Neutronium would like a word.
from fossilesque@mander.xyz to science_memes@mander.xyz on 22 Apr 23:47
https://mander.xyz/post/28632122

#science_memes

threaded - newest

LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net on 23 Apr 00:18 next collapse

Could you create a device that would compress some substance to the extent it would reach this weight or is that impossible?

gibmiser@lemmy.world on 23 Apr 00:22 next collapse

I believe that would be some form of fusion

benignintervention@lemmy.world on 23 Apr 00:45 collapse

So yes, for a moment

ChicoSuave@lemmy.world on 23 Apr 00:58 collapse

But also no

chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world on 23 Apr 01:10 collapse

A very large no.

nexguy@lemmy.world on 23 Apr 20:18 collapse

So…kinda yes?

lemmyng@lemmy.ca on 23 Apr 00:52 next collapse

Such devices exist, namely stars. Neutron stars are theorized to have neutronium at their core, essentially a soup of neutrons so densely packed that nothing else fits between them - in order words, the densest theoretical material (osmium is the densest material found on Earth).

LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net on 23 Apr 01:12 collapse

I guess I forgot to say it needs to fit in the package lol. I know it’s possible in extreme environments but can you create such an environment in this package is the question.

P00ptart@lemmy.world on 23 Apr 01:52 next collapse

Just toss a few teaspoons of black hole in there.

variants_of_concern@lemmy.one on 23 Apr 02:25 collapse

Just have the package delivered to the black hole and watch usps get it there rain or snow

Monument@lemmy.sdf.org on 23 Apr 03:25 collapse

Where the fuck did USPS get those super-powerful electromagnets from and how do they know to use them to manipulate impossibly heavy packages!?!

<img alt="The alien USPS mail sorter from the movie Men in Black II" src="https://lemmy.sdf.org/pictrs/image/9108e97d-0890-4ce2-b16b-fcc8494b88d6.png">.
No idea, man. I just saw that thing in the company warehouse and started pressing buttons

Umbrias@beehaw.org on 23 Apr 04:33 next collapse

no, i mean theoretically who knows, but practically no. compressing something to be more dense than a solid is energy intense. you are surpassing the bond energy of moleculesto do it. second, compressing enough osmium is going to take less, but still bigajoules, of energy. the compressive stress is immense. anything that could hold thht stress is much too big to fit in the package.

Gustephan@lemmy.world on 23 Apr 07:22 collapse

I wouldn’t be too surprised if you could achieve that kind of density for a few fractions of a second with explosive powered compression. I’m thinking something like the electromagnetic flux compression technique used by Nakamura et al to make the 1200T magnetic field back in 2018. The package absolutely wouldn’t exist for long though lol

Donjuanme@lemmy.world on 23 Apr 01:22 collapse

Good news, it’s 20-30 years away!

TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world on 23 Apr 00:18 next collapse

at a typical temperature and pressure, sure.

scytale@lemm.ee on 23 Apr 00:51 next collapse

What about a piece of neutron star in those dimensions? Would it still be lighter than 70 lbs?

sheepy@lemm.ee on 23 Apr 01:03 next collapse

The common popsci factoid tells us that a teaspoon of a neutron star weights as much as Mount Everest, so maybe.

Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca on 23 Apr 05:07 collapse

1 tsp neutron star < your mom

sheepy@lemm.ee on 23 Apr 06:56 collapse

Correct. That’s why I can’t ship her using USPS.

KickMeElmo@sopuli.xyz on 23 Apr 01:18 collapse

Good news, after obtaining a piece of neutron star in those dimensions, you wouldn’t need to worry about it anymore.

crawancon@lemm.ee on 23 Apr 01:48 collapse

I’d like an Ai to draw a 4 panel comic of this.

LostXOR@fedia.io on 23 Apr 03:43 collapse

Too lazy do it yourself? Come on. <img alt="comic" src="https://i.imgur.com/GiD7pun.png">

crawancon@lemm.ee on 23 Apr 04:04 collapse

glorious

crawancon@lemm.ee on 23 Apr 04:04 collapse

thank you kind strAinger

Delta_V@lemmy.world on 23 Apr 01:15 next collapse

you can balloon the box out a ways to get more volume

blandfordforever@lemm.ee on 23 Apr 02:03 next collapse

The surface area of the box is about 135 inches. If this surface area were spread over a sphere, it would have a diameter of about 6.5 inches and a volume of nearly 150 cubic inches (nearly twice the volume of the uninflated box!). 150 cubic inches of osmium weighs about 120lbs.

