapse

Appimages when you’re lazy? The fact you have to chmod them is annoying compared to an AUR helper

Grain9325@lemmy.ml on 19 Jan 2024 04:56 collapse

I mean Dolphin gives a prompt for the same thing when I launch it.

Samueru@lemmy.world on 18 Jan 2024 19:14 next collapse

I was like you using arch packages for everything until ferdium was hit by a terrible bug that broke its zoom function and wont be fixed in months since it is an issue with electron. Now I use the appimage version of it to downgrade to an older version.

And then there are the rust programs that you can only find as aur git packages which means installing a bunch of dependencies and all the crap that cargo puts into my home dir just to build one binary, for that I just instead take the appimage version or sometimes the binary if they release it and place it in ~/.local/bin.

Another good thing is that the appimages get compressed and take less disk space, for example the libreoffice package in arch is 600 MiB while the appimage is 300 MiB.

And the great thing is that I can just drop my homedir into any distro and as long as I make sure that fuse is installed everything will work out of the box.

shucks@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 18 Jan 2024 22:57 collapse

It sounds like NixOS would solve all your problems. And it makes coffee too!

sloppy_diffuser@sh.itjust.works on 19 Jan 2024 00:19 next collapse

Still figuring out Nix for my daily driver (too many fun customizations moving away from gnome), but love it so far and built my last self-hosted box with it. So easy to redeploy after the initial learning curve. Boot from ISO, partition with disko, upload SSH key to decrypt sops, install.

Oh and since practically everything can be overridden, its easy to get bleeding edge using existing packages!

barsoap@lemm.ee on 19 Jan 2024 10:13 collapse

Nix is objectively a bad language. Glancing past the syntax (which is atrocious and the parser is completely unhelpful) it’s just a bad idea to mix lazy evaluation and dynamic typing, the only way to get understandable error messages with nix is to put asserts all over the place, hoping one of them gets triggered by the evaluator.

That said I still love the system to bits and fixing the language actually wouldn’t be that hard: Add static typing, with inference most stuff should just run as-is. Exception are the two or three uses of the y-combinator (yes, seriously, that’s how you recurse in nix) deep in the bowels of nixpkgs, e.g. during stdenv bootstrap. Just make fix a primitive, or maybe a plain fold I don’t think nix even needs to be Turing-complete. Reason it’s not being done is that there’s enough other stuff to work on and, well, Stockholm syndrome. Good news: Nix doesn’t support constructing import paths dynamically, that would have been a nightmare to sort out in a static setting.

sloppy_diffuser@sh.itjust.works on 19 Jan 2024 14:02 collapse

I don’t mind most of the language having FP experience, but I agree the lack of static typing just sucks. I’m using the repl a lot to try and track down why things aren’t aligning quite right when trying different techniques to keep things DRY and organized. Documentation is also a headache as a newb with the multiple ways of structuring a repo while trying to grok all the implicits and how it all gets merged.

Samueru@lemmy.world on 19 Jan 2024 17:42 collapse

Is NixOS xdg base dir compliant? that is one of the reasons I don’t use flatpak.

shucks@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 19 Jan 2024 22:39 collapse

Yes, all the environment variables are set automatically and programs respect them.

BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk on 18 Jan 2024 19:31 collapse

I’ve always found the most time consuming thing about arch is having to spend half your life telling everyone you use it.

addie@feddit.uk on 18 Jan 2024 21:07 next collapse

Nah, it’s repeating the installation process until you finally get enough stuff working to have internet, and then you can bootstrap installing every other bit of software that you need. Thank goodness for rolling release - I can’t imagine having to go through that again.

joe_cool@lemmy.ml on 19 Jan 2024 01:40 next collapse

You can install Arch directly from a UEFI shell over the Internet: archlinux.org/releng/netboot/
If your BIOS has a UEFI shell that supports DHCP, HTTP and IPv4 PXE you can load the ipxe-arch.efi over HTTP and start installing.

planish@sh.itjust.works on 19 Jan 2024 03:13 collapse

Does UEFI shell have wget?

registrert@lemmy.sambands.net on 19 Jan 2024 15:58 next collapse

The important question is if the UEFI shell can run Doom.

