VivianRixia@piefed.social
on 11 Apr 16:24
nextcollapse
So was it just random that their fur is orange and not green? As both would help hunt prey just as well. Or is the advantage of being orange, that it wards away other tigers and predators that might otherwise muscle into its territory and create conflict.
pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
on 11 Apr 16:34
nextcollapse
Are there any green animals that arenât reptiles, birds or insects? That might be a clue.
EpicMuch@sh.itjust.works
on 11 Apr 17:00
nextcollapse
Could probably come up with a few fishes, but no mammals come to mind
Cris_Color@lemmy.world
on 11 Apr 17:38
nextcollapse
Sloths can be green if I recall correctly, they have a special clear type of hair that can grow moss or algea on, or in it or something
more accurately, orange pigments are readily available. Nothing fundamentally stops mammals (or anything else) from developing a green. Note for example many animals have green eyes.
Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
on 11 Apr 18:57
collapse
From what I understand green eyes are a bit weird as far as coloration goes, as they look green due to the way light is interacting with small amounts of melanin in the iris (the same pigment that makes eyes brown) rather than due to green pigment. Iâm not sure that could be replicated in fur vs in a liquid environment like with the eye.
Birds mimic green colored pigments with iridescence (except turacos, they have green pigments for real) in their feathers, but Iâm not sure thatâs something mammals can do structurally in fur the way birds can in feathers.
Both blue and green eyes in humans and blues and many greens in vertebrates are structural, yeah. Yes the structural coloring could be recreated in fur or skin. (noting that many mammals do structural IR effects in their fur, famously polar bears)
Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
on 11 Apr 23:56
collapse
I wish I could find the sources from when I was reading about this months ago, it was more about evolution in terms of things that can happen and not ârandomâ mutations, and one of the examples was tigers with orange fur instead of green. Itâs not physically impossible to have structural coloring (although the fact there are no green mammals suggests a strong inhibition somewhere along the line), but you first have to have the genetic and molecular groundwork laid to allow it to happen. Ex: itâs not physically impossible for animals to manufacture their own vitamin C, but humans just canât do it because we donât have the necessary molecular pathways other animals use. I hope that makes sense for what Iâm trying to get at.
Neat to learn mammals are normally green due to genetic structures.
So green hair and fur could never happen naturally.
NarrativeBear@lemmy.world
on 11 Apr 16:47
nextcollapse
This is probably an example of natural evolution/selection where tigers that had slowly evolved more orange in their fur naturally, were able to feed more. This in turn meant the orange triat in their genes was passed on more frequently and became more dominant in the population.
In a sense it was probably a ârandomâ mutation, but when it became useful and effective it was passed down quicker.
But deer vision is immutable god creation. Checkmate.
GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
on 11 Apr 18:10
nextcollapse
This is how evolution works. People often imagine some sort of logical system to it, but it really is just random mutations all over, with the advantageous ones propagating. There were probably a bunch of tigers with various odd colors or patterns at some point due to random mutations, but those evidently were less useful for hunting and reproducing than how they look now, so they died out in competition with the known variants.
brbposting@sh.itjust.works
on 12 Apr 07:19
collapse
Ya so we wouldnât expect everything to be optimized or all âfeaturesâ (traits) to be useful right?
Maybe the orange color happened to coincide with the patterns that worked best. Had their prey been able to see the orange tint it would have worked against the tiger, but since they can't it was allowed to flourish with that pattern. If true at all, it's a bit of a dead end since a mutation for the prey to begin seeing orange means tigers have narrowed into that pattern dependent on the color.
Khanzarate@lemmy.world
on 11 Apr 17:01
nextcollapse
Yellows and browns and orange are a lot more related, and whatever color the pre-orange tiger ancestor was, it was almost certainly one of those.
