latenightnoir@lemmy.blahaj.zone
on 10 Sep 14:38
nextcollapse
Oooooh, this explains a lot about my love life!
FundMECFS@anarchist.nexus
on 10 Sep 15:02
collapse
The joke plays on the fact that hemoglobin has a much higher affinity for carbon monoxide than for oxygen - about 200-250 times higher. So when carbon monoxide is present, hemoglobin will preferentially bind to it instead of oxygen, which is why carbon monoxide poisoning is so dangerous.
You used a LLM for something that is so incredibly easily researched yourself or can be figured out with some common sense???
FundMECFS@anarchist.nexus
on 10 Sep 16:58
nextcollapse
I wouldn’t call it super easy. I have a disability that severely limits my cognitive capacity and endurance. Trying to piece it together myself would have maybe taken ~10% my daily cognitive capacity which is something I can’t afford.
So using my self hosted FOSS LLM (while ofc being sceptical to catch hallucinations) was the right move for me here.
QuizzaciousOtter@lemmy.dbzer0.com
on 10 Sep 20:02
collapse
How could you catch hallucinations without checking this information with another source? Or is it the case that coming up with a correct search phrase was the hard part so when you already had the explanation it was easier to search for it? But at that point quoting the other source instead of LLM would be the obvious choice for me.
SpikesOtherDog@ani.social
on 11 Sep 00:43
collapse
I think if a LLM is pointing to a source and quoting it directly, it might actually be a valid tool for the less able.
However
The tool would need to actually go to the page and show that content.
I was thinking that they might actually also be good at describing text and images for those unable to see or read.
QuizzaciousOtter@lemmy.dbzer0.com
on 11 Sep 05:05
collapse
Yes, that’s why I’m asking questions and not bashing this person for using an LLM.
threaded - newest
Cobold Monoxoid
orcygen
Breathtaking
Oooooh, this explains a lot about my love life!
(from an LLM)
for those like me who didn’t get it
You used a LLM for something that is so incredibly easily researched yourself or can be figured out with some common sense???
I wouldn’t call it super easy. I have a disability that severely limits my cognitive capacity and endurance. Trying to piece it together myself would have maybe taken ~10% my daily cognitive capacity which is something I can’t afford.
So using my self hosted FOSS LLM (while ofc being sceptical to catch hallucinations) was the right move for me here.
How could you catch hallucinations without checking this information with another source? Or is it the case that coming up with a correct search phrase was the hard part so when you already had the explanation it was easier to search for it? But at that point quoting the other source instead of LLM would be the obvious choice for me.
I think if a LLM is pointing to a source and quoting it directly, it might actually be a valid tool for the less able.
However
The tool would need to actually go to the page and show that content.
I was thinking that they might actually also be good at describing text and images for those unable to see or read.
Yes, that’s why I’m asking questions and not bashing this person for using an LLM.
“Researched yourself” is what they did, idiot