HackerJoe@sh.itjust.works on 19 Jan 2024 20:09 collapse

Of course it can. What did you expect?

doomwiki.org/wiki/Doom_UEFI

HackerJoe@sh.itjust.works on 19 Jan 2024 20:07 collapse

Depends on the version. All of them (the newer ones with networking) have TFTP. Some even have HTTPS. I think HP Servers even have HTTPS-Boot with client TLS certificates.
None of it works with Wifi though. iPXE has wifi support for some devices but you obviously can’t start it over the Internet. You need to flash a ROM you don’t need or use a USB drive to load it. Then you can boot Linux from the Internet. (That also works if you don’t have a UEFI Shell in BIOS). netboot.xyz can also boot other OSes than Arch.

octopus_ink@lemmy.ml on 19 Jan 2024 14:28 collapse

I haven’t done a vanilla arch install for years either, because if that sort of thing is fun for some folks great, but it was only fun once or twice for me. I think a lot of the vanilla arch faithful end up scripting it for fresh installs.

But, FWIW there’s always endeavouros, manjaro, and I’m sure other Arch derivatives I’ve forgotten about. I just did an endeavouros install on new hardware I was given last weekend, and it’s certainly no harder to install than Ubuntu.

octopus_ink@lemmy.ml on 18 Jan 2024 21:18 collapse

I haven’t used it in years, so hard to remember now.

cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 18 Jan 2024 12:54 next collapse

Canonical’s Steam Snap is Causing Headaches for Valve

Natanael@slrpnk.net on 18 Jan 2024 21:07 next collapse

Thanos snapped the uptime

OscarRobin@lemmy.world on 19 Jan 2024 05:34 collapse

  1. Ubuntu wants to own snap, with their own proprietary store etc which runs against alternatives like Flatpak and goes against the FOS ethos

  2. Snap is slower and worse than Flatpak (the most popular alternative) in most ways, with very few pros that will likely be caught-up-to soon too

swag_money@lemmy.world on 18 Jan 2024 13:07 next collapse

guys hear me out. steam os: debian edition

shasta@lemm.ee on 18 Jan 2024 14:47 next collapse

This is not a problem with steam OS though

Contend6248@feddit.de on 18 Jan 2024 15:39 collapse

The original SteamOS is based on Debian, store.steampowered.com/steamos

I guess backporting everything was a pain.

SteamOS 2.0 which is used on Steamdeck (and only available on Steamdeck officially) has nothing to do with that.

swag_money@lemmy.world on 18 Jan 2024 17:04 collapse

TIL

Neon@lemmy.world on 18 Jan 2024 14:49 next collapse

Don’t they own the Code?

Can’t they just cease-and-desist them if they cause them trouble?

Contend6248@feddit.de on 18 Jan 2024 15:35 collapse

They could and they would if they wouldn’t profit from this in the end,

for some reasons there is no official Flatpak and they don’t want to support a Snap package, they just say anything but the *.deb is unsupported, kinda weird because they use the Flatpak package on Steamdeck because that is Arch-based, i guess they are somewhat involved there.

As much as they do for the Linux movement, they should get their shit together when it comes to a cross-distro client, preferably Flatpak obviously.

joyjoy@lemm.ee on 18 Jan 2024 18:08 collapse

Do they use the steam flatpak, or just allow flatpaks to be used? There’s a difference.

leopold@lemmy.kde.social on 18 Jan 2024 18:55 collapse

the latter

NaNABCV@lemmy.world on 18 Jan 2024 17:55 next collapse

A good reason to dual boot

Gingernate@programming.dev on 18 Jan 2024 18:01 next collapse

Or use flatpak or .deb

woelkchen@lemmy.world on 18 Jan 2024 19:02 next collapse

Why dual boot with Fedora when you can just use it exclusively?

Gingernate@programming.dev on 19 Jan 2024 00:21 collapse

You spelled openSuse wrong.

I use fedora BTW lol

woelkchen@lemmy.world on 19 Jan 2024 19:14 collapse

You spelled openSuse wrong.

openSUSE

FTFY

OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml on 19 Jan 2024 00:37 collapse

“snaps are slow and buggy! I’m gonna use Windowzzz!!”

Solrac@lemmy.world on 18 Jan 2024 18:17 next collapse

The one Linux Distro that people will look for out of popularity, fucking up the of the Linux user base? Of course, thanks canonical.

OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml on 19 Jan 2024 00:34 collapse

Snaps were designed to solve dependency hell, get modern software, security, among other issues. If it weren’t for the fact Flatpak does a better job, many more people would be praising Snap.

It’s good that Canonical is trying to make the desktop better. It would be better if they focused their efforts elsewhere.

[deleted] on 19 Jan 2024 01:43 collapse

.

captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works on 19 Jan 2024 17:43 collapse

Flatpak is intended for end-user graphical applications, not many terminal applications are packaged by Flatpak so it makes sense why it wouldn’t show up. Snap IIRC was first intended for their embedded system.