Natural variation in the coat means some of those tigers were more orange than their peers. This trait was selected for.
mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
on 11 Apr 17:38
nextcollapse
It feels like we were denied the stunning possibility of green tigers⌠until you stop and remember the stunning reality of them being bright fucking orange.
dnick@sh.itjust.works
on 11 Apr 19:03
nextcollapse
Probably both, except within the bounds of easily ârandomâ bounds. Supposing it were possible for a mammal to be green, it wouldnât matter of green were âbetterâ, unless it happened at the right time. Orange could have won out simply because it was good enough to do one thing (camoflauge for pretty) and didnât have enough downside to message that benefit (high visibility to hunters or less valuable prey). Heck, a gene that turned a lion invisible could have turned up and it wouldnât be guaranteed to carry forward even if it didnât have any downsides if the random recipient also happened to be clumsy or unlucky and died of some random injury or disease.
Evolution doesnât really have any tools that arenât random, at least until intelligence came around to provide other ânon naturalâ paths, though of course those are just as natural as the others, just that we think weâre special and above nature.
Recall that evolution isnât intelligent. Random mutations do random shit until one is accidentally successful. Random orange that appears green falls right into that scheme đ
latenightnoir@lemmy.blahaj.zone
on 11 Apr 16:35
nextcollapse
The green image of the tiger is terrifying. You wouldnât see it until itâs eyes or teeth were baring down on you in a lush green forest. Thankfully humans werenât itâs main prey and therefore it likely evolved to appear orange insteadâŚ
InverseParallax@lemmy.world
on 11 Apr 17:33
nextcollapse
Umm, Iâve met tigers.
You need to explain to them that weâre not prey, but they havenât figured it out yet.
Is that why cats can be so ginger and still good hunters? My orange stands out so much in the garden, but maybe to dichromatic mice heâs super stealthy?
Elsewhere in the thread, someone said non-primate mammals (like mice) are dichromic (canât see orange), but birds are quadchromic (see even more colors than trichromics like primates). Is your cat only a good mouse-hunter, and comparatively a bad bird-hunter?
He is! 95% mice, very occasional birds. I had attributed that to birds other advantages (mostly being able to harass him by flying at him but not low enough he can reach) but perhaps itâs also the colour!
Do tigers themselves see themselves as orange, or are they genuinely surprised when humans easily spot them hiding in the grass?
Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works
on 11 Apr 21:00
nextcollapse
My cats are surprised both by me seeing them sitting on an empty floor, and by other cats who they didnât see sitting on the floor.
So I can only conclude the answer is semi-perpetual amazement.
Initiateofthevoid@lemmy.dbzer0.com
on 11 Apr 21:20
collapse
They do not, like almost all mammals they are dichromatic! Itâs mostly us and some primates that can see in three wavelengths. Although interestingly enough, fish and birds can see in four wavelengths. Makes me wonder if that contributed to smaller cats being mostly gray and black, to just reduce as much light as possible?
this sounds dumb. if that was the reason then why arent they just green so that theyre camoflaged to EVERY animal and not just those with bad eyes
JPAKx4@lemmy.blahaj.zone
on 11 Apr 20:33
nextcollapse
Evolution is throwing things against the wall and seeing what sticks (by sticking I mean reproducing bc you have better traits). If every single one of their prey and predators have this color blindness then orange and green would have the same effectiveness and whichever trait comes out first. If a prey/predator evolved to have better color vision then it would quickly become a disadvantage and after millions of years itâs possible they evolve to have green fur.
There could be other benefits like being easier to attract mates.
Also some animals can see infrared, so even if their fur was perfect for the environment they could still have issues by being spotted, in which case the color doesnât matter as much and the colors for mating becomes more important.
I realized I couldnât think of a single green mammal so I DDGâd it and itâs true. In a nutshell, the pigments that give mammals their colors are limited to warm colors (so no blue or green) and you could also fake a green color by reflecting mostly just green light off you (itâs how birds do it) but it seems to be something only feathers and scales are good at, not fur.
Yeah the only one I can think of are sloths, which is kinda cheating cuz their green color comes from algae in their fur instead of natural pigmentation lol
Glad to have it confirmed tho, thanks!
Related to this - all fabrics used by the military need to be both Berry-amendment compliant, and NIR compliant. What that means is that, first, they need to be made in the USA (because you donât want to outsource military equipment if you end up going to war with the country that makes shit for you), and second, it needs to not show up like a sore thumb under infrared light, A lot of fabrics and dyes will show up as hot spots under IR, which means that they show up great with night vision. NIR-compliant fabrics will still appear camouflaged under IR.
