A totally normal figure of cancer signaling pathways
from zlatiah@lemmy.world to science_memes@mander.xyz on 16 Jan 16:42
https://lemmy.world/post/24350295

Reference (passed peer review btw):

Muhammad Salman Hameed, Hongxuan Cao, Li Guo, Lei Zeng, Yanliang Ren, Advancements, challenges, and future frontiers in covalent inhibitors and covalent drugs: A review, European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry Reports, Volume 12, 2024, 100217, ISSN 2772-4174, doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmcr.2024.100217

Try this link if the above doesn’t work (not that it’s worth visiting in the first place…): www.sciencedirect.com/…/S277241742400089X?via=ihu…

#science_memes

threaded - newest

django@discuss.tchncs.de on 16 Jan 16:53 next collapse

Non-small lung cancer: 🚙

Seems legit.

Laser@feddit.org on 16 Jan 16:53 next collapse

Dang, is always the small cars.

flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz on 16 Jan 17:15 next collapse

The only way to fight small cars is with COVEEENT INHIBTORS

Morphit@feddit.uk on 16 Jan 22:37 collapse

Despite the constant negative press covfefe

RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world on 16 Jan 19:22 next collapse

Maybe c/FuckCars is on to something.

ignotum@lemmy.world on 16 Jan 21:55 collapse

Small cars are fine, it’s the non-small ones that are cancerous

Mitsu@pawb.social on 16 Jan 17:17 next collapse

NOOO GO AWAY, BIND/TORTURE/KILL KILLER DO NOT GIVE ME CANCER

[deleted] on 16 Jan 18:50 next collapse

.

astrsk@fedia.io on 16 Jan 18:51 collapse
skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de on 16 Jan 17:33 next collapse

text looks sus too

friendlychemist@infosec.pub on 16 Jan 17:55 next collapse

That image was generated by AI and edited over. They didn’t even bother correcting all of it or erasing the parts that didn’t make sense.

Ffs, this is blatant.

wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 16 Jan 18:06 next collapse

How in the fuck did this pass peer review?

flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz on 16 Jan 19:23 next collapse

Not even peer review, the problem doesn’t go far enough to reach the level of checking the scientific methodology. Did nobody even read the article before publishing? They don’t have editors in the journal this was published in?

neurospice@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 17 Jan 01:53 next collapse

I’m wondering if the editors are actually just ChatGPT

Boomkop3@reddthat.com on 17 Jan 06:29 next collapse

It didn’t

iAvicenna@lemmy.world on 17 Jan 09:36 collapse

what peer review? This is likely one of the many reviewless journals that solely exist to publish, for a generous fee, shit that wouldn’t even pass as an undergrad homework. people then can write in their CVs for grant applications or position applications in low tier universities etc The name of the journal is usually chosen to look fancy and very international so it looks good on your CV. Honestly there are so many such journals now, no one person would be able to tell which is which, it’s a complete mess. Humans find a way of fucking up everything for profit.

Morphit@feddit.uk on 16 Jan 22:35 collapse

edited over

What did they edit?

ilovededyoupiggy@sh.itjust.works on 16 Jan 18:38 next collapse

Everything reminds me of HER2.

AlbertSpangler@lemmings.world on 16 Jan 22:27 next collapse

Doi seems to be a dead link now?

Morphit@feddit.uk on 16 Jan 22:34 collapse

I can still see it.

AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space on 16 Jan 23:16 next collapse

I wonder if they tested this on ridiculously well-endowed rats.

GooberEar@lemmy.wtf on 17 Jan 01:38 collapse

If they did it would be nuts.

GooberEar@lemmy.wtf on 17 Jan 01:45 next collapse

Turn around, bright eyes.

EGFR and AFATINIB

And I need you now tonight.

And I need you more than ever.

ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org on 17 Jan 06:08 collapse

Afatinib is real though

Agent641@lemmy.world on 17 Jan 02:13 next collapse

Where is Saddam?

fossilesque@mander.xyz on 17 Jan 03:18 collapse

In the little car. :)

ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org on 17 Jan 06:05 collapse

It’s not little, it’s normal-sized in a world where SUVs have become the norm.

friendlymessage@feddit.org on 17 Jan 08:33 collapse

Exactly. It’s non-small!

rational_lib@lemmy.world on 17 Jan 06:20 next collapse

“I have lung cancer? How bad is it?”
“Well let’s just say it’s…non-small lung cancer.”

dingus@lemmy.world on 17 Jan 07:40 next collapse

Actually that part is a legitimate classification and not part of the AI nonsense. Broadly, lung cancers are classified as either “small cell” cancers or “non small cell” cancers based on how the tumor appears microscopically. The “non small cell” cancers can be further subdivided into various types.

The reason for this distinction between the two is due to the significant difference in clinical management and prognosis. Having “small cell” lung cancer is effectively a death sentence, whereas the other types are a lot more treatable.

snugglesthefalse@sh.itjust.works on 17 Jan 12:20 next collapse

I just want to see the tiny cars

Katzenmann@feddit.org on 17 Jan 13:01 collapse

Looks like non-small lurrIb cancer to me

Boomkop3@reddthat.com on 17 Jan 06:28 next collapse

What’s up with this AI generated garbage? This post isn’t even half a day old and the article is already down.

webghost0101@sopuli.xyz on 17 Jan 07:35 next collapse

Its still there but the links goed trough like 3 proxys and sometimes fails.

Also new theory: auto generate ai slop on official platforms like science research to auto share those on social media as rage bait to then auto sell the “active” account in the furure.

It doesn’t need to be economically feasibly to be sure some people are trying something like it.

Boomkop3@reddthat.com on 17 Jan 07:57 collapse

True true, AI slop sucks

skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de on 17 Jan 09:50 collapse

It’s still up, just remove trailing dot from DOI

Boomkop3@reddthat.com on 17 Jan 10:05 collapse

Ahh, a typo! Thank you! I wish it was down tho

Boomkop3@reddthat.com on 17 Jan 06:31 collapse

They’re living up to the chinese stereotype unfortunately