Dolph is prime human
from Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com to science_memes@mander.xyz on 03 Jul 13:26
https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/48204173

youtube.com/shorts/ssMoo5orDxw

#science_memes

threaded - newest

ThePantser@sh.itjust.works on 03 Jul 13:38 next collapse

Dolph, Dolph, Dolph!

Dolph Lundgren the science front man.

Lemmygradwontallowme@hexbear.net on 03 Jul 13:41 next collapse

Lundgren the science guy!

FnordPrefect@hexbear.net on 03 Jul 14:41 collapse

šŸŽ¶ Dolph! Dolph! Dolph! Dolph! Dolph! Dolph!šŸŽ¶

ryedaft@sh.itjust.works on 03 Jul 13:43 next collapse

He quit the Fulbright thing after two weeks though.

Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 03 Jul 13:46 next collapse

Choice. A bold choice. Not a negative.

merc@sh.itjust.works on 04 Jul 03:41 collapse

Yeah, but look at why he quit:

However, while preparing for the move to Boston, he was spotted in the nightclub where he worked in Sydney and was hired by Grace Jones as a bodyguard, and the two became lovers.[18] He moved with Jones to New York City, where he dabbled in modeling at the Zoli Agency but was described as ā€œa bit too tall and muscular for a model’s size 40ā€.

It’s not like he said ā€œthis is too hard for meā€, it’s more like he said ā€œwait, I can have this other life instead?ā€

ryedaft@sh.itjust.works on 04 Jul 10:27 collapse

I’m not complaining or anything. Bro was banging peak Grace Jones and saw a better life than chemical engineering (maybe he saw god, she was smoking hot). Before this meme I thought he had a PhD and then I had to look up the scholar stuff.

Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca on 03 Jul 13:46 next collapse

And he is a Trump and Putin supporter. Fuck him.

Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 03 Jul 13:47 next collapse

Oof. Didn’t know that

starlinguk@lemmy.world on 03 Jul 17:27 collapse

There’s no evidence for that anywhere. Always ask for a source.

spankmonkey@lemmy.world on 03 Jul 13:53 next collapse

He took his role in Rocky IV too seriously.

logicbomb@lemmy.world on 03 Jul 14:12 next collapse

Dolph or Bill?

DarkCloud@lemmy.world on 03 Jul 14:30 collapse

Dolph… Bill Nye is a Queer and Trans supporter.

qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website on 03 Jul 18:32 collapse

And a big plastics shill, unfortunately.

TheBat@lemmy.world on 03 Jul 14:33 next collapse

I could only find this:

nymag.com/…/dolph-lundgren-putin-sniper-rifles-in…

It mentions only Putin (which also sounds like a joke) and it’s from 2013 (before the annexation of Crimea).

Is there any more, and preferably recent, info?

clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works on 03 Jul 14:39 next collapse

I don’t care much about this guy specifically, but I wanted to chime in and say that I appreciate you looking for a source.

troybot@midwest.social on 03 Jul 15:07 next collapse

Maybe they’re confusing Dolph with Kevin Sorbo?

TheBat@lemmy.world on 03 Jul 15:58 collapse

I think that’s bigger insult than calling him a Trump supporter

boonhet@sopuli.xyz on 03 Jul 19:42 collapse

2013 was still after 2008 invasion of Georgia and many other signs that Putin is a ruthless dictator tbh. In 2017 he said Russia is lucky to have Putin.

cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 03 Jul 15:16 next collapse

Source?

stoy@lemmy.zip on 03 Jul 15:34 collapse

Since we are talking science, let me paraphrase Carl Sagan:

ā€œClaims require evidenceā€

neidu3@sh.itjust.works on 03 Jul 17:37 collapse

Obligatory: Source?

Lv_InSaNe_vL@lemmy.world on 03 Jul 18:21 collapse

Source: I made it the fuck up

dumbass@quokk.au on 03 Jul 13:52 next collapse

If you read BS as Bullshit, it makes it better.

fartographer@lemmy.world on 03 Jul 14:56 next collapse

My brain has always translated BS to ā€œBastard Studies.ā€ I genuinely have up take a beat when someone says they have a BS in something so I can remind myself science bachelor

axEl7fB5@lemmy.cafe on 03 Jul 15:21 collapse

I always read it that way. Why not just call it B.O.S or remove the abbreviation?

atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works on 03 Jul 16:47 collapse

The same reason the National Aeronautics and Space Administration isn’t NAASA.

ceenote@lemmy.world on 03 Jul 14:07 next collapse

Eh, it’s more about the enthusiasm than the qualifications. Plus, while Bill Nye is no angel, at least he’s not a Putin supporter.

LikeTearsInTheRain@lemmynsfw.com on 03 Jul 15:13 next collapse

Bill Nye is an entertainer / educator. I’ve met plenty of people with PHDs and masters who couldn’t present a basic concept because they’re too caught up in technicalities and not understanding what it’s like to teach and get people interested in something.

