Blaster_M@lemmy.world
on 23 Dec 00:53
nextcollapse
Short-earth creationism (7,000 years from zero to human) is ridiculous.
jrs100000@lemmy.world
on 23 Dec 04:41
nextcollapse
The Earth is probably under 100 years old, since all of the people I personally know and trust are unable to provide first hand confirmation of its existence beyond that time frame.
SanndyTheManndy@lemmy.world
on 23 Dec 04:48
collapse
The Earth is 5 days old, since it has been 5 days since Thursday.
If that means I dont have to work on Thursdays anymore, then hallelujah I have seen the light!
DragonsInARoom@lemmy.world
on 23 Dec 13:43
collapse
I’m baised toward tall-earth destructionism myself (infinate to the start of the universe is the only true explanation.) The earth is a chad whom monopolizes all the stacies and doesn’t leave any for the rest of the men.
disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
on 23 Dec 03:37
nextcollapse
There is scientific room for creationism within agnosticism.
threaded - newest
Short-earth creationism (7,000 years from zero to human) is ridiculous.
The Earth is probably under 100 years old, since all of the people I personally know and trust are unable to provide first hand confirmation of its existence beyond that time frame.
The Earth is 5 days old, since it has been 5 days since Thursday.
If that means I dont have to work on Thursdays anymore, then hallelujah I have seen the light!
I’m baised toward tall-earth destructionism myself (infinate to the start of the universe is the only true explanation.) The earth is a chad whom monopolizes all the stacies and doesn’t leave any for the rest of the men.
There is scientific room for creationism within agnosticism.
Young Earth is the culprit. Catholics have been onboard with the big bang since a long time ago
You could say that…what with the theory first being proposed by a Catholic priest (who was also an astronomer, mathematician, and physicist).
Populus