I Am So Disappointed With Ubuntu 24.04 š”
(news.itsfoss.com)
from ylai@lemmy.ml to linux@lemmy.ml on 26 Apr 2024 05:18
https://lemmy.ml/post/14904361
from ylai@lemmy.ml to linux@lemmy.ml on 26 Apr 2024 05:18
https://lemmy.ml/post/14904361
threaded - newest
Itās astonishing.
Fedora introduced a whole new distro where you canāt install anything with dnf anymore and people love it. People love using flatpaks instead (yes I know of all the shortcomings, but you can always choose another install method for that broken package). And ubuntu users just hate ubuntu for what they do. The difference may also be that fedora gives a choice to the user and does not directly force it
.
Mir is not a good example of distro engineering, because itās an extreme case of NIH syndrome. Unlike what it is today, the original Mir was an alternative to Wayland.
The story started when Canonical decided that X isnāt good enough and they needed an alternative. They chose Wayland first, exciting the entire Linux desktop community. But then they dropped Wayland in favor of the new in-house Mir project, citing several drawbacks to Wayland. The Wayland community responded with several articles explaining why Canonicals concerns were unwarranted. But in typical Canonical style, they simply neglected all the replies and stuck with Mir.
This irked the entire Linux community who promised to promote Wayland and not support Mir at all. This continued for a while until Canonical realized their mistake late, like always. Then they repurposed Mir as a Wayland compositor.
Now this is a repeating story. You see this with Flatpak vs Snap, Incus vs LXD, etc. The amount of high handedness we see from Canonical is incredible.
FYI my understanding is that Incus is forked from LXD, because nobody trusts Canonical any longer. I donāt think LXD itself is them doing the thing that makes them untrustworthy.
You might be referring to something they have done since then, apologies if I misunderstood. Wouldnāt be surprised if they tried to make it a Snap or force Snaps into it.
linuxiac.com/incus-project-lxd-fork/
LXD was under the Linux containers project earlier. After the Canonical takeover of LXD, the following changes were made:
The first point means that Incus is the true successor of the original LXD. The current LXD is a jealously guarded pet project of Canonical in the same manner as Snap and Mir.
As for the second point, Iām usually a proponent of AGPL. But CLA corrupts it so much that itās more harmful than with a permissive license. The real intention of this license change is to prevent Incus from incorporating changes from LXD (since the copyleft license of LXD code is incompatible with the permissive license of Incus). Meanwhile LXD continues to incorporate changes from Incus, although the Incus developers havenāt signed any CLA. This move by Canonical is in very bad faith, IMO.
So yes - I consider LXD to be untrustworthy. But that doesnāt cover the old LXD code, its developers or its community. Those transformed fully into the Incus project the same way OpenOffice was forked into LibreOffice. And I donāt trust the LXD name anymore in the same way nobody trusted the OpenOffice name after the fork (before it was donated to the Apache foundation).
Oh, yep, thatās shady and bad behavior. Thank you.
Well there is immutable, which you probably refer to with Fedoras new distro, and then there is Canonical pushing their shitty snap format, and kinda non-sideloading. Canāt wait for the day when apt only ever allows to install snap packages.
@babara@lemmy.ml
The difference with Fedora Atomic, which I think you refer to, is that itās totally open. For example, people started using the OCI containers differently than Fedora intended, which resulted in uBlue and stuff like Bazzite.
Also, no one forces you to use Flatpak. You can still use Distrobox and use Pacman/ APT/ DNF/ whatever you prefer and export your apps that way. Itās just that Flatpak āwonā and doesnāt have many drawbacks, and is very convenient. I mostly like them.
And, most importantly, Fedora is the fronteer of innovation.
There were many projects and ideas that failed, but many more succedded (Wayland, image based distros, etc.), and Project Atomic is just one more ātesting groundā that is well thought out imo. Therefore people are expecting to ātest outā new generation Linux stuff, itās just part of Fedora. If you donāt like that, use Debian instead.
I can recommend you to give Fedora Atomic a chance, itās an extremely nice family of distros (e.g. Bluefin/ Aurora, Bazzite, etc.)!
Edit: one more thing is that Fedora is, in contrast to Ubuntu, not controlled by a company. RedHat doesnāt have nearly as much influence as people think, itās mainly community driven, and therefore choices arenāt (in theory) influenced by $$$
What I find impressive about this is that they turn this into a stable product. Early Fedora Core was more of an experimental distribution but those times are long gone (IIRC around Fedora 19).
