I’m flipping between “why is there cuneiform Unicode” and “of course there’s cuneiform Unicode” much more rapidly than I really expected
zqwzzle@lemmy.ca
on 28 Aug 2024 13:09
nextcollapse
𓂸 𓂹 𓂺 there are hieroglyphs too, and these appear often enough to be included.
emptyother@programming.dev
on 28 Aug 2024 13:31
nextcollapse
Shame I can only see squares there. I wonder why. I can see wikipedia’s. Does this work? Two hieroglyphs: 𓂀𓀀
Edit: It does, I can read those in my own comment.
Edit 2: Windows issue? I can see them on Android/sync for lemmy.
zqwzzle@lemmy.ca
on 28 Aug 2024 14:26
nextcollapse
Might not have the full code block implemented.
SARGE@startrek.website
on 28 Aug 2024 15:49
collapse
I can see both your and the original hieroglyphics just fine on my phone using Firefox, and on windows with the same.
Odd thing is, my wife sometimes gets MY emoji and non-standard text as squares, and we have the exact same phone. The only difference between us is she uses the default keyboard.
And the version of it most apps use doesn’t even have enough eyes. The original text (and the updated since Unicode) has 10-eyed O, while most places display 7. Old Cyrillic texts are pretty wild.
blackbrook@mander.xyz
on 29 Aug 2024 02:51
collapse
It’s kind of infuriating that with trouble having been taken defining this single use character, people don’t bother to render it correctly.
IrritableOcelot@beehaw.org
on 28 Aug 2024 15:01
nextcollapse
Yeah, most dead scripts have Unicode, specifically because how the hell would you write academic papers about them in this day and age otherwise?
Even old Irish Ogham:
ᚅᚖᚙᚗ
The line is a convention, because ogham was originally written on the corner of a stone stela.
Tlaloc_Temporal@lemmy.ca
on 29 Aug 2024 07:28
collapse
᚛ᚑᚌᚆᚐᚋ ᚔᚄ ᚐᚃᚓᚄᚑᚋᚓ᚜
Ogham is awesome
I’ve used it for cryptic languages in TTRPGs before, alongside a few other runic scripts like ᛖᛚᛞᛖᚱ᛫ᚠᚢᚦ︍ᚨᚱᚲ.
My favorite is Gallifreyan, which doesn’t have unicode, is far too niche and homebrewed to have unicode, and how the hell would unicode even work?
For anyone else stumbling about this revelation:
It very well wouldn’t be Unicode otherwise now, would it?
There’s a reason linguists and computer scientists sometimes get mental breakdowns over emoji because the know that those same emoji were on the same agenda taking up actual time as discussions about which ancient language or newly discovered grapheme/symbol/lexicogram/whatever should be added first/next. (Not saying emoji aren’t also tremendously important/good/what ever additions!!)
Iron_Lynx@lemmy.world
on 29 Aug 2024 10:42
nextcollapse
I was not expecting a reference to Ea-nāsir…
clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works
on 29 Aug 2024 11:12
collapse
All my homies hate Ea-nāsir. !reallyshittycopper@lemmy.world
Tudsamfa@lemmy.world
on 29 Aug 2024 11:54
collapse
Me and my 4 tribesmen making meters of twine by funnelling fibers through a mamoth femur: “Isn’t technology amazing?”
1500 years later in Mesopotamia: “Your feedback is highly appreciated, please listen to our lyremen as you wait in line”
threaded - newest
shakes fist in anger 𒂍𒀀𒈾𒍢𒅕
I’m flipping between “why is there cuneiform Unicode” and “of course there’s cuneiform Unicode” much more rapidly than I really expected
𓂸 𓂹 𓂺 there are hieroglyphs too, and these appear often enough to be included.
Shame I can only see squares there. I wonder why. I can see wikipedia’s. Does this work? Two hieroglyphs: 𓂀𓀀
Edit: It does, I can read those in my own comment.
Edit 2: Windows issue? I can see them on Android/sync for lemmy.
Might not have the full code block implemented.
I can see both your and the original hieroglyphics just fine on my phone using Firefox, and on windows with the same.
Odd thing is, my wife sometimes gets MY emoji and non-standard text as squares, and we have the exact same phone. The only difference between us is she uses the default keyboard.
I can’t imagine why or how they would be used very often. /s
cuneiform isnt even that weird,
check out the multiocular O ꙮ
this was only used once in a single cyrillic manuscript to spell “many-eyed seraphim”
Be not afraid.
Aaahhhhh!
I said be not afraid! Geez!
> Furries in the audience respond: "OwO neat sona~!
OK BE AT LEAST A LITTLE AFRAID
ꙮWꙮ
What’s this‽
Their fly-sona.
And the version of it most apps use doesn’t even have enough eyes. The original text (and the updated since Unicode) has 10-eyed O, while most places display 7. Old Cyrillic texts are pretty wild.
It’s kind of infuriating that with trouble having been taken defining this single use character, people don’t bother to render it correctly.
Yeah, most dead scripts have Unicode, specifically because how the hell would you write academic papers about them in this day and age otherwise? Even old Irish Ogham:
ᚅᚖᚙᚗ
The line is a convention, because ogham was originally written on the corner of a stone stela.
᚛ᚑᚌᚆᚐᚋ ᚔᚄ ᚐᚃᚓᚄᚑᚋᚓ᚜
Ogham is awesome
I’ve used it for cryptic languages in TTRPGs before, alongside a few other runic scripts like ᛖᛚᛞᛖᚱ᛫ᚠᚢᚦ︍ᚨᚱᚲ.
My favorite is Gallifreyan, which doesn’t have unicode, is far too niche and homebrewed to have unicode, and how the hell would unicode even work?
<img alt="Gallifreyan" src="https://lemmy.ca/pictrs/image/f0500922-5655-462b-82ed-0c7365696dae.png">
For anyone else stumbling about this revelation: It very well wouldn’t be Unicode otherwise now, would it?
There’s a reason linguists and computer scientists sometimes get mental breakdowns over emoji because the know that those same emoji were on the same agenda taking up actual time as discussions about which ancient language or newly discovered grapheme/symbol/lexicogram/whatever should be added first/next. (Not saying emoji aren’t also tremendously important/good/what ever additions!!)
I was not expecting a reference to Ea-nāsir…
All my homies hate Ea-nāsir. !reallyshittycopper@lemmy.world
Me and my 4 tribesmen making meters of twine by funnelling fibers through a mamoth femur: “Isn’t technology amazing?”
1500 years later in Mesopotamia: “Your feedback is highly appreciated, please listen to our lyremen as you wait in line”