JetBrains working on higher-abstraction programming language (www.infoworld.com)
from cm0002@lemmy.world to programming@programming.dev on 26 Jul 17:40
https://lemmy.world/post/33512627

#programming

threaded - newest

Colloidal@programming.dev on 26 Jul 18:38 next collapse

“So instead of writing three applications, you write it in a special programming language, which is basically English, which describes how you want to see this application in a very specified way, and then AI agents, together with JetBrains tooling, will generate the code of all of these platforms,” Skrygan said.

gramie@lemmy.ca on 26 Jul 18:39 next collapse

This makes me think of Inform, which compiles English sentences into interactive fiction.

tavernusmaximus@piefed.social on 26 Jul 18:50 next collapse

The language is in the works but JetBrains has not revealed a timeline for general availability at this point.

Won’t hold my breath for this ever shipping.

Assuming there will be an LLM involved because that’s what seems to be all AI is these days. How on earth they plan to get reproducible builds from this thing is beyond me (suppose that’s one reason I don’t work for JetBrains).

nebeker@programming.dev on 26 Jul 19:47 next collapse

Surely through an intermediate - real - language?

BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world on 27 Jul 00:16 collapse

It sounds like it uses similar ideas to Amazon Kiro. Many of the advancements in “vibe coding” tools are focused on ways to put consistent, coherent bumpers on AI output.

jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works on 26 Jul 18:54 next collapse

This kind of seems like a solution in search of a problem. Most modern high level programming languages are easily readable, ‘english oriented’, and already capable of at least some level of cross platform development.

One of the main problems with any programing language or framework is that flexibility breeds complexity. If they seriously think they’re going to lower the complexity of programming by allowing devs to write programs [essentially] in plain English, and then let AI do the rest, I think it’s a recipe for disappointment.

Michal@programming.dev on 26 Jul 20:30 collapse

This kind of seems like a solution in search of a problem

Not like it’s a bad things. A lot of inventions started this way.

a1studmuffin@aussie.zone on 26 Jul 23:42 collapse

But also, a lot of programming languages exist simply because a programmer really wanted to write a programming language.

CsJ5NPkuvE@lemmy.zip on 26 Jul 20:35 next collapse

“JetBrains is exploring how to make this new language a derivative from Kotlin, but Skrygan believes the derivative should be English.”

That sounds like (Visual) Basic. It looks like English but it’s basically pseudo-code.

I’m happy letting AI and my language server write all the extra annotations for Rust, i’ve no trouble reading them. I have much more trouble when types and usage specifiers/limiters are missing.

resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world on 26 Jul 22:29 next collapse

Does it involve AI?

JackLSauce@lemmy.world on 27 Jul 03:38 collapse

Yep!

developing a new programming language intended to make AI and code much more controllable and transparent

Don’t worry, no details on how a language would achieve that

resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world on 27 Jul 03:39 collapse

Oh okay.

AnotherPenguin@programming.dev on 27 Jul 01:27 collapse

Do they really need it when kotlin exists?