Linux Kernel Faces Reduction in Long-Term Support Due to Maintenance Challenges (www.linuxjournal.com)
from joojmachine@lemmy.ml to linux@lemmy.ml on 20 Sep 2023 02:59
https://lemmy.ml/post/5208814

#linux

threaded - newest

loops@beehaw.org on 20 Sep 2023 03:33 next collapse

I had no idea LTS could go up to six years… that’s crazy.

wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works on 20 Sep 2023 04:01 next collapse

That’s very sad news. Part of the appeal is long term support. Two year is extremely short. That means that even Debian old-stable won’t be getting security backported anymore!

Bitrot@lemmy.sdf.org on 20 Sep 2023 05:56 next collapse

Kernel 4.14 and 4.19 are still supported right now upstream, which seems like an extreme maintenance burden. For Debian they might need to release an update to the next longterm release somewhere during their stable release (like Ubuntu already does with HWE) or suggest people use the backported update on oldstable.

[deleted] on 20 Sep 2023 05:56 next collapse

.

skilltheamps@feddit.de on 20 Sep 2023 15:05 collapse

The parties that want or need this kind of long term support are companies for the most part, which could very well crowdfund the personell to carry out these backports.The issue is not the absence of maintainers, it is the absence of awareness for crucial foundations by which these commercial entities live of.

Laser@feddit.de on 20 Sep 2023 09:40 collapse

I was already surprised by the amount of LTS kernel series. There’s currently six of them! I wondered how this is sustainable and it seems the answer is that it just isn’t.