RedditRefugee69@lemmynsfw.com on 03 Jul 15:40 collapse

I’ll happily take a minimally qualified Science Guy that inspires thousands or millions of people to get into science than the most sciency scientist in all science that only ever inspired people to punch people.

buttnugget@lemmy.world on 04 Jul 00:50 collapse

Furthermore, formal education is only one part of knowledge. Gatekeeping the word ā€œscientistā€ is pointless. Maybe he has equivalent knowledge, skills, and ability to someone with a more advanced education. Maybe he doesn’t. Formal education is just the usual route, not the only route.

bear@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 03 Jul 15:38 next collapse

Is there some controversy around Bill Nye that I haven’t heard?

He has been a leading science communicator covering hundreds of topics for many decades, and is only human, of course there are going to be shortcomings.

Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone on 03 Jul 16:03 next collapse

He has a reputation of just being an unpleasant dick and difficult to work with. Nothing super problematic to my knowledge, just a bad personality.

Duamerthrax@lemmy.world on 03 Jul 19:37 next collapse

I’ve also heard that he gets a lot of weird people who are overly attached to the idea of him getting their fantasies crushed when they meet him. Realize that a lot of those ā€œI met him and he was rudeā€ people might not be completely honest about their encounters. Think along the lines of Paris Syndrome, but for a person.

Zagorath@aussie.zone on 03 Jul 20:37 next collapse

Fwiw Nye does seem to be very chummy with Neil de Grasse Tyson, and that guy’s issues are far more well attested to. From the smug poor media literacy, to reports of being professionally hard to work with, to his sexual harrassment allegations. I’m not especially inclined to give Nye the benefit of the doubt given the company he chooses to keep.

Duamerthrax@lemmy.world on 03 Jul 20:45 next collapse

I had to look up the sexual harassment stuff. That’s from 2019 and it was either cleared or never substantiated.

Even if Tyson is a bit of a lolcow on twitter, there are far worse things to be.

I’m just really suspicious of how popular it is to discredit science communicators while anti-intellectualism is so pervasive in society. It’s far easier to tear something down then it is to build something.

mojofrododojo@lemmy.world on 03 Jul 21:33 next collapse

I find it fascinating that they’re out for blood when it comes to Tyson and Nye, but they ignore the rapist in the whitehouse…

[deleted] on 03 Jul 22:32 collapse

.

[deleted] on 03 Jul 22:59 collapse

.

[deleted] on 03 Jul 23:21 collapse

.

[deleted] on 03 Jul 23:23 collapse

.

[deleted] on 03 Jul 23:57 collapse

.

[deleted] on 04 Jul 05:17 collapse

.

Zagorath@aussie.zone on 03 Jul 22:32 collapse

He’s more than just ā€œa bit of a lolcowā€. He discredits science by being an arsehole and inserting science into places it obviously does not belong. He’s the epitome of that stereotypical ā€œSTEM broā€ that looks down upon the arts and humanities. Here’s one anecdote about him I found:

Just saw a clip of his on Instagram about whether ā€œfahrenheit units are better for the weatherā€ as opposed to Celsius.

He starts off with ā€œwell, the weather doesn’t care about how we measure it. It just is what it is, regardless of our units. What you mean is that fahrenheit makes it easy for us to understand the weatherā€¦ā€ And then goes on to discuss it.

Like… Fuck off man. Everyone knows what the person meant, and he’s just being a smartass about it.

He’s also gone on ā€œprovingā€ that Santa can’t be real with real physics. That’s not stuff that makes people interested in science. It’s just dickish and does exactly the opposite.

Here’s an anecdote from someone who admits to overall liking him:

I still listen to [his podcast], but I’m gonna spoil it to you: just listen how often he interrupts people. Every question being asked he needs do change or add something and then ā€œcomplainsā€ that the section or question takes too long.

There’s also a clip with Joe Rogan where he’s not even listening but just rambles on, and keep interrupting.

And finally, I get annoyed by his words of wisdoms where he’s recycling the same sentences in his genius complex voice.

The claim there is that this is just one ā€œsideā€ of NDT and that his ā€œrealā€ side, when it’s allowed to show through, is a much better communicator of the wonder of science. My take is that we don’t get to see this ā€œauthenticā€ version of him nearly often enough to give him credit for it.

He has that bad habit that a lot of smart people (particularly physicists, for some reason) have, which is to think that because they’re smart in their one area, they must also be smart in others. He is certainly nowhere near as bad as some (looking at you, Sabine Hossenfelder), but he does have a nasty habit particularly when talking about the history of science (which, first and foremost, is history). One point that he’s particularly fond of (having repeated it regularly online as well as including it in his Cosmos remake) is the mediaeval flat earth myth.


As for the sexual misconduct allegations, they weren’t proven, but even if you take NDT entirely at his own word…it might not rise to the level of criminal misconduct, but it sure is creepy as fuck behaviour. Grabbing under someone’s dress straps? Inviting a subordinate home for a private meal?