So, indeed you could exceed the weight limit of the box by ballooning it out and filling it with something that’s at least 7/12ths as dense as osmium (or a little more dense than lead).

Squibbles@lemmy.ca on 23 Apr 03:10 collapse

The demon core’s theme just started playing for some reason

InverseParallax@lemmy.world on 23 Apr 12:36 collapse

Herewegoagain.jpg

LostXOR@fedia.io on 23 Apr 03:27 collapse

Hmm, that might make it feasible to do with something that you can actually buy in large quantities, like tungsten! Would still probably cost four or five figures though.

MF_COOM@hexbear.net on 23 Apr 01:35 next collapse

Osmium isn’t the densest substance known to humans it’s just the densest element

ryannathans@aussie.zone on 23 Apr 01:59 next collapse

What is the densest substance we can fill the box with?

Chakravanti@monero.town on 23 Apr 03:55 next collapse

A black hole.

ddash@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 23 Apr 04:21 collapse

Your mom (geez guys, did I really have to do that?)

Kratzkopf@discuss.tchncs.de on 23 Apr 04:24 next collapse

Would densest substance on earth be accurate or are there denser substances like alloys or non-standard crystal configurations of other elements which are denser than pure osmium?

uuldika@lemmy.ml on 23 Apr 07:14 collapse

bruh your username 😭😭 respect.

also, surely flerovium and the other mostly-theoretical elements would be denser, no? at least for a couple microseconds until they yeet some protons and fling themselves apart.

hperrin@lemmy.ca on 23 Apr 01:37 next collapse

Imagine shipping this tiny little box and it weighs 60 pounds. Poor mailman.

P00ptart@lemmy.world on 23 Apr 01:53 next collapse

Last package of the da… Yo wtf?!?

boonhet@lemm.ee on 23 Apr 03:03 collapse

It’s the 32 KG mop all over again

Note: Above video is marketing for an exercise plan, but it’s also funny to watch occasionally when he has new episodes. As far as I know, the weights are real, but they’re always loaded funny in the videos. Max plates visually for the weight the dudes are lifting

Treczoks@lemmy.world on 23 Apr 07:20 collapse

“I have to clean here!” - lifts fat barbell, that some steroid man just lifted with both hands, with one hand and moves it elsewhere.

Delphia@lemmy.world on 23 Apr 07:41 collapse

Not to be a killjoy but your basic mailman has a pretty low weight limit on the parcels they take.

JayDee@lemmy.sdf.org on 23 Apr 01:48 next collapse

Wait until I fill that box with quark-gluon plasma.

swab148@lemm.ee on 23 Apr 02:44 next collapse
davidgro@lemmy.world on 23 Apr 05:48 collapse

I’ll go one better.
A (non-spinning uncharged) black hole with diameter 1+5/8th inches (so it fits in the box) has a mass of about 2.3 earths.

(Near as I can tell QGP filling the whole box is around a ten billionth of that.)

Of course the box would Very quickly no longer be outside the black hole. QGP would also cause the box to no longer be a container in short order. To put it mildly.

BennyInc@feddit.org on 23 Apr 06:14 next collapse

It would also reach its destination very quickly. Or rather the other way around. Free delivery.

nexguy@lemmy.world on 23 Apr 20:18 collapse

Wouldn’t the box forever be outside the black hole… as in just on the surface as it would need to exceed the speed of light in order to actually enter the event horizon?..or is that our of date knowledge?

SpacetimeMachine@lemmy.world on 23 Apr 20:23 collapse

You need to supercede the speed of light to exit the singularity, not enter it. Now we would see an image of the box entering the black hole on its “surface” until that faded, but the box itself would still very much enter the event horizon and be destroyed.

davidgro@lemmy.world on 23 Apr 23:31 collapse

Not only does your explanation match my understanding, but your username suggests you know this stuff.

tamagotchicowboy@hexbear.net on 23 Apr 01:50 next collapse

He forgot packaging, gotta protect the ultra dense substance from bumps and scuffs

BumbyJohnson@lemmygrad.ml on 23 Apr 02:10 next collapse

What about one tablespoon of material from a neutron star?

astronot@hexbear.net on 23 Apr 02:21 next collapse

What about dark matter? One pound of it weighs over 10000 pounds.

Chakravanti@monero.town on 23 Apr 03:53 next collapse

Doesn’t matter. You won’t see it til it too late.

IsoSpandy@lemm.ee on 23 Apr 04:23 collapse

Do we have a source for this or are you just joking?

Thordros@hexbear.net on 23 Apr 06:23 next collapse

It’s true. One kilogram of dark matter weighs as much as ten thousand kilograms of feathers.