Thatâs why those nylon-cotton blend Crytek combat pants are something like $450, when the Chinese knock-offs made in poly-cotton are about $70.
SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone
on 11 Apr 23:28
collapse
As a biologist, Iâm always so happy with how versed your average Lemming is on evolution versus the bad place.
A) Evolution is not directed. If a pre-tiger happens to be a more advantageous colour, it will have more offspring. There is no goal.
B) An orange tiger has the same camouflage from its preyâs point of view as a green one, which is the thing that really matters. There is only one species a tiger is afraid of, and itâs humans. I would wager that the orange also happens to act as a signal colour, both to other tigers and other predators (such as humans). Less run-ins and less territorial dispute sound pretty good.
Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works
on 11 Apr 20:59
nextcollapse
Mammals donât come in green. We have 2 colours available to us, in different amounts: eumelanin, which is dark brown to black, and pheomelanin, which is yellow/red. We can mix those up in any way, or none (for white), but itâll never be green.
Now, many other animals donât have green either, peacock feathers for example, have brown pigment, but they have a structure that makes it look green and blue from wave interference.
Unfortunately, you canât really do that with fur, since you need to look at fur from all directions, not just the front.
So, mammals donât get green fur.
Iampossiblyatwork@lemmy.world
on 11 Apr 21:24
nextcollapse
NewOldGuard@hexbear.net
on 11 Apr 21:22
nextcollapse
Because evolution isnât an intelligent or designed process, itâs largely random changes where the things that work lead to better survival rates. So it doesnât matter that animals with more types of cone cells can see them easily, the adaptation was favorable for prey stalking so those are the only group of animals whose sight affected the tigers survivability.
Holy shit itâs that high? Red-green colourblindness is almost as common in men as left-handedness is?
chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
on 11 Apr 23:14
nextcollapse
Tigers are generally crepuscular which means theyâre most active around dawn or dusk, when the sun is very low in the sky. Their orange fur does not stand out so well when everything looks orange under the golden light of dawn.
LanguageIsCool@lemmy.world
on 11 Apr 23:39
nextcollapse
Accidentally beautiful
MECHAGODZILLA2@midwest.social
on 11 Apr 23:40
nextcollapse
Oooh I just thought nature was fucking stupid
bonsai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
on 12 Apr 00:31
nextcollapse
Itâs been far more important, evolution wise, to be agile and quick enough to avoid predators. Like a security camera can only tell you how someone was murdered.
superniceperson@sh.itjust.works
on 12 Apr 04:16
nextcollapse
Only in areas with tigers, and then it would only express itself enough if there were enough evolutionary pressure exclusively on that survival tactic.
As long as other causes of death happen to deer in tiger territories and as long as speed remains a good survival strategy, minor mutations that would only provide an advantage in extreme specific scenarios like a tiger stalking them wouldnât have a chance to be spread.
Thereâs also a whole host of additional brain power that needs to be dedicated to more complex colour blending and processing, and that may add enough delay to offset any potential gain in recognizing a threat.
Black death IIRC. Milk was one of few easily availabke foods when farmers died off. So, extremely specific scenario.
zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
on 12 Apr 12:23
collapse
North Europe is a frozen wasteland where nothing grows for like a third of the year, being able to digest lactose in those months is hugely advantageous. I donât think âwinterâ counts as an âextreme specific scenarioâ
uniquethrowagay@feddit.org
on 12 Apr 06:37
collapse
There are no green mammals because of some biology reason I canât remember.
DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
on 12 Apr 07:23
nextcollapse
Basically all mammalian pigmentation is just melanin, so mammal colorings are mostly just different amounts of brown combined with different amounts of red, and some animals donât even have the red.
Also, the vast majority of mammals donât see green either.
apotheotic@beehaw.org
on 12 Apr 07:12
nextcollapse
Presumably yes, but its still down to a roll of the dice whether a mutation like that happens in the first place, and whether the individuals who have that mutation live long enough to breed, and whether that mutation actually gets passed down, etc
It could, but it might also lead to something harmful for the deer at the same time. Iâm not sure if the gene affecting the deerâs eyesight is known, but it could be a pleiotropic gene (a gene that influences multiple traits at once).