Can you elaborate on this? I landed on nix for my PC turned server and havenāt regretted it, but Iāve been hesitant to go all in on my main laptop (Iām wary of my laptop iGPU and GPU switching becoming a config issue, and Iām dreading having to configure my wsl dev environments againā¦)
Windows is getting blatantly terrible enough I know Iām just putting it off, maybe a cool new technology might help make it sound more fun
I donāt know what I should say tbh š
For the start, you can read my post about image based distros: feddit.de/post/8234416
Imo, Fedora Atomic is NixOS made easy. You can go to the uBlue-builder and modify a custom image if youāre a tinkerer.
NixOS is down-to-top (local config file that defines your host), while uBlue is top-to-bottom (you modify an image, image gets built on GitHub and then shipped to you).
This allows you to fork or create an existing ādistroā without having to maintain a whole distro yourself.
Other than that, especially uBlue is extremely user friendly imo.
I love nothing else more.
Ok, when I googled it earlier I saw ācontainers and roll back to previous versionā and I made a note to do more reading
Your write up was good, much clearer than whatās on fedora and Wikipedia. And the fact you pitched immutable OSās in general first caught my attention⦠The concept is a no brainer. Decouple the os and the rest of the software, and donāt bother digging into one of a kind conflicts when updating things - just make it rebuildable and create it fresh. You never know when the wrong bit will flip
Nixās ālearn this one thing, configure it once, and youāre doneā stuck in my head. And after a different distros, a couple lines installed Nvidia, Nvidiaās docker package and docker
But then I had to configure WiFi and spend half an hour learning why I couldnāt mount an external drive and how to manage it⦠I still have no regrets, Iāve got a USB that should start converting my friends and familyās old PCs into a self organizing AI/self hosting cluster⦠Hopefully it works next month lol
But not what I want in a daily driver. I want something thatāll quickly do what I tell it and gracefully handle the fact I have 6 versions of Java and no idea why I need a version from 2018 specifically. And that Iām going to add a repo to install something and instantly forget what I did if it seems like the best path forward at the time
Youāve sold that pretty well - my takeaway was that atomic fedora is very modular and low side effect and also an interchangable foundation I can swap out and roll back easily⦠At this point, if it can run containers and the drivers I need, it sounds like a great option.
I used to use VMs so every 6-12 months I could start clean with the latest and run setup scripts for my dependencies⦠It was just easier than debugging some conflict. This sounds even cleaner - I swap out the base at will, and the stuff Iāve built on it should stay intact. Plus it sounds much more testable
So my main concern is will it run on an HP omen - it has zero Linux support and a bunch of concerning driver needs, but it does have a second m2 slot⦠Whatās the worst that can happen? Except apparently some models forget they have fans in Linux and I just know the iGPU-GPU switch will cause some problem with sleeping⦠But Windows is only going to get worse
Now that youāve convinced me this might be the best course (I only see less problems than other distros would have), and Iāve talked myself into giving it a go, is there any recommended reading or key concepts I should look into? Any particular flavor(s) youād point me to first?
Sometimes, software, especially install scripts for something, are less common for Silverblue, but executing those is very risky anyway and I never felt the need for it.
And, as I said, some things just work differently. But NixOS is one million times worse than that in that regard, so donāt worry about it. You shouldnāt have many issues.
I donāt know. In my opinion, my post should cover most stuff concepts and differences.
Donāt worry about it, youāll use Flatpak anyway most of the time, and it updates itself automatically, so the package manager (rpm-ostree) doesnāt matter much for you.
You can still use your prefered package manager (apt, dnf, etc.) in Distrobox.
Other than that, just donāt worry and use your laptop for whatever you want to do.
And about flavor choice, there are a few options:
Just go to the uBlue homepage and see for yourself what appeals to you :)
Well hey listen, I appreciate it. I wouldāve spent who knows how long waffling between distos that I donāt feel drawn to, and even if I came across an atomic flavor, I probably wouldāve just assumed it was marketing fluff
Good ideas need advocates, and this is a good idea⦠Itās a promise of an OS I want, not just running from one I donāt
Iām probably going to look at bazzite first. If I have containers that can run LLMs on my GPU, that checks off everything on my wish list except gaming. Iāll read up on it though, youāve given me the context I need to care about learning more
Not on Ubuntu nor Fedora, but yes: If a ālargerā package breaks on update and there is no fix available and I use that application on a pretty much daily basis, then I remove it and install the Flatpak variant.