Maturin@hexbear.net on 23 Apr 07:57 collapse

It’s what happens when all the gravitons and graviolis get mixed up

TankieTanuki@hexbear.net on 23 Apr 02:56 next collapse

Tariffs on neutronium are out of this world though.

brucethemoose@lemmy.world on 23 Apr 04:36 next collapse

It’s because all the packages have the same domestic weight limit.

Seems silly, but makes sense in the context.

Dragonstaff@leminal.space on 23 Apr 13:46 next collapse

This is the case for most “Dumb laws”: there’s an outlier that becomes kinda silly, but it’s not really worth the effort to change.

I saw one “It’s illegal to hunt Blue Whales in Idaho”. Because it’s illegal to hunt endangered species in Idaho, and Blue Whales are endangered, not because legislators were super concerned about saving Idaho’s whale population.

brucethemoose@lemmy.world on 23 Apr 13:52 next collapse

Makes for good clickbait, heh.

shalafi@lemmy.world on 23 Apr 20:16 collapse

I find that there’s usually a good reason for seemingly stupid shit in this world.

Was shooting the shit with a customer who was bitching about grass seed bags being full of inert materials. Had no idea! Another customer chimed in that the extra crap is to help if feed properly in a spreader.

Lv_InSaNe_vL@lemmy.world on 25 Apr 00:21 collapse

Okay so I originally assumed this was probably due to some union rule or something like that. But I didn’t find any reference to it in the NALC guidelines, anything in the USPS resources center (which is hard to use), anything in google searches, and the original employee documentation or spec.

I did find the USPS History section and it turns out they have someone whose job title is “Postal Historian”, Stephen Kochersperger.

But, anyways, I found the address (not email of course haha) for the USPS history office so I have wrote up an letter and put it in the mailbox. I will eventually update yall

fox@hexbear.net on 23 Apr 04:46 next collapse

If you stuffed that box with neutronium then:

  1. Funny event: it’s so dense the Earth itself is basically a thin gas in comparison and it immediately falls through the floor, the ground, and the mantle to oscillate around in the core.

  2. Funny other event: It’s so massive it dominates gravity nearby and everything within a couple of meters gets turned into Cool Physics from aggregating onto an incompressible box really fast and hard. Maybe the nearby atmosphere ignites from being compressed into plasma against the box.

  3. Real physics step in and the neutronium immediately decompresses and the mass equivalent of an inland ocean in neutrons and angry high-energy high-mass decay products sterilizes everything through to the horizon with a gamma ray burst, also triggering massive seismic events from the blast as well as killing everything on Earth since the atmosphere is now radioactive and a lot thinner

hanke@feddit.nu on 23 Apr 06:03 next collapse

  1. Sweet
  2. Also sweet
  3. Yikes okay don’t try that then. Though I am tempted to observe the cool physics…
conditional_soup@lemm.ee on 23 Apr 06:35 next collapse

Part two turning things into cool physics made me giggle IRL, good job

Neverclear@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 23 Apr 08:40 collapse

Ugh… does this mean I have to go all the way down to post office to get my package again?

PseudoSpock@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 23 Apr 04:59 next collapse

Apparently neither of you are aware of how dense I am. ;)

ComfortableRaspberry@feddit.org on 23 Apr 06:52 collapse

But do you fit into that box? 🤔

KMAMURI@lemmy.world on 23 Apr 07:09 next collapse

Nothing one of those fancy new blenders couldn’t handle.

Zabjam@lemm.ee on 23 Apr 07:51 next collapse

I have mixed feelings about this.

LunarLoony@lemmy.sdf.org on 23 Apr 12:02 collapse

Don’t breathe this.

[deleted] on 23 Apr 13:12 collapse

.

crawancon@lemm.ee on 23 Apr 12:32 collapse

first, ya cut a hole in that box…

Dragonstaff@leminal.space on 23 Apr 13:38 collapse

I’m pretty sure you’re about to break a lot of postal regulations.

Th3D3k0y@lemmy.world on 23 Apr 13:52 collapse

You know…

Looking at the list of restricted items, you can’t mail live animals, or cremated remains. But if you mail only your dick in a box it wouldn’t really be live anymore and isn’t cremated (yet). I suppose it could fall under perishable items though.

stage-www.usps.com/…/shipping-restrictions.htm

Dragonstaff@leminal.space on 23 Apr 19:48 next collapse

Cutting a hole suggests that, like in the song, the dick will still be attached to him, violating the rule against live animals.

shalafi@lemmy.world on 23 Apr 20:14 collapse

You can get a kit!