If thatâs the case, and the other effect is negative and somehow spreads through the population, it could become a future issue for the deer. Think about humansâwe lost the ability to produce our own vitamin C. Almost every other mammal can produce their own (except for hamsters). When this happened, it didnât harm us right away, so it spread through the population. But over time, it led to issues that werenât a problem before, like scurvy.
FooBarrington@lemmy.world
on 12 Apr 14:09
nextcollapse
AFAIK green is more expensive to produce. Plants use it since itâs good at absorbing sunlight, but whatâs the advantage to a tiger, if their prey canât tell the difference?
idk they could make green but then in, letâs say, UV itâs like a completely different color, so itâd just be the same situation but in another level
Churbleyimyam@lemm.ee
on 12 Apr 16:23
nextcollapse
threaded - newest
So was it just random that their fur is orange and not green? As both would help hunt prey just as well. Or is the advantage of being orange, that it wards away other tigers and predators that might otherwise muscle into its territory and create conflict.
Are there any green animals that arenât reptiles, birds or insects? That might be a clue.
Could probably come up with a few fishes, but no mammals come to mind
Sloths can be green if I recall correctly, they have a special clear type of hair that can grow moss or algea on, or in it or something
They can appear green because of the plant growth, but donât produce the green color themselves.
.
Itâs also orange because mammals canât produce green pigments, so orange is the next best thing if your prey is red-green colorblind.
Our primary outer protein is basically keratin, which can be tinted orange(carotene), beige (collagen) or brown/black (melanin).
The green pigment is a byproduct of bilirubin catabolism, which we donât have because we use a different pathway to metabolize and recycle it.
Found the tiger.
Good eyesight!
Not particularly, just doesnât have hooves.
the green pigment? What green pigment?
For reptiles and other stuff, we donât have those.
more accurately, orange pigments are readily available. Nothing fundamentally stops mammals (or anything else) from developing a green. Note for example many animals have green eyes.
From what I understand green eyes are a bit weird as far as coloration goes, as they look green due to the way light is interacting with small amounts of melanin in the iris (the same pigment that makes eyes brown) rather than due to green pigment. Iâm not sure that could be replicated in fur vs in a liquid environment like with the eye.
Birds mimic green colored pigments with iridescence (except turacos, they have green pigments for real) in their feathers, but Iâm not sure thatâs something mammals can do structurally in fur the way birds can in feathers.
Both blue and green eyes in humans and blues and many greens in vertebrates are structural, yeah. Yes the structural coloring could be recreated in fur or skin. (noting that many mammals do structural IR effects in their fur, famously polar bears)
I wish I could find the sources from when I was reading about this months ago, it was more about evolution in terms of things that can happen and not ârandomâ mutations, and one of the examples was tigers with orange fur instead of green. Itâs not physically impossible to have structural coloring (although the fact there are no green mammals suggests a strong inhibition somewhere along the line), but you first have to have the genetic and molecular groundwork laid to allow it to happen. Ex: itâs not physically impossible for animals to manufacture their own vitamin C, but humans just canât do it because we donât have the necessary molecular pathways other animals use. I hope that makes sense for what Iâm trying to get at.
⌠So how do green eyes work?
The color of your eyes doesnât have anything to do with the cones and rods that pick up the light reflected off of objects.
I mean the pigment of the iris.
Addressed this previously here: lemmy.blahaj.zone/comment/13887364
Awesome thanks!
Neat to learn mammals are normally green due to genetic structures.
So green hair and fur could never happen naturally.
This is probably an example of natural evolution/selection where tigers that had slowly evolved more orange in their fur naturally, were able to feed more. This in turn meant the orange triat in their genes was passed on more frequently and became more dominant in the population.
In a sense it was probably a ârandomâ mutation, but when it became useful and effective it was passed down quicker.
But deer vision is immutable god creation. Checkmate.
This is how evolution works. People often imagine some sort of logical system to it, but it really is just random mutations all over, with the advantageous ones propagating. There were probably a bunch of tigers with various odd colors or patterns at some point due to random mutations, but those evidently were less useful for hunting and reproducing than how they look now, so they died out in competition with the known variants.
