GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml
on 13 Aug 2024 10:51
collapse
No. I think the comment I replied to was supposed to mean that the person had issues with seeing sexual stuff everywhere. I disagreed because in this case porn creation is a legitimate concern.
That’s not discussed in the article though, I think they were just seeing a (not really that) phallic logo
GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml
on 13 Aug 2024 13:13
collapse
Oh ok I really didn’t see that.
that_leaflet@lemmy.world
on 12 Aug 2024 23:20
nextcollapse
A reminder that the Linux Foundation does what its members want. The members may not care about the Linux desktop, but more server oriented things and running LLMs on those servers.
fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
on 13 Aug 2024 06:35
nextcollapse
Sweet. There has been a little too much “open” just enough to contribute but restrictions on the actual end user.
UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee
on 13 Aug 2024 09:39
nextcollapse
That’s the way to go! AI isn’t bad. Closed sourced AI is.
umami_wasbi@lemmy.ml
on 13 Aug 2024 14:46
nextcollapse
That “ethical” is problematic. What considered to be ethical is very subjective to the culture context.
Edit: better wording
delirious_owl@discuss.online
on 13 Aug 2024 19:12
collapse
Im down to permit what the Linux Foundation considers ethical in this context. They seem to have their head screwed on straight
possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip
on 13 Aug 2024 22:53
collapse
The Linux foundation isn’t exactly known for “ethics”
unlawfulbooger@lemmy.blahaj.zone
on 14 Aug 2024 20:34
collapse
threaded - newest
That’s a penis dot gif
I think you might need to see a doctor
clearly, it’s obviously pronounced jif
But then the other image format would have to be prounounced JPEJ
No mister/miss. Porn creation is one of the concerns about open models because they can’t even prohibit it in the license.
Did you reply to the wrong comment?
No. I think the comment I replied to was supposed to mean that the person had issues with seeing sexual stuff everywhere. I disagreed because in this case porn creation is a legitimate concern.
That’s not discussed in the article though, I think they were just seeing a (not really that) phallic logo
Oh ok I really didn’t see that.
A reminder that the Linux Foundation does what its members want. The members may not care about the Linux desktop, but more server oriented things and running LLMs on those servers.
Sweet. There has been a little too much “open” just enough to contribute but restrictions on the actual end user.
That’s the way to go! AI isn’t bad. Closed sourced AI is.
That “ethical” is problematic. What considered to be ethical is very subjective to the culture context.
Edit: better wording
Im down to permit what the Linux Foundation considers ethical in this context. They seem to have their head screwed on straight
The Linux foundation isn’t exactly known for “ethics”
Why is that?