FrankTheHealer@lemmy.world on 18 Jan 2024 21:10 next collapse

Who the fuck was asking for a Steam Snap.

JFC

Give up on snaps. It’s not gonna happen. Whatever benefits they claim they could provide could be merged into Flatpak and everyone wins.

Toribor@corndog.social on 18 Jan 2024 21:59 next collapse

Snap is what finally got me to drop Ubuntu for Debian. Such a pain.

AMDIsOurLord@lemmy.ml on 19 Jan 2024 00:04 next collapse

Counterpoint: Snaps work fine for me, really convenient. But flatpak always shits the bed on my internet, it also needs huge Nvidia driver packages of it’s own if you have an Nvidia GPU (my laptop has one)

Snap on the other hand is very much fire and forget

OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml on 19 Jan 2024 00:32 next collapse

It’s Canonical. They’ll perfect snaps in 8 years, then give it up

xe3@lemmy.world on 19 Jan 2024 00:55 next collapse

Flatpak is not designed to solve all the same problems as snap they have very different scopes and goals. It’s really only Linux hobbyists that see these as comparable technologies.

Also the Steam flatpak is unofficial just like the snap, they would be unwilling to support flatpak issues as well.

planish@sh.itjust.works on 19 Jan 2024 02:45 collapse

Linux hobbyists

Who else has opinions on snaps vs. flatpacks? Are they distinct to the “Linux professional” somehow?

el_bhm@lemm.ee on 19 Jan 2024 05:28 collapse

Yes? How is this a question?

friend_of_satan@lemmy.world on 19 Jan 2024 01:40 collapse

Already gave up. Switched to Debian and it’s been great. I loved Ubuntu, but fuck snap all the bullshit that comes with it.

Dehydrated@lemmy.world on 18 Jan 2024 21:21 next collapse

Let me simplify that: Canonical’s Steam Snap is Causing Headaches for Valve

moon@lemmy.cafe on 18 Jan 2024 23:18 next collapse

Would be cool if they just straight up supported flatpaks. That’s been my main way of gaming for a couple years now, and it works great. The downside is that the folder structure is confusing so it makes things like modding pretty difficult.

superbirra@lemmy.world on 19 Jan 2024 02:17 next collapse

or, you know, you can use your distro packages

moon@lemmy.cafe on 19 Jan 2024 04:19 next collapse

or, you know, you could use a much better and consistent platform

Falcon@lemmy.world on 19 Jan 2024 04:47 next collapse

Well, no, neither approach is better than the other, it’s apples and oranges.

There will always be a place for installing native applications. In the least analysis, the container itself should probably have some dependencies packaged for the target program.

The benefits of containerisation are obvious, but it’s been a lot of work and there are still edge cases to iron out.

FreeBSD has had jails since 2000. Linux, however, only got namespaces in 2008 and the first bubblewrap release on GitHub was 2016.

I’ve been using chroots and containers for development for about 2 years now and it’s been fantastic, however, I’m still grateful I don’t have to jump inside one every time I need to write a python script.

barsoap@lemm.ee on 19 Jan 2024 10:04 collapse

I’m still grateful I don’t have to jump inside one every time I need to write a python script.

Honestly, I’m on NixOS and it’s not a bother because it saves time down the line when your script would break during a system upgrade which it doesn’t on NixOS as without you telling it to, it will still use all the old dependencies. Also you already have a couple of flake.nix floating around you can just copy and adjust and direnv does the rest.

superbirra@lemmy.world on 19 Jan 2024 08:11 collapse

I use debian, I’m happy and definitely have no idea what you are talking about :)

moon@lemmy.cafe on 19 Jan 2024 09:10 next collapse

It’s actually a massive issue on Debian

superbirra@lemmy.world on 19 Jan 2024 09:15 collapse

mmh, what? :)

moon@lemmy.cafe on 19 Jan 2024 09:26 collapse

?

superbirra@lemmy.world on 19 Jan 2024 11:05 collapse

👍🏾

TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world on 19 Jan 2024 10:11 collapse

Debian is one of the distros where flatpaks are most appropriate lol, it’s the best way to not have programs that are really old

Adding weird third party repositories that can cause all kinds of issues probably isn’t the best idea

superbirra@lemmy.world on 19 Jan 2024 11:04 collapse

tbf, flatpaks are problematic shit noobs tend to appreciate because reasons. That said, beside the fact steam ships its own chroot, I’m a happy sid user and I don’t even have this imaginary problem of things being ‘very old’ sooo … but I can confirm you shouldn’t add weird third party repos or shitty flatpaks :)

TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world on 19 Jan 2024 20:06 collapse

It’s not just noobs that appreciate flatpak. Flatpak is good all-round.

