Nice, we can also assume that P(she smiles at you | she likes you) is approximately 1, simplifying to only 2 variables, and also substitute P(you are likable) for P(she likes you) to remove all unknowns.
Zagorath@aussie.zone
on 22 Dec 2024 02:16
collapse
and also substitute P(you are likable) for P(she likes you)
That seems like a pretty wild leap of logic. Being likeable in general isn’t a substitute for a specific person liking you. Though there’s probably a correlation related to your overall “likeability score”.
MutilationWave@lemmy.world
on 22 Dec 2024 02:23
nextcollapse
Why?
leonine@sh.itjust.works
on 22 Dec 2024 05:11
nextcollapse
Smash!
Next question.
flora_explora@beehaw.org
on 22 Dec 2024 13:50
collapse
Wtf? This gives Incel vibes
Rhaedas@fedia.io
on 21 Dec 2024 21:43
nextcollapse
So lowest denominator possible (rarely smiles)?
kittehx@lemmy.blahaj.zone
on 21 Dec 2024 22:16
nextcollapse
unfortunately, P(she likes you) ≈ 0
technojamin@lemmy.world
on 22 Dec 2024 07:38
collapse
So you’re saying there’s a chance?
socsa@piefed.social
on 21 Dec 2024 22:27
nextcollapse
Damn you priors
LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
on 22 Dec 2024 02:24
nextcollapse
I’d be a lot less confused by a Venn diagram.
muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee
on 22 Dec 2024 05:11
nextcollapse
Given P(she smiles at you | she likes you) is approximately 1
Assuming P(she likes you) > 0
Then we can sub into
P(she likes you | she smiles at u) = (P(she smiles at you | she likes you) * P(she likes you))/P(she smiles in general)
To get
P(she likes you | she smiles at u) = x/P(she smiles in general)
Where x is some number between 0 and 1
Therefore we can conclude the more she smiles the less likely its cos she likes you. Therefore find the oens who dont smile and get em to smile. Therefore bigtiddygothgf.
flora_explora@beehaw.org
on 22 Dec 2024 13:55
collapse
You seem to confuse “someone likes you” with “someone finds you attractive”. Maybe someone smiles at you just because you seem like a nice person. I would even argue that this happens much more frequently than someone smiling at you because they find you attractive.
Well, this is aimed at straight dudes in any case, so in this mindset “girls” (!!!) only either are for sex or unimportant.
threaded - newest
Nice, we can also assume that P(she smiles at you | she likes you) is approximately 1, simplifying to only 2 variables, and also substitute P(you are likable) for P(she likes you) to remove all unknowns.
That seems like a pretty wild leap of logic. Being likeable in general isn’t a substitute for a specific person liking you. Though there’s probably a correlation related to your overall “likeability score”.
So you’re saying further research is needed to constrain P(she likes you|you are likeable)?
P(she only has a facial paralysis)
Alternatively
P(she smiles at you| she likes you) but…
<img alt="" src="https://lemmy.ml/api/v3/image_proxy?url=https%3A%2F%2Fi.vgy.me%2FgFa3kR.png">
Why?
Smash! Next question.
Wtf? This gives Incel vibes
So lowest denominator possible (rarely smiles)?
unfortunately, P(she likes you) ≈ 0
So you’re saying there’s a chance?
Damn you priors
I’d be a lot less confused by a Venn diagram.
Given P(she smiles at you | she likes you) is approximately 1
Assuming P(she likes you) > 0
Then we can sub into
P(she likes you | she smiles at u) = (P(she smiles at you | she likes you) * P(she likes you))/P(she smiles in general)
To get P(she likes you | she smiles at u) = x/P(she smiles in general)
Where x is some number between 0 and 1
Therefore we can conclude the more she smiles the less likely its cos she likes you. Therefore find the oens who dont smile and get em to smile. Therefore bigtiddygothgf.
You seem to confuse “someone likes you” with “someone finds you attractive”. Maybe someone smiles at you just because you seem like a nice person. I would even argue that this happens much more frequently than someone smiling at you because they find you attractive.
Well, this is aimed at straight dudes in any case, so in this mindset “girls” (!!!) only either are for sex or unimportant.