Flatpaks are slower, do not work super well with Wayland (especially scaling, some applications have GIANT text, some have 5 pixels large text, but fortunately I was able to circumvent those issues for most applications I use via Flatpak), and you need to run another system for updates and updates are friggin slow.
There is also this monstrosity ...
It is not fault-proof and it throws an error if there no older drivers, but this prevents accumulation of outdated Nvidia driver packages (at one point I had nearly 30 different variants installed, resulting of a couple of gigabytes of unused drivers that are āupdatedā every time I ran
flatpak update
).bash flatpak-update () { LATEST_NVIDIA=$(flatpak list | grep āGL.nvidiaā | cut -f2 | cut -d ā.ā -f5) flatpak update flatpak remove --unused --delete-data flatpak list | grep org.freedesktop.Platform.GL32.nvidia- | cut -f2 | grep -v ā$LATEST_NVIDIAā | xargs -o flatpak uninstall flatpak repair flatpak update }
On the other hand, the applications provided via Flatpak just work.
And messing with 32 bits multilib dependency hell for Steam or installing pretty much half of Kde just for Kdenlive simply isnāt something I want.
I think they got the nvidia driver accumulation thing straightened out. On Fedora 40, I had it automatically remove a bunch of older versions and now it only lists the 64 and 32 bit versions I expect it to.
Edit: looks like itās fixed by this.
I think you have a typo in your last paragraph.
Flatpak should run better on Wayland compared to Snaps. Not to mention Flatpak has much better XDG Portal Integration.
Should.
Fedora Silverblue is in an entirely different ball game. You canāt use dnf because itās an immutable image based system where you canāt make direct changes to the Root system without making use of the rpm-ostree & VCS mechanisms. Youāre making a conscious choice by using Fedora Silverblue, and the pros out way the cons for most people making that choice.
In contrast Fedora Workstation allows you to use dnf just as normal because itās not an immutable image based system.
Ubuntu doesnāt make use of any such system so their reliance on containerized user-space apps isnāt a technical one.
It is absolutely a different situation if it is opt-in. If Ubuntu made Snaps opt-in, people might not like them but itād be a minor critique instead of fleeing the distro.
Right. I just installed OpenSUSE MicroOS to try out, and itās the same idea. I agree with some of the anti-snap rhetoric. Closed, Canonical-centric system for profit; linking placeholder debs to download a snap. But the philosophy of all user applications come as chunky but robust packages that (almost) donāt interfere with each other and the system - I think that might be the future for safer computing for non-technical users.
Someone being enraged about snap on behalf of Windows users was certainly a take I didnāt know I needed.
Does this mean you have to use apt-get to get the deb version again? Or is there an even more complicated command? Iām wondering what happens for the other Ubuntu flavors. Iām usually running Kubuntu.
Canonical even patched apt a bit so it prefers to install snaps first.
That really pissed me off in 2018
It is about installing .deb that you manually downloaded from somewhere. You canāt install them by double clicking on them, you have to install from command line.
You absolutely could in the past.
Even apt is deliberately broken:
ā[If] You use āsudo apt install chromiumā, you get a Snap package of Chromium instead of Debianā
Why does this break apt? Just because, I assume (I am using Debian btw), it installs a placeholder deb-package which, while running the postinst script, installs chromium via snap commands?
It doesnāt break apt, apt just prefers snaps now.
This is as they designed it.
The issue here is that people donāt like this other thing and so the distribution which has been moving towards this other thing for like a decade now I guess is the bad guy for continuing to work towards that goal.
It doesnāt break apt, Canonical just broke their version of apt
justto prefer snaps now.FTFY
OK, so itās actually apt itself thatās different on Ubuntu, not just fake/virtual/transitional deb packages in their repos.
This was where I rage quit. Who in the hell thought it was a good idea?
Same here, itās the reason why I kicked Ubuntu off my laptop. They removed any way to choose and made it such a pain to get around the Snap bullshit. Iām on Linux because I want to choose what I do with my system.
Marc Shuttleworth
I have serious doubts about that due to the role of early Ubuntu in popularizing desktop Linux. For many including me, Ubuntu was the first taste of GNU/Linux and it was a breath of fresh air compared to the contemporary clumsy and cumbersome distros like Fedora. Only Ubuntu from those days has any resemblance to the experience we expect from desktop Linux today.
The problems at Canonical seems like a systemic institutional issue, probably related to egotistic management with temper issues. That of course means that Shuttleworth is the source of those personality disorders. But stillā¦
Ubuntu didnāt move overall Linux market share at all. It just took the āgateway drugā role from Mandrake/Mandriva.
