autotldr@lemmings.world
on 06 Jun 2024 15:15
nextcollapse
This is the best summary I could come up with:
Microsoft has published its first tagged preview of the upcoming Azure Linux 3.0 operating system.
Azure Linux – formerly what was known as CBL-Mariner as their in-house Linux distribution used for purposes from Azure to WSL to Windows IoT – is preparing for a big v3.0 update.
On Wednesday the Azure Linux 3.0.20240524-3.0 preview release was published.
No formal release notes have yet to be posted for the Azure Linux 3.0 changes in full.
Those wanting to try out the preview release of Microsoft Azure Linux 3.0 can find the pre-release on GitHub.
Azure Linux 3.0 preview releasing on the Phoronix 20th birthday is a nice present… Microsoft maintaining their own Linux distribution certainly wasn’t on my bingo card or wildest imagination twenty years ago.
The original article contains 180 words, the summary contains 125 words. Saved 31%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!
Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
on 06 Jun 2024 16:10
nextcollapse
Embrace.
dabu@lemmy.world
on 06 Jun 2024 16:24
nextcollapse
MS has been using Linux on their servers for years
Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
on 06 Jun 2024 16:27
collapse
And are now releasing something for users, which is a different animal.
just_another_person@lemmy.world
on 06 Jun 2024 16:55
nextcollapse
Literally no difference.
LeFantome@programming.dev
on 07 Jun 2024 04:41
collapse
It is for running on Azure and is the base under WSL.
jonne@infosec.pub
on 06 Jun 2024 16:36
nextcollapse
Still funny that there’s a Microsoft Linux distro. Didn’t think that would ever happen 20 years ago.
Pacmanlives@lemmy.world
on 07 Jun 2024 01:36
collapse
It is so funny to me as well. I remember M$ calling Linux cancer
DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org
on 07 Jun 2024 09:59
nextcollapse
They were right, it’s metastasising now
gwen@lemmy.dbzer0.com
on 08 Jun 2024 08:24
collapse
LINK PLEASE LMFAO
Pacmanlives@lemmy.world
on 08 Jun 2024 14:14
nextcollapse
The original interview is no longer available, but here are references.
Microsoft CEO and incontinent over-stater of facts Steve Ballmer said that “Linux is a cancer that attaches itself in an intellectual property sense to everything it touches,” during a commercial spot masquerading as a interview with the Chicago Sun-Times on June 1, 2001.
Ballmer was trying to articulate his concern, whether real or imagined, that limited recourse to the GNU GPL requires that all software be made open source.
“The way the license is written, if you use any open-source software, you have to make the rest of your software open source,” Ballmer explained to an excessively credulous, un-named Sun-Times reporter who, predictably, neglected to question this bold assertion.
LMAO. Microsoft really made Windows Server and won’t even use that crap themselves.
goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org
on 07 Jun 2024 02:52
nextcollapse
They don’t want to deal with their licensing either 😂
possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip
on 07 Jun 2024 04:11
collapse
Have you used WS? It is a beast and is totally different. It is also the only option for many organizations as Samba and Linux aren’t doable in some cases.
LeFantome@programming.dev
on 07 Jun 2024 04:39
collapse
SAMBA? Did you mean Azure blob storage?
possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip
on 07 Jun 2024 20:32
collapse
No Samba as in the SMB server
semperverus@lemmy.world
on 08 Jun 2024 02:18
collapse
You missed the joke
perishthethought@lemm.ee
on 06 Jun 2024 18:00
collapse
I don’t think it ships with a desktop environment by default; I think they’re just referring to the Qt framework. If it is mentioning a desktop environment - it’s probably LXQt.
I know Microsoft gave Gnome a donation of 10.000$ because they use Ubuntu (which use Gnome) and inside the repo (inside SPECS folder) I’ve seen gnome-commons to build gnoem stuff.
But yes, this is probably a server distro without a DE.
