theshatterstone54@feddit.uk
on 17 Nov 2023 19:57
collapse
Why couldn’t it be 6.7, which has bcachefs?
Chewy7324@discuss.tchncs.de
on 17 Nov 2023 20:06
nextcollapse
It’s initial bcachefs anyway, which doesn’t support all features yet and still needs a lot of work. I wouldn’t run bcachefs yet on any system where an LTS kernel is necessary.
GreenMario@lemm.ee
on 17 Nov 2023 20:41
nextcollapse
Cuz 6.6.6 is coming 😈
ryannathans@aussie.zone
on 18 Nov 2023 00:20
collapse
threaded - newest
Why couldn’t it be 6.7, which has bcachefs?
It’s initial bcachefs anyway, which doesn’t support all features yet and still needs a lot of work. I wouldn’t run bcachefs yet on any system where an LTS kernel is necessary.
Cuz 6.6.6 is coming 😈
So is christmas
Same
What is the use case for bcachefs? ZFS exists and btrfs if you need to froth over licencing
Faster or something. I am personally peeved they took the tiered storage thing out of it because in my eyes that was it’s claim to fame
typically it’s based on the last kernel release of the year which gets promoted to LTS, not because of certain features