Canonical
It is a good idea. Imagine you are completely new to Ubuntu and want to install chromium. Youāre gonna search on Google how to do that and you will probably find an old article telling you to use APT. If āsudo apt install chromiumā did not work it would be very frustrating.
Only reason it wouldnāt work is Canonical killing the .deb package. That was an unforced error. So no, still not a good idea.
š¤®
Seriously? Wow. That moves the whole thing into asshole territory. Iām glad I went with a distro that prioritizes not being shitty.
Same with firefox
I could barely make out the straw man hiding between the ads. The author is working hard for them clicks!
It's 2024, use an adblocker
Ublock origin
Why anyone browses the web in 2024 without an adblocker is completely beyond my ability to understand. You get zero sympathy from me.
Yeah, I wonder why the author puts ads on their website in 2024 too.
The sheer audacity and arrogance of giving me something for free and not caring* about me.
* āNot caringā presumably means ānot doing something about my pet issueā, but Iām not going to take the clickbait.
Itās about not being able to install .deb packages through the installation GUI.
The whole snap issue is hardly a pet peeve. Let alone in an LTS release.
Ubuntu user here. You can/could install .deb packages with the UI?
TIL
as far as I remember I could always double click the .deb and the GUI would let me install it, pretty handy. Aaand it stopped working some time ago. Iām not using ubuntu outside of work and thereās not much system package installing in work environments so Iām out of touch now, but it was handy at the time.
The discord snap is basically unusable for me so thatās the only way I can have discord installed. Iāll probably switch away from kubuntu next time if it inherited this problem.
Thereās the flatpak too, thatās the version I use alongside webcord in arch.
Does that have auto updates? Itās kind of annoying to download debs every week.
Iām not super well versed, Iām a Linux casual.
you can go into the command line and write āflatpak upgradeā, but every time I open the discord app it apparently downloads something, idk if itās self updating correctly or not.
Iāll see if I can enable it in Discover and run updates through that. Thanks for the tip.
You can everywhere else
What are you talking about? It is not even āfor freeā, they get a lot value from the community.
Theyāre nothing without the users, itās not that they would be making it if nobody uses it anyways. Users used to love them, they trusted them, they went on spreading their system, reported issues, created tutorials, flavors, videos, tools, and so on, they helped Cannonical become what it is now.
I donāt think theyāre giving us anything āfor free.ā
Theyāre getting āexposureā?
The software is broken in an obvious way, even though it used to work and they could just roll it back for the release.
They are actively trying to harm the community to somehow āforceā users into snaps.
Iām actually baffled that this would come as a surprise to people. Canonical has been like this for a long time and youād have to have blinders on to not see it. They are hell-bent on doing things their way and ignoring the wider Linux community and even their users. That is, of course, their prerogative and to some degree I even welcome their attempts at differentiating their distro from others. As a user though you should be aware of their history and the apparent direction theyāre heading.
I just wish theyād stop stalling and went all-in on snaps already, since thatās pretty obviously where theyāre headed.
.
Remember Unity? They got it popular and well liked and then killed it.
Ubuntu is just getting worse and worse. I was pretty happy running Ubuntu server for years after moving from Gentoo; I jag lost interest in spending time taking care for that server and wanted something easy.
I went to Debian half a year ago and it's been great. Should've done it earlier.
I never understood why people run Ubuntu on servers. It's madness. Ubuntu is a fork of unstable Debian packages. You don't want unstable on your server!
Ubuntu on Desktop I can understand. Back in the days the Debian release was really long so much software was a tad outdated after a couple of years. But Debian had a much faster release cycle now, and had pretty much incorporated all the good stuff from Ubuntu and left the bad behind.
Mhm I have Ubuntu LTS on my server because my VPS provider provided me with it. :/
Unstable does not mean crashes all the time. What makes them unstable on Debian is they can change and break API completely. But guess what, Ubuntu freezes the versions for their release and maintains their own security patches, completely mitigating that issue.
There are other reasons you might not want to use Ubuntu on a server but package version stability is not one of them.
āBut they are maintaiend for 5 years!ā
Not anymore. A whole extra, unneeded, proprietary, locked-in package system. Ads in the default install.
Thereās Mint, Pop!, and plenty of other options that actually respect the user.
Definitely. But back in the day it was good for desktops. Ubuntu has never been good for servers.
Why?