SquiffSquiff@lemmy.sdf.org
on 07 Jun 2024 13:43
nextcollapse
If you follow the links, you’ll see that it’s essentially a new name for/ release of CBL-Mariner. from the GitHub readme:
CBL-Mariner is an internal Linux distribution for Microsoft’s cloud infrastructure and edge products and services.
hobbsc@lemmy.sdf.org
on 07 Jun 2024 15:23
nextcollapse
I’d wager it uses systemd considering Lennart Poettering works for Microsoft.
woelkchen@lemmy.world
on 08 Jun 2024 07:54
collapse
threaded - newest
This is the best summary I could come up with:
Microsoft has published its first tagged preview of the upcoming Azure Linux 3.0 operating system.
Azure Linux – formerly what was known as CBL-Mariner as their in-house Linux distribution used for purposes from Azure to WSL to Windows IoT – is preparing for a big v3.0 update.
On Wednesday the Azure Linux 3.0.20240524-3.0 preview release was published.
No formal release notes have yet to be posted for the Azure Linux 3.0 changes in full.
Those wanting to try out the preview release of Microsoft Azure Linux 3.0 can find the pre-release on GitHub.
Azure Linux 3.0 preview releasing on the Phoronix 20th birthday is a nice present… Microsoft maintaining their own Linux distribution certainly wasn’t on my bingo card or wildest imagination twenty years ago.
The original article contains 180 words, the summary contains 125 words. Saved 31%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!
Embrace.
MS has been using Linux on their servers for years
And are now releasing something for users, which is a different animal.
Literally no difference.
It is for running on Azure and is the base under WSL.
Still funny that there’s a Microsoft Linux distro. Didn’t think that would ever happen 20 years ago.
It is so funny to me as well. I remember M$ calling Linux cancer
They were right, it’s metastasising now
LINK PLEASE LMFAO
letmegooglethat.com/?q=microsoft+calls+linux+canc…
The original interview is no longer available, but here are references.
theregister.com/…/top_10_steve_ballmer_quotes_fro…
“Ballmer: I may have called Linux a cancer but now I love it” zdnet.com/…/ballmer-i-may-have-called-linux-a-can…
“Former Microsoft CEO Ballmer does about-face on Linux technology” reuters.com/…/us-microsoft-ballmer-linux-idUSKCN0…
LMAO. Microsoft really made Windows Server and won’t even use that crap themselves.
They don’t want to deal with their licensing either 😂
Have you used WS? It is a beast and is totally different. It is also the only option for many organizations as Samba and Linux aren’t doable in some cases.
SAMBA? Did you mean Azure blob storage?
No Samba as in the SMB server
You missed the joke
Oh neat! What comes after that?
Extend and then Extinguish
Seems to be based mostly on Fedora by reading the Readme.
I would like to know if it does use systemd and/or other redhat technologies.
In the readme they mention Qt, does anyone know what DE do they use?
I don’t think it ships with a desktop environment by default; I think they’re just referring to the Qt framework. If it is mentioning a desktop environment - it’s probably LXQt.
I know Microsoft gave Gnome a donation of 10.000$ because they use Ubuntu (which use Gnome) and inside the repo (inside SPECS folder) I’ve seen gnome-commons to build gnoem stuff.
But yes, this is probably a server distro without a DE.
If you follow the links, you’ll see that it’s essentially a new name for/ release of CBL-Mariner. from the GitHub readme:
I’d wager it uses systemd considering Lennart Poettering works for Microsoft.
Just look it up instead of making wild guesses: github.com/microsoft/azurelinux/tree/…/systemd
It does use systemd. It uses SELinux and dnf as well. It seems to be patterned in Fedora or CentOS Stream. There is no desktop environment.
I wonder how much “metrics” data is sent home?
All of it.
Gotta make sure Linux also has ads and spyware somehow!
ChromeOS has that covered.
Same shit, different company
honestly the way they’re going i could see windows just be a desktop environment for a Linux based os in the future
<img alt="" src="https://infosec.pub/pictrs/image/8462b290-25bf-4708-906d-afeb18d0402d.webm">
Copilot when?
Just after Recall.
We all love icecream but who’d love turd icecream?
Because I don’t get who’d want to use an MS Linux distro
They wouldn’t release it if they weren’t obligated to
It’s mandated? How come? Sorry I’m out of the loop
Depends on the given software but kernel edits for instance need to be public. That’s why Android is open source
Since this is their Cloud software I imagine they need to provide their source to customers.
It might just have been easier to push the whole of the open source side than it would be to pick and choose