And the problem of Debian packages being old is very much not imaginary lol. Debian has only just moved beyond Gnome 3.38/Plasma 5.20/kernel version 5.10.

That’s ancient. And that’s not to mention the other software repos, which are often updated at an even slower pace.

Don’t assume that just because you want extremely outdated packages, everyone else must want the same.

superbirra@lemmy.world on 19 Jan 2024 20:11 next collapse

you normally skip reading half of the comments you reply to, eh? :) ciao ciao from my debian system which does everything, including paying my rent and a bit more, w/o this shit ;)

TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world on 19 Jan 2024 20:29 collapse

I didn’t ignore anything.

And you don’t need to be so defensive. Nobody said Debian is bad or that you can’t use it to make money, just that it being severely outdated can be an issue, and it can. Flatpak helps, but it doesn’t completely fix it.

My comment wasn’t meant to hurt your feelings.

superbirra@lemmy.world on 19 Jan 2024 20:37 collapse

lol I’m not defensive at all hahahaha rest assured my opinions aren’t changed by such a stupid zealot conversation, also this fact you don’t entirely read comments you’re replying about contibute to the lulz. Don’t react too bad to the money thing, one day or another you could also start working in this industry but if I could choose I’d go w/ dog training (I’m speaking for me, I’d really go that way). Cheers my friend

TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world on 19 Jan 2024 20:47 collapse

I dunno, it sounds awfully defensive to me. It wasn’t meant to hurt you, it’s just a discussion about software packaging. There’s no personal attacks here.

I did read your comments, and despite trying to change the topic, create strawmen, and shout ad-hominems, it doesn’t change the fact that it’s reasonable to say Debian packages are often very, very old and outdated. Because they are.

That may not be an issue for you, but it is for many.

You shouldn’t let that make you upset, it doesn’t invalidate your use-case.

superbirra@lemmy.world on 19 Jan 2024 21:01 collapse

hahaha I swear to you that seeing you strain so hard to push your fallacies who knows where makes me laugh. Believe it or not, there remains a world of people out there laughing at those who use this garbage, and your social media woes will not, as usual, shift half an ounce of reality :) believe it or not, lemmy is not reality, outside those servers there is a real world :) but please, feel welcomed to keep supporting I don’t know what theory, you’re welcome, at least at this party :PP

TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world on 19 Jan 2024 23:58 collapse

Now you’re just talking absolute gobbledegook.

superbirra@lemmy.world on 20 Jan 2024 00:25 collapse

I don’t know man, the important thing is that you stay calm while I continue to mind my own business. Say hello to the computer vegans from me, and ofc stay hydrated :P and please, PLEASE, do not mumble 3h again your next response sweetie <3

stinerman@midwest.social on 19 Jan 2024 21:03 collapse

I don’t mind the old packages (I’m typing from Debian Stable right now). If that’s a bother for other people Debian Stable isn’t the way to go. Even I wouldn’t recommend Stable on a desktop/laptop unless that person knew what they were getting themselves into. I used to run Sid a while back, but didn’t want to have to deal with the mild breakage from time to time. Generally speaking it’s “stable enough” for most people, especially on a daily driver.

That being said, I have a few flatpaks running, but that’s mostly because they’re apps that aren’t packaged for Debian.

TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world on 20 Jan 2024 00:00 collapse

Yeah. And if it works for you, it’s good. I have a headless Debian home server running in my house right now.

I’m just saying it’s completely valid to not be into Debian because the packages are ancient, just as it’s also completely valid to not be into Arch because the packages are too bleeding edge.

stinerman@midwest.social on 20 Jan 2024 16:10 collapse

Agreed, but I think there are enough flavors of Debian to satisfy someone if they want newer packages without resorting to Flatpak/Snap/etc.

TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world on 20 Jan 2024 17:22 collapse

You say “resorting” like using flatpak is awful

OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml on 19 Jan 2024 04:49 collapse

Steam’s runtime is already sandbox-ception. Flatpak might be more appealing to Valve than it seems.

superbirra@lemmy.world on 19 Jan 2024 08:14 collapse

I see no value in switching from current situation (in-repo deb pkg + steam autoupdates) to flat/snap/farts, which I don’t use at all…

OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml on 19 Jan 2024 10:09 collapse

It’s not about you, it’s about what’s easier for Valve. If Valve is fine packaging, and getting bug reports, from all the different distributions, they’ll keep doing things as is. But as a Linux app developer myself, I exclusively publish to Flatpak because it guarantees everyone has the same system.

superbirra@lemmy.world on 19 Jan 2024 11:09 collapse

you’re at best uninformed about how the process actually works and what’s the role of a distro maintainer, a distro project, upstream authors. Not that every piece of software has enough value to be included in this process so maybe it will make sense to package your stuff by yourself.

mp3@lemmy.ca on 19 Jan 2024 03:52 collapse

Maybe they’ll get there eventually, considering this is their method of choice for installing 3rd party apps on SteamOS 3.0.