And where do you think debian stable packages come from exactly ?..
itās basicaly the exact same thing. In both case :
It was awesome back when during the install you could just select "LAMP", and a full stack web server suite would be automatically set up and configured correctly out of the box. But those days are long gone.
A lot of distributions do that. OpenSuSE does that. And at least itās the kind of industrial rated system that will just keep chugging along no matter what you throw at it.
Yeah now they do. Back in the early 2000s, I only remember Ubuntu having just a single option to install everything needed to be up and running on first boot. Everything else needed some tweaking of configs and quite a bit of domain knowledge to get started at the time. It's what jumpstarted me into PHP development.
sudo tasksel lamp?
We should be clear on our terminology here. Debian Unstable is called that because the package āversionsā are not stable ( change ). It is not really a comment on quality although more frequent change also implies more opportunities for issues to be introduced. In Unstable, Debian may introduce disruptive changes either to configuration or even to the package library itself.
Regardless, taking a snapshot of Debian unstable and then separately supporting those packages completely eliminates these issues. That is what Ubuntu does.
Ubuntu LTS now offers up to 10 years of support without having to upgrade a release. This is far more āstableā than anything in Debian, including of course āDebian Stsbleā. In fact, it exceeds the stability of Red Hat Enterprise.
I have not used Ubuntu in many years but I have been considering using it again for some server use cases precisely because it is now so āstableā. I still do not like Ubuntu on the desktop and do not like snaps in particular. I do not think snaps impact any of the server packages I would use though and I do not expect Canonical to introduce them during the support lifetime of a particular release.
For personal use, the 10 years of support is entirely free. That is pretty compelling.
I gave up Ubuntu when they switched Firefox to a snap
I gave up Ubuntu when they switched to the Unity desktop. ugh!
Yup, that was a whole kerfuffle. That is what got me to stop installing Ubuntu.
I feel that.
Three years ago I moved to fedora and RHEL based distros like Rocky for my devices and servers because Iāve gotten suck of Canonicalās shit. Donāt regret it.
Iām personally interested in Rocky Linux (for servers)
Give a shot for Fedora!
Idk, I probably havenāt used Debian derivatives long enough, but isnāt installing random .deb-s somewhat of a bad practice? I mean, repos exist for a reason (ignoring the fact they usually have like 3 packages in the official repos)
But even if it is, it shouldnāt prevent installing released debs you find for example on GitHub repositories.
But it seems to be a bit better when using the terminal
But most Windows emigrants don't use the terminal
It doesnāt prevent you from doing so. It just doesnāt launch the store app when you double click a . deb.
You should try MX, itās Debian based, and they have their own repo full of .deb, up to date, never break
A lot of software wont be distributed with a PPA to add.
Additionally, debs are useful for offline installations, with apt youāre able to recursively download a package and all of itās dependencies as deb files, then transfer those over to the offline machine and install in bulk.
That being said Iāve never had great luck with the software center, itās always felt broken. Iāll typically just
dpkg -I <pkg>
.Some things we would want to install arenāt in the official repos. Downloading the deb file is a solution to that for newer users.
Yes, depending on the context
Baah. KBIN just ate my reply.
Point form since I forgot to save to clipboard first.
Tried mint - booted to black screen
Tried ubuntu - got silly crashes like in the post trying to install stuff. It also wanted me to sign up for some sort of support package with 5 free devices to get updates or something. Also, trackpad scrolling was uncontrollable. Would scroll up half a screen or more as I lifted my fingers off.
Tried fedora - only 100% and 200% zoom option, and no right click.
Managed to fix the fedora issues with some command line found on Google and a gnome customising addon.
n00b here, just playing. Can't migrate fully as I need VBA and Playit Live etc.
I do wonder what kind of gardware you have⦠And if itās maybe defective?
Asus F555D - 12G RAM, AMD R8 M350DX GPU and a sticker that says Radeon Dual Graphics. That's probably what was tripping up the system booting to a black screen.
I took a similar path but eventually ended up on openSUSE for my desktop. Iāve been pretty happy with it. I canāt think of a single issue that I wasnāt able to quickly resolve. I even got CUDA installed and working in under an hour.
Time to switch to mbin! The features you might miss are new comment highlighting and the all content view, but these are being worked out and mbin still has, otherwise, way more features.
Is this snap stuff something the Ubuntu variants avoid I.e Ubuntu studio and Ubuntu budgie?
Does Linux Mint count as an āUbuntu variantā?
Well, itās complicated, isnāt it?
Ubuntu is built on Debianās skeleton. RHEL is built on Fedora. Many more examples.