But it’s not clear to me that we should just take him at his word. His own post defending himself, particularly the 1980s case, spends an awful lot of time attacking the character of the accuser. Whereas in the other cases he at least attempts to play it in the respectful ā€œoh I can see how you might have gotten the wrong impression and I’m sorryā€ manner, here it’s just ā€œno, you’re clearly my intellectual inferior and therefore why should anybody believe you?ā€

As for him being ā€œclearedā€:

According to Watson, the so-called ā€œinvestigationsā€ Tyson was referring to consisted of the following: ā€œI had one 30-minute sit-down with a Fox HR representative and a 45 minute-hour sit-down with a man from a private company. I gave them both lengthy lists of extremely reliable people who could corroborate my story, text messages from that time, emails NDT had sent to me, etc. None of the people I gave contact info for were ever contacted by these companies.ā€


In his defence, I will say, I’ve seen a lot of people accusing him of also getting the physics wrong on certain things. And at least one case of him getting into a conversation with Richard Dawkins where he supposedly got something wrong about DNA. My read on most of the situations of this sort that I’ve seen are that they’re either minor errors that are naturally going to occur in off-the-cuff discussions, or stem from an imprecision of language where the actual point he is trying to convey was totally reasonable. Maybe, given he’s a science communicator, he should try better to get these things right, and be ready to correct them in the comments or in editing when they happen and are pointed out, which is something he seems not to do. But I don’t consider this a slight on him as a person at all. Not at the scale that I’ve seen.

CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world on 04 Jul 00:53 collapse

I saw Tyson take such a dismissive attitude toward the threats of something like AI, specifically, AGI/ASI with the flippant ā€œbut we’d just shut it off!ā€ kind of thing, it really grinded my gears.

However, I guess I’m falling into the same trap that so many do - expecting this guy to be all things to every aspect of anything that smacks of ā€œscienceā€ and that’s just not a realistic expectation. I’ll stick with him on things like the re-make/update of Cosmos and ignore his random hot takes on virtually everything else. Probably also when he’s putting pen to paper vs. the hot take kind of thing on a talk show. He seems to be a frequent guest on talk shows and I remember a few being quite cringe at times.

I seem to remember a certain kind of person (usually your local WELLAXKTUALLY guy) getting butthurt about the way Sagan was being held up (in their view) as the arbiter of science or something, repeating ā€œhe’s not a real scientist he’s just a generalistā€ as a constant refrain.

Fuck it, who cares. If guys like this are good at getting whole generations of people interested in science, more power to them…science could use all the PR it can get in the age of Idiocracy.

Zagorath@aussie.zone on 04 Jul 06:21 collapse

If guys like this are good at getting whole generations of people interested in science, more power to them

That’s the problem here though. He might be good at getting a certain kind of STEM bro into science, but his smart attitude turns away heaps more. He contributes to the perception of science as being hostile to women, at the same time as reinforcing the perception of science as elitist and exclusionary. He might’ve fit in well in the '90s and '00s, but unfortunately he’s around in the '10s and '20s.

Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone on 03 Jul 20:38 next collapse

Definitely possible, it’s just a little too consistent for me to think it’s all people meeting their hero and nobody just trying to do their job and getting treated poorly.

Duamerthrax@lemmy.world on 03 Jul 20:50 collapse

I mean, I got the info about other people being weird around Bill Nye from a fan who went to one of his talks. According to her, lot of people who asked questions were asking him questions they were hyper specific to their chosen field that Nye would have no way of knowing unless that was the field he was working in. His specific field is education and science commutation. Without preparation, he’s only going to be able to answer in depth questions in that field.

CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world on 04 Jul 00:46 collapse

Hm, never heard of Paris Syndrome; guess you learn something every day, thanks.

FinnFooted@lemmy.world on 04 Jul 16:10 collapse

Pretty much this. Met him once. He’s has no scandals, he’s just kind of a rude guy.

I had a friend tell a story once about how he was on a field trip and the class found out Bill Nye was in the building. But once Bill found out kids were on the way he escaped out a window to avoid them. I’m not sure how true that is, but its kinda funny.

can@sh.itjust.works on 03 Jul 16:28 next collapse

His AMA was pretty bad.

Zagorath@aussie.zone on 03 Jul 16:54 collapse

How so?

can@sh.itjust.works on 03 Jul 17:00 collapse

It’s been a while and I don’t feel like going back there to refresh my memory.

Krauerking@lemy.lol on 03 Jul 16:42 collapse

Having personally interacted with him more times than I would like, and it was only 3, he’s just a massive jerk, and a self assured belittler.

He doesn’t respect people. I’m not sure he respects anyone other than those that can make his image better, and then it’s conditional and stops when they aren’t useful.

bear@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 04 Jul 06:44 collapse

That’s disappointing.

starlinguk@lemmy.world on 03 Jul 17:28 collapse

Source or GTFO. Spreading rumours about people is a shitty thing to do.

ceenote@lemmy.world on 03 Jul 18:04 next collapse

I’ll be nice, but nobody owes it to you to source everything they say or look things up for you. Googling isn’t hard.

prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works on 03 Jul 18:09 next collapse

Nobody owes it to you to believe what you say either, but they offered you the chance to back up your words.

Granted they weren’t nice about it, but shit for shit leaves everyone covered in shit.

[deleted] on 03 Jul 18:45 next collapse

.

ceenote@lemmy.world on 03 Jul 19:12 collapse

Onlyfans already knew.

bleistift2@sopuli.xyz on 03 Jul 19:32 collapse

On a more serious note: If anyone can just claim anything in a conversation, that would be detrimental to any discussion. Either everybody makes up their own ā€œfactsā€ because no-one bothers proving everyone else’s version of a story (which is just everybody lying in everybody’s face); or everybody is constantly fact-checking everyone else, which makes the conversation take much longer than necessary.

