Grindset Mindset
from fossilesque@mander.xyz to science_memes@mander.xyz on 04 Jan 17:53
https://mander.xyz/post/22960256

IS FOR SUCKERS

#science_memes

threaded - newest

neatobuilds@lemmy.today on 04 Jan 18:12 next collapse

Think tanks go brrrr

Donkter@lemmy.world on 04 Jan 18:35 collapse

Think tanks be like: if we motivate people by rewarding them with food and sleep they become extremely productive (work 20 hours a day)

monk@lemmy.unboiled.info on 04 Jan 18:26 next collapse

65 days off to revise

šŸ˜‚ has this fella seen academia in movies only? ever written anything longer than a tweet?

Ephera@lemmy.ml on 04 Jan 18:32 next collapse

2022-01-02

Yeah, that checks out. This person would be gushing over ChatGPT instead, if it had already been released at that point. Because clearly, more words = more better. Doesnā€™t matter, that no one wants to read your 120 articles which all say the same, because you havenā€™t done any research in between.

FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 04 Jan 19:25 next collapse

But if I say it enough times it becomes true. If I make enough studies claiming it, then do a meta analysis of those studies, it becomes an accepted fact. (Ah academia)ā€¦

Tomassci@sh.itjust.works on 08 Jan 08:28 collapse

If you donā€™t have a serious reason for writing something, I donā€™t have a serious reason for reading it.

higgsboson@dubvee.org on 04 Jan 18:33 next collapse

And people wonder why journals get polluted with ChatGPT filler.

ryedaft@sh.itjust.works on 04 Jan 18:34 next collapse

Itā€™s sad that kids today donā€™t know Tim Gill

FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 04 Jan 19:11 next collapse

PUBLISH OR PERISH

GET CITED OR GET UNINVITED

daddy32@lemmy.world on 04 Jan 20:36 next collapse

That sound like elsevier propaganda.

prof@infosec.pub on 04 Jan 21:56 next collapse

Yes, because the hard thing about writing papers is the actual writing.

Jokes aside, of course I can just write whatever, but if I donā€™t have any actual research to write about, all of those 4000 words I write a day are just filler that will get deleted after someone remotely intelligent reviews it.

Academia is not fun šŸ˜‚

Thorry84@feddit.nl on 04 Jan 22:45 collapse

Well you say that, but Iā€™ve had legit discussions with coders that use things like Dvorak because it allows them to type faster and thus code faster. I pointed out the actual typing of the code is the easy part and only a very small part of the bigger task. This one coder that swore by Dvorak had an impressive typing speed for sure, but also a reputation he could never push his commits because the linter kept spotting typos. And even then wouldnā€™t get through testing because not all typos are caught by the linter. Of course he was the kind of developer that wrote 3000 lines of code before ever committing anything and testing for himself was beneath him, that was a job for the testers. Once he had lost a couple of days of work because he didnā€™t commit/push and when he booted his machine somehow his files got corrupted and all was lost. After that he was in trouble for the nteenth time and was let go, shame because I liked the guy.

Using alternative layouts to prevent rsi Iā€™m all for, but optimizing typing speed seems like not the way to go. Iā€™m old and learned to type on a typewriter and later horrible 80s keyboards (although some were nice as well), so I donā€™t care, as long as it has keys Iā€™m OK to go.

snw@feddit.nl on 04 Jan 23:42 next collapse

Dvorak is kinda trash as an alternative layout anyway, there are way better modern layouts that are excellent for comfort

theangryseal@lemmy.world on 05 Jan 02:27 collapse

Just gimme what I know. The kids can hit those newer layouts.

My brain isnā€™t up to the task of learning a new finger language.

Edit:

And just for fun. Did anyone else type their thoughts when they first began mastering typing?

I-t (space) d-r-o-v-e (space) m-e (space) i-n-s-a-n-e (space) f-o-r (space) a (space) l-o-n-g (space) t-i-m-e.