Linux Mint is based on Ubuntu, but in a much deeper and more connected way than Ubuntu is based on Debian. It even shares many of the same software repositories.
The next closer level is how Xubuntu, Lubuntu, and Kubuntu are just slight variations of Ubuntu. People like to call these āflavoursā.
Finally, you get to the closest layerāthe thousands of people who have taken a stock Ubuntu installation and swapped out one or two components to meet their requirements. We donāt even think of these as distros in their own right.
Itās a continuous spectrum, and any labels we try to apply will be pretty much guaranteed to have fuzzy edges.
No. It based on Ubuntu but without all the bullshit. .deb ist standard and flatpak is also built in. Whenever both are available, you get a choice right from the software manager. Mint is very much its own thing and great if you want to ditch Ubuntu.
Ubuntu variants are required to use snap if they are to be considered official
Thenā¦I guess stop using it? Whatās your issue exactly? You have a plethora of alternatives.
How dare people complain about something they donāt like!
That aside, the article is shitty lol
When you start thinking that everyone on the Internet deserves to hear your opinions on everything, itās time to shut the fuck up. This guy is at that step, and this āarticleā has no information in it that could be deemed useful to a reader.
I think they had a point, but they didnāt care to make a high quality writing out of it. Itās basically a rant
I think he has a point that Canonical is sabotaging Windows emigrants' core user experience to force their Snaps
for sure! Just didnāt like the presentation.
I wish Ubuntu wasnāt standard
How do you mean?
I get it.
I donāt love Snaps either.
However, a thing I try to remember and wish others would as well is simply this: Canonical is a company. Their goal is to make money. They are not out to create the ultimate free as in freedom Linux distribution.
This does (to my mind) not make them evil, and ESPECIALLY doesnāt make the folks who work there evil. It makes them participants in the great horrible game that is Capitalism, and expecting anything else from them is going to lead to heartache, as youāve seen.
If you want a Linux distro that shares your preferences and wonāt try to jam snaps down your throat, you might consider giving Debian a whirl as many others have.
Continuing to ride the Ubuntu train and raging against the dying of the light when it continues chugging in the direction itās been headed for YEARS seems ⦠futile :)
Agreed.
For any (k)ubuntu refugees, do as I did and switch to Debian!
Or as I did and switch to fedora! (Debianās also a really good option)
Nice to see that KDE is so well supported! Iād been running Manjaro KDE the last time I had Linux installed on my desktop but I may give Debian a try this time around.
How do snaps make money for Canonical?
Thereās no way to install a snap except through Canonicalās snap store (or snap store proxy, which gets them from Canonicalās snap store).
Theyāre charging for kernel security live patches. They charge for LTS. If they get enough buy-in re: snaps, theyāre going to do the only thing a for-profit company can do.
Red Hat and SUSE also charge for extended support, itās literally the only fucking way to make money off of a distro
Canonical still offers 5 years standard at the enormous cost of 0.0$
Are you under the impression that they write all the patches?
No, but they actually do write some patches and they also do all the menial work, testing and verification to keep a piece of software serviceable for 10 years
If you think itās easy, go and attempt it yourself. The greatest cure for people talking shit about needed effort, according to my experienceā¦
Iām not gonna speak for Canonical but snaps enable commercial vendors to more readily ship their apps on the Ubuntu platform.
Money is literally the very incarnation of evil via the Talisman it bears.
If they trying to make money then they are, not a fiber of otherwise, Evil.
Youāre decision to not recognize the blatant & obvious Talisman does not make you correct. Itās not your choice. Itās the choice of that occult chant and signature.
Humans are inherently evil. There is but a thin veneer we call ācivilizationā that stops of from beating each other to death with whatever object can be brought to hand.
And what does any of this have to do with the price of tea in China? :)
I dunno, what does it have to do with the price of tea in China?
This along with other things is another reason why i will continue to recommend noobs start with pop os and more advanced users to use bazzite.
I do wish pop os would change their name to cosmic os though. Their current name is too close to poop os š
CosmOS?
Thatās fantastic! Obviously no one will ever use it.
or something more cheerful like GladOS
Donāt forget the random punctuation mixed in. Itās like the title of a kidsā tv show.
never thought of āpoop osā but I think Pop!_OS is a stupid name, itās the only reason I avoided it and chose Nobara instead lol
āI understand that Canonical has every right to make the decision about their product.ā
That seems fair. There are loads of distros available so why not try something else if you donāt like Ubuntu?