UnaSolaEstrellaLibre@lemmy.world on 19 Jan 2024 02:39 next collapse

Kinda saw this coming sooner or later.

I remember asking in one of their articles if they had planned to reign over (or partner up) the project over to Valve once it was ready and said they had no plans.

randomaside@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 19 Jan 2024 04:27 next collapse

Ubuntu used to get a lot of undeserved hate but lately the hate feels deserved. Ubuntu has been the face of the usable desktop Linux for a long time and they just keep tripping over themselves every time they try to move forward.

Their intentions are usually good. A lot of things they propose usually end up being adopted by the community at large (just not their implementation). They seem to just yank everyone’s chain a little too hard in the direction we’re eventually going to go and we all resent them for that.

Off the top of my head, there was Upstart (init system), there was unity (desktop), and now snaps (containerized packaging). All of these were good ideas but implemented poorly and with a general lack of support from the community. In almost each case in the past what’s happened is that once they run out of developers who champion the tech, they eventually get onboard with whatever Debian and Rhel are doing once they were caught up and settled.

Valve’s lack of interest in maintaining the snap makes sense. The development on the Ubuntu platform is very opinionated in a way where the developers of the software (valve) really want nothing to do with Canonicals snaps.

On another note: my favorite thing about the Ubuntu server was LXD + ZFS integration. Both have been snapified. It was incredibly useful and stable. Stephane Graber has forked the project now into INCUS. It looks very promising.

Falcon@lemmy.world on 19 Jan 2024 04:40 next collapse

The ZFS stuff was exciting! Are they still incorporating zfs in current releases though?

randomaside@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 19 Jan 2024 20:38 collapse

I think they are! I’m still trying to do more with ZFS everyday.

OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml on 19 Jan 2024 04:48 next collapse

LXD got better with the AGPL license, so Canonical did the right thing there.

(I know they added a CLA but it’s still way better than the permissive license they had before)

ulu_mulu@lemm.ee on 19 Jan 2024 10:38 next collapse

This might be an unpopular opinion but I really don’t get this trend of wanting to containerized just about everything, it feels like a FOTM rather than doing something that makes sense.

I mean, containers are fantastic tools and can help solve compatibility problems and make things more secure, especially on servers, but putting everything into containers on the desktop doesn’t make any sense to me.

One of the big advantages Linux always had over Windows is shared components, so packages are much smaller and updating the whole system is way faster, if every single application comes with its own stuff (like it does on Windows) you lose that advantage.

Ubuntu’s obsession with snaps is one of the reasons I stopped using it years ago, I don’t want containers forced upon me, I want to be free to decide if/when to use them (I prefer flatpack and appimage).

Debian derivatives that don’t “reinvent the wheel” is the way to go for me, I’ve been using Linux MX on my gaming desktop and LMDE on laptop for years and I couldn’t be happier, no problem whatsoever with Steam either.

AnyOldName3@lemmy.world on 19 Jan 2024 11:04 next collapse

Shared components work brilliantly in a fantasy world where nothing uses new features of a library or depends on bug fixes in new versions of a library, and no library ever has releases with regressions or updates that change the API. That’s not the case, though, so often there’ll exist no single version of a dependency that makes all the software on your machine actually compile and be minimally buggy. If you’re lucky, downstream packagers will make different packages for different versions of things they know cause this kind of problem so they can be installed side by side, or maintain a collection of patches to create a version that makes everything work even though no actual release would, but sometimes they do things like remove version range checks from CMake so things build, but don’t even end up running.

NotJustForMe@lemmy.ml on 19 Jan 2024 14:28 collapse

Shared containers work beautifully for a lot of things, though, many programs aren’t all that sensitive either. Making snaps for the tricky ones makes sense. Having snaps for all of them is ridiculous.

I can count the software requiring repo-pins on one hand on my desktop. For those, snaps make sense, replacing the need for any pins. Snaps are less confusing than pins. IMO.

