Introducing UniFi OS Server for MSPs (blog.ui.com)
from ruffsl@programming.dev to selfhosted@lemmy.world on 01 Aug 00:14
https://programming.dev/post/34889239

How many folks already self-host UniFi on their own hardware vs native consoles?

Related Discussion:

#selfhosted

threaded - newest

ruffsl@programming.dev on 01 Aug 00:16 next collapse

I’m still using an old UC Gateway, doubt my homelab will outgrow it.

suzune@ani.social on 01 Aug 01:41 next collapse

I’ve got Unifi Network installed in a container on my home server. I have also an custom-built router, because it is much more powerful than any appliance and does not cost as much.

rumba@lemmy.zip on 01 Aug 05:31 collapse

I decommissioned mine, I had it and to access points. When I moved, I replaced it with a dream machine se pro. I really wanted DPI and IDS at my full internet speed. I strongly considered just throwing a bunch of their access points up and crafting a firewall out of a PC. Run ntopng on it. In the end the sweet siren song of a cohesive, single interface, completely managed network won out.

quokka1@mastodon.au on 01 Aug 05:41 collapse

@rumba @ruffsl never underestimate the lure of a single pane of glass approach

rumba@lemmy.zip on 01 Aug 05:51 collapse

Time, metrics, I have 7 access points, if one starts getting high noise, I get a message and can move it. If I want to put my TV on it’s own vlan, I can see what switch it’s on and what port, change the vlan from my phone in a handful of clicks

Updates, backups. For their issues, they also have a lot of creature comforts.

I ran Cisco for years. I spent more time on Cisco in most week than I have post setup on unifi and uniform has more features.

chargen@lemmy.ca on 01 Aug 00:29 next collapse

So this is a way to run virtualized UniFi controllers per client? What’s the benefit of this over proxmox+linux hosting?

curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 01 Aug 00:32 collapse

Site manager with cloud and on prem hosted in a single view. The benefit is for MSPs.

non_burglar@lemmy.world on 01 Aug 00:35 next collapse

I am, the UniFi Java blob that runs on MongoDB. I use it for my 802.11ac access points, although not very often.

I really want to move to openwrt on them (not a big fan of how Ubiquiti treats out-of-support hardware), but I’m scared of taking the big plunge of managing them all with a unified interface. There exist projects to do just this, I guess it’s the work to set it all up.

possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip on 01 Aug 05:10 collapse

OpenWISP?

non_burglar@lemmy.world on 01 Aug 15:35 collapse

That’s the one. It’s a bit daunting and I have a caldav migration to complete and some offsite backups to get done first.

Faceman2K23@discuss.tchncs.de on 01 Aug 01:04 next collapse

Very happy to see this, I thought they were going to be pulling away from self-hostable and more flexible solutions a few years back when they stopped developing things like Unifi Video, but they seem to have made many positive movements towards openness, true ownership and self-hostability lately.

WASTECH@lemmy.world on 01 Aug 03:30 collapse

They mention in the post that other apps are coming soon. If they start letting you self host Protect, that will be huge. When they killed off Video, the only way to get their cameras to work was to buy their hardware that could run Protect. I was shocked when they allowed you to use 3rd party cameras in Protect.

Faceman2K23@discuss.tchncs.de on 01 Aug 03:53 collapse

They still push their exclusive features and services in the UI’s pretty hard, but I’m OK with that while they are making moves like this, and letting you have third party cameras mixed into their ecosystem reasonably easily.

avidamoeba@lemmy.ca on 01 Aug 02:05 next collapse

I’m running a container,

possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip on 01 Aug 05:09 next collapse

And?

k_rol@lemmy.ca on 01 Aug 19:12 collapse

Way to leave us hanging by that comma 😅

scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech on 01 Aug 04:55 next collapse

Wait didn’t they kill off the self hosted a few years ago? Now it’s back?

possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip on 01 Aug 05:09 collapse

They required online accounts briefly before they backed down after pushback

possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip on 01 Aug 05:08 next collapse

They still have mediocre support for IPv6

vatlark@lemmy.world on 01 Aug 08:42 next collapse

They were working pretty hard to wall their garden. This looks promising but I remain sceptical.

Sims@lemmy.ml on 02 Aug 03:43 collapse

MSP’s ??

ruffsl@programming.dev on 02 Aug 05:00 collapse

I think it stands for Managed Service Providers.