You already have the source, or at least an idea in which context you got the information and how to find it again. It’s just common courtesy to share it the others rather than making them do the work, too.

Also: en.wikipedia.org/…/Burden_of_proof_(philosophy)

ceenote@lemmy.world on 03 Jul 22:59 collapse

There is a time and topic for demanding rigorous discussion, and shit posting about Dolph Lundgren ain’t it. Insinuating dishonesty and demanding a source about something so unserious is like inserting yourself into a casual conversation to start an argument.

TempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.world on 03 Jul 18:05 next collapse

There was a clickbait NY Post article that I’d never link to, this article (archive) is more even handed.

treesapx@lemmy.world on 03 Jul 19:35 collapse

This is confirmed by a search that’s faster than your comment so where’s your anger coming from?

The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world on 03 Jul 14:23 next collapse

It’s tragic that he never got to play a scientist who could smell crime.

<img alt="" src="https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/ddc8a058-d114-4ded-b047-1f127d1922ae.jpeg">

Lussy@hexbear.net on 03 Jul 14:58 next collapse

I bet Lundgren is a huge piece of shit irl, no way someone like this can’t have a major fatal flaw

sourquincelog@hexbear.net on 03 Jul 16:14 next collapse

I read through his wiki entry and didn’t notice anything of import except he made a bunch of flop movies and then he married a personal trainer 40 years younger than him

ProfessorOwl_PhD@hexbear.net on 03 Jul 16:40 collapse

IIRC he’s a Zionist and criticised Sweden for being too socialist, so yeah, a couple.

Boxscape@lemmy.sdf.org on 03 Jul 15:23 next collapse

Bill is just a science guy after all. Not a science lord.

Boomkop3@reddthat.com on 03 Jul 16:00 next collapse

More educated, you mean? Cuz to my knowledge only one of them works in science

shalafi@lemmy.world on 03 Jul 16:04 next collapse

He also dated Grace Jones. Prime human indeed.

n3m37h@sh.itjust.works on 03 Jul 16:14 next collapse

Bill Nye is a science communicator, like Kyle Hill

SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de on 03 Jul 19:08 collapse

I wonder if Kyle will ever address his Bill Gates video or if he’ll just ignore it forever

psx_crab@lemmy.zip on 03 Jul 16:35 next collapse

He’s a science guy, not a scientist.

But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world on 03 Jul 17:47 collapse

He sure does like to pretend he’s the latter

Blueberrydreamer@lemmynsfw.com on 03 Jul 19:06 next collapse

Based on what exactly? I’ve gone to one of his events, he’s pretty explicit about being a science educator. I can’t say I’ve seen him claim otherwise anywhere, though people definitely like to put those words in his mouth.

LovableSidekick@lemmy.world on 03 Jul 19:40 collapse

The Information Age - the age of tailoring information to support our personal anger impulses.

treesapx@lemmy.world on 03 Jul 19:30 next collapse

He’s explicit about being a science communicator and welcomes that discussion.

Duamerthrax@lemmy.world on 03 Jul 19:32 next collapse

citation needed

mojofrododojo@lemmy.world on 03 Jul 21:29 collapse

aw did the science guy hurt your feefees?

show me where the bad man TOLD YOU SOMETHING OBVIOUS THAT RUINED YOUR DAY.

But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world on 03 Jul 22:14 collapse

Oh wow, didn’t know Bill Nye also has a toxic, Rick and Morty style army of shit slinging white knights

mojofrododojo@lemmy.world on 03 Jul 22:16 collapse

it’s ok, calm down calm down… just explain what your beef with the science bro is.

not hard, articulate your issues man. let it off your chest, I can tell it’s really really bothering you.

dubyakay@lemmy.ca on 03 Jul 23:08 collapse

I personally found his style really abrasive in the first and only recent show I’ve seen. Reddit was shitting all over him too, stating mostly that he’s a prick and not friendly IRL at all.

That said what he advocates for is right.

mojofrododojo@lemmy.world on 03 Jul 23:14 collapse

I personally found his style really abrasive

the goofball science schtick doesn’t work for you? I know him from his old tv show from my youth.

Reddit was shitting all over him too, stating mostly that he’s a prick and not friendly IRL at all.

well that’s… kinda an endorsement for me lol. most of reddit is a prick and not friendly irl from my own experiences.

appreciate the reply

[deleted] on 03 Jul 23:25 next collapse

.

mojofrododojo@lemmy.world on 03 Jul 23:31 next collapse

realize you’re am asshole

am? dude, try not to trip on your keyboard while insulting people. it really undercuts your effort. I mean, perhaps consider for a moment that you am the real asshole lol

WrenFeathers@lemmy.world on 04 Jul 01:15 collapse

Oh the irony.

But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world on 04 Jul 01:22 collapse

Actually bill Nye is a well known asshole, but keep defending your celebrity gods

WrenFeathers@lemmy.world on 04 Jul 01:28 collapse

It’s important that you understand the difference between calling out the irony in a person like you accusing others of being ā€œamā€ asshole- and… ā€œdefending celebrity gods.ā€

But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world on 04 Jul 01:32 collapse

Being pedantic about grammar is such a loser move

WrenFeathers@lemmy.world on 04 Jul 01:38 collapse

lol… I don’t think you know what pedantic means.

dubyakay@lemmy.ca on 03 Jul 23:49 next collapse

I’ve never seen the originals, as he’s not that popular in Europe. My only exposure is ā€œBill Nye Saves The Worldā€ on Netflix. I couldn’t get past the first episode.