Ya so we wouldnât expect everything to be optimized or all âfeaturesâ (traits) to be useful right?
Maybe the orange color happened to coincide with the patterns that worked best. Had their prey been able to see the orange tint it would have worked against the tiger, but since they can't it was allowed to flourish with that pattern. If true at all, it's a bit of a dead end since a mutation for the prey to begin seeing orange means tigers have narrowed into that pattern dependent on the color.
Yellows and browns and orange are a lot more related, and whatever color the pre-orange tiger ancestor was, it was almost certainly one of those.
Natural variation in the coat means some of those tigers were more orange than their peers. This trait was selected for.
It feels like we were denied the stunning possibility of green tigers⌠until you stop and remember the stunning reality of them being bright fucking orange.
Probably both, except within the bounds of easily ârandomâ bounds. Supposing it were possible for a mammal to be green, it wouldnât matter of green were âbetterâ, unless it happened at the right time. Orange could have won out simply because it was good enough to do one thing (camoflauge for pretty) and didnât have enough downside to message that benefit (high visibility to hunters or less valuable prey). Heck, a gene that turned a lion invisible could have turned up and it wouldnât be guaranteed to carry forward even if it didnât have any downsides if the random recipient also happened to be clumsy or unlucky and died of some random injury or disease.
Evolution doesnât really have any tools that arenât random, at least until intelligence came around to provide other ânon naturalâ paths, though of course those are just as natural as the others, just that we think weâre special and above nature.
Recall that evolution isnât intelligent. Random mutations do random shit until one is accidentally successful. Random orange that appears green falls right into that scheme đ
Thanks, eyes!
The green image of the tiger is terrifying. You wouldnât see it until itâs eyes or teeth were baring down on you in a lush green forest. Thankfully humans werenât itâs main prey and therefore it likely evolved to appear orange insteadâŚ
Umm, Iâve met tigers.
You need to explain to them that weâre not prey, but they havenât figured it out yet.
I think the key word is âmainâ.
fish are friends not food.
Iâm colorblind and the images are nearly identical. Good thing Iâm not in tiger habitats very often.
Same. Didnât even realise they were different images until after I read the text.
Those are different pictures?! Damn red-green colorblindness, gonna get me eaten by tigers
TIL
Is that why cats can be so ginger and still good hunters? My orange stands out so much in the garden, but maybe to dichromatic mice heâs super stealthy?
Elsewhere in the thread, someone said non-primate mammals (like mice) are dichromic (canât see orange), but birds are quadchromic (see even more colors than trichromics like primates). Is your cat only a good mouse-hunter, and comparatively a bad bird-hunter?
He is! 95% mice, very occasional birds. I had attributed that to birds other advantages (mostly being able to harass him by flying at him but not low enough he can reach) but perhaps itâs also the colour!
Do tigers themselves see themselves as orange, or are they genuinely surprised when humans easily spot them hiding in the grass?
My cats are surprised both by me seeing them sitting on an empty floor, and by other cats who they didnât see sitting on the floor.
So I can only conclude the answer is semi-perpetual amazement.
They do not, like almost all mammals they are dichromatic! Itâs mostly us and some primates that can see in three wavelengths. Although interestingly enough, fish and birds can see in four wavelengths. Makes me wonder if that contributed to smaller cats being mostly gray and black, to just reduce as much light as possible?
this sounds dumb. if that was the reason then why arent they just green so that theyre camoflaged to EVERY animal and not just those with bad eyes
Evolution is throwing things against the wall and seeing what sticks (by sticking I mean reproducing bc you have better traits). If every single one of their prey and predators have this color blindness then orange and green would have the same effectiveness and whichever trait comes out first. If a prey/predator evolved to have better color vision then it would quickly become a disadvantage and after millions of years itâs possible they evolve to have green fur.
There could be other benefits like being easier to attract mates.
Also some animals can see infrared, so even if their fur was perfect for the environment they could still have issues by being spotted, in which case the color doesnât matter as much and the colors for mating becomes more important.
Edit: Wording.
Iâve also heard green coloring is hard to achieve for mammals, but iirc the source was some tumblr post so take that with a grain of salt.
