Hopefully DNF5 gets in for F41, especially since it was supposed to get in as the default for the current release, F39. If anyone’s curious, here’s the vote for deferring:
pagure.io/fesco/issue/3039
And the reasoning given by the DNF5 team for targeting F41 instead of F40:
…fedoraproject.org/…/EYE2JY537OM7GFW46EK7YIBLHJ52… (though fesco also wanted to keep it in F41 to not disturb the mass branching from F40 to RHEL 10)
It has been a while since I used fedora. I believe the last time was fedora 31 and heard murmurings of a dnf rewritten in c++ to be faster. Glad they actually pulled it off.
threaded - newest
Hopefully DNF5 gets in for F41, especially since it was supposed to get in as the default for the current release, F39. If anyone’s curious, here’s the vote for deferring: pagure.io/fesco/issue/3039
The reasoning for the upgrade: fedoraproject.org/wiki/…/ReplaceDnfWithDnf5#Benef…
And the reasoning given by the DNF5 team for targeting F41 instead of F40: …fedoraproject.org/…/EYE2JY537OM7GFW46EK7YIBLHJ52… (though fesco also wanted to keep it in F41 to not disturb the mass branching from F40 to RHEL 10)
And some things that need fixing before it becomes default: github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf5/…/1057
And some commands that will be/are implemented: github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf5/…/429
Personally, I just hope DNF4’s (what)provides comes back in full.
It has been a while since I used fedora. I believe the last time was fedora 31 and heard murmurings of a dnf rewritten in c++ to be faster. Glad they actually pulled it off.