I can type super fast because of it though. I be out here on leaderboards haha.

snw@feddit.nl on 05 Jan 09:28 collapse

Yeah itā€™s a pretty painful task to learn a new layout. Iā€™ve done it 3 times, going from QWERTY -> Dvorak -> BEAKL15 -> Graphite, itā€™s been a pretty awful experience each time. Especially the latest one, as I actually have a job now where I type a lot. There was a period of about a month where I slowly forgot my old layout and needed to build speed with my new one pretty quickly.

But, if you ever are looking to switch, I can definitely recommend Graphite as keyboard layout for developers. I personally swapped X and J to make it more dutch-friendly, but other than that itā€™s been excellent for comfort.

Ephera@lemmy.ml on 05 Jan 02:47 next collapse

Yeah, I can understand that someone whoā€™s into coding would also be nerdy enough to separately care about keyboard layouts, but truly, I would hardly benefit from faster typing speed, because my brainā€™s constantly rattling while I do that. If I finish typing early, I still wonā€™t have finished thinking. And for the rare times, where thereā€™s no thinking involved, chances are that you can copy-paste 90% of it and then have to edit select places. So, not really hugely beneficial to type faster either.

prof@infosec.pub on 05 Jan 05:46 next collapse

Thatā€™s sad.

If the negative for more speed is errors, then youā€™re not faster.

leisesprecher@feddit.org on 05 Jan 08:30 collapse

Thereā€™s a really annoying subgroup of developers who are convinced that typing itself magically produces good code and the only bottleneck in their productivity is how fast they can smash keys.

These are the ones who are hellbent on not using anything graphical, a mouse or any tool they deem too advanced.

Itā€™s super annoying, especially since they often spend more time ā€œoptimizingā€ their setup than actually working, and even more time talking about how efficient they are.

Gerudo@lemm.ee on 04 Jan 22:37 next collapse

Iā€™m not an academic writer, but donā€™t you need time to likeā€¦research?

prex@aussie.zone on 04 Jan 23:57 next collapse

I know right?

InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world on 05 Jan 00:00 next collapse

Just publish on the flat earth journal. Or here.

Bwaz@lemmy.world on 05 Jan 17:15 collapse

I see youā€™re unfamiliar wuth AI.

RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world on 04 Jan 22:53 next collapse

No way that volume of output could have any significant value or contribution to the subject. Just generating clutter.

Phoonzang@lemmy.world on 04 Jan 23:34 collapse

Welcome to the publish or perish world of academia!

keepcarrot@hexbear.net on 05 Jan 00:20 next collapse

No editing, no problems!

Hammocks4All@lemmy.ml on 05 Jan 02:38 next collapse

This is related to research in the similar field because of bullshit. Our work expands on the bullshit by bullshitting even more. Itā€™s actually all inconsequential but we cited these guys and who gives a fuck.

Honytawk@lemmy.zip on 05 Jan 02:47 next collapse

If I wanted unintelligent brabbel that doesnā€™t get to the point, Iā€™d use ChatGPT

LovableSidekick@lemmy.world on 05 Jan 03:34 next collapse

That might apply to novelists, but if academics spent all that time writing, when would they do the work their papers are about? Most of their time goes into research, data gathering, experimental design, performing experiments, teaching, managing grad studentsā€™ work, etc, and then at some point they finally write up their results. Even novelists often spend a lot of time researching so their stories will sound real. Maybe this person is talking about influencers.

leisesprecher@feddit.org on 05 Jan 07:15 collapse

You didnā€™t get the joke, did you?

HollowNaught@lemmy.world on 05 Jan 08:46 next collapse

As part of my final paper for my bachelors I had to write 8k words. Took me over a month

I donā€™t think Iā€™m cut out for this bro

Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 05 Jan 16:20 collapse

The complexity is not in the ā€œwriting wordsā€, itā€™s in knowing which words to write.