Your sea crits are safe with me.
from elevenbones@sh.itjust.works to science_memes@mander.xyz on 20 Jun 19:22
https://sh.itjust.works/post/40613651

#science_memes

threaded - newest

seven_phone@lemmy.world on 20 Jun 19:43 next collapse

Life in the sea is not dying because we catalogued it, it is dying because we are polluting its environment.

TowardsTheFuture@lemmy.zip on 20 Jun 20:34 next collapse

So they’re called sea crits because we only have identified 5%, which is 1/20… aka the only way we find sea crits is by rolling a nat 20?

toynbee@lemmy.world on 20 Jun 20:59 next collapse

<img alt="Homer Simpson Nerd Meme" src="https://media.tenor.com/VhyT0SFXR4kAAAAM/nerd-simpsons.gif">

(but that’s not a criticism, I enjoyed your comment)

HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world on 21 Jun 12:39 collapse
solsangraal@lemmy.zip on 20 Jun 20:44 next collapse

if it’s undiscovered, then how do they know what the percentage is?

Zorque@lemmy.world on 20 Jun 20:47 next collapse

Math.

hoch@lemmy.world on 20 Jun 22:01 next collapse

It’s easy. Just write down all the sea critters and cross off the ones you don’t know.

HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world on 21 Jun 12:46 collapse

Have you met Gary yet?

nooneescapesthelaw@mander.xyz on 21 Jun 17:30 collapse

I love it when people just make jokes instead of answering a question

number of genera, families, orders, classes, and phyla—a designation above class—in each kingdom. That’s a relatively easy task, since the number of new examples in these categories has leveled off in recent decades.

By contrast, the number of newly discovered species continues to rise sharply.

Using complex statistics, Worm and colleagues used the number of genera, families, and so on to predict Earth’s number of unknown species, and their calculations gave them a number: 8.7 million.

An Issue of Statistics

Some experts called the research, published August 23 in the journal PLoS Biology, reasonable.

But Dan Bebber, an ecologist at the environmental group Earthwatch Institute, said the study relies on improper statistical methods.

The study team used a method called linear regression to calculate the number of Earth’s species. But Bebber thinks this method is the wrong one for the data, and that the team should have used a technique known as ordinal regression.

solsangraal@lemmy.zip on 21 Jun 18:12 collapse

thank you

catty@lemmy.world on 21 Jun 18:26 collapse

I think the more creatures we discover down there, the greater pace science will advance. Unless we do the homo sapien thing and kill them all.