…usps.com/…/cremated-remains-kit-1-P_BOX_CREKIT1

I had ordered some stickers but they never sent them. :(

Nounka@lemmy.world on 23 Apr 05:17 next collapse

What about a ’ shrodingers 71 pounds ’ cat.’

Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de on 23 Apr 09:38 collapse

If it was dead before you put it in the box, it’s still dead.

Nounka@lemmy.world on 23 Apr 14:40 collapse

True but if it is 71 befor putting it in…

Inside the box it can stay 71 or… loose fat to 35 . You can only know by picking up the box.

Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de on 23 Apr 16:19 collapse

You’ll have an idea by the ooze around the box, but that too is an observation

Ledericas@lemm.ee on 23 Apr 07:02 next collapse

at least 2 sci-fi franchised used "neutronium as a ex machina armor: sg1 and ST(exclusive to select advanced race who can use and make the “armor”, although i think its mostly an alloy in both of these shows rather than pure neutronium(alloy of neutronium and some other metal)

neonred@lemmy.world on 23 Apr 07:18 next collapse

8 5/8" x 5 3/8" x 1 5/8"

Don’t write yourself off yet, learn metric.

SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 23 Apr 07:23 next collapse

It’s only in your head you feel left out or looked down on…

Ediacarium@feddit.org on 23 Apr 08:52 collapse

just try your best, try everything you can

tektite@slrpnk.net on 23 Apr 21:23 collapse

And don’t you worry what they tell themselves when you’re away

Iron_Lynx@lemmy.world on 23 Apr 09:33 next collapse

For most of the rest of the world, that’s about 219 mm × 137 mm × 41,3 mm

Zron@lemmy.world on 23 Apr 13:34 collapse

For those of us that don’t use arbitrary made up units at all, that’s 1.35515609E+34 Planck Length x 8.477460474E+33 Planck Length x 2.555613997E+33 Plank Length.

Use real measurements. A meter is how far light travels in 1/299,792,458 of a second? Statements made by the utterly deranged.

Th3D3k0y@lemmy.world on 23 Apr 13:49 next collapse

Finally a truly universally usable measurement for everyday use

L0rdMathias@sh.itjust.works on 23 Apr 20:25 collapse

I’m sorry but… Length and Units? Actually disgusting. There is only ONE thing that exists, and it is inversely proportional the base rate of growth in half of a circular degree about a complex orthogonal dimension.

funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works on 23 Apr 13:35 collapse

moving from Europe to America the amount of times I’m like “it’s 12 3/8ths” to try to, yknow, join in, and everyone’s like “call it 12 or 13”

motherfucker that’s a huge gap!

stembolts@programming.dev on 23 Apr 09:44 next collapse

USPS GOAT. Fuck privatización.

TaiCrunch@sh.itjust.works on 23 Apr 10:42 next collapse

But sometimes I have mildly inconveniencing experiences with the postal service in my extremely rural town that require me to navigate my extremely rural town’s nearly non-existent public services so we should absolutely surrender complete control to Amazon

Dragonstaff@leminal.space on 23 Apr 13:34 next collapse

Private companies love the heartland and will work out of patriotism even if rural routes are less profitable! 🤡

1995ToyotaCorolla@lemmy.world on 23 Apr 14:08 next collapse

We recently moved in a very rural area. The rural carrier for our new route gave us a form to fill out, and by the end of the week we were receiving mail. UPS and FedEX on the other hand, wouldn’t deliver to us for a month. USPS will carry our packages up our driveway to our steps; UPS and FedEX throw them in the ditch by the mailbox.

Also, did you know you can buy stamps, cards, and envelopes directly from the rural carrier? Here’s a fun quote from the rural customer registration form:

Rural carriers maintain a supply of stamps, cards, and envelopes for sale. Additionally, your carrier will accept Certified Mail™, Registered Mail™, insure packages, and prepare money orders. Generally, rural carriers can extend practically all services available at a Post Office. Please purchase a sufficient supply of stamps and affix proper postage on all outgoing mail.

Imagine how bleak things would be if Amazon was running the show. USPS is truly the best

shalafi@lemmy.world on 23 Apr 20:10 next collapse

I would expect better from UPS, and as usual the USPS surprises me with their quality.

I would think Americans of every political stripe would say the post office is the best government institution we have. That tells you that attempts to undermine them aren’t in our best interest.

GroundedGator@lemmy.world on 23 Apr 21:50 collapse

Imagine how bleak things would be if Amazon was running the show. USPS is truly the best

I’m sorry you are only subscribed to Amazon letter prime, in order to get your packages you must collect them from your nearest whole foods or upgrade to prime plus.

We’re sorry prime plus is not available in your service area.

