"Me Ug! Ug feel ACADEMIC!"
from PugJesus@lemmy.world to science_memes@mander.xyz on 19 Feb 08:44
https://lemmy.world/post/25776334

Not STEM inherently, but I thought this community might have a handful of sympathizers

#science_memes

threaded - newest

ThePyroPython@lemmy.world on 19 Feb 09:22 next collapse

As an R&D engineer I feel both seen and offended by this meme. Excellent work, am I ok to cite this meme in IEEE format?

F04118F@feddit.nl on 19 Feb 09:22 next collapse

The “Peter” bit reminded me: Years back, there was a viral trend on Dutch socials where women shared a hashtag “I am Peter” to raise awareness that there were more people named Peter in Boards of Directors than women.

azolus@slrpnk.net on 19 Feb 10:03 next collapse

Oh no, APA style

UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee on 19 Feb 10:18 collapse

Hey, what’s wrong with APA?

azi@mander.xyz on 20 Feb 11:22 collapse

Author-date systems create line noise that makes text hard to grok. Numeric systems (with or without footnotes) don’t have that problem. Honestly I don’t see the point of author-date. If a a paper is really important then it should be referenced in prose, otherwise “(Kowalchuck et al., 2018)” doesn’t tell you anything more than “[11]”; you’re still gonna need to look it up in the bibliography. And that looking up is actually made harder: finding [11] between [10] and [12] is easier than finding Kowalchuk between Kowal and Kowalski or whatever other names happen to be there.

UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee on 20 Feb 13:10 collapse

Makes sense

CluckN@lemmy.world on 19 Feb 14:13 collapse

Imagine seeing Ted Kacynzki in your math proof.

mkwt@lemmy.world on 20 Feb 22:02 collapse

Better known for other work.

FiskFisk33@startrek.website on 21 Feb 05:08 collapse