I’m a big fan of Sagan, and while I don’t think NDT’a Cosmos: A Space time Odyssey was as good as the first series, I was mostly looking at Nye’s show with the same lense and trying to draw comparisons between them.

mojofrododojo@lemmy.world on 04 Jul 05:15 collapse

My only exposure is ā€œBill Nye Saves The Worldā€ on Netflix.

have not seen that. will go look for it, I wonder if perhaps he’s exhausted trying to explain basic science in this idiot-filled age.

I watched half of the new cosmos, then something got in the way (deployment or vacation or something where I was away from the internet), I should rewatch it. Agree it was not as amazing as OG Cosmos (I love that series so much that I own two copies of the book, one for me and one for the kids). Sagan is just that awesome, it even overcomes the 70s outfits :D

Wolf@lemmy.today on 04 Jul 00:36 collapse

well that’s… kinda an endorsement for me lol

From me too. Reddit wasn’t mad because he’s ā€˜not friendly’, they were mad that Bill was ā€œtoo wokeā€ and featured a song and dance number by Rachel Bloom that even I found a little cringy tbh. Not because of the message, but I just think it was kind of poorly done. The only people I’ve ever heard say a bad word about Bill were climate deniers, anti vaxxers etc.

I’m proud of Bill for not backing down from politically charged issues, when he could easily ignore them to get more viewers/supporters. Scientists shouldn’t let politics interfere with Science and Science Communicators shouldn’t either.

mojofrododojo@lemmy.world on 04 Jul 05:12 collapse

well put. any time someone sneers ā€˜woke’ I laugh and check that person off of my list of people to give two fucks about. it’s such a stupid, regressive pattern that you realize is represented in choices throughout their lives.

hobovision@mander.xyz on 03 Jul 16:41 next collapse

What about a masters in engineering and a bachelor’s in chemistry makes him even double more qualified? Yeah, maybe if he had a doctorate you could make that argument, but you could easily learn and do as much science work in 6 years outside of a university than you would in a BS and MS program at a university.

hakunawazo@lemmy.world on 03 Jul 17:05 next collapse

<img alt="" src="https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/f0c18ded-8ba9-48a1-bf56-32d959a018bc.gif">

Zerush@lemmy.ml on 03 Jul 17:16 next collapse

IQ 160, speaks 6 lenguages, Black Belt in several martial arts, in the making of the Rocky movie, Stallone wanted for realism that Lundgreen give him a real punch, after this he woke up in the hospital.

ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one on 03 Jul 21:19 collapse

Instead, Lundgren found himself at the centre of one of New York’s most romanticised periods. He dabbled in modelling but was too tall and big for most gigs. He earned a basic wage alongside Chazz Palminteri as a bouncer on the door of Manhattan’s Limelight Club. By night, he hung out with Keith Haring, Iman and Steve Rubell. By morning, [Garace] Jones would bring back as many as five girls for group sex, an activity he describes as ā€œexhaustingā€. He was a regular at both Studio 54 and the Factory, and Andy Warhol would invite him to do a photoshoot with Jones. But not before Warhol asked him: ā€˜What are you famous for?’

ā€œIt was certainly a shock for this young engineering student,ā€ he says. ā€œI’m pleased to have been part of that scene. It was right before Aids, and the club scene was hardcore. And my girlfriend, Grace, was a big gay icon, so we went to a lot of the clubs. We knew Andy and all the designers, and Michael Jackson and David Bowie. It was simpler in those days somehow. And fun. Entertainment wasn’t corporate in the way entertainment is now. A lot of the people I met back then are not alive anymore. You know, Aids or drugs or a combination of the two. Its bittersweet looking back. Even with Andy. I thought he was an old man at the time but he died in his 50s.ā€

irishtimes.com/…/dolph-lundgren-grace-jones-would…

Point to Lundren for epic party stories.

merc@sh.itjust.works on 04 Jul 06:32 collapse

The quote in his online biography about his modeling career is a bit more detailed:

Dolph took up modeling at the famous Zoli Agency to make some extra cash. ā€˜A bit too tall and muscular for a model’s size 40’,

Wow. Can you imagine a bigger ego boost than being turned down to be a male model because you’re just too tall and muscular?

Being perpetually exhausted because your celebrity girlfriend keeps bringing back too many girls for the group sex session is a close second though.

El_guapazo@lemmy.world on 03 Jul 17:30 next collapse

Nye is more of if an educator than scientist. A lot like your average science teacher in high school.

Dolph is usually posted in this manner to put down Nye’s support for climate research, anti creationism, and other ā€˜political’ stands.

Doom@ttrpg.network on 03 Jul 20:48 collapse

Wait why? Does he not support those views?

El_guapazo@lemmy.world on 03 Jul 22:00 next collapse

His views are easily found online. I’m commenting on the side by side comic meme and its implications.