I realized I couldnât think of a single green mammal so I DDGâd it and itâs true. In a nutshell, the pigments that give mammals their colors are limited to warm colors (so no blue or green) and you could also fake a green color by reflecting mostly just green light off you (itâs how birds do it) but it seems to be something only feathers and scales are good at, not fur.
Yeah the only one I can think of are sloths, which is kinda cheating cuz their green color comes from algae in their fur instead of natural pigmentation lol
Glad to have it confirmed tho, thanks!
Related to this - all fabrics used by the military need to be both Berry-amendment compliant, and NIR compliant. What that means is that, first, they need to be made in the USA (because you donât want to outsource military equipment if you end up going to war with the country that makes shit for you), and second, it needs to not show up like a sore thumb under infrared light, A lot of fabrics and dyes will show up as hot spots under IR, which means that they show up great with night vision. NIR-compliant fabrics will still appear camouflaged under IR.
Thatâs why those nylon-cotton blend Crytek combat pants are something like $450, when the Chinese knock-offs made in poly-cotton are about $70.
As a biologist, Iâm always so happy with how versed your average Lemming is on evolution versus the bad place.
Iâm not exactly average, but Iâm definitely not a biologist lol
A) Evolution is not directed. If a pre-tiger happens to be a more advantageous colour, it will have more offspring. There is no goal.
B) An orange tiger has the same camouflage from its preyâs point of view as a green one, which is the thing that really matters. There is only one species a tiger is afraid of, and itâs humans. I would wager that the orange also happens to act as a signal colour, both to other tigers and other predators (such as humans). Less run-ins and less territorial dispute sound pretty good.
Mammals donât come in green. We have 2 colours available to us, in different amounts: eumelanin, which is dark brown to black, and pheomelanin, which is yellow/red. We can mix those up in any way, or none (for white), but itâll never be green.
Now, many other animals donât have green either, peacock feathers for example, have brown pigment, but they have a structure that makes it look green and blue from wave interference.
Unfortunately, you canât really do that with fur, since you need to look at fur from all directions, not just the front.
So, mammals donât get green fur.
Damn.
Then how do you explain this? <img alt="" src="https://lemmy.wtf/pictrs/image/5c59b81e-f85d-49f6-ae75-0a87a55bebc6.jpeg">
I donât know any animal with green fur. Reptiles and birds, sure. Maybe green fur does not work đ¤ˇ
<img alt="" src="https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/26ad8385-fd3f-41d6-8caf-79e800b9a37e.jpeg">
You just need an algal symbiote.
Because evolution isnât an intelligent or designed process, itâs largely random changes where the things that work lead to better survival rates. So it doesnât matter that animals with more types of cone cells can see them easily, the adaptation was favorable for prey stalking so those are the only group of animals whose sight affected the tigers survivability.
Mammals canât do green. They can do orange easy
Thank you, evolution, for allowing me to see orange so I can get an head start and outrun a mother fucking tiger!
You only need to outrun your travelbuddy.
Better bring someone whoâs colorblind đ
Especially if your travel buddy is your mother.
Does the tiger buy her dinner first?
Get fucked tigers
Hey nowâŚ
Oh. Not you, youâre one of the good ones. I actually have a lot of friends who are tigers.
Where have I heard this before?
Racism
That must be it. Sounds like something theyâd sayâŚ
Youâre an all star?
Damn right :-)
Get your hunt on.
This is also why hunting vests are bright orange. Easy for humans to spot, and deer get confused by there being a fucking tiger loose in New England.
I always wondered about that, thanks.
Apparently pink works as well, if a hunter wants a second color vest
That works on the same principle, except the deer thinks youâre a panther.
Ok this makes complete sense now, thank you!
This kinda makes Lord Vetinari a little less cool thoâŚ
Still pretty fun fact.
9% of people with only one x-chromosome: <img alt="same-picture" src="https://hexbear.net/api/v3/image_proxy?url=https%3A%2F%2Fchapo.chat%2Fpictrs%2Fimage%2F7150788f-bb31-4c20-a2db-07f8ff8ff1f0.png">
Holy shit itâs that high? Red-green colourblindness is almost as common in men as left-handedness is?
