Chips
from fossilesque@mander.xyz to science_memes@mander.xyz on 30 Jun 11:10
https://mander.xyz/post/14773136

#science_memes

threaded - newest

gressen@lemm.ee on 30 Jun 11:37 next collapse

That would work if chips were made out of fries.

bstix@feddit.dk on 30 Jun 12:28 collapse

Looks like those are crisps and not chips.

Crisps could theoretically be made from fries, chips cannot.

In order to be a chip, it literally has be a “chip” of a potato.

Crisps can be made from anything.

OpenStars@discuss.online on 30 Jun 12:47 collapse

Don’t Google cow chips…

OpenStars@discuss.online on 30 Jun 12:44 next collapse

So then the integral would look like…?

<img alt="img" src="https://pics.craiyon.com/2023-10-21/6e1c73490e5444d0b0a2e64e2a81566f.webp">

Elgenzay@lemmy.ml on 30 Jun 15:23 collapse

I fought that thing in Pikmin

joneskind@lemmy.world on 30 Jun 13:03 next collapse

I’m a little confused here. Wouldn’t be the chips in second position since it’s a plane?

  • Volume => ax^3^
  • Surface => a3x^2^
  • Line => a6x
Nacktmull@lemmy.world on 30 Jun 15:13 next collapse

f(x) = Potatoes

f’(x) = Potato mash

f’'(x) = Pringles

FIFY

IrritableOcelot@beehaw.org on 30 Jun 22:08 next collapse

I’m gonna pitch that a potato is a volume (3D), a chip is a surface (2D), and a fry is a line (1D), and so fries and chips should be flipped.

I_am_10_squirrels@beehaw.org on 01 Jul 11:59 next collapse

I feel like I’ve seen this meme before, it’s very derivative

nothacking@discuss.tchncs.de on 02 Jul 04:54 collapse

Wrong:

f(x) = potato^3 = 3d potato

f'(x) = 3 potato^2 = 2d potato chips x3

f''(x) = 6 potato = 1d potato fries x6
No_Change_Just_Money@feddit.de on 02 Jul 13:16 collapse

Counterpoint:

I can derive/make fries from potatoes and pringles from fries