Linux and other mainstream Unices such as FreeBSD or OpenBSD int al (thatās not something I ever thought Iād be able to say a few decades back) are not Windows or Apples or whatevs. You do you and not them!
If Ubuntu fails to scratch your itch then move on. Debian is the upstream for Ubuntu so youāll probably be fine with that instead. There is loads of documentation for Debian via the wiki etc and of course most Ubuntu docs will apply as well.
You only got part of the quote, and not the part that really is what the article is about.
And there is a pretty reasonable middle ground:
Thatās precisely I changed to MX Linux. I wonāt use ubuntu for a long time I guess.
Ubuntu has long suffered from NIH syndrome, constantly inventing its own non-standard components (snaps, Unity, etc) and trying to make them "win" by forcing them on their own users. Reminds me of Microsoft with its non-standard Internet Explorer, its own non-standard version of Java and others.
The lesson is to use a Community distro, not a Corporate distro. When the distro's goals align with its community's, even a distro based on Ubuntu will usually be better than straight Ubuntu. For example Mint keeps the good things about Ubuntu (in Mint's opinion of course), removes the bad things like Snaps, and adds other features that the community wants that Ubuntu won't (like built-in Flatpak support among other things).
Okay, but you donāt see these kinds of complaints with Fedora or SUSE. While I donāt necessarily disagree with your core point (community is better), this doesnāt seem like an issue with corporations so much as an issue strictly with Canonical.
Been running KDE on fedora for the last 6 years after giving up on everything Ubuntu based back then. Havenāt thought to look elsewhere since as its been just fine
I went through something similar 2 years ago. I was sold in PopOS, mainly because Debian based distros were easier to find help for. Almost 2 years ago I started using Fedora on my PC while still having PopOS on my laptop. Within 3 weeks I was setting my laptop up with Fedora as well, and Iāve never looked back (other than the regular distro-hopping bursts, lol).
It has been very good & stable over the last few years. I switched because kbuntus ancient kernel caused me issues so I needed something more current, and its worked ever since so I never looked elsewhere. Running Linux isnāt a hobby for me, these are my work systems, so I donāt hop without a push.
Edit: Iāve just rolled out fedora 40 and plasma 6 is running great
Yeah, I get you. My PC is for work, and my laptop can be used for work, but itās mostly my gaming rig (together with my Steam Deck), and my distro-hopping unit as well.
I used Fedora 40 with KDE 6 since the Beta, but KDE and I just donāt get along, so Iām on Gnome 46 on both devices now.
One of the huge advantages on Linux is that you can be back in business in 20 minutes if you choose to try another distro. Similar to Windows and Mac, said Noone ever š¤£š¤£
Youāre being purposefully obtuse. Corporate distro means āby and for companiesā which rolling releases are not
Okay? OpenSUSE Leap is a point release by and for companies. While Fedora isnāt necessarily a server distro, it IS a point release designed with enterprise use in mind.
If we look at both of their strictly enterprise counterparts, Iāve never heard of any complaints about SUSE and any complaints with RHEL Iāve heard are with source availability. Neither of them have the mega amounts of bad publicity of Canonical.
This is why I moved to Linux Mint. Then, when I got tired of having to reinstall the entire OS every time thereās a new version I moved again. Spare a thought for the poor saps who feel stuck with an OS from a single vendor. And sometimes even paying for the privilege. That being said fund open source. Freedom isnāt free.
Mint has an auto-upgrade tool so you don't have to reinstall each time. It used to be only for minor version upgrades but now you can auto-upgrade to a new major version as well. In any case there are plenty of great distros to choose from.
And yes! whatever distro (and other FLOSS software) you use, support them with a donation if you can! When you consider the value you are getting for free vs. what you'd be spending on proprietary software, it's not so hard to do and feels good too.
Also⦠the amount of money Iāve saved by being able to revive old hardware! I havenāt bought a new computer in 11 years. My computer before that (and still working) was a gift in 2006⦠that bitch is old enough to vote.
I have other computers that people have given to me because they were ājust too old,ā but for me, it was an upgrade. I revived a windows 98-era HP a few years ago, just so I could use the 9-pin connection to fix my bricked OG Xbox that I was modding.
Granted, I donāt game on PC or require heavy lifting (though I am saving for a personal build, because thereās some hobbies I just canāt do without a good desktop), but for everyday use, I have more than enough.
I currently have 4 āworkingā computers. Two of them are my main, one still needs to be āreinvigoratedā (itās 18 years old), and one is my server.