It reminds me of Python programming, with requirements pinned to version ranges. Some dev-teams forget, and their apps won’t work out of the box. Sometimes, software still works ten years later, if they only use the most common arguments and commands from the packages.

Snaps <==> Virtualenv.

randomaside@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 19 Jan 2024 22:12 collapse

I agree with a lot of your points but I do think containers a great solution.

I’ve been a really big fan of Universal Blue lately. It presents a strong argument for containerizing everything. Your core is immutable and atomic which makes upgrades seamless. User land lives in a container and just gets layered back on top afterwards.

phoenixz@lemmy.ca on 19 Jan 2024 16:02 next collapse

Wasn’t there MIR as well?

randomaside@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 19 Jan 2024 21:53 collapse

Yeah, I think as the replacement for x before Wayland?

flux@beehaw.org on 24 Jan 2024 17:52 collapse

I do think the idea behind snap isn’t all about pushing the Linux platform as such forward, but to specifically gain a market advantage to Ubuntu.

Why else is finding documentation for changing the default store so difficult? And I don’t think you can even have multiple “repositories” there–quite unlike all other Linux packaging systems out there. (Corrections welcome!)

HawlSera@lemm.ee on 19 Jan 2024 04:28 next collapse

Okay…

What’s a Steam Snap? I don’t know what that is

Falcon@lemmy.world on 19 Jan 2024 04:39 next collapse

Snap is a sandboxed environment to install applications in.

Flatpak is a more portable implementation of the same broad idea, it downloads a chroot and runs applications from within using a separate program called bubblewrap (one could, in theory, use chroot to run apps from within the downloaded flatpak images, bubblewrap offers further isolation through things like namespaces and cgroups etc. )

Snap, unlike flatpak, is a Canonical specific implementation that has a reputation for breaking a lot of things.

barsoap@lemm.ee on 19 Jan 2024 09:55 collapse

It’s perfectly possible to isolate a steam install, NixOS does that by default to even get it running (on NixOS nothing is where any binary blob expects it to be). There was a very brief issue with experimental steam when they tightened up their own sandboxing and doing sandbox-in-sandbox broke stuff but that was fixed before release as Valve is, indeed, responsive, even if the distribution isn’t officially supported. But you gotta have some professionalism and have institutional continuity, they don’t want to deal with J. Random Hacker doing a one-off packaging job. Or distros trying to be smart and replace the steam runtime with their own library versions. Basically, assume that the whole thing runs directly on the kernel, make sure to have graphics drivers, and you’ll be fine running it as-is.

Reil@beehaw.org on 19 Jan 2024 04:58 next collapse

Snaps are a relatively recent way of packaging application installations in certain flavors of Linux. Steam is Valve’s game distribution platform (amongst other things).

There’s an unofficial Snap package to install Steam and it apparently doesn’t work so good

registrert@lemmy.sambands.net on 19 Jan 2024 15:57 collapse

It’s also worth mentioning that the snap system is quite disliked by a lot of users for various reasons, like stuff not working right.

I suppose this article is a good example of snaps not working right.

captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works on 19 Jan 2024 17:39 collapse

Snap is Canonical’s (developers of Ubuntu) attempt at their own containerized software package format, conceptually similar to Flatpak in some ways but differing in details of implementation. One major note is the back end is kept closed source so you cannot host your own Snap repo, which ruffles some feathers.

Apparently distributing Steam (Valve’s video game store/launcher) in Snap format is causing some problems.

danielfgom@lemmy.world on 19 Jan 2024 06:10 next collapse

The problem is that 3rd parties are doing the packaging both on Snap and Flatpak whereas if they had followed proper security practice ONLY THE REAL DEV should ever be allowed to package their app as a Flatpak or Snap.

This would ensure security, as well as a proper functioning flatpak/snap and also all feedback would be directed to the Dev.

I’ve never liked the fact that Canonical and whoever can make Snaps and Flatpaks of other people’s software. There is zero security guarantee, zero guarantee they’ll update it and zero guarantee it will work.

Just because Snap and Flatpak exist doesn’t mean just anyone should be able to just make them.

If Valve only chooses to make a deb then so be it! It’s their product!

anothermember@lemmy.zip on 19 Jan 2024 08:20 next collapse

The problem is that 3rd parties are doing the packaging both on Snap and Flatpak whereas if they had followed proper security practice ONLY THE REAL DEV should ever be allowed to package their app as a Flatpak or Snap.

