You can extend the dot product to imaginary fields, there are a couple of standard extractions. If I remember correctly (but my quantum physics background is really poor, so I’m ready to be proven wrong) the one compatible with the bra-ket notation is
a dot b := sum_i conj(a)_i b_i
ornery_chemist@mander.xyz
on 23 Aug 20:00
collapse
The current administration has removed all genders from science, so all verb stems are now uninflected in the quantum tense, sorry.
threaded - newest
Oh the duality!
Don’t you have to conjugate the ket? Like I don’t think braket is dot multiplication
You can assume a and b are real to make the joke make sense.
You can extend the dot product to imaginary fields, there are a couple of standard extractions. If I remember correctly (but my quantum physics background is really poor, so I’m ready to be proven wrong) the one compatible with the bra-ket notation is
a dot b := sum_i conj(a)_i b_i
The current administration has removed all genders from science, so all verb stems are now uninflected in the quantum tense, sorry.
Took me too long to decipher the field
THIS SIMPLE TRICK RAISED $1M STARTUP MONRY (100% GUARANTEED)
Investor money embezzlement speedrun any%