I have a 5th desktop that was given to me (because it was too slow/old), and it just recently crapped out on me (either because of windows bullshit, or a bad hdd. But I have my hunches). So itās about to be revived when I have time.
Hardest part was getting my wife onboard with switching to Linux, instead of buying a new computer. But now sheās getting ready to switch her Mac to Linux because itās been struggling. And I think sheās starting to realize that a brand-new computer isnāt really ānecessaryā, if all youāre doing is email, browsing web, and editing docs. Shit, our phones can handle most of that; you donāt need a $1k+ computer for that, or pay for windows software that will barely work on the hardware you have.
So yeah⦠end rant. Absolutely love how much Linux has breathed new life into my old hardware. Has saved me time and time again, as well as a bunch of money. I definitely need to throw a donation at a distro, cause they have saved me more than just money at this point
Mint has been my goto desktop distro for many years now. It is everything Ubuntu used to be. For servers Debian is the answer.
For those that prefer non-debian based Linux then Fedora variants are the way to go.
I was on Mint over 10 years ago and noped out of it when an auto update borked my system. I canāt remember what it was, and maybe if it happened to me today, I could work my way through it. But, as it stood at the time, I remember feeling rolling was the way to go.
I donāt get the anger. Just install your software as snaps. Whatās the problem?
Iāve seen a video where the guy installed steam on Ubuntu 24.04. Of course it was the snap. The guy usually tests distro to see of itās easy to game on it. If the drivers are easy to install, etcā¦
He usually launches steam, then tests Valheim, Overwatch, Tomb Raider and cyberpunk.
Overwatch didnāt launch, cyberpunk neither. Valheim reported that a service didnāt launch. Tomb raider was OK.
Then he uninstalled the steam snap and installed the .deb one. Everything worked.
Enforcing packages is already something that people donāt appreciate on Linux, enforcing packages that donāt work is surprisingly hated.
Ubuntu is supposed to be a distro for beginners, how am I supposed to recommand a distro when I have no confidence the applications will work ?
mint or manjaro are better anyways
Mint is far better, I usually recommand it. But Ubuntu is still more popular.
I didnāt use Manjaro in many years, so I canāt judge it. The biggest problem I see with Manjaro is that it has access to AUR.
Manjaro has its own repos, and they take more time to release packages than Arch, which can be a good thing stability wise. But if you have applications from AUR installed then you might have conflicts with the dependencies needed and the dependencies used by the system.
As I said, I didnāt use Manjaro in a while, so I donāt know if it still a problem. If it is, then itās a shame that the biggest advantage of Arch, the AUR, become that much a risk for the system.
But how is a new person supposed to know that? Ubuntu is still at the top of many charts. And has years of previous positive reviews.
i feel like anyone switching os should look a bit into what they entail and then its our responsibility to tell people what is better
I donāt use Ubuntu myself but I put Zorin on my dadās computer. He 82 and he doesnāt know what an operating system is. He seems to be able to use it though š¤·
Itās almost like you didnāt read the article, because this specific point is addressed.
.
I was a long-time Xubuntu fan, tried Ubuntu directly from canonical for my new laptop.
Itās been a bit rocky, all things considered. I think Iām trying something else next time, maybe mint or whatever. Maybe Xubuntu, but only if this snap shit has been cut out.
I dont mind snaps but blocking deb installs by default on file clicks is a bad look.
Just go Debian.
Ubuntu used to bring a bit of spit and polish at a time when most Linux distros lacked that. Nowadays it brings nothing worthwhile to the table anymore, itās just brand recognition, but what it does bring is aggravation for experienced users.
I had this realization a few years ago when I found myself fighting against 20.04 and I asked myself: what exactly is Ubuntu doing for me that plain Debian canāt? The answer was nothing really, so I moved all my Ubuntu VMs over to Debian Bullseye and never looked back.
Definitely time to just use debian, mint MX, or pop os even. I did a lot of hopping though and Iāve settled on Nobara KDE. Mint was great but the Bluetooth was finicky for some reason, and debian is mostly just ubuntu with some gui stuff removed. PopOS is basically just debian until COSMIC but still good too.
Time to move on to the Ubuntu of the Arch stream, Manjaro.
For my server I simply switched to Debian and add the packages I need on top, without all that proprietary snap crap.
For desktop Iām tempted to switch to an atomic distro like Fedora Silverblue (Gnome) or Fedora Onyx (Budgie), and for the Steam Deck Iād go with Bazzite.