SavageCreation@lemmy.world on 24 Apr 11:26 collapse

You see, this one service does all things right but one of them irks me. Meanwhile this other one does everything wrong but has one thing I agree with. I’ll switch to it.

Tiger666@lemmy.ca on 24 Apr 09:02 collapse

Milten Friedman is the reason we are where we are today.

TanteRegenbogen@feddit.org on 23 Apr 09:50 next collapse

He said “physically” which is wrong because Neutronium. What he possibly meant was “practically” in which Osmium would be the only element you can practically fit in the box since it isn’t possible to synthesize neutronium at that amount or handle that much safely.

coffeejunky@beehaw.org on 23 Apr 10:54 next collapse

I always fill them up with that stuff black holes are made of, it’s pretty dense.

AndrasKrigare@beehaw.org on 23 Apr 12:16 next collapse

it isn’t possible to synthesize neutronium at that amount or handle that much safely.

To be clear, the neutronium you’re talking about here is the one that is theorized to exist at the core of neutron stars? Could you elaborate on how much has been synthesized and could be handled safely?

TanteRegenbogen@feddit.org on 23 Apr 12:39 collapse

Wasn’t neutronium practically synthesized in miniscule amounts in the Large Hydron Collider? Also I am not a quantum physicist, so I am not sure if any neutronium is currently safe to handle beyond a miniscule amount considering a sugar cube sized amount of neutronium is theoretically the weight of a large freight ship.

Dragonstaff@leminal.space on 23 Apr 13:36 next collapse

If mailing 70 lbs of unstable particles that can’t exist outside of a lab is wrong, I don’t wanna be right.

TanteRegenbogen@feddit.org on 23 Apr 15:44 collapse

It would be interesting transporting a microscopic object weighing 70lbs.

Blooper@lemmynsfw.com on 23 Apr 23:43 collapse

Something something my penis

Akasazh@feddit.nl on 23 Apr 15:37 next collapse

No you mean theoretical. As neutronium is a theoretical substance. To our knowledge there’s no way to find it outside of neuron stars. It is therefore physically impossible, within our current state of knowledge.

It’s highly unlikely, bordering on theoretically impossible to assume that mankind will be able to synthesize enough to fill a cardboard box with. Then the practical side says even if that was possible, there would probably no way a cardboard box could contain that (and a plethora of other practical impossibilities).

Hugin@lemmy.world on 23 Apr 16:08 next collapse

That and the neutrons would rapidly undergo beta decay producing a LOT of free energy and other particles.

AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world on 23 Apr 18:21 next collapse

Big Bada Boom!

Akasazh@feddit.nl on 24 Apr 01:12 collapse

Yeah there physical and practical reasons intermixed!

Gtoasted@feddit.org on 24 Apr 11:15 collapse

Well, you wouldn’t actually need to fill the box, just exceed the weight limit. And since neuronium weighing just 70 Pounds would have negligible volume, the problem becomes on of making a containment chamber that would fit inside the box.

yozul@beehaw.org on 24 Apr 07:54 collapse

I guarantee that it is physically impossible to fill a cardboard box with pure neutronium. Is it physically possible to get over 70 lbs of the stuff in there in a stable, shippable manner? I don’t know, and neither do you. It’s certainly far, FAR beyond the capability of any technology on Earth, but I guess it might maybe possibly not break the laws of physics. I can’t prove that though, and neither can you, so neither of us can actually prove the statement wrong.

Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee on 23 Apr 13:57 next collapse

Neutronium… I am having early 2000s trivia website flashbacks! Wasn’t a teaspoon of that stuff several tons or something?

Soulg@ani.social on 23 Apr 15:45 next collapse

I’m not sure if it’s a hard weight or just guesstimate to illustrate its heavy, but I always heard that a teaspoon would weigh as much as a city

shalafi@lemmy.world on 23 Apr 20:07 next collapse

Yep. Or a mountain, something like that.

vfsh@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 23 Apr 20:34 collapse

A quick search just told me that it’s been hypothesized that a teaspoon of it would weigh around 10 billion tons on Earth

Osnapitsjoey@lemmy.one on 23 Apr 21:50 collapse

Damn! How much does that weigh in feathers?

AmalgamatedIllusions@lemmy.ml on 23 Apr 20:56 collapse

On the order of a billion tons.

Hupf@feddit.org on 24 Apr 10:19 next collapse

At what velocity are the box’s dimensions and effective mass determined?

computergeek125@lemmy.world on 24 Apr 23:21 collapse

Anyone else notice that a large flat rate box has the same limit and the post only counts a small flat rate box?