Says who? If it were the case, Linux would either be a nightmare of fragmentation or become centralised on one distribution. Distros need to be able to package their own software, and these are kind of like distributions. Also since we’re talking about proprietary software here, is it really any better security practice if the “real dev” packages it or somebody else, they both could contain malicious code.

danielfgom@lemmy.world on 19 Jan 2024 09:27 collapse

Valve are not going to put malicious code on their app. Neither is VLC or any other FOSS developer.

The distros should stick to packaging their repo apps and leave the Snap/FlatPak tech as an alternative to the original dev if they decide they want to use that.

We can’t have Bob from nowhere packaging Valve, then not updating it or patching it because he doesn’t have time. Or 5 Bob’s all doing the same thing with 5 copies of Valve on the Store.

It’s crazy. This is what causes fragmentation. Flathub should vet every app and if you are not the dev of the app, you may not host it on Flathub. You’re still welcome to make a Flatpak for home use on your own pc but not for wide distribution.

jyte@lemmy.world on 19 Jan 2024 12:14 next collapse

isn’t that kind of what AUR is, and exactly what people love about arch ?

danielfgom@lemmy.world on 19 Jan 2024 15:44 collapse

Yes but if you use an Arch distro like Endeavour, they won’t support you with issues caused by AUR apps. Because of these reasons I mentioned.

anothermember@lemmy.zip on 19 Jan 2024 13:35 next collapse

Valve are not going to put malicious code on their app. Neither is VLC or any other FOSS developer.

How would you know that? It’s not like it’s something that doesn’t happen.

Or 5 Bob’s all doing the same thing with 5 copies of Valve on the Store.

It’s crazy. This is what causes fragmentation.

I don’t know what snaps are like but that’s clearly a non-existent problem on Flathub.

Flathub should vet every app and if you are not the dev of the app, you may not host it on Flathub. You’re still welcome to make a Flatpak for home use on your own pc but not for wide distribution.

I don’t know why you feel like there’s permission involved. You don’t have to use Flathub, therefore Flathub can have what ever policies it likes. Users can set up a different flatpak repo if there’s a need.

danielfgom@lemmy.world on 19 Jan 2024 15:51 collapse

That’s not my point. I use Flathub but I try to only use verified apps which were packaged by the actual dev.

I’d rather get a deb from the official dev than a flatpak from flathub packaged by someone who is essentially anonymous and could easily inject malicious code.

If you think the dev himself could inject malicious code in the official app, then you should be super aware that an anonymous Joe can too, and is far more likely to.

Anyway flatpak ideally was supposed to save Devs the work of packaging for every distro so it makes sense that the real actual verified dev of the app would package the flatpak/snap himself

NotJustForMe@lemmy.ml on 19 Jan 2024 14:18 collapse

How is “the dev of the app” defined, exaxtly?

danielfgom@lemmy.world on 19 Jan 2024 16:36 collapse

The official Developer of the app. E.g. the official dev of Blender is blender.org. The flatpak people give them a line of code to embed in their website and they use that to verify that the dev really is blender.org and not a malicious actor.

NotJustForMe@lemmy.ml on 20 Jan 2024 05:50 collapse

Ah, that makes sense. Inwas hung up on the word, interpreting it as a single guy, not an entity. Thank you.

OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml on 19 Jan 2024 10:18 next collapse

Wait until you find out how distro packaging works

[deleted] on 19 Jan 2024 18:00 next collapse

.

danielfgom@lemmy.world on 20 Jan 2024 05:24 collapse

How so? How does ensuring they only the real dev of the app is also the only one allowed to package it hurt desktop adoption.

It’s very easy to enforce. Flathub need to verify the identity of the person submitting the Flatpak to make sure it’s the app’s dev uploading it and not Joe Smith or nsa.gov…

Infiltrated_ad8271@kbin.social on 20 Jan 2024 14:37 collapse

For security reasons the packaging of flatpaks in flathub is done by flathub, whether they are devs or third parties they just write the manifest. Although I seem to remember there are some exceptions, such as firefox.

danielfgom@lemmy.world on 21 Jan 2024 06:31 collapse

Ah, I was not aware of that. Ok, that’s good to hear because it potentially adds a layer of security.

Any idea whether they vet the code as well?

Infiltrated_ad8271@kbin.social on 21 Jan 2024 10:06 collapse

Not that I know of. But you may be interested that it requires prior authorization to modify manifests.

danielfgom@lemmy.world on 21 Jan 2024 15:33 collapse

Excellent. Thank you

merthyr1831@lemmy.world on 19 Jan 2024 09:50 next collapse

This is a big issue with Snap. It may be like Flatpak, allowing devs to set their own dependencies for ALL distros, but its poor uptake outside of Ubuntu’s ecosystem means that it’s no different to yet another distro repackaging system.

