The art of the sacrificial 'duck' in programming projects (rachelbythebay.com)
from morg@zorg.social to programming@programming.dev on 22 Nov 2023 21:40
https://zorg.social/post/89542

#programming

threaded - newest

monotremata@kbin.social on 22 Nov 2023 23:58 next collapse

The only real objection I have to this as a term is that it's too easy to confuse with "rubber ducking": https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rubber_duck_debugging

towerful@programming.dev on 23 Nov 2023 06:11 collapse

My dad tells a similar story of an offshore oilrig person giving a tour to some C-Suite type people. His alarm goes off, and he pauses the tour to throw an oily rag on the floor. 5 minutes later the rig supervisor person steps out of their office, looks around, shouts about oily rags and health&safety risks, then goes back into their office.
With a similar “punchline” about giving the supervisor something obvious to complain about

So, perhaps call it an “oily rag”?

RagingHungryPanda@lemm.ee on 23 Nov 2023 00:00 next collapse

I heard this story but with the original Kirby game

Tamo@programming.dev on 23 Nov 2023 05:53 next collapse

I remember seeing a comic once about two devs, one complaining that this senior always puts lots of nitpicky comments on her code review, and the other replies that he always makes one obvious mistake, so the senior can point it out and feel like they’ve done their job

Do your thing internet, cos I cannot find it

Sigmatics@lemmy.ca on 23 Nov 2023 06:31 collapse

This works a lot of the time with the people that don’t really care about the review. With those that do it won’t