MrMakabar@slrpnk.net on 04 Jul 00:33 collapse

Dolph is vegan and seems to not care about religion, but mostly stays out of politics.

Doom@ttrpg.network on 04 Jul 04:25 collapse

So he’s probably on the same page as Nye I’m guessing.

altphoto@lemmy.today on 03 Jul 19:01 next collapse

Its not the size of your knowledge. Its what you do with it that counts.

theotherbelow@lemmynsfw.com on 03 Jul 19:58 next collapse

ā€œBill nye the science guyā€

Fair enough.

bytesonbike@discuss.online on 03 Jul 23:01 collapse

Dolph lundgren the Science… Dungeon?

AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world on 03 Jul 23:05 collapse

Curmudgeon?

Speiser0@feddit.org on 03 Jul 20:18 next collapse

Exponential in which variable?

Kolanaki@pawb.social on 03 Jul 20:47 next collapse

Bill Nye the Engineering Guy

Daft_ish@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 03 Jul 21:00 next collapse

What do you guys think is so special about a scientist.

They measure things and record data really well. They apply scientific principles and such.

They use lab equipment and usually have a very narrow scope on the things they are working on.

Do you think every scientist gets a nobel or something?

Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 03 Jul 21:02 collapse

Scientist isn’t a thing. It’s like artist, a self-designation.

Daft_ish@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 03 Jul 21:03 next collapse

No, its a thing, people have the title ā€œscientist.ā€ Its just a job, tho.

Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 03 Jul 21:20 next collapse

Nuh-uh.

Daft_ish@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 03 Jul 21:56 collapse

Just do a quick job search. I know plenty of scientists.

Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 04 Jul 00:22 collapse

Researchers, professors, testers, archeologists, chemists, physicists, biologists.

Show me someone walking around with ā€œscientistā€ on their lapel. It’s like a cartoon joke.

slackassassin@sh.itjust.works on 04 Jul 18:48 collapse

Staff scientists at work vanish into thin air upon receiving this profound take.

Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 04 Jul 19:12 collapse

Staff assassins move in to protect them from staff ninjas.

slackassassin@sh.itjust.works on 04 Jul 20:41 collapse

It’s a real staff infection

BCsven@lemmy.ca on 04 Jul 01:33 collapse

My kid holds a Materials Science degree and worka as a Materials Scientist americanprofessionguide.com/materials-scientist-c…

Slovene@feddit.nl on 04 Jul 04:49 collapse

and worka

It’sa you, Mario!

BCsven@lemmy.ca on 04 Jul 13:44 collapse

Eeii, mama mia!

princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 03 Jul 23:09 next collapse

What kinda essentialism is this? Artist is also absolutely a job title. Sure, you can self-describe as well, but there are people that get paid to be an artist.

Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 03 Jul 23:38 collapse

I’m a warrior, a poet, an entrepreneur. Who says I’m not?

princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 03 Jul 23:44 collapse

No one. Like I said, you can self-identify but it is also a title you can have from a job or similar.

Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 03 Jul 23:55 collapse

You did say that. I’m corrected.

BCsven@lemmy.ca on 04 Jul 01:32 collapse

Bachelors of Science? I know you could argue that is applied to a lot of degrees, However one of my kids is a Materials Scientist. It is the Diploma and Job. americanprofessionguide.com/materials-scientist-c…

Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 04 Jul 02:23 collapse

I’ll bet the bachelor of science degree is in something. BS in psychology. BS in materials (new to me). So you’re going to be a counselor, or a psychologist, or whatever a materialist is called other than materialist which doesn’t make sense.

BCsven@lemmy.ca on 04 Jul 02:49 collapse

I’m not sure what you are saying. Its not Materialist its Material Scientist, they study the science of materials and get a diploma in Materials Science, and the job is called Materials Scientist. Its basically Math, chemistry and metalurgial sciences rolled I into one discipline. Thus the link I posted, here’s another materials.princeton.edu/…/what-materials-science

troglodytis@lemmy.world on 03 Jul 22:26 next collapse

<img alt="" src="https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/e12f80ba-df98-421b-87d2-b01fd04111bc.gif">

Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 03 Jul 23:39 collapse

This is the way

rockandsock@lemmy.world on 03 Jul 22:49 next collapse

I’mma need to see Dolph in a bow tie…

MacNCheezus@lemmy.today on 04 Jul 05:40 collapse
burgerpocalyse@lemmy.world on 03 Jul 23:08 next collapse

im not a scientist but my data points indicate that this meme fucking sucks

Vespair@lemmy.zip on 03 Jul 23:11 next collapse

…Does Bill Nye need more qualifications to be an effective science educator?

buttnugget@lemmy.world on 04 Jul 00:29 next collapse

He does not. This post is gatekeeping bullshit. The only thing that matters is knowledge of a subject. This shit reminds me of the worthless dumbfucks who immediately start asking for credentials when I tell them that their understanding of AI is nonsense.

Tollana1234567@lemmy.today on 04 Jul 01:29 collapse

the post thinks having more degrees means your more qualfied in that profession, and also prestige. experience and basic qualification> more degrees and prestige just because your an actor.

glitchdx@lemmy.world on 03 Jul 23:20 next collapse

bill nye is not a scientist, and he never claimed to be one. He is a science communicator, a role he has done well for some time.

