Gotta make sure everyone is still angry about the kids smoking the devil’s lettuce. Dropping numbers are highly inconvenient when you’re trying to rile people up.
It’s ok: you only get this value every two years. That way, even though it’s a decrease from the previous year you have actually no idea whether the figure is higher than two years before
So to be clear: there is no correlation between weed use and hotdog use, other than that they’re both in decline. This means that they created this graph showing two unrelated datasets for no reason other than that they could. Or, maybe, because they wanted to use the cursed image of a spliff in a hotdog bun.
frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone
on 09 Oct 15:42
nextcollapse
THC makes you hungry, and hungry people eat hot dogs. Checkmate, atheist!
I imagine they’re trying to push an agenda of some sort
happybadger@hexbear.net
on 09 Oct 14:14
nextcollapse
I’m considering applying this to my plant science research. In response to drought stress we observed that the tree became -3 smaller marijuana. Accelerometer data reflects the impact of this change in biomass, with hotdog levels variably +2 to +5. We demonstrate that as the tree becomes smaller marijuana it also becomes bigger hotdog.
usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca
on 09 Oct 14:30
nextcollapse
Thought it was showing a cutaway view of fingers playing barre chords
Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
on 09 Oct 14:36
nextcollapse
This graph is such an awful data visualization that it’s almost art
threaded - newest
Also a negative percent change from previous year is a wild thing to try and visualize as being bigger than the previous year but ok.
Oh my God I didn’t even notice that… Wtf
Gotta make sure everyone is still angry about the kids smoking the devil’s lettuce. Dropping numbers are highly inconvenient when you’re trying to rile people up.
See also: crime statistics.
It’s ok: you only get this value every two years. That way, even though it’s a decrease from the previous year you have actually no idea whether the figure is higher than two years before
So to be clear: there is no correlation between weed use and hotdog use, other than that they’re both in decline. This means that they created this graph showing two unrelated datasets for no reason other than that they could. Or, maybe, because they wanted to use the cursed image of a spliff in a hotdog bun.
THC makes you hungry, and hungry people eat hot dogs. Checkmate, atheist!
With THC everything seems more edible than it really is, even Hot Dogs.
I imagine they’re trying to push an agenda of some sort
I’m considering applying this to my plant science research. In response to drought stress we observed that the tree became -3 smaller marijuana. Accelerometer data reflects the impact of this change in biomass, with hotdog levels variably +2 to +5. We demonstrate that as the tree becomes smaller marijuana it also becomes bigger hotdog.
Thought it was showing a cutaway view of fingers playing barre chords
This graph is such an awful data visualization that it’s almost art
Poop
I don’t see the problem.
*exhales* Anybody else wanna hit this shit? It’s so good.
What. the. fuck.
I think this graph just gave me a migraine.
I understand everything about this except why it exists in the first place.
Worst lunch ever.
What the fuck is this data trying to say?
More weed use among teens → more hot dogs sold in the U.S.
But the percent changes are negative. Look at the axis labels.
First glance def had me thinking this was gonna be tampon related
I thought raw fish
marijuanaSukuna's finger dog :3I agree with all the comments here, but also, now I’m craving hotdogs.
Does it make you want a hotdog real bad?
Risky click of the day
Why so blunt?
Bluntdogs
I recognized the j right away but the hotdog bun took longer, and imagining eating a j on a hotdog bun is really disconcerting.
God damn it. I already woke up wanting a hotdog. This is just making me hungrier.
I graduated in 99. Didn’t think I’d make that big of a difference.