Tigers are generally crepuscular which means theyâre most active around dawn or dusk, when the sun is very low in the sky. Their orange fur does not stand out so well when everything looks orange under the golden light of dawn.
Accidentally beautiful
Oooh I just thought nature was fucking stupid
Meanwhile my colorblind ass: <img alt="" src="https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/pictrs/image/4b865a5d-2ccc-46c0-9947-07bee9a2d99f.webp">
Wouldn't a mutation in the deer sight to see orange be vastly evolutionary beneficial?
Itâs been far more important, evolution wise, to be agile and quick enough to avoid predators. Like a security camera can only tell you how someone was murdered.
Only in areas with tigers, and then it would only express itself enough if there were enough evolutionary pressure exclusively on that survival tactic.
As long as other causes of death happen to deer in tiger territories and as long as speed remains a good survival strategy, minor mutations that would only provide an advantage in extreme specific scenarios like a tiger stalking them wouldnât have a chance to be spread.
Thereâs also a whole host of additional brain power that needs to be dedicated to more complex colour blending and processing, and that may add enough delay to offset any potential gain in recognizing a threat.
Most north europeans can digest lactose.
Black death IIRC. Milk was one of few easily availabke foods when farmers died off. So, extremely specific scenario.
North Europe is a frozen wasteland where nothing grows for like a third of the year, being able to digest lactose in those months is hugely advantageous. I donât think âwinterâ counts as an âextreme specific scenarioâ
Hey northern europe is not all Iceland.
And then soon weâd have green tigers.
There are no green mammals because of some biology reason I canât remember.
Basically all mammalian pigmentation is just melanin, so mammal colorings are mostly just different amounts of brown combined with different amounts of red, and some animals donât even have the red.
Some birds and insects are green.
True, but they arenât mammals.
No, why is it so hard for mammals to make green? Even green eyes are just a reflection/interferrence trick.
Itâs hard to do with fur, I believe. Birds and bugs also donât have green pigment, I believe. But they also donât have fur.
Right, i just remembered that green and blue in feathers is also just a interferrence trick. Same in bug shell.
Yeah I think it was a balance patch, because mammals that could photosynthesize were too OP.
Also, the vast majority of mammals donât see green either.
Presumably yes, but its still down to a roll of the dice whether a mutation like that happens in the first place, and whether the individuals who have that mutation live long enough to breed, and whether that mutation actually gets passed down, etc
It could, but it might also lead to something harmful for the deer at the same time. Iâm not sure if the gene affecting the deerâs eyesight is known, but it could be a pleiotropic gene (a gene that influences multiple traits at once).
If thatâs the case, and the other effect is negative and somehow spreads through the population, it could become a future issue for the deer. Think about humansâwe lost the ability to produce our own vitamin C. Almost every other mammal can produce their own (except for hamsters). When this happened, it didnât harm us right away, so it spread through the population. But over time, it led to issues that werenât a problem before, like scurvy.
Same could happen to the deer.
Competitive advantage over their deer peers.
Do the tigers know they are orange?
No, they too are dichromats
Do humans know tigers are green?
Asking the real questions
Probably not, the same way humans donât know we are striped.
Ist is possible to make the own pattern visible? Like with special Cameras and Light?
I mean I saw these on people last time I took acid. Does that count?
Desperately need me a community just for tiger facts like this and pictures of tigers. Greatest of the Big Cats
Thank you for subscribing to Big Cat Facts
Oh hell yeah. Big Cats are the best
Subscribe
Feel free to open !bigcats or !tiger Iâll be your first follower.
I wish lol. I donât have enough time to manage a community though. if someone else made one though iâd follow it instantly
I vaguely remember someone mentioning a community to give your community ideas to who may want to implement it⌠I forgot the name.
Would not green be the obvious route then?
AFAIK green is more expensive to produce. Plants use it since itâs good at absorbing sunlight, but whatâs the advantage to a tiger, if their prey canât tell the difference?
idk they could make green but then in, letâs say, UV itâs like a completely different color, so itâd just be the same situation but in another level
This must be utterly terrifying for them.
âWhy? Iâve always been orange.â - tigers
Almost like our eyes evolved to give danger its own colour.