Re-Evolved
from Lisk91@sh.itjust.works to science_memes@mander.xyz on 24 Aug 2024 18:42
https://sh.itjust.works/post/24174488

usnews.com/…/extinct-bird-re-evolved-itself-back-…

#science_memes

threaded - newest

expatriado@lemmy.world on 24 Aug 2024 19:10 next collapse

revolving dove

DeathsEmbrace@lemmy.ml on 24 Aug 2024 19:57 next collapse

Convergent evolution

Noodle07@lemmy.world on 24 Aug 2024 20:58 collapse

Back to crab we go

FuglyDuck@lemmy.world on 24 Aug 2024 22:20 collapse
finickydesert@lemmy.ml on 24 Aug 2024 20:35 next collapse

8 parallel universes ahead of us

jezza@lemmy.world on 24 Aug 2024 20:48 next collapse

Don’t birds float?

rescue_toaster@lemm.ee on 24 Aug 2024 22:30 next collapse

Just ducks.

leftzero@lemmynsfw.com on 25 Aug 2024 10:06 next collapse

Even if they could float, and reach the coast, they’d have immediately gone extinct due to not being adapted to having predators and being outcompeted by their flying relatives.

just_an_average_joe@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 25 Aug 2024 13:09 collapse

No you are confusing them with witches

lugal@sopuli.xyz on 25 Aug 2024 00:11 next collapse

Truthers: birds aren’t real in the first place

SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml on 25 Aug 2024 00:38 next collapse

That must be one determined bird. One does not simply defy evolution.

leftzero@lemmynsfw.com on 25 Aug 2024 10:04 collapse

One does not simply defy evolution.

It didn’t.

It evolved to be flightless because it was useless on an island with no predators, it drowned when the sea levels rose and covered the island, its closest relative (from whose ancestor it had evolved) flew back to the island once the sea levels fell, it evolved to be flightless because it was useless on an island with no predators.

It’s evolution all the way down.

HollowNaught@lemmy.world on 25 Aug 2024 00:41 next collapse

I knew a guy when we were both in final year of a biomed bachelor. He was a creationist

Don’t know how he went that long without finding something that challenges that viewpoint

ReplicantBatty@lemmy.one on 25 Aug 2024 01:15 next collapse

I’m sure he found a shitload of stuff that challenged that viewpoint.

…and then proceeded to completely ignore it

HollowNaught@lemmy.world on 25 Aug 2024 03:13 collapse

The sheer aptitude they had for ignoring information is commendable

They should become a politician

SomeAmateur@sh.itjust.works on 25 Aug 2024 05:02 next collapse

Like what kind? Believing in higher powers doesn’t have to mean that you don’t belive in evolution/natural adaptation taking place over time.

If it was “God made everything in a few earth days and nothing changed” then yeah I feel you

tyler@programming.dev on 25 Aug 2024 05:16 next collapse

Creationists believe the first. For example I’m Christian, but not a moron, so I don’t believe in creationism.

JackbyDev@programming.dev on 25 Aug 2024 10:04 collapse

They specifically said he was a creationist though. Not just that he believed in a higher power.

webghost0101@sopuli.xyz on 25 Aug 2024 09:32 next collapse

As long as the teacher understands their own lesson from the students work it doesn’t matter that the students doesn’t actually grasp what its about

HollowNaught@lemmy.world on 25 Aug 2024 11:04 collapse

I mean, I’m in a medical course so… yes it does matter that students understand a fundamental concept all life is based on?

webghost0101@sopuli.xyz on 25 Aug 2024 11:31 collapse

Of course, i am not disputing that and it also matters to me. But i don’t believe the system of education allows a teacher to accurately assess such without putting a great amount of personalization in for every student.

The skills required to pass education are not the same as those to get a good understanding and as a side effect we often have people severely lacking understanding biased by credentials in critical positions.

Large language models have pretty much proven this by being able to ace exams better then any human while being unable to reason or understand.

Are teachers even allowed to fail a student who has excellent scores on the argument they hold beliefs that are inconsistent with understanding the content matter?

JasonDJ@lemmy.zip on 25 Aug 2024 13:29 collapse

Two sets of facts for different purposes. Just like how we know that the stars are only a few miles away, but for the purpose of science they are millions of miles away. (/minitrue)

umbrella@lemmy.ml on 25 Aug 2024 01:52 next collapse

bad strategy considering it went extinct in the first place

Shou@lemmy.world on 25 Aug 2024 06:07 next collapse

Sounds like it wasn’t his time yet.

anton@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 25 Aug 2024 08:33 next collapse

The sinking of your habitat can do that to you, otherwise it has a good evolutionary niche.
Also, the flying ancestors are still around, so if anything happens they can come back in another 20 000 years.

edit: spelling

Tilgare@lemmy.world on 25 Aug 2024 11:22 collapse

It went extinct because the sea levels rose and the island it inhabits was entirely under water. Honestly, we’re headed that direction - they might be in trouble again in relatively quick order.

pigup@lemmy.world on 25 Aug 2024 11:08 next collapse

This is a particularly unhinged image. Fantastic.

wewbull@feddit.uk on 25 Aug 2024 13:55 collapse

“Aldabra went under the sea and everything was gone,” Julian Hume, paleontologist and author of the study, said in a press release from the Natural History Museum in London. “There was an almost complete turn over in the fauna. Everything … went extinct. Yet as the Aldabra rail still lives on today, something must have happened for it to have returned.”

It swam.