Flatpak, or even Nixpkgs, are the future because they allow devs to have control over the distribution of their software. Snap being such a closed ecosystem in comparison only means it will replicate many of the problems we’ve found with traditional (re)packaging systems.

mac@infosec.pub on 19 Jan 2024 20:49 collapse

I can’t speak for Flatpak as I haven’t tried it but nixpkgs are beautiful to work with and configuration of my system has become completely reproducible in a clean format.

merthyr1831@lemmy.world on 19 Jan 2024 22:46 collapse

As a dev, you can just distribute a nixpkg with whatever build tool inside. That beats the current system of “native” packages where your software is repacked and then maintained by half a dozen teams for different distros that use different dependencies and update cadences.

Bottles has gone as far as to demand its fedora package be removed and now shows a warning if you’re not using the flatpak version because repackers just don’t properly test all their software (how can they? there are thousands of apps in these repos!)

mac@infosec.pub on 19 Jan 2024 23:29 collapse

Yeah there are some issues with compatibility, I’ve found a couple of apps that error on my Mac.

How does it compare to Flatpak?

merthyr1831@lemmy.world on 25 Jan 2024 11:58 collapse

nix is a “native” packaging format. Apps are compiled for your host OS and run in that environment with no restrictions, for better or worse.

Flatpaks are containers. They provide a virtual OS to the application such as the file system, and accessing host OS features is done through “portals” which just means you can give/revoke the ability of the app to access your host OS resources such as networking, file access etc.

Flatpaks are therefore much safer in theory. But Nix packages are lower overhead, and can interact like any built-in software binary that you’d have when you spin up a fresh install of, say, debian.

Nix packages are harder to use IMO thanks to their poor documentation and lack of GUI package manager support (not that it’s impossible, just that it’s been a niche system for most of its life) and since most people are accustomed to flatpaks and their permissions system (and the fact it comes preinstalled on most distros) so flatpak is still pretty ubiquitous, even for NIxOS users

jimbo@lemmy.world on 19 Jan 2024 17:31 next collapse

Yeah, it’s trash. I switched to the .deb awhile ago because of how bad the snap was.

boaratio@lemmy.world on 19 Jan 2024 19:30 next collapse

Good. Snap is an abomination.

thecookingsenpai@lemmy.world on 19 Jan 2024 19:31 next collapse

Tbh i never found an app that runs better on snap than on deb

Same goes for almost anything like snap

mlg@lemmy.world on 19 Jan 2024 23:49 collapse

I’m really hoping this all forces Ubuntu out as the face of desktop Linux.

It’s been pretty low tier for years now, and Canonical just proves corporate backing doesn’t guarantee a good distro.

Snap is pretty garbage, default GNOME is horrendous, the repos break every other month, apt is still pretty lame despite being an user upgrade for apt-get, the packages are neither stable nor cutting edge, they change core OS backends like every update which breaks configs and makes documentation obsolete.

I’d like to suggest Fedora as the new goto, but I feel like it’s a bit too privacy and FOSS oriented which may scare away new users.

Debian is great but it doesn’t have latest packages which isn’t optimal as performance upgrades would take time to release or need to be manually installed.

LeroyJenkins@lemmy.world on 20 Jan 2024 00:16 next collapse

unfortunately, industry loves shit like Ubuntu and RHEL because of their corporate backing. comps love having the insurance of someone to blame or somebody to fix their shit when things hit the fan. I’ve worked for many comps who choose RHEL for that alone. Should we choose the OS built by a bunch of randos in their basement, or something backed by Red Hat where I can just pay them money to handle my support tickets faster if shit blows up? or who tf do I have my cyber liabilities insurance guys sue if the OS has a huge fuckin problem? I want a company behind that shit.

Zetta@mander.xyz on 21 Jan 2024 01:24 next collapse

Fedora is the best!

(In my opinion)

phr0g@lemmy.world on 21 Jan 2024 21:58 collapse

Well, I’d prefer Canonical to fix their shit, instead of forcing immature products onto users. I’m not against snap per se, as there are valid reasons for sandboxing, especially for games (remember when Steam accidentally wiped some user’s home folders back in 2015? Sandboxing would have prevented that).

However, in its current state, snap causes just too much friction. For example Firefox can’t remember the last used directory for up/downloads, Steam snap will just create a new data directory (forgetting about the games already downloaded), there’s no way to allow additional folders (like /net from autofs) in snap apps etc. It’s just a myriad of issues which make working with the system unnecessarily complex and frustrating, and there seems to be little progress fixing those.