<img alt="twitter screenshot of 3 different microsoft shark emojis, with text " đ¨ Important update!! đ¨ Microsoftâs đŚ finally found some gill slits! âŚonly 2/5, but an improvement nonetheless. Your move, Twitter!!!"" src="https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/9db45e60-b7dd-4490-8e95-c2b838edf305.png">
threaded - newest
Google gets bonus points for being the most blahaj.
Unfortunately, they changed it:
<img alt="" src="https://cdn3.emoji.gg/unicode/google/shark.png">
How do any of these sharks function without a cloaca?!?
Fish asshole y is usually hidden in an anal fin.
<img alt="1000101843" src="https://feddit.org/pictrs/image/ab4221cc-7421-4056-ba0a-f12e0f415932.jpeg"> Default android
Funny, I just wish the image wasnât so horribly compressed. I canât even see the 4 gills on Facebookâs one.
Also, why does Apple get 9/10 and Samsung only 8/10 when theyâre pretty much identical in terms of accuracy?
<img alt="" src="https://lemmy.zip/pictrs/image/5fd11b41-e517-4423-b6e6-ca98c7c24252.webp">
Hereâs the Facebook Shark in full quality.
TIL that sharks have, and always have had five gill slits??? Is this a Mandela effect situation?
And they are way more compressed than on those images.
I now realized I never had a good idea of how sharks look like.
Shouldnât get a perfect score when itâs still missing a fin, wtf!?
Iâm saying this lightly, but âtriggering afâ
No, I think you used that term 100% appropriately. Trigger warning to anyone who hasnât viewed the image, yet.
Graded on a curve
The most important metric is shark happiness.
Apple:
<img alt="" src="https://cdn3.emoji.gg/unicode/apple/shark.png">
Google:
<img alt="" src="https://cdn3.emoji.gg/unicode/google/shark.png">
Microsoft:
<img alt="" src="https://cdn3.emoji.gg/unicode/microsoft/shark.png">
Samsung:
<img alt="" src="https://cdn3.emoji.gg/unicode/samsung/shark.png">
Whatsapp:
<img alt="" src="https://cdn3.emoji.gg/unicode/whatsapp/shark.png">
Twitter:
<img alt="" src="https://cdn3.emoji.gg/unicode/twitter/shark.png">
Facebook:
<img alt="" src="https://cdn3.emoji.gg/unicode/facebook/shark.png">
LG:
<img alt="" src="https://cdn3.emoji.gg/unicode/lg/shark.png">
Wow Twitterâs really does suck, huh?
I donât mind the Microsoft style, but I wouldnât be sure itâs a shark without context
See similar review of ant emoji.
âFirefox: that is a termite.â
Hork bajir reference gets an upvote
And that antâs mouth parts/muzzle really does look like a Hork-Bajirâs mouth does on the covers that feature them!
Embedded the image, you have to click to view full size probably: <img alt="" src="https://i.imgur.com/sVAAz7r.jpeg">
Til all sharks do a shrimp pose. Must be the Victory sign equivalent for humans
Itâs because theyâre all caught in an invisible square cage :(
Here are some fishies more
www.thiings.co/things
How long until Muskrat replaces the Twitter emojis with AI slop?
here is the full res version of the image, via the authorâs 2019 twitter thread⌠where there was also this important update two years later:
<img alt="twitter screenshot of 3 different microsoft shark emojis, with text " đ¨ Important update!! đ¨ Microsoftâs đŚ finally found some gill slits! âŚonly 2/5, but an improvement nonetheless. Your move, Twitter!!!"" src="https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/9db45e60-b7dd-4490-8e95-c2b838edf305.png">
this other post âA Marine Biologist Ranks Shark Emojisâ covers some of the same and also some other ones
The Apple and Samsung ones look oddly similar