rsky: AT Protocol implementation in Rust – a Blacksky project
(github.com)
from erlend_sh@lemmy.world to rust@programming.dev on 12 Oct 2024 19:55
https://lemmy.world/post/20784801
from erlend_sh@lemmy.world to rust@programming.dev on 12 Oct 2024 19:55
https://lemmy.world/post/20784801
Links:
- https://atproto.com - https://atproto.com/articles/atproto-for-distsys-engineers
- https://www.blackskyweb.xyz - https://bsky.app/profile/rudyfraser.com/post/3l6d7mmzhik2r
For a lot of us, atproto projects are some of the biggest (most users, most publicized, most code written, etc.) projects we’ve ever done. For me, it’s also my first time working in open source (ironically, someone asked me to be more open about that)
If you can help, pls check out open issues.
I know not everyone thinks highly of atproto around these parts, but please don’t let that get in the way of welcoming a fellow rustacean into the open source world 🦀
threaded - newest
This is what I was looking after, thanks
+++
OK
ATH
NO CARRIER
OK
My initial thoughts too
cool, though I don’t like atproto
Why not?
Made by bluesky, just to be different from the rest. They could’ve added the features (e.g. DIDs) of atproto to activitypub, which is a standard, but they refused to do so.
Some shallow observations without really getting into the code:
misc
labeler/ResNet50_nsfw_model.pth
in the repository really necessary?(I like my
–filter=tree:0
clones to be maximally fast and small.)rsky-crypto
anyhow
in library code.multibase
dependency much either. I know thatbase64
at least got re-written since that crate’s last update (Nov 6, 2020).rsky-feedgen
serde_cbor
is long dead (I was a user myself).serde_cbor
andserde_ipld_dagcbor
are dependencies anyway.lazy_static
toonce_cell
a long time ago. And your use is available in std on stable Rust today.rsky-firehose
$CURRENT_YEAR
is meh anyway. But I guess that comes from IPLD.rsky-identity
anyhow
in library code.rsky-pds
*base*
dependencies does one need? All of them of course!rsky-syntax
lazy_static
andanyhow
again.That’s all from a code organization and ecosystem PoV. Otherwise, things look normal and not fancy (which is good).
Unfortunately, I don’t have the time to look beyond that at this moment.
Appreciate the review! I’ve forwarded it to the dev :)
Sharing for anyone else not familiar with AT Protocol:
FAQ Why not use ActivityPub?:
Account portability and Scalability through activity aggregation
Bluesky uses AT Protocol. The connected network/platform is called the Atmosphere.
I didn’t see any mention of other software/platforms using AT protocol on the protocol website or Wikipedia.
Yeah. I read the linked explanation by OP.
User repositories is basically how FMS on Freenet (now Hyphanet) works. The big difference is that JSON is used at AT instead of XML 😁. Also, things on Freenet are “content addressable” (what a buzz word) and immutable, always has been.
General data scalability is a part of the Freenet network model. App bandwidth and sync is admittedly not optimal, since on FMS, you basically pull from everyone’s feed to your database (bar the ones you distrust, or others you trust their distrust judgment distrust). But that can be trivially fixed by adding watchers split over the keyspace. These watchers can give users metadata about who to pull/update from. This of course was never actually needed since the user-base is small.
So reading about AT, I was left wondering. Is this really innovative? Then I read this part
… and everything made sense. The masters of pretending they are coming up with new stuff are at it again.
Not sure that is a good name from a search or brand recognition perspective.
Yeah, I thought the same. Pretty bad name.