Same with Neil DeGrasse Tyson.

Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 03 Jul 23:37 next collapse

NDT is a pompous ass

S0ck@lemmy.world on 04 Jul 00:00 next collapse

It’s a downside of being educated and fascinated by what you’ve learned.

Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 04 Jul 00:03 next collapse

He kisses himself in the mirror

buttnugget@lemmy.world on 04 Jul 00:27 next collapse

He also has credible sexual assault allegations against him.

OozingPositron@feddit.cl on 04 Jul 02:59 collapse

But only on the lips.

zipzoopaboop@lemmynsfw.com on 04 Jul 01:08 next collapse

Mark rober manages just fine without being a pompous ass

MissingInteger@lemmy.zip on 04 Jul 01:37 collapse

Here is Mark Rober shilling for Anduril, an AI weapon company.

zipzoopaboop@lemmynsfw.com on 04 Jul 02:06 collapse

Well shit. Veritasium? Smarter every day?

Sidhean@lemmy.world on 04 Jul 02:32 next collapse

Smarter Every Day pushed Young Earth Creation talking points in a video where he tears up remembering his time developing guided missiles :(

I liked Mark Rober until about ten seconds ago, too :(

Its a raw youtube link (I’m a cave-dweller) so I’m putting it here: youtu.be/VPSm9gJkPxU?t=1615

MissingInteger@lemmy.zip on 04 Jul 02:38 collapse

Here is an advert by Veritasium for Google’s car’s (Waymo). It’s a terrible video. It uncritically shills. It contains garbage ā€œresearch.ā€ Here is a longer breakdown.

BradleyUffner@lemmy.world on 04 Jul 02:26 collapse

I’m educated and fascinated by what I’ve learned too, and I’ve managed to not be an pompous ass… Oh wait, nevermind.

pixeltree@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 04 Jul 00:00 next collapse

Sure but watching him on nova when I was a kid is a big reason I got so into science and engineering so I don’t really care

MonkeMischief@lemmy.today on 04 Jul 00:13 collapse

Unfortunately same with Bill Nye. He seemed so pissed at getting recognized by people at a symposium.

Like geeze dude sorry you inspired people as kids and encouraged them to pursue science and they’re excited to meet you.

NikkiDimes@lemmy.world on 03 Jul 23:59 next collapse

Neil does have a PhD. in astrophysics, however.

LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world on 04 Jul 00:04 collapse

Neil regularly gets osmosis wrong and thinks it/distilled water can ā€œsuck mineralsā€ from your body, something I was taught repeatedly in basic A&P, biology, and chemistry, that isnt true bc osmosis is the movement of water, not solutes.

Doxatek@mander.xyz on 04 Jul 02:31 next collapse

Neil regularly says super dumb shit lol I don’t subscribe to him but I see random clips of him talking sometimes and not getting things right

NikkiDimes@lemmy.world on 04 Jul 06:00 collapse

Well, considering that’s not astrophysics, I can’t say I’m surprised. Not trying to defend the guy; he can be confidently wrong and a dick at times and should be more aware of what he doesn’t know. On the other hand, I’ve never heard anyone say anything bad about Bill.

JackbyDev@programming.dev on 04 Jul 00:54 next collapse

He specifically claims to be a science guy. Not a scientist.

…

BILL! BILL! BILL! BILL!

BCsven@lemmy.ca on 04 Jul 01:27 next collapse

Sure, but he has a Bachelor of Science degree. :)

Glytch@lemmy.world on 04 Jul 02:18 collapse

Yeah, but that’s BS

merc@sh.itjust.works on 04 Jul 03:37 next collapse

Not the same with Neil DeGrasse Tyson.

I’m not his biggest fan, but I fully respect his scientific credentials. He has a PhD from Columbia. He published at least a dozen papers. There’s no question that he’s a scientist, a manager of scientists, as well as a science communicator.

The problem is that his success seems to have destroyed his humility. It’s not that he brags about being so incredibly smart. It’s more that he doesn’t ever seem to sit back and say ā€œhey, maybe this isn’t something where my contributions won’t be appreciatedā€. I think his science communication is doing more good than harm. I think he’s a great role model for little black boys who think all scientists are white, or that they’re all stuffy nerds with no personality. But, I think he’s at his best when he’s in a show where there’s a script and an editor. On social media and on free-form podcasts, he comes off as a know-it-all ass.

P00ptart@lemmy.world on 04 Jul 05:02 next collapse

He is a know-it-all ass. He’s a self-important dickhead. But I appreciate his role in getting young black kids seeing a role model that they can relate to. That’s far more important than his ego.

merc@sh.itjust.works on 04 Jul 06:12 collapse

Ha! It makes it sound like you’re saying that young black kids are self-important dickheads and that’s why he’s a good role model.

But, yeah, I know what you’re trying to say. Despite his social media presence, the image that kids generally see is a very positive one. He’s a somewhat stylish (in his own way) guy, who clearly has personality, and is a very accomplished scientist. I just cringe any time he comments on something not related to astrophysics.

