The 1950s were wild...
from fossilesque@mander.xyz to science_memes@mander.xyz on 21 Jun 10:31
https://mander.xyz/post/14410242

Old textbook from the 50s.

#science_memes

threaded - newest

aeronmelon@lemmy.world on 21 Jun 10:42 next collapse

And by wild we mean institutionalized child abuse.

[deleted] on 21 Jun 11:02 next collapse

.

waigl@lemmy.world on 21 Jun 11:18 next collapse

Generally yes, but what’s shown here isn’t, it only looks a bit like it if you ignore the clearly spelled out context.

null@slrpnk.net on 21 Jun 12:22 collapse

Saving someone from choking is abuse?

aeronmelon@lemmy.world on 21 Jun 12:32 collapse

Doing that is causing more harm than good. The logic that lead to recommending such action is derived from the institutionalized and abusive corporal discipline of the time. ‘I beat my kid all the time, this can’t possibly be bad for them. They can take it.’

It’s like a cartoon where someone is being held upside-down by their ankles and shaken. Also, commentary of the time.

If you honestly believe in 2024 what is pictured is helping, do not help.

null@slrpnk.net on 21 Jun 12:50 next collapse

I’ll believe medical professionals, you believe whatever you want to.

aeronmelon@lemmy.world on 21 Jun 13:23 collapse

Medical professionals and guidebooks from the present day, not from 74 years ago. At the very least, stay away from my kid.

What started as a throwaway comment had to become a legitimate PSA.

null@slrpnk.net on 21 Jun 13:38 next collapse

medlineplus.gov/ency/presentations/100221_1.htm

bobotron@lemm.ee on 21 Jun 15:08 next collapse

Look at that horrible child abuse! /s

Reddfugee42@lemmy.world on 21 Jun 20:20 collapse

🦗🦗🦗

null@slrpnk.net on 22 Jun 14:36 collapse

Somebody sure got real quiet all of a sudden, after talking a lot of shit…

Guess the PSA was actually for you, huh?

BrundleFly2077@sh.itjust.works on 21 Jun 12:56 next collapse

This is the wildest take I’ve heard in a fuckin’ age. Dude, I never say this, but you in particular need to duck out quickly and touch grass.

You don’t get to use the language of facts while just warbling your own uninformed opinions on a subject. It’s gross.

glimse@lemmy.world on 21 Jun 13:06 next collapse

Have you considered googling your bullshit before leaving a comment? Though I’m inclined to think you’re just trolling since you’re comparing a life saving technique to beating your child. Either way, take a break.

SkyezOpen@lemmy.world on 21 Jun 13:43 next collapse

Doing that is causing more harm than good.

Letting kids choke to death is the lesser harm here? Aight.

YaxPasaj@lemmy.eco.br on 21 Jun 17:35 next collapse

Here we have a great example of being confidently wrong.

southsamurai@sh.itjust.works on 21 Jun 19:07 next collapse

My homie, go take a first aid/cpr class. You are wrong for so many reasons, and taking the class would remedy this one tiny section of that.

And, seriously, go take the damn class, everyone should know how to perform basic care like this, period. It should be taught in schools imo.

Reddfugee42@lemmy.world on 21 Jun 20:19 collapse

Oh honey

Terces@lemmy.world on 21 Jun 11:18 next collapse

I…don’t get it. This is an old way to help a child that has something stuck in their throat. I mean, the heimlich maneuver was first described in 1974, so I guess this WAS in fact the best technique at the time. Keeping someone from suffocating is kind of important, and this seems like something you can do fast and easy (at least with a relatively small person).

DrBob@lemmy.ca on 21 Jun 11:26 collapse

This method is still superior to Heimlich. But its difficult to execute under most circumstances.

Reddfugee42@lemmy.world on 21 Jun 20:19 collapse

*superior for small children

cynar@lemmy.world on 21 Jun 11:26 next collapse

That method is still mostly recommended, though mostly for younger children/babies. The Heimlich maneuver is difficult to perform on a small body. You either over squeeze, and cause harm, or are too tentative, and so not helping.

With babies, you hold them lying on your forearm, facing downwards, and slap (open handed) hard. I’ve only seen it used once, but it worked perfectly then.

conditional_soup@lemm.ee on 21 Jun 12:14 next collapse

Paramedic here, this is still half of how it’s done for choking in small children and babies. Five back blows, flip, five chest thrusts.

expr@programming.dev on 21 Jun 14:00 collapse

As someone that has recently taken an infant and and family CPR class for my son who started solid foods a few months ago, this is pretty similar to how they teach it today and I’m pretty sure it would have the same effect. You can’t perform a heimlich on a baby or very small child for a variety of reasons. This method or something similar to it is both safer and more effective, since it lets gravity help dislodge the food.

Slovene@feddit.nl on 21 Jun 15:03 next collapse

Bullshit, gravity is just a theory.

Reddfugee42@lemmy.world on 21 Jun 20:18 next collapse

Careful, you’ll summon the round earth morons

blackbrook@mander.xyz on 22 Jun 22:12 collapse

Maybe, but if true it means that whether the child is choking on feathers or bowling balls, they are ejected at the same speed, which is a great advantage of this technique.

InternetUser2012@midwest.social on 22 Jun 15:59 collapse

Way back when my oldest was little one, he was choking and I just grabbed him and flipped him upside down and kind of bounced him like you’re trying to get ketchup out of a bottle. It worked and I had no idea what to do, it was like an instinct kind of thing.