P00ptart@lemmy.world on 04 Jul 07:05 collapse

Exactly. He doesn’t need to ruin movies. We know that movies are for entertainment, it doesn’t need to be dissected as fact. And we certainly don’t need someone taking our escapism away from us. Let us have this, dude. We need this right now, including from the time he became prominent. He killed Pluto, which I guess is fine because it was accurate, but he didn’t need to shove himself into movies and try to ruin our very-much-needed escapism. It’s egotistical, and insulting, as if we don’t know that it’s a movie.

CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world on 04 Jul 13:28 collapse

But, I think he’s at his best when he’s in a show where there’s a script and an editor. On social media and on free-form podcasts, he comes off as a know-it-all ass.

^ This. I still am miffed at his attitude in regards to considering the issues of AI on I forget which talk show, but he took the attitude of ā€œwe’d just pull the plugā€.

Maybe when in a scripted format or in writing, he might be able to extrapolate a bit, but he just sounded like a layperson when it comes to the topic, and I honestly have no idea if he’s read or considered the kinds of things that, say, Nick Bostrom has put out there. It just sounded like some hot take man-on-the-street kind of response, talking about the problem as if we are talking about someone’s server running somewhere. It was just…facepalm.

Twoafros@sh.itjust.works on 04 Jul 07:01 collapse

Neil DeGrasse Tyson has a Phd in astrophysics and he has published a lot of papers. He is a scientist and a science communicator. Neil DeGrasse Tyson and Bill Nye are not the same.

Bronstein_Tardigrade@lemmygrad.ml on 04 Jul 00:05 next collapse

And we are commenting on a device whose WiFi signal was inspired by the work of Hedy Lamaar.

WrenFeathers@lemmy.world on 04 Jul 01:12 next collapse

Whoever made this meme doesn’t know what exponentially means.

Agent641@lemmy.world on 04 Jul 03:08 next collapse

This is science, not math.

[deleted] on 04 Jul 05:56 next collapse

.

mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de on 04 Jul 14:53 collapse

I, too, spent longer than I ever should have thinking about this. My first thought was, they’re just using it in a linguistic sense, so it doesn’t matter that the exponent would have to be something very small to go from 1 qualification to 4. But then I thought, hm, I guess since there’s only 1 qualification for Bill, no exponent would be enough. But then I realized that grammatically the value in question is ā€œqualificationā€ and not ā€œnumber of degreesā€. The number of degrees is merely standing in as a heuristic proxy to illustrate qualification. This ā€œqualificationā€ scale makes the most the most sense if it’s between 0 and 1, representing percentiles of qualification. Therefore, the exponent applied to Bill’s qualifications must also be between 0 and 1 in order to increase the value to Lundgren’s. For a moment I thought this was the nail in the coffin for the original text, but of course the word ā€œmoreā€ there again refers to the qualification, not to the exponent itself. This interpretation has the nice benefit that no matter what the exponent is, we always get a qualification value between 0 and 1. Hence I can conclude this is the only viable headcanon for this post.

Tollana1234567@lemmy.today on 04 Jul 01:24 next collapse

to be fair bill nye is using his degree and teaching rather than someone that just ditched his degree after he got it. in a job setting they will take bill nye over someone that hasnt used his degree in a while. some people. one is passionate about the stems while the other ones wasnt, some people get higher degrees just because of pressure in thier social circles and then end up hating it and leaving, there were alot of those people in college.

they are seeing someone as having more prestige and degree means they are more qualfied than someone that has more experience in the field.

meep_launcher@sh.itjust.works on 04 Jul 03:43 collapse

If anything, in my 30 years I’ve learned degrees only mean so much. Someone without a degree but with actual on the job experience will out perform a new grad any day of the week.

Frankly the university system has become a way to make sure the poor stay poor.

Tollana1234567@lemmy.today on 04 Jul 05:07 collapse

i believe that too, unfortunately for stems its still archaic in the way it gains experience, plus its also gatekeeped too in a way too, like they gatekeep MD salaries, although not as aggressive, the profs at my school you can gauranteed one of them had money to go to harvard or some expensive school and come out with a job in hand, you can tell which one came from these top schools because they also give off an elitist attitude. one the gen chem prof was like that.

jsomae@lemmy.ml on 04 Jul 01:50 next collapse

He’s a science guy.

MacNCheezus@lemmy.today on 04 Jul 05:41 next collapse

Sounds like he got him beat.

DominatorX1@thelemmy.club on 04 Jul 12:33 next collapse

Theater is everything. Even in ā€œscienceā€.

Asswardbackaddict@lemmy.world on 04 Jul 14:04 next collapse

Stephen Hawking fell into the same role in his later years. If your first introduction to him was trying to communicate science to stupid people, please read Black Holes and Baby Universes, or really, any of his works before he was getting ready to die.

Asswardbackaddict@lemmy.world on 04 Jul 14:06 next collapse

Carl Sagan, Neil Tyson, Dora the Explorer. All very important. Be interested in things.

thatradomguy@lemmy.world on 04 Jul 16:20 next collapse

If he is a Prime, what does he transform into?

RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world on 04 Jul 18:34 collapse

120ft tall robot version of himself.

RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world on 04 Jul 18:32 next collapse

He still audits classes at MIT occasionally.

underscores@lemmy.zip on 04 Jul 19:42 collapse

Dolph Lundgren also smells crime, and when he’s not out fighting crime …